|
Does grilled Geithner serve better on toast?
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...012704755.html
It seems like your Presidents pick to be the dollar czar isn't fairing well from either side of the isle. Throwing billions to Wall Street and little to Main Street isn't making him a very popular man. |
Does grilled Geithner serve better on toast?
On Wed, 27 Jan 2010 21:13:56 -0800 (PST), TopBassDog
wrote: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...012704755.html It seems like your Presidents pick to be the dollar czar isn't fairing well from either side of the isle. Throwing billions to Wall Street and little to Main Street isn't making him a very popular man. that's true. it's because he's not as accomplished a liar as the GOP is. the GOP would have sold this as a tax cut for the free market, and explained that's why the middle class had to pay for it and the goons, fueled by rush limbaugh, would have fallen in line |
Does grilled Geithner serve better on toast?
On Jan 28, 5:24*am, bpuharic wrote:
On Wed, 27 Jan 2010 21:13:56 -0800 (PST), TopBassDog wrote: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...10/01/27/AR201... It seems like your Presidents pick to be the dollar czar isn't fairing well from either side of the isle. Throwing billions to Wall Street and little to Main Street isn't making him a very popular man. that's true. it's because he's not as accomplished a liar as the GOP is. the GOP would have sold this as a tax cut for the free market, and explained that's why the middle class had to pay for it and the goons, fueled by rush limbaugh, would have fallen in line I couldn't say he is an accomplished liar or not, but he holds an office eat in Washington D.C, and so now he's qulified. However, it appears he isn't concerned for how many dollars in taxes you will pay, for he pays none himself. To you Bob, that is the "republican way." To pay no taxes and lay the burden of debt on the American cheque payer. Now does he have the qualifications to be a republican? |
Does grilled Geithner serve better on toast?
On Jan 27, 11:13*pm, TopBassDog wrote:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...10/01/27/AR201... It seems like your Presidents pick to be the dollar czar isn't fairing well from either side of the isle. Throwing billions to Wall Street and little to Main Street isn't making him a very popular man. Like most "Czars" I'm trying to figure out what the guy actually does. |
Does grilled Geithner serve better on toast?
On Jan 28, 12:39*pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Tim" wrote in message ... On Jan 27, 11:13 pm, TopBassDog wrote: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...10/01/27/AR201... It seems like your Presidents pick to be the dollar czar isn't fairing well from either side of the isle. Throwing billions to Wall Street and little to Main Street isn't making him a very popular man. Like most "Czars" I'm trying to figure out what the guy actually does. I believe he's the Secretary of the Treasury, but don't let me stand it the way of a right wing rant on czars. -- Nom=de=Plume Stand in ( I take it you meant 'in' instead of 'it') the way of what rant ? I know what his official title is, but I'm wondering what he's actually doing for everyones benefit. It looks to me like he isn't getting supported well by some democrats as well as some republicans. Thats all. |
Does grilled Geithner serve better on toast?
On 1/28/10 1:49 PM, Tim wrote:
On Jan 28, 12:39 pm, wrote: wrote in message ... On Jan 27, 11:13 pm, wrote: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...10/01/27/AR201... It seems like your Presidents pick to be the dollar czar isn't fairing well from either side of the isle. Throwing billions to Wall Street and little to Main Street isn't making him a very popular man. Like most "Czars" I'm trying to figure out what the guy actually does. I believe he's the Secretary of the Treasury, but don't let me stand it the way of a right wing rant on czars. -- Nom=de=Plume Stand in ( I take it you meant 'in' instead of 'it') the way of what rant ? I know what his official title is, but I'm wondering what he's actually doing for everyones benefit. It looks to me like he isn't getting supported well by some democrats as well as some republicans. Thats all. I'd bet that an overwhelming majority of Americans from all sides of the political fence have no idea of what any of the cabinet officers do. I wouldn't have coughed up a dollar to help out the shareholder/owners of the big banks and financial services companies and those of their employees who get huge bonuses. But I would have helped community banks and credit unions to the greatest extend possible, and mandated a 50% or more cutback in the amount of paperwork and levels of approvals needed for SBA loans. One of my clients is in the financial services industry. It's a small company, handling less than $10 billion in assets. It has been profitable since its inception. No one there, including the CEO, is pulling down an extraordinary salary, and the bonuses are small, too. Maybe it is because personal greed is not an attribute the company seeks in its employees. |
Does grilled Geithner serve better on toast?
