BoatBanter.com

BoatBanter.com (https://www.boatbanter.com/)
-   General (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/)
-   -   Obama moving to limit fishing access (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/114287-obama-moving-limit-fishing-access.html)

TopBassDog March 18th 10 10:37 AM

Obama moving to limit fishing access
 
On Mar 18, 3:30*am, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
wrote in message

...



On Wed, 17 Mar 2010 22:18:33 -0700, "Bill McKee"
wrote:


Ok. Produce something more recent. Bush was much worse and ruined the
economy, but it's Obama's fault, right?


--
Nom=de=Plume


Bush screwed the economy. *You are somewhat correct. *Throw in both a
Republican and Democrat Controlled *Congress and you got it more correct.
But Obama knew the problems coming in. *He has screwed it up royally. *His
spending is out of control, not helping and laying the groundwork for a
huge
crash. *Make 1929 look good, maybe.


Something that I am sure will be pointed out in the congressional
elections is that the economy tanked after the Democrats took over
both houses in 2006. Neither Bush nor Obama is going to be on the
ballot but about 468 people from congress will be.


Yes, both parties are complicit in the problems, but the Dems are the only
ones with even a partial solution. The Reps just say no, as though anyone
actually buys that.

--
Nom=de=Plume


Having a different view than you would consider your political
opponents is not a solution D'Plume. But you haven't remembered that
from your remedial classes yet?

D.Duck[_5_] March 18th 10 10:59 AM

Obama moving to limit fishing access
 

"Obama knew the problems coming in." Yet, his actions didn't take effect
until he was well into the position, and the results when they did have been
a slowing of the job loss, a stablization of the economy, and he's on track
to save billions if not trillions. But, of course the Republicans have a
plan... the status quo. To hell with getting the spending under control in a
meaningful way, reform the financial system, reform the healthcare system,
reform the school system. Just say no!


My crystal ball sure doesn't show the savings of "billions if not
trillions". Are you looking through rose colored glasses?



I am Tosk March 18th 10 03:29 PM

Obama moving to limit fishing access
 
In article ,
says...

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m...

"bpuharic" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 13 Mar 2010 15:45:52 -0600, Frogloogyherringsnacks
wrote:



Naw. Jest cracker talk from them's too scared of a black man being
Prez. Like I said, we colored folk fish too.
You ain't said nothin but scare talk. Nothin. Not a damn detail.
Why's that, peckerwood?

yeah it's amazing. a rich white guy destroys the economy and the
middle class

and they blame it on the darkie president

You sound really stupid and you probably are. Obama has over spent more
in the last year than Bush did in 4 years. And Obama's next budget is
coming in with a $1.4 trillion deficit amount. He is Proposing over
spending more in the next 10 years, that every President, including Bush
II, has overspent total! My new granddaughter is due tomorrow. She will
enter the world with a $74,000 debt burden. And you want no pain due to
the overspending by both Dem's and Republican's you have voted for. We
all deserve a severe beating for letting our elected representatives,
especially the present ones who are setting records, over spend. We
should revolt at the idea they can screw the people and then get full pay
for the rest of their lives. We need to hold their feet to the fire to
both stop spending like drunken sailors and get rid of pensions that
reward them as if they were royalty.



As usual, you're just wrong....

http://www.forbes.com/2009/01/19/oba...19hassett.html


--
Nom=de=Plume


Nothing in that fluff piece about the dollars being spent. Remember those
banks to big to fail. How they are showing huge profits now? Where are the
profits from? Loans? Do not think much is being loaned. Most of the
profits are from the banks being able to borrow at 0.25%. 100 of millions
of $$$$ at 0.25%. And then buying T-bills from in essence the same
government loaning them the money and getting 3.5% on those 100s of millions
of $$$$$$$$$$$$. Guaranteed nice profits. Does not help the economy, but
hides government deficit spending. At least for a while.


Not to mention doubling or tripling interest rates for little or no reason on
most of their customers in the last year. That has to have doubled their
profits right there...

Scotty


nom=de=plume March 18th 10 04:38 PM

Obama moving to limit fishing access
 
"D.Duck" wrote in message
...

"Obama knew the problems coming in." Yet, his actions didn't take effect
until he was well into the position, and the results when they did have
been a slowing of the job loss, a stablization of the economy, and he's
on track to save billions if not trillions. But, of course the
Republicans have a plan... the status quo. To hell with getting the
spending under control in a meaningful way, reform the financial system,
reform the healthcare system, reform the school system. Just say no!


My crystal ball sure doesn't show the savings of "billions if not
trillions". Are you looking through rose colored glasses?




I'm using the same source as everyone else... the CBO. If you have a
different source, I'd be happy to look at it, as long as it's not
Rush/Beck/Palin/Cheney or Faux News.

--
Nom=de=Plume



nom=de=plume March 18th 10 04:39 PM

Obama moving to limit fishing access
 
"TopBassDog" wrote in message
...
On Mar 17, 12:48 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"TopBassDog" wrote in message

...
On Mar 15, 11:37 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:

So, basically it's ok to promulgate a lie.


