nom=de=plume wrote:
"Jack" wrote in message
...
On Jan 28, 8:35 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Jack" wrote in message

...
On Jan 28, 5:56 pm, bpuharic wrote:





On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 10:42:30 -0800, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:
The traditional role of justices during a State of the Union address is
to
sit quietly and say/do nothing.
I noticed him bobbing his head around and mouthing something, and was
shocked. Looks like I'm not the only one.
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/44/...s-not-true-at-...
he should resign because he's a traitor. he sold out the american
political process to enemy powers. is there any restriction on who can
finance an election now?
if saudi arabia wants to buy air time, alito just said 'you're rich,
go ahead
Like Clinton selling out the Lincoln bedroom to the Chinese.
I didn't realize that Clinton rented out the Lincoln bedroom for several
billion dollars.

That money hasn't changed hands. You made the amount up.

It hasn't changed hands, but it's not a made up number.

But one does wonder how much the chinese actually paid Clinton to
exert influence on the POTUS. Was he a cheap whore, or really
expensive?

I hope an expensive one. I wonder who Bush was whoring for... Haliburton or
the Saudis? Or both... more likely, since he bent over for both.



Don't talk about Bush that way, you slut wanna be. Have you no respect
for our former president?

On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 19:14:37 -0800, nom=de=plume wrote:


But one does wonder how much the chinese actually paid Clinton to exert
influence on the POTUS. Was he a cheap whore, or really expensive?

I hope an expensive one. I wonder who Bush was whoring for... Haliburton
or the Saudis? Or both... more likely, since he bent over for both.

Clinton? He was an expensive whore.

http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1997/...inton.lincoln/

Bush? Perhaps not as expensive, but still a whore.

http://www.usatoday.com/news/washing...se-perks_x.htm

On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 17:22:20 -0800 (PST), Jack
wrote:

On Jan 28, 5:56*pm, bpuharic wrote:
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 10:42:30 -0800, "nom=de=plume"

wrote:
The traditional role of justices during a State of the Union address is to
sit quietly and say/do nothing.

I noticed him bobbing his head around and mouthing something, and was
shocked. Looks like I'm not the only one.

http://voices.washingtonpost.com/44/...s-not-true-at-...

he should resign because he's a traitor. he sold out the american
political process to enemy powers. is there any restriction on who can
finance an election now?

if saudi arabia wants to buy air time, alito just said 'you're rich,
go ahead

Like Clinton selling out the Lincoln bedroom to the Chinese.

uh...

so tell me how the lincoln bedroom affects your vote.

you right wingers...always with the non sequiturs

"bpuharic" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 17:22:20 -0800 (PST), Jack
wrote:

On Jan 28, 5:56 pm, bpuharic wrote:
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 10:42:30 -0800, "nom=de=plume"

wrote:
The traditional role of justices during a State of the Union address is
to
sit quietly and say/do nothing.

I noticed him bobbing his head around and mouthing something, and was
shocked. Looks like I'm not the only one.

http://voices.washingtonpost.com/44/...s-not-true-at-...

he should resign because he's a traitor. he sold out the american
political process to enemy powers. is there any restriction on who can
finance an election now?

if saudi arabia wants to buy air time, alito just said 'you're rich,
go ahead

Like Clinton selling out the Lincoln bedroom to the Chinese.

uh...

so tell me how the lincoln bedroom affects your vote.

you right wingers...always with the non sequiturs



He's concerned that if two people have sex, it'll ruin his life.

--
Nom=de=Plume

On Jan 28, 10:15*pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"bpuharic" wrote in message

...





On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 17:22:20 -0800 (PST), Jack
wrote:

On Jan 28, 5:56 pm, bpuharic wrote:
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 10:42:30 -0800, "nom=de=plume"

wrote:
The traditional role of justices during a State of the Union address is
to
sit quietly and say/do nothing.

I noticed him bobbing his head around and mouthing something, and was
shocked. Looks like I'm not the only one.

http://voices.washingtonpost.com/44/...s-not-true-at-...

he should resign because he's a traitor. he sold out the american
political process to enemy powers. is there any restriction on who can
finance an election now?

if saudi arabia wants to buy air time, alito just said 'you're rich,
go ahead

Like Clinton selling out the Lincoln bedroom to the Chinese.

uh...

so tell me how the lincoln bedroom affects your vote.

you right wingers...always with the non sequiturs

He's concerned that if two people have sex, it'll ruin his life.

So you're saying that Clinton had sex with the male Chinese business-
politicos that "rented" the Lincoln bedroom?

Ewwww...

"Jack" wrote in message
...
On Jan 28, 10:15 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"bpuharic" wrote in message

...





