BoatBanter.com

BoatBanter.com (https://www.boatbanter.com/)
-   General (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/)
-   -   Government Health Care Fraud (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/114265-government-health-care-fraud.html)

nom=de=plume March 8th 10 06:27 AM

Government Health Care Fraud
 
"Canuck57" wrote in message
...
On 07/03/2010 4:15 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Sun, 07 Mar 2010 14:10:34 -0700,
wrote:

On 07/03/2010 1:16 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Sun, 07 Mar 2010 10:21:55 -0700,
wrote:

The reason Obama and democrats want health care is to skim it. Get
the
income flow to the government then dumb down services.


whattsamatter, canuck? tin foil hat slip? if they wanted control of
healthcare they'd have it by now you idiot

For the idiot sheeples that follow big mouth Obama remember, Canadians
too have to pay big time. Williams, a premier with means uses the US
for surgery as his own province and country is clearly inferior. Then
this... the truth...

Government health care sucks!

really? and if you dont even HAVE health care like 47M dont in the
US?

And willing to bet 98% of those 47 million, cars, booze, drugs and
living high on the hog maters more than insurance.


yep more typical right wing bull****. i was unemployed for a bit when
lucent technologies went under

but the right wing HATES the middle class. just like canuck just
proved. 10% unemployment? no health insurance?

good....let 'em die. **** em and their lazy children. if they die in
the streets at least the rich can have some entertainment

this is PROOF that we need socialized medicine


Can't say I felt sorry for them, it is all about priorities and
welshing. But at least they had the freedom to chose.


oh sure we did. $600/week for unemployment with no health insurance.
and canuck's view?

**** em. the rich will survive


how bad does healthcare suck when you have NONE?

Should get insurance if you can't afford the risk.


uh huh. and how, precisely. does one do that? the tooth fairy perhaps?
what planet do you live on?


Now if it is a parapalegic and something more than a drinking or drug
habit, well, the governemtn should pick up for that. But for the
majority, it is about priorities. With a growing number of retirees
that didn't save enough living too high on the hog, now they want
socialized medicine ... LMAO. Just greedy selfish SOBs.


yep. notice how he froths at the mouth at the idea the middle class
should have ANY protections

to him, millions unemployed is fine. dying children? great. suffering,
disease, poverty? fantastic!!

but let's protect the RICH!!!



And try to find a basic family physician
where I live, freaking near impossible.

courtesy of our HMO we had to go 30 miles before we found a doctor
who'd graduated from a US medical school.

At least you found one.

how do you feel about the karachi medical school for women? want your
wife to see a doctor who's graduated from that fine instituion?

Don't know the place. But medicine, many doctors are just licensed drug
pushers anyway. A pill will do ya.


then why you bitching? if all you need is a pill, what difference does
it make where you get it?

but you notice...he favors substandard care for the middle class
because that's all they deserve. after all, only the rich should get
good healthcare.

If you are rational and literate, you can probably diagnose yourself
better with the internet.



gee. i was just diagnosed with meniere's disease. why not tell me
about how you're gonna self diagnose that, genius? hell, i'd been to
nursing school and never heard of it.



The money is better in your pocket spent on a boat employing people
and
not government statism and marxism.

the US has the most expensive healthcare in the world.

guess you forgot about that you paranoid moron.

Not at all. When it comes to life and death, no surprise that people
want the best and willing to pay for it.


too bad we dont get it. the french have a better healthcare system
than we do, at half the cost

so in your delusional, rush limp ball fairy tale word, what makes a
health system 'better'? more cost? higher death rates? it only serves
the rich?

that what you consider good care?


I never understood the liberal bull**** why someone is willing to spend
more on better care should not be allowed to because of big fat in your
face and up your ass government now wants your wallet.

And if some person wants a cadillac plan, why should they not pay a
premium? Americans can afford more and get more. I don't see the
problem here. Just because some loser ****** is jealous? Envious?
Screw them, these are sins not rights.


yep, the middle class should just die, right. who needs 'em.


But I shouldn't have to pay for some able bodied jack as not
contributing because some idiot politician says so. They can shove it.

oh. you're a paranoid right wing moron and didn't know that.