On Jan 28, 1:05*pm, Harry wrote:
On 1/28/10 1:49 PM, Tim wrote: On Jan 28, 12:39 pm, *wrote: *wrote in message .... On Jan 27, 11:13 pm, *wrote: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...10/01/27/AR201.... It seems like your Presidents pick to be the dollar czar isn't fairing well from either side of the isle. Throwing billions to Wall Street and little to Main Street isn't making him a very popular man. Like most "Czars" I'm trying to figure out what the guy actually does.. I believe he's the Secretary of the Treasury, but don't let me stand it the way of a right wing rant on czars. -- Nom=de=Plume Stand in ( I take it you meant 'in' instead of 'it') the way of what rant ? I know what his official title is, but I'm wondering what he's actually doing for everyones benefit. It looks to me like he isn't getting supported well by some democrats as well as some republicans. Thats all. I'd bet that an overwhelming majority of Americans from all sides of the political fence have no idea of what any of the cabinet officers do. I wouldn't have coughed up a dollar to help out the shareholder/owners of the big banks and financial services companies and those of their employees who get huge bonuses. But I would have helped community banks and credit unions to the greatest extend possible, and mandated a 50% or more cutback in the amount of paperwork and levels of approvals needed for SBA loans. One of my clients is in the financial services industry. It's a small company, handling less than $10 billion in assets. It has been profitable since its inception. No one there, including the CEO, is pulling down an extraordinary salary, and the bonuses are small, too. Maybe it is because personal greed is not an attribute the company seeks in its employees.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - sounds good to me.... |
Does grilled Geithner serve better on toast?
"Tim" wrote in message
... On Jan 28, 12:39 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Tim" wrote in message ... On Jan 27, 11:13 pm, TopBassDog wrote: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...10/01/27/AR201... It seems like your Presidents pick to be the dollar czar isn't fairing well from either side of the isle. Throwing billions to Wall Street and little to Main Street isn't making him a very popular man. Like most "Czars" I'm trying to figure out what the guy actually does. I believe he's the Secretary of the Treasury, but don't let me stand it the way of a right wing rant on czars. -- Nom=de=Plume Stand in ( I take it you meant 'in' instead of 'it') the way of what rant ? I know what his official title is, but I'm wondering what he's actually doing for everyones benefit. It looks to me like he isn't getting supported well by some democrats as well as some republicans. Thats all. Reply: Yes, stand in :-) I believe he's doing the best he can with the hand he was dealt. He's got the support of the President, which for the time being is what he needs. It's an interesting measure when both sides aren't truly happy with someone's performance. -- Nom=de=Plume |
Does grilled Geithner serve better on toast?
"Tim" wrote in message
... On Jan 28, 1:05 pm, Harry wrote: On 1/28/10 1:49 PM, Tim wrote: On Jan 28, 12:39 pm, wrote: wrote in message ... On Jan 27, 11:13 pm, wrote: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...10/01/27/AR201... It seems like your Presidents pick to be the dollar czar isn't fairing well from either side of the isle. Throwing billions to Wall Street and little to Main Street isn't making him a very popular man. Like most "Czars" I'm trying to figure out what the guy actually does. I believe he's the Secretary of the Treasury, but don't let me stand it the way of a right wing rant on czars. -- Nom=de=Plume Stand in ( I take it you meant 'in' instead of 'it') the way of what rant ? I know what his official title is, but I'm wondering what he's actually doing for everyones benefit. It looks to me like he isn't getting supported well by some democrats as well as some republicans. Thats all. I'd bet that an overwhelming majority of Americans from all sides of the political fence have no idea of what any of the cabinet officers do. I wouldn't have coughed up a dollar to help out the shareholder/owners of the big banks and financial services companies and those of their employees who get huge bonuses. But I would have helped community banks and credit unions to the greatest extend possible, and mandated a 50% or more cutback in the amount of paperwork and levels of approvals needed for SBA loans. One of my clients is in the financial services industry. It's a small company, handling less than $10 billion in assets. It has been profitable since its inception. No one there, including the CEO, is pulling down an extraordinary salary, and the bonuses are small, too. Maybe it is because personal greed is not an attribute the company seeks in its employees.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - sounds good to me.... I wonder if it's appropriate in any company or industry... -- Nom=de=Plume |
Does grilled Geithner serve better on toast?
