![]() |
Consideration required
wrote in message
... On Tue, 9 Feb 2010 23:45:41 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: None of these things actually turn into facts, however. They will Come talk to me in 2012 (when the end of the SS surplus is in sight) and see what everyone is talking about, including the Democrats. I guarantee it will be the debt crisis and the impending failure of Social Security. Umm... everyone knows about the coming problem with SS. It won't fail, just as the economy won't fail. That's a chicken little attitude. -- Nom=de=Plume |
Consideration required
nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message ... On Tue, 9 Feb 2010 23:45:41 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: None of these things actually turn into facts, however. They will Come talk to me in 2012 (when the end of the SS surplus is in sight) and see what everyone is talking about, including the Democrats. I guarantee it will be the debt crisis and the impending failure of Social Security. Umm... everyone knows about the coming problem with SS. It won't fail, just as the economy won't fail. That's a chicken little attitude. Of course it won't fail. Obama is going to bail out SS. Right Nom? It's probably the only thing he could do to redeem himself at this point. |
Consideration required
|
Consideration required
"John H" wrote in message
... On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 11:11:30 -0500, wrote: On Tue, 9 Feb 2010 23:45:41 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: None of these things actually turn into facts, however. They will Come talk to me in 2012 (when the end of the SS surplus is in sight) and see what everyone is talking about, including the Democrats. I guarantee it will be the debt crisis and the impending failure of Social Security. That would be true only if those particular Democrats have enough sense to see what's going on. Plenty of those. It would be nice if someone in the Republican party stopped acting like a spoiled child who can only say no, no, no, while shaking his head from side to side. -- Nom=de=Plume |
Consideration required
wrote in message
... On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 09:35:19 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: wrote in message . .. On Tue, 9 Feb 2010 23:45:41 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: None of these things actually turn into facts, however. They will Come talk to me in 2012 (when the end of the SS surplus is in sight) and see what everyone is talking about, including the Democrats. I guarantee it will be the debt crisis and the impending failure of Social Security. Umm... everyone knows about the coming problem with SS. It won't fail, just as the economy won't fail. That's a chicken little attitude. OK, economies never fail. Keep telling yourself that. Perhaps it is time to remind you of the Alexander Tyler quote. I never said "economies never fail." I said ours wouldn't, especially not because of a SS crisis. "A democracy will continue to exist up until the time that voters discover they can vote themselves generous gifts from the public treasury." "From that moment on, the majority always vote for the candidates who promise the most benefits from the public treasury, with the result that every democracy will finally collapse due to loose fiscal policy, which is always followed by a dictatorship." "The average age of the world's greatest civilizations from the beginning of history, has been about 200 years" Umm... Roman Empire = 900 years? We are running on borrowed time ... and borrowed money. I suggest you move to Wyoming and buy a gun. -- Nom=de=Plume |
Consideration required
wrote in message
... On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 13:34:18 -0500, John H wrote: Come talk to me in 2012 (when the end of the SS surplus is in sight) and see what everyone is talking about, including the Democrats. I guarantee it will be the debt crisis and the impending failure of Social Security. That would be true only if those particular Democrats have enough sense to see what's going on. The reality of the loss of the SS surplus will be on our door in 2012. If nothing else, they will not have that slush fund to attempt to balance the budget with, although with a deficit approaching $1T that is an insignificant number. The real question will be whether China decides to cash out of treasuries or what interest rate we will need to offer to keep them attractive. According to you. -- Nom=de=Plume |
Consideration required
|
Consideration required
wrote in message
... On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 10:29:55 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: wrote in message . .. On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 13:34:18 -0500, John H wrote: Come talk to me in 2012 (when the end of the SS surplus is in sight) and see what everyone is talking about, including the Democrats. I guarantee it will be the debt crisis and the impending failure of Social Security. That would be true only if those particular Democrats have enough sense to see what's going on. The reality of the loss of the SS surplus will be on our door in 2012. If nothing else, they will not have that slush fund to attempt to balance the budget with, although with a deficit approaching $1T that is an insignificant number. The real question will be whether China decides to cash out of treasuries or what interest rate we will need to offer to keep them attractive. According to you. If you do much reading, you will find a lot of financial people are asking the same questions about how long we can continue the raise the debt limit and how we will deal with the entitlements when they explode in our face.. Huh?? Lots of financial people (aka economists) ask those questions. We can't continue to raise it forever, but it's no where near an unusual dept to GDP crisis. The end of the SS surplus is straight from the trustees report on SSA.GOV, The demographics of the number of baby boomers vs the following generations who have to pay the bill is available from the census. The amount of our debt that is held by foreigners is from the treasury department. The percentage of discretionary spending vs entitlements, out in the future is from OMB. You may disagree with how I connect the dots but the dots are fact. Typically, dots are connected with some sort of logic. :) -- Nom=de=Plume |
Consideration required
In article ,
says... On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 07:52:24 -0500, BAR wrote: In article , says... On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 20:17:08 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: According to you. If you do much reading, you will find a lot of financial people are asking the same questions about how long we can continue the raise the debt limit and how we will deal with the entitlements when they explode in our face.. Huh?? Lots of financial people (aka economists) ask those questions. We can't continue to raise it forever, but it's no where near an unusual dept to GDP crisis. The end of the SS surplus is straight from the trustees report on SSA.GOV, The demographics of the number of baby boomers vs the following generations who have to pay the bill is available from the census. The amount of our debt that is held by foreigners is from the treasury department. The percentage of discretionary spending vs entitlements, out in the future is from OMB. You may disagree with how I connect the dots but the dots are fact. Typically, dots are connected with some sort of logic. :) The warnings are out there but sometimes you just have to let the baby touch the stove. See you in 2012 At least one elected official knows what to do: http://wcbstv.com/local/governor.chr...2.1487727.html The problem with the US economy is the biggest chunk of our spending in 10 years will be "entitlements" that you can't "freeze". They grow on their own, unless you want to throw grandma from the train. You have to start somewhere. And, it is good to know that someone has the political courage to do what is needed. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:29 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com