![]() |
Obama moving to limit fishing access
On Mar 18, 3:30*am, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
wrote in message ... On Wed, 17 Mar 2010 22:18:33 -0700, "Bill McKee" wrote: Ok. Produce something more recent. Bush was much worse and ruined the economy, but it's Obama's fault, right? -- Nom=de=Plume Bush screwed the economy. *You are somewhat correct. *Throw in both a Republican and Democrat Controlled *Congress and you got it more correct. But Obama knew the problems coming in. *He has screwed it up royally. *His spending is out of control, not helping and laying the groundwork for a huge crash. *Make 1929 look good, maybe. Something that I am sure will be pointed out in the congressional elections is that the economy tanked after the Democrats took over both houses in 2006. Neither Bush nor Obama is going to be on the ballot but about 468 people from congress will be. Yes, both parties are complicit in the problems, but the Dems are the only ones with even a partial solution. The Reps just say no, as though anyone actually buys that. -- Nom=de=Plume Having a different view than you would consider your political opponents is not a solution D'Plume. But you haven't remembered that from your remedial classes yet? |
Obama moving to limit fishing access
"Obama knew the problems coming in." Yet, his actions didn't take effect until he was well into the position, and the results when they did have been a slowing of the job loss, a stablization of the economy, and he's on track to save billions if not trillions. But, of course the Republicans have a plan... the status quo. To hell with getting the spending under control in a meaningful way, reform the financial system, reform the healthcare system, reform the school system. Just say no! My crystal ball sure doesn't show the savings of "billions if not trillions". Are you looking through rose colored glasses? |
Obama moving to limit fishing access
"D.Duck" wrote in message
... "Obama knew the problems coming in." Yet, his actions didn't take effect until he was well into the position, and the results when they did have been a slowing of the job loss, a stablization of the economy, and he's on track to save billions if not trillions. But, of course the Republicans have a plan... the status quo. To hell with getting the spending under control in a meaningful way, reform the financial system, reform the healthcare system, reform the school system. Just say no! My crystal ball sure doesn't show the savings of "billions if not trillions". Are you looking through rose colored glasses? I'm using the same source as everyone else... the CBO. If you have a different source, I'd be happy to look at it, as long as it's not Rush/Beck/Palin/Cheney or Faux News. -- Nom=de=Plume |
Obama moving to limit fishing access
"TopBassDog" wrote in message
... On Mar 17, 12:48 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "TopBassDog" wrote in message ... On Mar 15, 11:37 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: So, basically it's ok to promulgate a lie. -- Nom=de=Plume If you say so, D'Plume. It is, of course, to you. Are you back to stalking me from thread to thread? -- Nom=de=Plume Why no, D'Plume. I came back to ask how your remedial classes are coming along for you. There is still hope and time, but it is evident you haven't progressed well. Get a life it that's still an option for you. -- Nom=de=Plume |
Obama moving to limit fishing access
nom=de=plume wrote:
"D.Duck" wrote in message ... "Obama knew the problems coming in." Yet, his actions didn't take effect until he was well into the position, and the results when they did have been a slowing of the job loss, a stablization of the economy, and he's on track to save billions if not trillions. But, of course the Republicans have a plan... the status quo. To hell with getting the spending under control in a meaningful way, reform the financial system, reform the healthcare system, reform the school system. Just say no! My crystal ball sure doesn't show the savings of "billions if not trillions". Are you looking through rose colored glasses? I'm using the same source as everyone else... the CBO. If you have a different source, I'd be happy to look at it, as long as it's not Rush/Beck/Palin/Cheney or Faux News. I just can't see ridding this country of its "fiscal cancer" anytime soon. I hope I'm wrong. I know what the CBO says, too many variables and unforseen circustances. For that matter it could go either way. |
Obama moving to limit fishing access
"D.Duck" wrote in message
... nom=de=plume wrote: "D.Duck" wrote in message ... "Obama knew the problems coming in." Yet, his actions didn't take effect until he was well into the position, and the results when they did have been a slowing of the job loss, a stablization of the economy, and he's on track to save billions if not trillions. But, of course the Republicans have a plan... the status quo. To hell with getting the spending under control in a meaningful way, reform the financial system, reform the healthcare system, reform the school system. Just say no! My crystal ball sure doesn't show the savings of "billions if not trillions". Are you looking through rose colored glasses? I'm using the same source as everyone else... the CBO. If you have a different source, I'd be happy to look at it, as long as it's not Rush/Beck/Palin/Cheney or Faux News. I just can't see ridding this country of its "fiscal cancer" anytime soon. I hope I'm wrong. I know what the CBO says, too many variables and unforseen circustances. For that matter it could go either way. I agree with this, and I hope we're both wrong. Of course, the CBO can't know everything. -- Nom=de=Plume |
Obama moving to limit fishing access
nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message ... nom=de=plume wrote: "Bill wrote in message m... wrote in message ... On Sat, 13 Mar 2010 15:45:52 -0600, Frogloogyherringsnacks wrote: Naw. Jest cracker talk from them's too scared of a black man being Prez. Like I said, we colored folk fish too. You ain't said nothin but scare talk. Nothin. Not a damn detail. Why's that, peckerwood? yeah it's amazing. a rich white guy destroys the economy and the middle class and they blame it on the darkie president You sound really stupid and you probably are. Obama has over spent more in the last year than Bush did in 4 years. And Obama's next budget is coming in with a $1.4 trillion deficit amount. He is Proposing over spending more in the next 10 years, that every President, including Bush II, has overspent total! My new granddaughter is due tomorrow. She will enter the world with a $74,000 debt burden. And you want no pain due to the overspending by both Dem's and Republican's you have voted for. We all deserve a severe beating for letting our elected representatives, especially the present ones who are setting records, over spend. We should revolt at the idea they can screw the people and then get full pay for the rest of their lives. We need to hold their feet to the fire to both stop spending like drunken sailors and get rid of pensions that reward them as if they were royalty. As usual, you're just wrong.... http://www.forbes.com/2009/01/19/oba...19hassett.html That report is 14 months old. Ok. Produce something more recent. Bush was much worse and ruined the economy, but it's Obama's fault, right? I never said that. I've also never posted a political link - old or current - to a boating group and I'm not going to start now. |