Your statement is your justification of envy and greed? Sure did.
Happens all the time. If my wifes father took a second mortgage out so
his wife could go to Portlan OR for a heart surgery Canada would not
provide. He was lucky, his house was paid for and cash/investments to
cover.


more **** the middle class


Now, with the Mayo Clinic having done what the Alberta Cancer Board
wouldn’t authorize or even explain, but with the tumour unable to be
totally removed, the province will now not fund the expensive drug,
Avastin, that the Mayo prescribed to keep him alive and keep the
remaining tumour from increasing in size — despite the costs of the
drug
being totally funded by the province for other forms of cancer.

oh, yes, american HMO's would NEVER turn down a sick patient's
treatment, right? they ALWAYS pay for treatment..

Didn't say your system was perfect either. That is why the rules of
such maters need to be open, pbli and readable to a grade 12 graduate
level of understanding.


ah. so we kill hundreds of thousands of kids that other countries
dont...and your view is **** 'em



Just that Americans still have a choice. And liberal-statism leftists
hate people having choices.


we have a choice?

care to prove that? care to prove anything obama's doing will change
that?


I put on some pounds for the case of Cocoa Puffs I bought. Can't get them
here. I always buy Cocoa Puffs I kid you not.


I have no doubt. None whatsoever!

--
Nom=de=Plume



nom=de=plume March 8th 10 06:30 AM

Government Health Care Fraud
 
"CalifBill" wrote in message
...

"bpuharic" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 07 Mar 2010 19:44:01 -0700, Canuck57
wrote:

On 07/03/2010 7:17 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Sun, 07 Mar 2010 18:48:33 -0700,
wrote:

got the same problem here.

. But
lets say you lived here all your life and have one. Then the tummy
hurts, call them up and they can see you in 4 weeks. So you wait 10
hours in emergency to find out you have appencitis.

and if you lose your job in the US? you NEVER get to see a doctor.

more proof that his solution is just to kill the middle class

I doubt you are middle class, just someone who doesn't like their new
station in life as a poor working class. If you work? You work?


yep. thinks that all working people are lazy...cant believe we
actually work


Since Obama and the corrupt Congress has spent much more than Bush even
thought of spending, you are never going to have money. And most of the
rest of us are going to be awfully short. His new budget proposes $1.6
Trillion more in debt. At the rate he and Congress are going by the end
of next year, the cost to service the debt at present very low interest
rates the cost will be $800 Billion bucks a year. And interest rates will
definitely be higher. What are you going to do then? There will be no
money for bailouts, no money for healthcare. The government if it is the
banker for healthcare, will just keep the money and meter out a minimum of
heathcare. What has the stimulus accomplished? Other than keeping
overpaid government workers on the payrole.


"Interest rates will definitely be higher." You must be an oracle. Duhh...
they're currently at historic lows, so that's not much of a leap in logic.

Obama spent FAR less than Bush. Interesting how you right nuts forget about
the $10T in tax cuts for the rich and the Iraqi war's $6T.

"No money for healthcare." So, a public option or even better a single-payer
system would have 100s of billions. Nope, can't do that, right?

I'm sorry you're struggling. I'm sure the RNC would like your meager
donation, since you're a reactionary and they have a fear-based strategy.

--
Nom=de=Plume



Harry[_2_] March 8th 10 11:49 AM

Government Health Care Fraud
 
On 3/7/10 11:35 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 07/03/2010 7:42 PM, Harry wrote:
On 3/7/10 9:32 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 07/03/2010 7:13 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Sun, 07 Mar 2010 19:10:24 -0700,
wrote:

On 07/03/2010 5:43 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Sun, 07 Mar 2010 18:04:20 -0600, Frogloogyherringsnacks


canuck is just another stupid idiot who's overdosed on the right wing
koolaid that masquerades as social policy

Nope. While you were at the union meetings,

there are no unions in the US. if there were, the middle class
wouldn't be as poor as it is.

Hey, let us not forget the $100 billion auto disater of GM & Chrysler.

Mix in mafia like unions with slack assed management and a spineless
board of directors... a couple of decades and US auto is irreperably
damaged.

