Ping: John, Scotty, Tim
 

On Feb 26, 11:56*pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"John H" wrote in message

...



On Thu, 25 Feb 2010 23:02:28 -0500, I am Tosk

wrote:

In article ,

says...

nom=de=plume wrote:
*wrote in message
...
On Feb 24, 9:11 pm, *wrote:

*wrote in message

om...

nom=de=plume wrote:

*wrote in message
...

On 24/02/2010 10:09 AM, I am Tosk wrote:

In ,
says...

On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 18:02:16 -0700,

wrote:

On 23/02/2010 3:58 PM, Jim wrote:

Just wanted to say thanks for your posts today.
Keep up the good work.

Lib - Worthless posters, every damn one of them.

Like to see a lib BS out of this one:

http://tinyurl.com/ycwcnfm

Actually, if you'd looked closely you'd see this wasn't even a
political
thread.
Nomdepuke, who seems to have you hooked, hasn't even posted
here.
Or,
if
she
has, no one's responded. Folks are learning. Some, very slowly.

Oh, I have a "sneaking suspicion" she will be back about the same
time
as, uh,
er, her room mate;)

Scotty

Agreed, once the batteries wear out.

We really don't want to know what it takes to get you going.

Who is "we"? You and Mr. Buzz-buzz?

Strong suggestion: Don't shove yours up your butt so often.

--
Nom=de=Plume

D'Plume. you sound authoritative and experienced. Is that your
expertise?

You're the one with something stuck up your butt.

Pathetic. *Is Donnie writing this ****? *Are *you* Donnie?

No, the vulgar language would suggest JPS, or Slammer... JimH if he were
still
here...

Scotty

No, I think it's nincdepoop. She's been highly focused on the anal orifice
lately. I don't think there's anyone hear who could spoof her. Most folks
here
wouldn't be able to sound so ****ing stupid.

(Pardonez moi the french, sil vous plait.)
--

John H

You're an expert wrt to anuses.

--
Nom=de=Plume

Brilliant D'Plume. you still act like the third grader trying to
insult your way out of a paper bag. and you are still losing.

Ping: John, Scotty, Tim
 

On Feb 26, 11:57*pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Bruce" wrote in message

...



I am Tosk wrote:
In articlejsSdnaKOhf5wghrWnZ2dnUVZ_hRi4...@giganews. com,

says...

nom=de=plume wrote:

* wrote in message
....
On Feb 24, 9:11 pm, * wrote:

* wrote in message

news:uMSdncG5zql7SBjWnZ2dnUVZ_jszAAAA@giganew s.com...

nom=de=plume wrote:

* wrote in message
.. .

On 24/02/2010 10:09 AM, I am Tosk wrote:

In ,
says...

On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 18:02:16 -0700,
wrote:

On 23/02/2010 3:58 PM, Jim wrote:

Just wanted to say thanks for your posts today.
Keep up the good work.

Lib - Worthless posters, every damn one of them.

Like to see a lib BS out of this one:

http://tinyurl.com/ycwcnfm

Actually, if you'd looked closely you'd see this wasn't even a
political
thread.
Nomdepuke, who seems to have you hooked, hasn't even posted here.
Or,
if
she
has, no one's responded. Folks are learning. Some, very slowly..

Oh, I have a "sneaking suspicion" she will be back about the same
time
as, uh,
er, her room mate;)

Scotty

Agreed, once the batteries wear out.

We really don't want to know what it takes to get you going.

Who is "we"? You and Mr. Buzz-buzz?

Strong suggestion: Don't shove yours up your butt so often.

--
Nom=de=Plume

D'Plume. you sound authoritative and experienced. Is that your
expertise?

You're the one with something stuck up your butt.

Pathetic. *Is Donnie writing this ****? *Are *you* Donnie?

No, the vulgar language would suggest JPS, or Slammer... JimH if he were
still
here...

Scotty

I wasn't as vulgar as it was just dumb.

Let me correct your sentence:

I wasn't as vulgar as I was just dumb.

--
Nom=de=Plume

D'Plume It really does look appropriate when you say that.

Ping: John, Scotty, Tim
 

"TopBassDog" wrote in message
...
On Feb 26, 11:56 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"John H" wrote in message

...



