http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...012704755.html


It seems like your Presidents pick to be the dollar czar isn't fairing
well from either side of the isle. Throwing billions to Wall Street
and little to Main Street isn't making him a very popular man.

On Wed, 27 Jan 2010 21:13:56 -0800 (PST), TopBassDog
wrote:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...012704755.html


It seems like your Presidents pick to be the dollar czar isn't fairing
well from either side of the isle. Throwing billions to Wall Street
and little to Main Street isn't making him a very popular man.

that's true. it's because he's not as accomplished a liar as the GOP
is. the GOP would have sold this as a tax cut for the free market, and
explained that's why the middle class had to pay for it

and the goons, fueled by rush limbaugh, would have fallen in line

On Jan 28, 5:24*am, bpuharic wrote:
On Wed, 27 Jan 2010 21:13:56 -0800 (PST), TopBassDog

wrote:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...10/01/27/AR201...

It seems like your Presidents pick to be the dollar czar isn't fairing
well from either side of the isle. Throwing billions to Wall Street
and little to Main Street isn't making him a very popular man.

that's true. it's because he's not as accomplished a liar as the GOP
is. the GOP would have sold this as a tax cut for the free market, and
explained that's why the middle class had to pay for it

and the goons, fueled by rush limbaugh, would have fallen in line

I couldn't say he is an accomplished liar or not, but he holds an
office eat in Washington D.C, and so now he's qulified.

However, it appears he isn't concerned for how many dollars in taxes
you will pay, for he pays none himself. To you Bob, that is the
"republican way." To pay no taxes and lay the burden of debt on the
American cheque payer. Now does he have the qualifications to be a
republican?

On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 05:10:14 -0800 (PST), TopBassDog
wrote:



However, it appears he isn't concerned for how many dollars in taxes
you will pay, for he pays none himself. To you Bob, that is the
"republican way." To pay no taxes and lay the burden of debt on the
American cheque payer. Now does he have the qualifications to be a
republican?

the biggest spender in US history: bush.

he cut taxes for the rich, cut no taxes for the middle class then
handed the check to the middle class

that's the republican way

On 28/01/2010 3:59 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 05:10:14 -0800 (PST), TopBassDog
wrote:



However, it appears he isn't concerned for how many dollars in taxes
you will pay, for he pays none himself. To you Bob, that is the
"republican way." To pay no taxes and lay the burden of debt on the
American cheque payer. Now does he have the qualifications to be a
republican?

the biggest spender in US history: bush.

Took 8 years.

Obama has the highest annual rate of debt-send in the worlds history. At
this rate, Obama will surpass Bush's debt in less than one more year.

Obama is debt-spend crazy.

he cut taxes for the rich, cut no taxes for the middle class then
handed the check to the middle class

that's the republican way

Hell, Obama just dumped all that cash into corporations.... You talk
like Obama is a republican.

On Fri, 29 Jan 2010 17:16:15 -0700, Canuck57
wrote:

On 28/01/2010 3:59 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 05:10:14 -0800 (PST), TopBassDog
wrote:



However, it appears he isn't concerned for how many dollars in taxes
you will pay, for he pays none himself. To you Bob, that is the
"republican way." To pay no taxes and lay the burden of debt on the
American cheque payer. Now does he have the qualifications to be a
republican?

the biggest spender in US history: bush.

Took 8 years.

and that's relevant because??


Obama has the highest annual rate of debt-send in the worlds history. At
this rate, Obama will surpass Bush's debt in less than one more year.

i know you're a crybaby and are in love with the idea of middle class
unemployment at 25%.

but some of us like working for a living. sorry you limbaugh morons
can't understand economics


Obama is debt-spend crazy.

he cut taxes for the rich, cut no taxes for the middle class then
handed the check to the middle class

that's the republican way

Hell, Obama just dumped all that cash into corporations.... You talk
like Obama is a republican.

the govt gave money to

0.8% of the corporations in the US.

yes. i guess if you're a right wing fanatic that's a govt takeover.

On 28/01/2010 4:24 AM, bpuharic wrote:
On Wed, 27 Jan 2010 21:13:56 -0800 (PST), TopBassDog
wrote:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...012704755.html


It seems like your Presidents pick to be the dollar czar isn't fairing
well from either side of the isle. Throwing billions to Wall Street
and little to Main Street isn't making him a very popular man.

that's true. it's because he's not as accomplished a liar as the GOP
is. the GOP would have sold this as a tax cut for the free market, and
explained that's why the middle class had to pay for it

and the goons, fueled by rush limbaugh, would have fallen in line

You liberal-democrackers aught to take a course in basic economics on
how the real world works.

Then you will realize the democrats have sold out the American citizens.
Quit living in a fantasy and get an education.

On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 18:03:57 -0700, Canuck57
wrote:

On 28/01/2010 4:24 AM, bpuharic wrote:
On Wed, 27 Jan 2010 21:13:56 -0800 (PST), TopBassDog
wrote:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...012704755.html


It seems like your Presidents pick to be the dollar czar isn't fairing
well from either side of the isle. Throwing billions to Wall Street
and little to Main Street isn't making him a very popular man.

that's true. it's because he's not as accomplished a liar as the GOP
is. the GOP would have sold this as a tax cut for the free market, and
explained that's why the middle class had to pay for it

and the goons, fueled by rush limbaugh, would have fallen in line

You liberal-democrackers aught to take a course in basic economics on
how the real world works.

says the crybaby who thinks that, if you click your heels together
with your magic slippers on

you'll have the magic of a free market


Then you will realize the democrats have sold out the American citizens.
Quit living in a fantasy and get an education.

guess he forgot bush spent a trillion in iraq

where'd it get us?

On 28/01/2010 7:26 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 18:03:57 -0700,
wrote:

On 28/01/2010 4:24 AM, bpuharic wrote:
On Wed, 27 Jan 2010 21:13:56 -0800 (PST), TopBassDog
wrote:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...012704755.html


It seems like your Presidents pick to be the dollar czar isn't fairing
well from either side of the isle. Throwing billions to Wall Street
and little to Main Street isn't making him a very popular man.

that's true. it's because he's not as accomplished a liar as the GOP
is. the GOP would have sold this as a tax cut for the free market, and
explained that's why the middle class had to pay for it

and the goons, fueled by rush limbaugh, would have fallen in line

You liberal-democrackers aught to take a course in basic economics on
how the real world works.

says the crybaby who thinks that, if you click your heels together
with your magic slippers on

you'll have the magic of a free market


Then you will realize the democrats have sold out the American citizens.
Quit living in a fantasy and get an education.

guess he forgot bush spent a trillion in iraq

where'd it get us?

No where of course. 8 years, one trillion on a useless war.

$2 trillion in less than a year on useless bailouts, got Americans no
where bu MORE debt.

Which debt and cash flow do you think is worse?

On Fri, 29 Jan 2010 16:47:54 -0700, Canuck57
wrote:

On 28/01/2010 7:26 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 18:03:57 -0700,
wrote:


you'll have the magic of a free market


Then you will realize the democrats have sold out the American citizens.
Quit living in a fantasy and get an education.

guess he forgot bush spent a trillion in iraq

where'd it get us?

No where of course. 8 years, one trillion on a useless war.

and the collapse of the US economy.


$2 trillion in less than a year on useless bailouts, got Americans no
where bu MORE debt.

really? creating over a million jobs and preventing unemployment from
going to 25% is useless?

oh, yes, i forgot. you righties don't care about middle class
unemployment

only the rich are important