--
Nom=de=Plume
If you say so, D'Plume. It is, of course, to you.


Are you back to stalking me from thread to thread?

--
Nom=de=Plume


Why no, D'Plume. I came back to ask how your remedial classes are
coming along for you. There is still hope and time, but it is evident
you haven't progressed well.



Get a life it that's still an option for you.

--
Nom=de=Plume



D.Duck[_5_] March 18th 10 07:19 PM

Obama moving to limit fishing access
 
nom=de=plume wrote:
"D.Duck" wrote in message
...
"Obama knew the problems coming in." Yet, his actions didn't take effect
until he was well into the position, and the results when they did have
been a slowing of the job loss, a stablization of the economy, and he's
on track to save billions if not trillions. But, of course the
Republicans have a plan... the status quo. To hell with getting the
spending under control in a meaningful way, reform the financial system,
reform the healthcare system, reform the school system. Just say no!

My crystal ball sure doesn't show the savings of "billions if not
trillions". Are you looking through rose colored glasses?




I'm using the same source as everyone else... the CBO. If you have a
different source, I'd be happy to look at it, as long as it's not
Rush/Beck/Palin/Cheney or Faux News.



I just can't see ridding this country of its "fiscal cancer" anytime
soon. I hope I'm wrong. I know what the CBO says, too many variables
and unforseen circustances. For that matter it could go either way.

nom=de=plume March 18th 10 08:55 PM

Obama moving to limit fishing access
 
"D.Duck" wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:
"D.Duck" wrote in message
...
"Obama knew the problems coming in." Yet, his actions didn't take
effect until he was well into the position, and the results when they
did have been a slowing of the job loss, a stablization of the economy,
and he's on track to save billions if not trillions. But, of course the
Republicans have a plan... the status quo. To hell with getting the
spending under control in a meaningful way, reform the financial
system, reform the healthcare system, reform the school system. Just
say no!

My crystal ball sure doesn't show the savings of "billions if not
trillions". Are you looking through rose colored glasses?




I'm using the same source as everyone else... the CBO. If you have a
different source, I'd be happy to look at it, as long as it's not
Rush/Beck/Palin/Cheney or Faux News.



I just can't see ridding this country of its "fiscal cancer" anytime soon.
I hope I'm wrong. I know what the CBO says, too many variables and
unforseen circustances. For that matter it could go either way.



I agree with this, and I hope we're both wrong. Of course, the CBO can't
know everything.

--
Nom=de=Plume



Larry[_8_] March 18th 10 11:27 PM

Obama moving to limit fishing access
 
nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...

nom=de=plume wrote:

"Bill wrote in message
m...


wrote in message
...


On Sat, 13 Mar 2010 15:45:52 -0600, Frogloogyherringsnacks
wrote:




Naw. Jest cracker talk from them's too scared of a black man being
Prez. Like I said, we colored folk fish too.
You ain't said nothin but scare talk. Nothin. Not a damn detail.
Why's that, peckerwood?


yeah it's amazing. a rich white guy destroys the economy and the
middle class

and they blame it on the darkie president


You sound really stupid and you probably are. Obama has over spent more
in the last year than Bush did in 4 years. And Obama's next budget is
coming in with a $1.4 trillion deficit amount. He is Proposing over
spending more in the next 10 years, that every President, including Bush
II, has overspent total! My new granddaughter is due tomorrow. She
will
enter the world with a $74,000 debt burden. And you want no pain due to
the overspending by both Dem's and Republican's you have voted for. We
all deserve a severe beating for letting our elected representatives,
especially the present ones who are setting records, over spend. We
should revolt at the idea they can screw the people and then get full
pay
for the rest of their lives. We need to hold their feet to the fire to
both stop spending like drunken sailors and get rid of pensions that
reward them as if they were royalty.



As usual, you're just wrong....

http://www.forbes.com/2009/01/19/oba...19hassett.html




That report is 14 months old.




Ok. Produce something more recent. Bush was much worse and ruined the
economy, but it's Obama's fault, right?


I never said that. I've also never posted a political link - old or
current - to a boating group and I'm not going to start now.

Larry[_8_] March 18th 10 11:37 PM

Obama moving to limit fishing access
 
nom=de=plume wrote:
"Bill wrote in message
m...

wrote in message
...

wrote in message
...

nom=de=plume wrote:

"Bill wrote in message
m...


wrote in message
...