I will not buy a GM/Chrysler/GMAC/UAW/CAW/Cerberus/Carlyle anything is
the result for me. As I don't like rewarding corruption,
dysfunctionality and entitlement.

If I was president, I would have said you want to save GM? Take out a
loan on your own, each one of you UAW/CAW *******s buy the company. It
would have took about $50K to 100K from each claimed UAW/CAW member and
the debts would have been paid.

I read the Wealthy Barber
and learned investing. While you racked up debt you could not handle,
setting you back I invested in myself and the markets and kept my
debts
down and manageble. While others were waiting for life, I went out and
did lived it. And it isn't over. Liking South America more and more.

blah blah blah...the middle class sucks...the m iddle class should
die...blah blah blah...


Now you selfish *******s who didn't invest in yourselves want a free
lunch. LMAO.

Get back to work, Obama wants your taxes.

sorry. the GOP already cut taxes for the rich and stuck me with the
bill

Yep, I guess then Obama is GOP. He would be a real ass if he let Bush
sign the checks in the last 14+ months now. And all with democratic
congressional approval.

But we all know you like to ignore those facts. Envy, greed, dilusional
crap are best disposed of, and focus the energy on bettering yourself.
To governemtn you are just a 9 digit number and sheeples.



Yawn. You take the cake as the most uninformed right-wing gasbag posting
in rec.boats. You're nothing more than a jobless ex-pat, hiding out in
Canada so you can take advantage of its taxpayers and the Canadian
welfare state. You remind me of Scott Ingersoll, another right-wing
gasbag, except he still lives here, and he, too, lives off the largess
of others.


Not at all, had a better investment opportunity here and could see the
US economy might go to hell. And being on visa's, well, always get out
when the going is good and on your terms. Worked out quite well too.



Oh, yeah...you've got me convinced you're a disgruntled old fart who
games the system up in Canada because he can't make it in the USA.


--

Canuck57[_9_] March 8th 10 01:30 PM

Government Health Care Fraud
 
On 07/03/2010 10:52 PM, CalifBill wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Sun, 07 Mar 2010 19:44:01 -0700,
wrote:

On 07/03/2010 7:17 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Sun, 07 Mar 2010 18:48:33 -0700,
wrote:

got the same problem here.

. But
lets say you lived here all your life and have one. Then the tummy
hurts, call them up and they can see you in 4 weeks. So you wait 10
hours in emergency to find out you have appencitis.

and if you lose your job in the US? you NEVER get to see a doctor.

more proof that his solution is just to kill the middle class

I doubt you are middle class, just someone who doesn't like their new
station in life as a poor working class. If you work? You work?


yep. thinks that all working people are lazy...cant believe we
actually work


Since Obama and the corrupt Congress has spent much more than Bush even
thought of spending, you are never going to have money. And most of the
rest of us are going to be awfully short. His new budget proposes $1.6
Trillion more in debt. At the rate he and Congress are going by the end of
next year, the cost to service the debt at present very low interest rates
the cost will be $800 Billion bucks a year. And interest rates will
definitely be higher. What are you going to do then? There will be no
money for bailouts, no money for healthcare. The government if it is the
banker for healthcare, will just keep the money and meter out a minimum of
heathcare. What has the stimulus accomplished? Other than keeping overpaid
government workers on the payrole.


And likely less money for Social Security so the pain will be
widespread. And they don't see the rationed health care for governemtn
profit principle.

I am with you on this, but bpuharic and nom-du-plume types are clearly
an issue because they support Obama's madness. I am not sure if it is
selfishness or stupidity or both, but they sure follow the pied piper
like good little sheep.

One thing no Obamanite wants to realize is how much unemployment has
Obama debt-bailout spend cost in jobs?

Lets say I could start a business employing 1000 people. But I know my
wigits in this market have a price inflexability, I can't just pass on a
10% tax or wage hike for Obama debt and make it economically work. So I
play wait and see as if companies are taxed more or I have to lower
wages I get unionized or union issues, I can't afford it. So I play it
safe and do not invest.