On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 17:22:20 -0800 (PST), Jack
wrote:

On Jan 28, 5:56 pm, bpuharic wrote:
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 10:42:30 -0800, "nom=de=plume"

wrote:
The traditional role of justices during a State of the Union address
is
to
sit quietly and say/do nothing.

I noticed him bobbing his head around and mouthing something, and was
shocked. Looks like I'm not the only one.

http://voices.washingtonpost.com/44/...s-not-true-at-...

he should resign because he's a traitor. he sold out the american
political process to enemy powers. is there any restriction on who can
finance an election now?

if saudi arabia wants to buy air time, alito just said 'you're rich,
go ahead

Like Clinton selling out the Lincoln bedroom to the Chinese.

uh...

so tell me how the lincoln bedroom affects your vote.

you right wingers...always with the non sequiturs

He's concerned that if two people have sex, it'll ruin his life.

So you're saying that Clinton had sex with the male Chinese business-
politicos that "rented" the Lincoln bedroom?

Ewwww...


I think you're the one who was proposing that, but let's say he did. How
would that ruin your life?
--
Nom=de=Plume

On Jan 28, 9:22*pm, bpuharic wrote:
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 17:22:20 -0800 (PST), Jack
wrote:





On Jan 28, 5:56*pm, bpuharic wrote:
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 10:42:30 -0800, "nom=de=plume"

wrote:
The traditional role of justices during a State of the Union address is to
sit quietly and say/do nothing.

I noticed him bobbing his head around and mouthing something, and was
shocked. Looks like I'm not the only one.

http://voices.washingtonpost.com/44/...s-not-true-at-....

he should resign because he's a traitor. he sold out the american
political process to enemy powers. is there any restriction on who can
finance an election now?

if saudi arabia wants to buy air time, alito just said 'you're rich,
go ahead

Like Clinton selling out the Lincoln bedroom to the Chinese.

uh...

so tell me how the lincoln bedroom affects your vote.

It affected my country and the POTUS directly. It bypassed my vote,
and yours.

You're blind if you actually think that our elections haven't been
affected by big business, unions, and foreign influence and money for
years. Hopefully, this ruling will just put it out in the open for
all to see.

In article 23be0caa-e872-41c4-bc0b-
, says...

On Jan 28, 9:22*pm, bpuharic wrote:
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 17:22:20 -0800 (PST), Jack
wrote:





On Jan 28, 5:56*pm, bpuharic wrote:
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 10:42:30 -0800, "nom=de=plume"

wrote:
The traditional role of justices during a State of the Union address is to
sit quietly and say/do nothing.

I noticed him bobbing his head around and mouthing something, and was
shocked. Looks like I'm not the only one.

http://voices.washingtonpost.com/44/...s-not-true-at-...

he should resign because he's a traitor. he sold out the american
political process to enemy powers. is there any restriction on who can
finance an election now?

if saudi arabia wants to buy air time, alito just said 'you're rich,
go ahead

Like Clinton selling out the Lincoln bedroom to the Chinese.

uh...

so tell me how the lincoln bedroom affects your vote.

It affected my country and the POTUS directly. It bypassed my vote,
and yours.

You're blind if you actually think that our elections haven't been
affected by big business, unions, and foreign influence and money for
years. Hopefully, this ruling will just put it out in the open for
all to see.

What it does is level the playing field so both parties can take
advantage of the money that has been coming in for decades. Money like
the three million from the Chinese Military, Billions from George Soros,
Billions from Unions.. All to Democrats, that's the way they wanted it
to stay. Remember one of the very first flip flops (dirty tricks) the
Obama campaign made was pledging to stay with public funds to eliminate
the issue, then once McCain agreed, turned around and took the private
money from Soros and the Unions... It was a Chicago style setup from the
start.

Scotty

In article abadea14-d56c-40cb-af3c-
,
says...

On Jan 28, 5:56*pm, bpuharic wrote:
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 10:42:30 -0800, "nom=de=plume"

wrote:
The traditional role of justices during a State of the Union address is to
sit quietly and say/do nothing.

I noticed him bobbing his head around and mouthing something, and was
shocked. Looks like I'm not the only one.

http://voices.washingtonpost.com/44/...s-not-true-at-...

he should resign because he's a traitor. he sold out the american
political process to enemy powers. is there any restriction on who can
finance an election now?

if saudi arabia wants to buy air time, alito just said 'you're rich,
go ahead

Like Clinton selling out the Lincoln bedroom to the Chinese.

It's a democrat thing, they can't play on a level playing field. They
want it the way it was to they can claim to be bound by campaign rules
until the other side agrees, then change the rules to bring in three
times as much money from the Unions, George Soros, Chinas Military
wing,,, etc. But they don't want the republicans to have the same
advantages, it's typical.

Scotty