On Fri, 19 Feb 2010 13:48:07 -0500, I am Tosk
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Fri, 19 Feb 2010 10:31:06 -0800, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

wrote in message
.. .
On Fri, 19 Feb 2010 08:26:11 -0600, Jim wrote:

wrote:
On Fri, 19 Feb 2010 01:06:58 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote:

On Feb 19, 12:19 am, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"jps" wrote in message

news


On Thu, 18 Feb 2010 18:12:45 -0700, Canuck57
wrote:
I must admit, I agree with this guys letter. The appathetic sheep
in US
and Canada should wake up and assert economic freedom to the
governments.
Ah, Canadian al Qaeda. You're just as insane as we've come to
expect.
If it's Tim McVeigh or that assholes in Kansas who thinks he was
right
in killing the abortion doctor, it's just a crime.
If a brown person does it on behalf of Allah, they're a terrorist.
There's no difference between this asshole and bin Laden apart from
the sizes of their organizations.
Good grief... Canuck thinks that a beef with the IRS means it's ok to
kill
people. That's just sick.

--
Nom=de=Plume
He said this:

"I must admit, I agree with this guys letter. The apathetic sheep in
US and Canada should wake up and assert economic freedom to the
governments.

Do you see ANYTHING there that promotes murder?

C'mon....

Tim, I don't think she's going to pass up any opportunity to throw the
gratuituous strawman into the fray. Without the informal fallacy,
most radicalized liberals would have to rely only on the patented
shout-down.

Yup. Typical lib strawman.

Lib - When the text doesn't support you, toss invectives.

It's not as though factions on opposing sides of an issue don't resort
to informal fallacies. The Left tends to believe, however, that if an
informal fallacy leaves the mouth of an impassioned Liberal, it
suddenly transforms into an unassailable truth. There's little
demonstration of intellectual honesty from the left of things.


Why don't you look at his posts today, some of which he calls libs "mud"
people. No racism there... Keep blathering... you're not much of an
independent thinker are you.

It would have been wise to have read my observation carefully before
posing your unpunctuated question.

The Plum/Harry knows he didn't write this. You have been away but we have had a
rash of ID spoolers here lately. Harry/Plume is most likely the ignorant writer
of the vial racist post...

Scotty

The disconnect seems to be unadulterated "Nom=de=Plume." But, you're
right. I've been away for some time.

wrote in message
...
On Fri, 19 Feb 2010 13:48:07 -0500, I am Tosk
wrote:

In article ,

says...

On Fri, 19 Feb 2010 10:31:06 -0800, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

wrote in message
.. .
On Fri, 19 Feb 2010 08:26:11 -0600, Jim wrote:

wrote:
On Fri, 19 Feb 2010 01:06:58 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote:

On Feb 19, 12:19 am, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"jps" wrote in message

news


On Thu, 18 Feb 2010 18:12:45 -0700, Canuck57

wrote:
I must admit, I agree with this guys letter. The appathetic
sheep
in US
and Canada should wake up and assert economic freedom to the
governments.
Ah, Canadian al Qaeda. You're just as insane as we've come to
expect.
If it's Tim McVeigh or that assholes in Kansas who thinks he was
right
in killing the abortion doctor, it's just a crime.
If a brown person does it on behalf of Allah, they're a
terrorist.
There's no difference between this asshole and bin Laden apart
from
the sizes of their organizations.
Good grief... Canuck thinks that a beef with the IRS means it's
ok to
kill
people. That's just sick.

--
Nom=de=Plume
He said this:

"I must admit, I agree with this guys letter. The apathetic sheep
in
US and Canada should wake up and assert economic freedom to the
governments.

Do you see ANYTHING there that promotes murder?

C'mon....

Tim, I don't think she's going to pass up any opportunity to throw
the
gratuituous strawman into the fray. Without the informal fallacy,
most radicalized liberals would have to rely only on the patented
shout-down.

Yup. Typical lib strawman.

Lib - When the text doesn't support you, toss invectives.

It's not as though factions on opposing sides of an issue don't
resort
to informal fallacies. The Left tends to believe, however, that if
an
informal fallacy leaves the mouth of an impassioned Liberal, it
suddenly transforms into an unassailable truth. There's little
demonstration of intellectual honesty from the left of things.


Why don't you look at his posts today, some of which he calls libs
"mud"
people. No racism there... Keep blathering... you're not much of an
independent thinker are you.

It would have been wise to have read my observation carefully before
posing your unpunctuated question.

The Plum/Harry knows he didn't write this. You have been away but we have
had a
rash of ID spoolers here lately. Harry/Plume is most likely the ignorant
writer
of the vial racist post...

Scotty

The disconnect seems to be unadulterated "Nom=de=Plume." But, you're
right. I've been away for some time.


Perhaps you should consider staying away, since you're a fraud, at least
intellectually.

--
Nom=de=Plume