Betch Obama doesn't want some independant think tank to look at the last
paragraph, as investing USA is on hold until the economics of Obama-debt
spend is realized. That is, who eats the shafting?
--
Politicians don't provide anything, the tax payers do.

Canuck57[_9_] March 8th 10 01:35 PM

Government Health Care Fraud
 
On 07/03/2010 11:30 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...

wrote in message
...
On Sun, 07 Mar 2010 19:44:01 -0700,
wrote:

On 07/03/2010 7:17 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Sun, 07 Mar 2010 18:48:33 -0700,
wrote:

got the same problem here.

. But
lets say you lived here all your life and have one. Then the tummy
hurts, call them up and they can see you in 4 weeks. So you wait 10
hours in emergency to find out you have appencitis.

and if you lose your job in the US? you NEVER get to see a doctor.

more proof that his solution is just to kill the middle class

I doubt you are middle class, just someone who doesn't like their new
station in life as a poor working class. If you work? You work?

yep. thinks that all working people are lazy...cant believe we
actually work


Since Obama and the corrupt Congress has spent much more than Bush even
thought of spending, you are never going to have money. And most of the
rest of us are going to be awfully short. His new budget proposes $1.6
Trillion more in debt. At the rate he and Congress are going by the end
of next year, the cost to service the debt at present very low interest
rates the cost will be $800 Billion bucks a year. And interest rates will
definitely be higher. What are you going to do then? There will be no
money for bailouts, no money for healthcare. The government if it is the
banker for healthcare, will just keep the money and meter out a minimum of
heathcare. What has the stimulus accomplished? Other than keeping
overpaid government workers on the payrole.


"Interest rates will definitely be higher." You must be an oracle. Duhh...
they're currently at historic lows, so that's not much of a leap in logic.


They can't go lower than zero.

Obama spent FAR less than Bush. Interesting how you right nuts forget about
the $10T in tax cuts for the rich and the Iraqi war's $6T.


Not as rate/time. For rate over time, Obama is debt-spending more than
4 times faster. By the end of 2010, 2 years, Obama will have debt spent
about the same as Bush did in 8 years.

"No money for healthcare." So, a public option or even better a single-payer
system would have 100s of billions. Nope, can't do that, right?


Eventually, when you can't pay for something you lose it. Just takes time.

I'm sorry you're struggling. I'm sure the RNC would like your meager
donation, since you're a reactionary and they have a fear-based strategy.


Doesn't mater the reason, now is not a good time to be you.

--
Politicians don't provide anything, the tax payers do.

HK[_6_] March 8th 10 01:42 PM

Government Health Care Fraud
 
On 3/8/10 8:30 AM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 07/03/2010 10:52 PM, CalifBill wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Sun, 07 Mar 2010 19:44:01 -0700,
wrote:

On 07/03/2010 7:17 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Sun, 07 Mar 2010 18:48:33 -0700,
wrote:

got the same problem here.

. But
lets say you lived here all your life and have one. Then the tummy
hurts, call them up and they can see you in 4 weeks. So you wait 10
hours in emergency to find out you have appencitis.

and if you lose your job in the US? you NEVER get to see a doctor.

more proof that his solution is just to kill the middle class

I doubt you are middle class, just someone who doesn't like their new
station in life as a poor working class. If you work? You work?

yep. thinks that all working people are lazy...cant believe we
actually work


Since Obama and the corrupt Congress has spent much more than Bush even
thought of spending, you are never going to have money. And most of the
rest of us are going to be awfully short. His new budget proposes $1.6
Trillion more in debt. At the rate he and Congress are going by the
end of
next year, the cost to service the debt at present very low interest
rates
the cost will be $800 Billion bucks a year. And interest rates will
definitely be higher. What are you going to do then? There will be no
money for bailouts, no money for healthcare. The government if it is the
banker for healthcare, will just keep the money and meter out a
minimum of
heathcare. What has the stimulus accomplished? Other than keeping
overpaid
government workers on the payrole.


And likely less money for Social Security so the pain will be
widespread. And they don't see the rationed health care for governemtn
profit principle.

I am with you on this, but bpuharic and nom-du-plume types are clearly
an issue because they support Obama's madness. I am not sure if it is
selfishness or stupidity or both, but they sure follow the pied piper
like good little sheep.