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 05:10:14 -0800 (PST), TopBassDog
wrote: However, it appears he isn't concerned for how many dollars in taxes you will pay, for he pays none himself. To you Bob, that is the "republican way." To pay no taxes and lay the burden of debt on the American cheque payer. Now does he have the qualifications to be a republican? the biggest spender in US history: bush. he cut taxes for the rich, cut no taxes for the middle class then handed the check to the middle class that's the republican way |
Does grilled Geithner serve better on toast?
|
Does grilled Geithner serve better on toast?
On 27/01/2010 10:13 PM, TopBassDog wrote:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...012704755.html It seems like your Presidents pick to be the dollar czar isn't fairing well from either side of the isle. Throwing billions to Wall Street and little to Main Street isn't making him a very popular man. The freaking senators and congress people up for election in 2010 are firing up the flack now. How convenient that congress and the senate now want scape goats for their actions. Blame the banks, tough talk. Liberals seem to forget the whole taxpayer bilking scam was 100% endorced by democrats. Big debt spending democrats. |
Does grilled Geithner serve better on toast?
On 28/01/2010 4:24 AM, bpuharic wrote:
On Wed, 27 Jan 2010 21:13:56 -0800 (PST), TopBassDog wrote: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...012704755.html It seems like your Presidents pick to be the dollar czar isn't fairing well from either side of the isle. Throwing billions to Wall Street and little to Main Street isn't making him a very popular man. that's true. it's because he's not as accomplished a liar as the GOP is. the GOP would have sold this as a tax cut for the free market, and explained that's why the middle class had to pay for it and the goons, fueled by rush limbaugh, would have fallen in line You liberal-democrackers aught to take a course in basic economics on how the real world works. Then you will realize the democrats have sold out the American citizens. Quit living in a fantasy and get an education. |
Does grilled Geithner serve better on toast?
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 18:03:57 -0700, Canuck57
wrote: On 28/01/2010 4:24 AM, bpuharic wrote: On Wed, 27 Jan 2010 21:13:56 -0800 (PST), TopBassDog wrote: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...012704755.html It seems like your Presidents pick to be the dollar czar isn't fairing well from either side of the isle. Throwing billions to Wall Street and little to Main Street isn't making him a very popular man. that's true. it's because he's not as accomplished a liar as the GOP is. the GOP would have sold this as a tax cut for the free market, and explained that's why the middle class had to pay for it and the goons, fueled by rush limbaugh, would have fallen in line You liberal-democrackers aught to take a course in basic economics on how the real world works. says the crybaby who thinks that, if you click your heels together with your magic slippers on you'll have the magic of a free market Then you will realize the democrats have sold out the American citizens. Quit living in a fantasy and get an education. guess he forgot bush spent a trillion in iraq where'd it get us? |
Does grilled Geithner serve better on toast?
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 18:02:10 -0700, Canuck57
wrote: On 27/01/2010 10:13 PM, TopBassDog wrote: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...012704755.html It seems like your Presidents pick to be the dollar czar isn't fairing well from either side of the isle. Throwing billions to Wall Street and little to Main Street isn't making him a very popular man. The freaking senators and congress people up for election in 2010 are firing up the flack now. How convenient that congress and the senate now want scape goats for their actions. Blame the banks, tough talk. the right wing thinks the banks had zip to do with the banking crisis. only the right wing could be this deluded, without drugs |
Does grilled Geithner serve better on toast?
On Jan 28, 12:49*pm, Tim wrote:
On Jan 28, 12:39*pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "Tim" wrote in message .... On Jan 27, 11:13 pm, TopBassDog wrote: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...10/01/27/AR201.... It seems like your Presidents pick to be the dollar czar isn't fairing well from either side of the isle. Throwing billions to Wall Street and little to Main Street isn't making him a very popular man. Like most "Czars" I'm trying to figure out what the guy actually does. I believe he's the Secretary of the Treasury, but don't let me stand it the way of a right wing rant on czars. -- Nom=de=Plume Stand in ( I take it you meant 'in' instead of 'it') the way of what rant ? I know what his official title is, but I'm wondering what he's actually doing for everyones benefit. It looks to me like he isn't getting supported well by some democrats as well as some republicans. Thats all. Tim, Geithner isn't the only one in question by some on either side. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...l?hpid=topnews |
Does grilled Geithner serve better on toast?
