On 1/28/2010 4:26 PM, Harry wrote:
On 1/28/10 4:22 PM, Harry wrote:
Harry wrote:
On 1/28/10 2:34 PM, Harry wrote:
Harry wrote:
On 1/28/10 2:16 PM, flajim posing as Harry wrote:
Harry has access to a PC and is perfectly capable of using it to
make a
convincing spoof, as we have already seen. In fact we have seen
screen
shots of his desktop which included spoofing software. One might ask
oneself if someone has spoofing software on his desk top, would he be
likely to use it?
Ask your self these questions. Is this post a spoof? Am I
responding to
a spoof? Why am I reading posts that are likely to be spoofs?

What "spoofing software" do you think I have on my Win 7 virtual
machine that would allow me to ID spoof on usenet via a PC, **** for
brains, and where is your evidence that I have done this?

Maybe you better consult with your idiot buddy, SnottyScotty...he
doesn't know anything about software, either...just like you.


You showed a screenshot of your desktop a while ago and I'm sure
several
people saw it. You sure did take it off photo bucket in a hurry once
someone noticed it. I have no idea what is on your desktop now. You
truly are a fruitcake.



Just as I suspected, flajims...you're posting more of your bull****.
I've never had software on a Windows computer that would allow me to
"ID spoof" on usenet.
\

I guess that settles it. We all know you are honest as the day is
long. ;-)


More honest than you are, flajims. I'm posting as me, and you're not
posting as you. You've posted as me hundreds and hundreds of times, and
each time you do, you're lying.

If memory serves, it was that idiot snottyscotty who made the claim
about software on my desktop. That would be the same snottyscotty who
couldn't get a job sweeping out a 7-11.




Sorry, my best buddy, it was Eisboch, back when you like him.