On Thu, 25 Feb 2010 23:02:28 -0500, I am Tosk

wrote:

In article ,

says...

nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Feb 24, 9:11 pm, wrote:

wrote in message

om...

nom=de=plume wrote:

wrote in message
...

On 24/02/2010 10:09 AM, I am Tosk wrote:

In ,
says...

On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 18:02:16 -0700,

wrote:

On 23/02/2010 3:58 PM, Jim wrote:

Just wanted to say thanks for your posts today.
Keep up the good work.

Lib - Worthless posters, every damn one of them.

Like to see a lib BS out of this one:

http://tinyurl.com/ycwcnfm

Actually, if you'd looked closely you'd see this wasn't even a
political
thread.
Nomdepuke, who seems to have you hooked, hasn't even posted
here.
Or,
if
she
has, no one's responded. Folks are learning. Some, very
slowly.

Oh, I have a "sneaking suspicion" she will be back about the
same
time
as, uh,
er, her room mate;)

Scotty

Agreed, once the batteries wear out.

We really don't want to know what it takes to get you going.

Who is "we"? You and Mr. Buzz-buzz?

Strong suggestion: Don't shove yours up your butt so often.

--
Nom=de=Plume

D'Plume. you sound authoritative and experienced. Is that your
expertise?

You're the one with something stuck up your butt.

Pathetic. Is Donnie writing this ****? Are *you* Donnie?

No, the vulgar language would suggest JPS, or Slammer... JimH if he were
still
here...

Scotty

No, I think it's nincdepoop. She's been highly focused on the anal
orifice
lately. I don't think there's anyone hear who could spoof her. Most
folks
here
wouldn't be able to sound so ****ing stupid.

(Pardonez moi the french, sil vous plait.)
--

John H

You're an expert wrt to anuses.

--
Nom=de=Plume

Brilliant D'Plume. you still act like the third grader trying to
insult your way out of a paper bag. and you are still losing.


Keep replying to all my posts. You're the king of dufus!

--
Nom=de=Plume

Ping: John, Scotty, Tim
 

On Feb 27, 2:06*am, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"TopBassDog" wrote in message

...
On Feb 26, 11:56 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:



"John H" wrote in message

.. .

On Thu, 25 Feb 2010 23:02:28 -0500, I am Tosk

wrote:

In article ,

says...

nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Feb 24, 9:11 pm, wrote:

wrote in message

om...

nom=de=plume wrote:

wrote in message
...

On 24/02/2010 10:09 AM, I am Tosk wrote:

In ,
says...

On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 18:02:16 -0700,

wrote:

On 23/02/2010 3:58 PM, Jim wrote:

Just wanted to say thanks for your posts today.
Keep up the good work.

Lib - Worthless posters, every damn one of them.

Like to see a lib BS out of this one:

http://tinyurl.com/ycwcnfm

Actually, if you'd looked closely you'd see this wasn't even a
political
thread.
Nomdepuke, who seems to have you hooked, hasn't even posted
here.
Or,
if
she
has, no one's responded. Folks are learning. Some, very
slowly.

Oh, I have a "sneaking suspicion" she will be back about the
same
time
as, uh,
er, her room mate;)

Scotty

Agreed, once the batteries wear out.

We really don't want to know what it takes to get you going.

Who is "we"? You and Mr. Buzz-buzz?

Strong suggestion: Don't shove yours up your butt so often.

--
Nom=de=Plume

D'Plume. you sound authoritative and experienced. Is that your
expertise?

You're the one with something stuck up your butt.

Pathetic. Is Donnie writing this ****? Are *you* Donnie?

No, the vulgar language would suggest JPS, or Slammer... JimH if he were
still
here...

Scotty

No, I think it's nincdepoop. She's been highly focused on the anal
orifice
lately. I don't think there's anyone hear who could spoof her. Most
folks
here
wouldn't be able to sound so ****ing stupid.

(Pardonez moi the french, sil vous plait.)
--

John H

You're an expert wrt to anuses.

--
Nom=de=Plume
Brilliant *D'Plume. *you still act like the third grader trying to
insult your way out of a paper bag. and you are still losing.