One thing no Obamanite wants to realize is how much unemployment has
Obama debt-bailout spend cost in jobs?

Lets say I could start a business employing 1000 people. But I know my
wigits in this market have a price inflexability, I can't just pass on a
10% tax or wage hike for Obama debt and make it economically work. So I
play wait and see as if companies are taxed more or I have to lower
wages I get unionized or union issues, I can't afford it. So I play it
safe and do not invest.

Betch Obama doesn't want some independant think tank to look at the last
paragraph, as investing USA is on hold until the economics of Obama-debt
spend is realized. That is, who eats the shafting?




You guys are a giggle and a half.

We need more tax revenues. The way to get them is to raise all sorts of
taxes on the wealthiest Americans. What are they going to do...move to
Canada?

Raise income taxes on the wealthy
Uncap the upper limits on employee payroll taxes (not the employer share)
Remove most of the corporate tax loopholes and tax breaks, except those
that result in hiring Americans and buying product and services made in
the USA or provided by Americans
Raise the estate tax for estates over a certain amount
Impose confiscatory taxes on the "bonus" earnings of those fleecing the
public (commercial bankers,brokers,health insurance scammers)

Use most of the funds to pay off the national debt, use some of the
funds to solidify social security and medicare and to extend full
medicare to every American.

Have a nice day.

Canuck57[_9_] March 8th 10 02:03 PM

Government Health Care Fraud
 
On 08/03/2010 6:42 AM, HK wrote:
On 3/8/10 8:30 AM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 07/03/2010 10:52 PM, CalifBill wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Sun, 07 Mar 2010 19:44:01 -0700,
wrote:

On 07/03/2010 7:17 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Sun, 07 Mar 2010 18:48:33 -0700,
wrote:

got the same problem here.

. But
lets say you lived here all your life and have one. Then the tummy
hurts, call them up and they can see you in 4 weeks. So you wait 10
hours in emergency to find out you have appencitis.

and if you lose your job in the US? you NEVER get to see a doctor.

more proof that his solution is just to kill the middle class

I doubt you are middle class, just someone who doesn't like their new
station in life as a poor working class. If you work? You work?

yep. thinks that all working people are lazy...cant believe we
actually work


Since Obama and the corrupt Congress has spent much more than Bush even
thought of spending, you are never going to have money. And most of the
rest of us are going to be awfully short. His new budget proposes $1.6
Trillion more in debt. At the rate he and Congress are going by the
end of
next year, the cost to service the debt at present very low interest
rates
the cost will be $800 Billion bucks a year. And interest rates will
definitely be higher. What are you going to do then? There will be no
money for bailouts, no money for healthcare. The government if it is the
banker for healthcare, will just keep the money and meter out a
minimum of
heathcare. What has the stimulus accomplished? Other than keeping
overpaid
government workers on the payrole.


And likely less money for Social Security so the pain will be
widespread. And they don't see the rationed health care for governemtn
profit principle.

I am with you on this, but bpuharic and nom-du-plume types are clearly
an issue because they support Obama's madness. I am not sure if it is
selfishness or stupidity or both, but they sure follow the pied piper
like good little sheep.

One thing no Obamanite wants to realize is how much unemployment has
Obama debt-bailout spend cost in jobs?

Lets say I could start a business employing 1000 people. But I know my
wigits in this market have a price inflexability, I can't just pass on a
10% tax or wage hike for Obama debt and make it economically work. So I
play wait and see as if companies are taxed more or I have to lower
wages I get unionized or union issues, I can't afford it. So I play it
safe and do not invest.

Betch Obama doesn't want some independant think tank to look at the last
paragraph, as investing USA is on hold until the economics of Obama-debt
spend is realized. That is, who eats the shafting?




You guys are a giggle and a half.

We need more tax revenues. The way to get them is to raise all sorts of
taxes on the wealthiest Americans. What are they going to do...move to
Canada?


Nope. Just like a former Prime Minister, move it offshore like Canadian
Steam Ship Lines.