Obama moving to limit fishing access
nom=de=plume wrote:
"Bill wrote in message m... wrote in message ... wrote in message ... nom=de=plume wrote: "Bill wrote in message m... wrote in message ... On Sat, 13 Mar 2010 15:45:52 -0600, Frogloogyherringsnacks wrote: Naw. Jest cracker talk from them's too scared of a black man being Prez. Like I said, we colored folk fish too. You ain't said nothin but scare talk. Nothin. Not a damn detail. Why's that, peckerwood? yeah it's amazing. a rich white guy destroys the economy and the middle class and they blame it on the darkie president You sound really stupid and you probably are. Obama has over spent more in the last year than Bush did in 4 years. And Obama's next budget is coming in with a $1.4 trillion deficit amount. He is Proposing over spending more in the next 10 years, that every President, including Bush II, has overspent total! My new granddaughter is due tomorrow. She will enter the world with a $74,000 debt burden. And you want no pain due to the overspending by both Dem's and Republican's you have voted for. We all deserve a severe beating for letting our elected representatives, especially the present ones who are setting records, over spend. We should revolt at the idea they can screw the people and then get full pay for the rest of their lives. We need to hold their feet to the fire to both stop spending like drunken sailors and get rid of pensions that reward them as if they were royalty. As usual, you're just wrong.... http://www.forbes.com/2009/01/19/oba...19hassett.html That report is 14 months old. Ok. Produce something more recent. Bush was much worse and ruined the economy, but it's Obama's fault, right? -- Nom=de=Plume Bush screwed the economy. You are somewhat correct. Throw in both a Republican and Democrat Controlled Congress and you got it more correct. But Obama knew the problems coming in. He has screwed it up royally. His spending is out of control, not helping and laying the groundwork for a huge crash. Make 1929 look good, maybe. "Obama knew the problems coming in." Yet, his actions didn't take effect until he was well into the position, and the results when they did have been a slowing of the job loss, a stablization of the economy, and he's on track to save billions if not trillions. But, of course the Republicans have a plan... the status quo. To hell with getting the spending under control in a meaningful way, reform the financial system, reform the healthcare system, reform the school system. Just say no! Keep flailing away. I'm sure someone out there is listening. Closing Gitmo was his first declaration as president. It's still open. I have a huge concern for a president who can't follow through with a relatively simple task, but wants to tackle universal health care - something that less than half of his constituents want under it's current terms. |
Obama moving to limit fishing access
"Larry" wrote in message
... nom=de=plume wrote: "Bill wrote in message m... wrote in message ... wrote in message ... nom=de=plume wrote: "Bill wrote in message m... wrote in message ... On Sat, 13 Mar 2010 15:45:52 -0600, Frogloogyherringsnacks wrote: Naw. Jest cracker talk from them's too scared of a black man being Prez. Like I said, we colored folk fish too. You ain't said nothin but scare talk. Nothin. Not a damn detail. Why's that, peckerwood? yeah it's amazing. a rich white guy destroys the economy and the middle class and they blame it on the darkie president You sound really stupid and you probably are. Obama has over spent more in the last year than Bush did in 4 years. And Obama's next budget is coming in with a $1.4 trillion deficit amount. He is Proposing over spending more in the next 10 years, that every President, including Bush II, has overspent total! My new granddaughter is due tomorrow. She will enter the world with a $74,000 debt burden. And you want no pain due to the overspending by both Dem's and Republican's you have voted for. We all deserve a severe beating for letting our elected representatives, especially the present ones who are setting records, over spend. We should revolt at the idea they can screw the people and then get full pay for the rest of their lives. We need to hold their feet to the fire to both stop spending like drunken sailors and get rid of pensions that reward them as if they were royalty. As usual, you're just wrong.... http://www.forbes.com/2009/01/19/oba...19hassett.html That report is 14 months old. Ok. Produce something more recent. Bush was much worse and ruined the economy, but it's Obama's fault, right? -- Nom=de=Plume Bush screwed the economy. You are somewhat correct. Throw in both a Republican and Democrat Controlled Congress and you got it more correct. But Obama knew the problems coming in. He has screwed it up royally. His spending is out of control, not helping and laying the groundwork for a huge crash. Make 1929 look good, maybe. "Obama knew the problems coming in." Yet, his actions didn't take effect until he was well into the position, and the results when they did have been a slowing of the job loss, a stablization of the economy, and he's on track to save billions if not trillions. But, of course the Republicans have a plan... the status quo. To hell with getting the spending under control in a meaningful way, reform the financial system, reform the healthcare system, reform the school system. Just say no! Keep flailing away. I'm sure someone out there is listening. Closing Gitmo was his first declaration as president. It's still open. I have a huge concern for a president who can't follow through with a relatively simple task, but wants to tackle universal health care - something that less than half of his constituents want under it's current terms. Why do you think it's a relatively simple task? Even Bush wanted to close it, and that brilliant mind of his (Karl Rove) couldn't get it done. Please show me where he's even talking about universal healthcare? He's not, although it would be a great thing... as all other 1st world countries have it. And, just so you're clear on the facts, something like 70% of the public is in favor of a public option. Get real. -- Nom=de=Plume |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:55 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com