On Sat, 13 Mar 2010 15:45:52 -0600, Frogloogyherringsnacks
wrote:




Naw. Jest cracker talk from them's too scared of a black man being
Prez. Like I said, we colored folk fish too.
You ain't said nothin but scare talk. Nothin. Not a damn detail.
Why's that, peckerwood?


yeah it's amazing. a rich white guy destroys the economy and the
middle class

and they blame it on the darkie president


You sound really stupid and you probably are. Obama has over spent
more
in the last year than Bush did in 4 years. And Obama's next budget is
coming in with a $1.4 trillion deficit amount. He is Proposing over
spending more in the next 10 years, that every President, including
Bush
II, has overspent total! My new granddaughter is due tomorrow. She
will
enter the world with a $74,000 debt burden. And you want no pain due
to
the overspending by both Dem's and Republican's you have voted for.
We
all deserve a severe beating for letting our elected representatives,
especially the present ones who are setting records, over spend. We
should revolt at the idea they can screw the people and then get full
pay
for the rest of their lives. We need to hold their feet to the fire
to
both stop spending like drunken sailors and get rid of pensions that
reward them as if they were royalty.



As usual, you're just wrong....

http://www.forbes.com/2009/01/19/oba...19hassett.html




That report is 14 months old.




Ok. Produce something more recent. Bush was much worse and ruined the
economy, but it's Obama's fault, right?

--
Nom=de=Plume


Bush screwed the economy. You are somewhat correct. Throw in both a
Republican and Democrat Controlled Congress and you got it more correct.
But Obama knew the problems coming in. He has screwed it up royally. His
spending is out of control, not helping and laying the groundwork for a
huge crash. Make 1929 look good, maybe.



"Obama knew the problems coming in." Yet, his actions didn't take effect
until he was well into the position, and the results when they did have been
a slowing of the job loss, a stablization of the economy, and he's on track
to save billions if not trillions. But, of course the Republicans have a
plan... the status quo. To hell with getting the spending under control in a
meaningful way, reform the financial system, reform the healthcare system,
reform the school system. Just say no!

Keep flailing away. I'm sure someone out there is listening.


Closing Gitmo was his first declaration as president. It's still open.
I have a huge concern for a president who can't follow through with a
relatively simple task, but wants to tackle universal health care -
something that less than half of his constituents want under it's
current terms.



nom=de=plume March 18th 10 11:49 PM

Obama moving to limit fishing access
 
"Larry" wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:
"Bill wrote in message
m...

wrote in message
...

wrote in message
...

nom=de=plume wrote:

"Bill wrote in message
m...


wrote in message
...


On Sat, 13 Mar 2010 15:45:52 -0600, Frogloogyherringsnacks
wrote:




Naw. Jest cracker talk from them's too scared of a black man
being
Prez. Like I said, we colored folk fish too.
You ain't said nothin but scare talk. Nothin. Not a damn detail.
Why's that, peckerwood?


yeah it's amazing. a rich white guy destroys the economy and the
middle class

and they blame it on the darkie president


You sound really stupid and you probably are. Obama has over spent
more
in the last year than Bush did in 4 years. And Obama's next budget
is
coming in with a $1.4 trillion deficit amount. He is Proposing over
spending more in the next 10 years, that every President, including
Bush
II, has overspent total! My new granddaughter is due tomorrow. She
will
enter the world with a $74,000 debt burden. And you want no pain
due
to
the overspending by both Dem's and Republican's you have voted for.
We
all deserve a severe beating for letting our elected
representatives,
especially the present ones who are setting records, over spend. We
should revolt at the idea they can screw the people and then get
full
pay
for the rest of their lives. We need to hold their feet to the fire
to
both stop spending like drunken sailors and get rid of pensions that
reward them as if they were royalty.



As usual, you're just wrong....

http://www.forbes.com/2009/01/19/oba...19hassett.html




That report is 14 months old.




Ok. Produce something more recent. Bush was much worse and ruined the
economy, but it's Obama's fault, right?

--
Nom=de=Plume


Bush screwed the economy. You are somewhat correct. Throw in both a
Republican and Democrat Controlled Congress and you got it more
correct.
But Obama knew the problems coming in. He has screwed it up royally.
His
spending is out of control, not helping and laying the groundwork for a
huge crash. Make 1929 look good, maybe.



"Obama knew the problems coming in." Yet, his actions didn't take effect
until he was well into the position, and the results when they did have
been
a slowing of the job loss, a stablization of the economy, and he's on
track
to save billions if not trillions. But, of course the Republicans have a
plan... the status quo. To hell with getting the spending under control
in a
meaningful way, reform the financial system, reform the healthcare
system,
reform the school system. Just say no!

Keep flailing away. I'm sure someone out there is listening.


Closing Gitmo was his first declaration as president. It's still open. I
have a huge concern for a president who can't follow through with a
relatively simple task, but wants to tackle universal health care -
something that less than half of his constituents want under it's current
terms.


Why do you think it's a relatively simple task? Even Bush wanted to close
it, and that brilliant mind of his (Karl Rove) couldn't get it done.

Please show me where he's even talking about universal healthcare? He's not,
although it would be a great thing... as all other 1st world countries have
it. And, just so you're clear on the facts, something like 70% of the public
is in favor of a public option. Get real.

--
Nom=de=Plume




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:55 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com