"bpuharic" wrote in message ... On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 18:02:10 -0700, Canuck57 wrote: On 27/01/2010 10:13 PM, TopBassDog wrote: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...012704755.html It seems like your Presidents pick to be the dollar czar isn't fairing well from either side of the isle. Throwing billions to Wall Street and little to Main Street isn't making him a very popular man. The freaking senators and congress people up for election in 2010 are firing up the flack now. How convenient that congress and the senate now want scape goats for their actions. Blame the banks, tough talk. the right wing thinks the banks had zip to do with the banking crisis. only the right wing could be this deluded, without drugs Damn. You sound stupider every post. According to you the present administration and Congress have done everything correctly. Turned around a recession, putr everyone back to work, balanced the budget, and wasted zero dollars. You are an idiot! |
Does grilled Geithner serve better on toast?
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m... "bpuharic" wrote in message ... On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 18:02:10 -0700, Canuck57 wrote: On 27/01/2010 10:13 PM, TopBassDog wrote: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...012704755.html It seems like your Presidents pick to be the dollar czar isn't fairing well from either side of the isle. Throwing billions to Wall Street and little to Main Street isn't making him a very popular man. The freaking senators and congress people up for election in 2010 are firing up the flack now. How convenient that congress and the senate now want scape goats for their actions. Blame the banks, tough talk. the right wing thinks the banks had zip to do with the banking crisis. only the right wing could be this deluded, without drugs Damn. You sound stupider every post. According to you the present administration and Congress have done everything correctly. Turned around a recession, putr everyone back to work, balanced the budget, and wasted zero dollars. You are an idiot! Sure... 1 yr of mixed effort vs. 8 of failed policies.... who's the idiot. -- Nom=de=Plume |
Does grilled Geithner serve better on toast?
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 23:10:25 -0800, "Bill McKee"
wrote: "bpuharic" wrote in message .. . On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 18:02:10 -0700, Canuck57 wrote: How convenient that congress and the senate now want scape goats for their actions. Blame the banks, tough talk. the right wing thinks the banks had zip to do with the banking crisis. only the right wing could be this deluded, without drugs Damn. You sound stupider every post. According to you the present administration and Congress have done everything correctly. Turned around a recession, putr everyone back to work, balanced the budget, and wasted zero dollars. You are an idiot! and according to the right wing, obama's been president for 8 years, personally passed the CFMA in 2000, deregulated banks etc etc. uh huh. and i suppose he was responsible for the civil war, too |
Does grilled Geithner serve better on toast?
On 28/01/2010 7:26 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 18:03:57 -0700, wrote: On 28/01/2010 4:24 AM, bpuharic wrote: On Wed, 27 Jan 2010 21:13:56 -0800 (PST), TopBassDog wrote: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...012704755.html It seems like your Presidents pick to be the dollar czar isn't fairing well from either side of the isle. Throwing billions to Wall Street and little to Main Street isn't making him a very popular man. that's true. it's because he's not as accomplished a liar as the GOP is. the GOP would have sold this as a tax cut for the free market, and explained that's why the middle class had to pay for it and the goons, fueled by rush limbaugh, would have fallen in line You liberal-democrackers aught to take a course in basic economics on how the real world works. says the crybaby who thinks that, if you click your heels together with your magic slippers on you'll have the magic of a free market Then you will realize the democrats have sold out the American citizens. Quit living in a fantasy and get an education. guess he forgot bush spent a trillion in iraq where'd it get us? No where of course. 8 years, one trillion on a useless war. $2 trillion in less than a year on useless bailouts, got Americans no where bu MORE debt. Which debt and cash flow do you think is worse? |
Does grilled Geithner serve better on toast?
On 28/01/2010 3:59 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 05:10:14 -0800 (PST), TopBassDog wrote: However, it appears he isn't concerned for how many dollars in taxes you will pay, for he pays none himself. To you Bob, that is the "republican way." To pay no taxes and lay the burden of debt on the American cheque payer. Now does he have the qualifications to be a republican? the biggest spender in US history: bush. Took 8 years. Obama has the highest annual rate of debt-send in the worlds history. At this rate, Obama will surpass Bush's debt in less than one more year. Obama is debt-spend crazy. he cut taxes for the rich, cut no taxes for the middle class then handed the check to the middle class that's the republican way Hell, Obama just dumped all that cash into corporations.... You talk like Obama is a republican. |
Does grilled Geithner serve better on toast?