Raise income taxes on the wealthy


Part of the problem is they can't if the wealth are not making any
money. US governemnt revenue from business is reputed to be down 55%.
As businesses with lower or no profits don't pay income taxes. Same for
people, doubtful Waren Buffet is paying taxes with his loss carry forwards.

Uncap the upper limits on employee payroll taxes (not the employer share)
Remove most of the corporate tax loopholes and tax breaks, except those
that result in hiring Americans and buying product and services made in
the USA or provided by Americans
Raise the estate tax for estates over a certain amount
Impose confiscatory taxes on the "bonus" earnings of those fleecing the
public (commercial bankers,brokers,health insurance scammers)


Don't worry, I am sure it is coming. In Canada the top rates were
supposed to be for the "rich". But somehow once esablished it snuck
down right into the middle class.

Use most of the funds to pay off the national debt, use some of the
funds to solidify social security and medicare and to extend full
medicare to every American.

Have a nice day.


You will never live long enough to see the national debt payed off.
Even if you were born yesterday.

--
Politicians don't provide anything, the tax payers do.

nom=de=plume March 8th 10 06:41 PM

Government Health Care Fraud
 
"Canuck57" wrote in message
...
On 07/03/2010 11:30 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...

wrote in message
...
On Sun, 07 Mar 2010 19:44:01 -0700,
wrote:

On 07/03/2010 7:17 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Sun, 07 Mar 2010 18:48:33 -0700,
wrote:

got the same problem here.

. But
lets say you lived here all your life and have one. Then the tummy
hurts, call them up and they can see you in 4 weeks. So you wait
10
hours in emergency to find out you have appencitis.

and if you lose your job in the US? you NEVER get to see a doctor.

more proof that his solution is just to kill the middle class

I doubt you are middle class, just someone who doesn't like their new
station in life as a poor working class. If you work? You work?

yep. thinks that all working people are lazy...cant believe we
actually work


Since Obama and the corrupt Congress has spent much more than Bush even
thought of spending, you are never going to have money. And most of the
rest of us are going to be awfully short. His new budget proposes $1.6
Trillion more in debt. At the rate he and Congress are going by the end
of next year, the cost to service the debt at present very low interest
rates the cost will be $800 Billion bucks a year. And interest rates
will
definitely be higher. What are you going to do then? There will be no
money for bailouts, no money for healthcare. The government if it is
the
banker for healthcare, will just keep the money and meter out a minimum
of
heathcare. What has the stimulus accomplished? Other than keeping
overpaid government workers on the payrole.


"Interest rates will definitely be higher." You must be an oracle.
Duhh...
they're currently at historic lows, so that's not much of a leap in
logic.


They can't go lower than zero.


And your point (if you have one)? Interest rates are not at zero, at least
not for consumers. They will go up. They're at historic lows. And, I forgot,
you have no point.


Obama spent FAR less than Bush. Interesting how you right nuts forget
about
the $10T in tax cuts for the rich and the Iraqi war's $6T.


Not as rate/time. For rate over time, Obama is debt-spending more than 4
times faster. By the end of 2010, 2 years, Obama will have debt spent
about the same as Bush did in 8 years.


What??? Bush bankrupted the economy and you're blaming Obama????


"No money for healthcare." So, a public option or even better a
single-payer
system would have 100s of billions. Nope, can't do that, right?


Eventually, when you can't pay for something you lose it. Just takes
time.


The Oracle speaketh again!


I'm sorry you're struggling. I'm sure the RNC would like your meager
donation, since you're a reactionary and they have a fear-based strategy.


Doesn't mater the reason, now is not a good time to be you.


Really? I'm doing just fine. Obviously you aren't. I'm sorry for you.


--
Nom=de=Plume



nom=de=plume March 8th 10 06:42 PM

Government Health Care Fraud
 
"Canuck57" wrote in message
...
On 07/03/2010 10:52 PM, CalifBill wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Sun, 07 Mar 2010 19:44:01 -0700,
wrote:

On 07/03/2010 7:17 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Sun, 07 Mar 2010 18:48:33 -0700,
wrote:

got the same problem here.

