|
Ping: John, Scotty, Tim
On Sat, 27 Feb 2010 11:31:01 -0500, John H wrote:
On Sat, 27 Feb 2010 11:29:38 -0500, John H wrote: On Sat, 27 Feb 2010 11:27:00 -0500, John H wrote: On Sat, 27 Feb 2010 11:23:40 -0500, BAR wrote: In article , says... She's up to 4124 posts right here since September. Most of which are inane, but do get answered. Why does anyone respond to it? I don't know! John H Maybe I do know. We are such jerks no one wants to talk to us now. John H Are your filters working? -- John H Don't answer that. I have never figured out how to really get them to work. |
Ping: John, Scotty, Tim
|
Ping: John, Scotty, Tim
On Sat, 27 Feb 2010 12:09:10 -0500, "Steve B."
wrote: On Sat, 27 Feb 2010 11:59:19 -0500, I am Tosk wrote: In article , says... In article , says... She's up to 4124 posts right here since September. Most of which are inane, but do get answered. Why does anyone respond to it? Many of the answers are from JPS, Slammer, and Harry, spoofing and responding to their own spoofs... You are guessing,,, and incorrectly. He may not have the spoofers correct, but both he and I are being spoofed repeatedly. -- John H |
Ping: John, Scotty, Tim
On Sat, 27 Feb 2010 17:07:47 -0500, John H wrote:
On Sat, 27 Feb 2010 12:09:10 -0500, "Steve B." wrote: On Sat, 27 Feb 2010 11:59:19 -0500, I am Tosk wrote: In article , says... In article , says... She's up to 4124 posts right here since September. Most of which are inane, but do get answered. Why does anyone respond to it? Many of the answers are from JPS, Slammer, and Harry, spoofing and responding to their own spoofs... You are guessing,,, and incorrectly. He may not have the spoofers correct, but both he and I are being spoofed repeatedly. ? |
Ping: John, Scotty, Tim
On Feb 27, 12:09*pm, "Steve B." wrote:
On Sat, 27 Feb 2010 11:59:19 -0500, I am Tosk wrote: In article , says... In article , says... She's up to 4124 posts right here since September. Most of which are inane, but do get answered. Why does anyone respond to it? Many of the answers are from JPS, Slammer, and Harry, spoofing and responding to their own spoofs... You are guessing,,, and incorrectly. He's right, you know...... |
Ping: John, Scotty, Tim
In article , says...
On Sat, 27 Feb 2010 17:07:47 -0500, John H wrote: On Sat, 27 Feb 2010 12:09:10 -0500, "Steve B." wrote: On Sat, 27 Feb 2010 11:59:19 -0500, I am Tosk wrote: In article , says... In article , says... She's up to 4124 posts right here since September. Most of which are inane, but do get answered. Why does anyone respond to it? Many of the answers are from JPS, Slammer, and Harry, spoofing and responding to their own spoofs... You are guessing,,, and incorrectly. He may not have the spoofers correct, but both he and I are being spoofed repeatedly. ? His point is easy, it's the three vulgar "progressives" who are still spoofing and trying to destroy the group because nobody is listening to them. I mean can you imagine JPS's poor kids with him running around calling eveyone "c88ksuckers" and "mutha' fu8888" every two minutes. Wonder if he calls his kid a homo everytime he get's ****ed off. Must be hard for the kids to not pick up his vulgar, pedestrian language... Scotty -- Can I haz Cheezeburger? |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:49 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com