Keep replying to all my posts. You're the king of dufus!

--
Nom=de=Plume

"You're just stupid. Were you trying to make a point, or is that just
a bump on your head?

--
Nom=de=Plume "

--
Nom=de=Plume "

Ping: John, Scotty, Tim
 

On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 22:17:52 -0800 (PST), TopBassDog
wrote:

On Feb 26, 11:57*pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Bruce" wrote in message

...



I am Tosk wrote:
In articlejsSdnaKOhf5wghrWnZ2dnUVZ_hRi4...@giganews. com,

says...

nom=de=plume wrote:

* wrote in message
...
On Feb 24, 9:11 pm, * wrote:

* wrote in message

news:uMSdncG5zql7SBjWnZ2dnUVZ_jszAAAA@giganew s.com...

nom=de=plume wrote:

* wrote in message
.. .

On 24/02/2010 10:09 AM, I am Tosk wrote:

In ,
says...

On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 18:02:16 -0700,
wrote:

On 23/02/2010 3:58 PM, Jim wrote:

Just wanted to say thanks for your posts today.
Keep up the good work.

Lib - Worthless posters, every damn one of them.

Like to see a lib BS out of this one:

http://tinyurl.com/ycwcnfm

Actually, if you'd looked closely you'd see this wasn't even a
political
thread.
Nomdepuke, who seems to have you hooked, hasn't even posted here.
Or,
if
she
has, no one's responded. Folks are learning. Some, very slowly.

Oh, I have a "sneaking suspicion" she will be back about the same
time
as, uh,
er, her room mate;)

Scotty

Agreed, once the batteries wear out.

We really don't want to know what it takes to get you going.

Who is "we"? You and Mr. Buzz-buzz?

Strong suggestion: Don't shove yours up your butt so often.

--
Nom=de=Plume

D'Plume. you sound authoritative and experienced. Is that your
expertise?

You're the one with something stuck up your butt.

Pathetic. *Is Donnie writing this ****? *Are *you* Donnie?

No, the vulgar language would suggest JPS, or Slammer... JimH if he were
still
here...

Scotty

I wasn't as vulgar as it was just dumb.

Let me correct your sentence:

I wasn't as vulgar as I was just dumb.

--
Nom=de=Plume

D'Plume It really does look appropriate when you say that.

She's up to 4124 posts right here since September. Most of which are inane, but
do get answered.

Geeesh.
--

John H

Ping: John, Scotty, Tim
 

On Sat, 27 Feb 2010 10:25:12 -0500, John H wrote:


D'Plume It really does look appropriate when you say that.

She's up to 4124 posts right here since September. Most of which are inane, but
do get answered.

Geeesh.

Of course I am the one that answers them all. I can't help myself. I
believe the aneurysm causes this.

What say you all?

Ping: John, Scotty, Tim
 

In article ,
says...
She's up to 4124 posts right here since September. Most of which are inane, but
do get answered.

Why does anyone respond to it?

Ping: John, Scotty, Tim
 

On Sat, 27 Feb 2010 11:23:40 -0500, BAR wrote:

In article ,
says...
She's up to 4124 posts right here since September. Most of which are inane, but
do get answered.

Why does anyone respond to it?

I don't know!

John H

Ping: John, Scotty, Tim
 

On Sat, 27 Feb 2010 11:27:00 -0500, John H wrote:

On Sat, 27 Feb 2010 11:23:40 -0500, BAR wrote:

In article ,
says...
She's up to 4124 posts right here since September. Most of which are inane, but
do get answered.

Why does anyone respond to it?

I don't know!

John H

Maybe I do know. We are such jerks no one wants to talk to us now.

John H

Ping: John, Scotty, Tim
 

On Sat, 27 Feb 2010 11:29:38 -0500, John H wrote:

On Sat, 27 Feb 2010 11:27:00 -0500, John H wrote:

On Sat, 27 Feb 2010 11:23:40 -0500, BAR wrote:

In article ,
says...
She's up to 4124 posts right here since September. Most of which are inane, but
do get answered.

Why does anyone respond to it?

I don't know!

John H

Maybe I do know. We are such jerks no one wants to talk to us now.

John H

Are your filters working?
--
John H