. But
lets say you lived here all your life and have one. Then the tummy
hurts, call them up and they can see you in 4 weeks. So you wait 10
hours in emergency to find out you have appencitis.

and if you lose your job in the US? you NEVER get to see a doctor.

more proof that his solution is just to kill the middle class

I doubt you are middle class, just someone who doesn't like their new
station in life as a poor working class. If you work? You work?

yep. thinks that all working people are lazy...cant believe we
actually work


Since Obama and the corrupt Congress has spent much more than Bush even
thought of spending, you are never going to have money. And most of the
rest of us are going to be awfully short. His new budget proposes $1.6
Trillion more in debt. At the rate he and Congress are going by the end
of
next year, the cost to service the debt at present very low interest
rates
the cost will be $800 Billion bucks a year. And interest rates will
definitely be higher. What are you going to do then? There will be no
money for bailouts, no money for healthcare. The government if it is the
banker for healthcare, will just keep the money and meter out a minimum
of
heathcare. What has the stimulus accomplished? Other than keeping
overpaid
government workers on the payrole.


And likely less money for Social Security so the pain will be widespread.
And they don't see the rationed health care for governemtn profit
principle.

I am with you on this, but bpuharic and nom-du-plume types are clearly an
issue because they support Obama's madness. I am not sure if it is
selfishness or stupidity or both, but they sure follow the pied piper like
good little sheep.

One thing no Obamanite wants to realize is how much unemployment has Obama
debt-bailout spend cost in jobs?

Lets say I could start a business employing 1000 people. But I know my
wigits in this market have a price inflexability, I can't just pass on a
10% tax or wage hike for Obama debt and make it economically work. So I
play wait and see as if companies are taxed more or I have to lower wages
I get unionized or union issues, I can't afford it. So I play it safe and
do not invest.

Betch Obama doesn't want some independant think tank to look at the last
paragraph, as investing USA is on hold until the economics of Obama-debt
spend is realized. That is, who eats the shafting?
--
Politicians don't provide anything, the tax payers do.



Yes, you "play it safe." No doubt about that. Except, not being very bright,
playing it safe means you don't get out much.

--
Nom=de=Plume



HK[_6_] March 8th 10 09:33 PM

Government Health Care Fraud
 
On 3/8/10 4:24 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 8 Mar 2010 10:41:51 -0800, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

What??? Bush bankrupted the economy and you're blaming Obama????


The thing that really is going to bankrupt the country is the
entitlements.
That was an 80 year process where nobody was willing to say no and
nobody was willing to actually pay for it. They just passed the cost
on to the next generation. Minor stuff like the 4 or 5 wars were
trivial since they have an end. There is no end to the entitlements
and they will gobble up an ever increasing part of the GDP until we
fix the problem or until the country actually does bankrupt itself.
This medical insurance boondoggle is just more grease for the slippery
slope. To start with, does anyone really think congress will actually
make the Medicare cuts part of the "savings" are based on?
Do you think the insurance companies won't restructure the "Cadillac
plans" enough by 2018 (the current "cut in" data) that they avoid that
tax?
Do you think they will actually raise any of the taxes necessary to
fund this?

If so, you have been living in a cave for the last 40 years.

All the spending is immediate and the funding is years down the road.


There is also no restraint on what insurance companies will charge,
only the mandate that they have to cover more people. They would do
that tomorrow ... if we were willing to pay for it. This bill makes
sure we will. You will see this October when the new policies come
out. The election in November. Any questions about how that will come
out?


What is needed is a complete trashing and restructuring of our health
care payment methodology.

The Swiss have a good model. Basic and decent health care insurance is
mandatory. You have to buy it. If you don't have the ability to pay for
it, you get whatever subsidy is needed to cover its cost. The insurance
is provided by private sector insurance companies. The basic plan is the
same and at the same cost no matter which insurance company you select.
The insurers compete by offering a wide variety of supplemental plans at
market price. There are plenty of insurers competing for the Swiss
health care insurance dollar.

That's just one way to do it. There are others.

What is in the works here now is far from ideal, but it will get
coverage to tens of millions more Americans than have it now. The GOP
counter plan is nothing more than silly.

I don't see where it is in the interest of this country to pour billions
upon billions of dollars of profit into the coffers of health insurance
companies.


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:27 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com