On Fri, 29 Jan 2010 17:16:15 -0700, Canuck57
wrote: On 28/01/2010 3:59 PM, bpuharic wrote: On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 05:10:14 -0800 (PST), TopBassDog wrote: However, it appears he isn't concerned for how many dollars in taxes you will pay, for he pays none himself. To you Bob, that is the "republican way." To pay no taxes and lay the burden of debt on the American cheque payer. Now does he have the qualifications to be a republican? the biggest spender in US history: bush. Took 8 years. and that's relevant because?? Obama has the highest annual rate of debt-send in the worlds history. At this rate, Obama will surpass Bush's debt in less than one more year. i know you're a crybaby and are in love with the idea of middle class unemployment at 25%. but some of us like working for a living. sorry you limbaugh morons can't understand economics Obama is debt-spend crazy. he cut taxes for the rich, cut no taxes for the middle class then handed the check to the middle class that's the republican way Hell, Obama just dumped all that cash into corporations.... You talk like Obama is a republican. the govt gave money to 0.8% of the corporations in the US. yes. i guess if you're a right wing fanatic that's a govt takeover. |
Does grilled Geithner serve better on toast?
On Fri, 29 Jan 2010 16:47:54 -0700, Canuck57
wrote: On 28/01/2010 7:26 PM, bpuharic wrote: On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 18:03:57 -0700, wrote: you'll have the magic of a free market Then you will realize the democrats have sold out the American citizens. Quit living in a fantasy and get an education. guess he forgot bush spent a trillion in iraq where'd it get us? No where of course. 8 years, one trillion on a useless war. and the collapse of the US economy. $2 trillion in less than a year on useless bailouts, got Americans no where bu MORE debt. really? creating over a million jobs and preventing unemployment from going to 25% is useless? oh, yes, i forgot. you righties don't care about middle class unemployment only the rich are important |
Does grilled Geithner serve better on toast?
"nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... "Bill McKee" wrote in message m... "bpuharic" wrote in message ... On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 18:02:10 -0700, Canuck57 wrote: On 27/01/2010 10:13 PM, TopBassDog wrote: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...012704755.html It seems like your Presidents pick to be the dollar czar isn't fairing well from either side of the isle. Throwing billions to Wall Street and little to Main Street isn't making him a very popular man. The freaking senators and congress people up for election in 2010 are firing up the flack now. How convenient that congress and the senate now want scape goats for their actions. Blame the banks, tough talk. the right wing thinks the banks had zip to do with the banking crisis. only the right wing could be this deluded, without drugs Damn. You sound stupider every post. According to you the present administration and Congress have done everything correctly. Turned around a recession, putr everyone back to work, balanced the budget, and wasted zero dollars. You are an idiot! Sure... 1 yr of mixed effort vs. 8 of failed policies.... who's the idiot. -- Nom=de=Plume You. The last 2 years of Bush was really bad for the economy. And the last 2 years of Bush, Pelosi and Reid were in charge. Who the hell spends the money for the Federal Government? |
Does grilled Geithner serve better on toast?
"bpuharic" wrote in message ... On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 23:10:25 -0800, "Bill McKee" wrote: "bpuharic" wrote in message . .. On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 18:02:10 -0700, Canuck57 wrote: How convenient that congress and the senate now want scape goats for their actions. Blame the banks, tough talk. the right wing thinks the banks had zip to do with the banking crisis. only the right wing could be this deluded, without drugs Damn. You sound stupider every post. According to you the present administration and Congress have done everything correctly. Turned around a recession, putr everyone back to work, balanced the budget, and wasted zero dollars. You are an idiot! and according to the right wing, obama's been president for 8 years, personally passed the CFMA in 2000, deregulated banks etc etc. uh huh. and i suppose he was responsible for the civil war, too Get a brain. |
Does grilled Geithner serve better on toast?
"bpuharic" wrote in message ... On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 18:03:57 -0700, Canuck57 wrote: On 28/01/2010 4:24 AM, bpuharic wrote: On Wed, 27 Jan 2010 21:13:56 -0800 (PST), TopBassDog wrote: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...012704755.html It seems like your Presidents pick to be the dollar czar isn't fairing well from either side of the isle. Throwing billions to Wall Street and little to Main Street isn't making him a very popular man. that's true. it's because he's not as accomplished a liar as the GOP is. the GOP would have sold this as a tax cut for the free market, and explained that's why the middle class had to pay for it and the goons, fueled by rush limbaugh, would have fallen in line You liberal-democrackers aught to take a course in basic economics on how the real world works. says the crybaby who thinks that, if you click your heels together with your magic slippers on you'll have the magic of a free market Then you will realize the democrats have sold out the American citizens. Quit living in a fantasy and get an education. guess he forgot bush spent a trillion in iraq where'd it get us? 4400 dead, lots of jobs building war materials. Where has the 2 trillion that has been spent in the last 1 year, vs 8 years got us? |
Does grilled Geithner serve better on toast?
|
Does grilled Geithner serve better on toast?
On Fri, 29 Jan 2010 20:42:11 -0800, "CalifBill"
wrote: "bpuharic" wrote in message .. . On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 18:03:57 -0700, Canuck57 wrote: says the crybaby who thinks that, if you click your heels together with your magic slippers on you'll have the magic of a free market Then you will realize the democrats have sold out the American citizens. Quit living in a fantasy and get an education. guess he forgot bush spent a trillion in iraq where'd it get us? 4400 dead, lots of jobs building war materials. Where has the 2 trillion that has been spent in the last 1 year, vs 8 years got us? 1.2M jobs no dead. 10% unmployment instead of 25% as in the last depression looks like a winner to me |
Does grilled Geithner serve better on toast?
On Fri, 29 Jan 2010 20:40:20 -0800, "CalifBill"
wrote: "nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... the right wing thinks the banks had zip to do with the banking crisis. only the right wing could be this deluded, without drugs Damn. You sound stupider every post. According to you the present administration and Congress have done everything correctly. Turned around a recession, putr everyone back to work, balanced the budget, and wasted zero dollars. You are an idiot! Sure... 1 yr of mixed effort vs. 8 of failed policies.... who's the idiot. -- Nom=de=Plume You. The last 2 years of Bush was really bad for the economy. And the last 2 years of Bush, Pelosi and Reid were in charge. Who the hell spends the money for the Federal Government? you mean the EIGHT YEARS bush spent destroying our economny, after reagan and his massive tax cuts for the rich. |
Does grilled Geithner serve better on toast?
On Fri, 29 Jan 2010 20:40:43 -0800, "CalifBill"
wrote: "bpuharic" wrote in message .. . On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 23:10:25 -0800, "Bill McKee" wrote: ! and according to the right wing, obama's been president for 8 years, personally passed the CFMA in 2000, deregulated banks etc etc. uh huh. and i suppose he was responsible for the civil war, too Get a brain. as mencken said, 'not all conservatives are stupid. but all stupid people are conservatives'. |
Does grilled Geithner serve better on toast?
On Sat, 30 Jan 2010 00:14:56 -0500, I am Tosk
wrote: In article , says... "bpuharic" wrote in message ... On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 23:10:25 -0800, "Bill McKee" wrote: and according to the right wing, obama's been president for 8 years, personally passed the CFMA in 2000, deregulated banks etc etc. uh huh. and i suppose he was responsible for the civil war, too Get a brain. Well, as usual, the guy is lying. The "right wing" never, ever said anything close to "Obama has been President for 8 years sure you do. blaming obama for the depression that started in dec of 07. blaming him for deficits that started under reagan.... what else you got? |
Does grilled Geithner serve better on toast?
"CalifBill" wrote in message
m... "nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... "Bill McKee" wrote in message m... "bpuharic" wrote in message ... On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 18:02:10 -0700, Canuck57 wrote: On 27/01/2010 10:13 PM, TopBassDog wrote: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...012704755.html It seems like your Presidents pick to be the dollar czar isn't fairing well from either side of the isle. Throwing billions to Wall Street and little to Main Street isn't making him a very popular man. The freaking senators and congress people up for election in 2010 are firing up the flack now. How convenient that congress and the senate now want scape goats for their actions. Blame the banks, tough talk. the right wing thinks the banks had zip to do with the banking crisis. only the right wing could be this deluded, without drugs Damn. You sound stupider every post. According to you the present administration and Congress have done everything correctly. Turned around a recession, putr everyone back to work, balanced the budget, and wasted zero dollars. You are an idiot! Sure... 1 yr of mixed effort vs. 8 of failed policies.... who's the idiot. -- Nom=de=Plume You. The last 2 years of Bush was really bad for the economy. And the last 2 years of Bush, Pelosi and Reid were in charge. Who the hell spends the money for the Federal Government? Who got us into the mess to begin with... Bush/Cheney. They're your gods. Keep worshipping them if you must. -- Nom=de=Plume |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:34 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com