|
BREAKING: Brown Wins in Mass. Race
"bpuharic" wrote in message ... On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 08:24:26 -0700, Canuck57 wrote: On 24/01/2010 3:50 AM, bpuharic wrote: On Sat, 23 Jan 2010 22:11:10 -0800, "CalifBill" wrote: i did my grad work at lehigh. they didn't admit women until '71. neither did princeton. there's still alot of bias in the system Can one imagine the howling if I set up a institution with the same funding like UNCF but called it UWCF? and how many blacks used to own whites? let's see....the right believes that obama's been president for 8 years. and that slavery never happened. what other interesting facts of history will the right wing invent? stay tuned! Racism is a two sided coin and isn't always what it seems. In fact, cries of racism are often crying wolf when there is no wolf. And the disease where it exists is not limited to WASPs, in fact some of the worst racism I have ever seen whas not white initiated. ever hear of 'loving vs virginia'? why not tell us about how it was illegal for blacks to marry whites until 1972 and how that proves racism never existed in the US, OK? as to black racism, its first victim is other blacks and the way it cripples black achievement. BUT blacks never sat on the boards of big companies, were CEO's etc. until racism became disgusting which didn't happen all that long ago. so tell us how blacks used to lynch whites, and other right wing stories. i love a good fairy tale You are very uninformed. Blacks owned slaves in the south. Did you know that? |
BREAKING: Brown Wins in Mass. Race
|
BREAKING: Brown Wins in Mass. Race
On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 15:51:04 -0800, "nom=de=plume"
wrote: wrote in message .. . On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 12:23:09 -0500, bpuharic wrote: It sure sounds like that was a bi-partisan screwing if those 2 deregulation bills were the cause. The democrats and Bill Clinton were leading the charge to pump up the market and increase corporate power over us. Stop blaming Clinton and the democrats for something that's obviously been supported far longer and with more fervor by the right wing. yeah that's plain nuts. if he could, he'd blame obama for the civil war... |
BREAKING: Brown Wins in Mass. Race
wrote:
On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 12:56:42 -0500, bpuharic wrote: On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 12:41:30 -0500, Harry wrote: wrote: On Sat, 23 Jan 2010 14:17:14 -0500, bpuharic wrote: it was corporate america's attitude that destroyed GM, not the UAW. What was GM's largest financial liability? Just a wild ass guess. LABOR nope. less than 10% of the vehicle's price but, of course, that's what the right whine WOULD guess You are right that the average labor cost in a GM car is about $1600 but the burden is the additional obligations to retirees that adds another $2000 to that car. It didn't help that GM has been buying out the boomers with full pensions and benefits when they are in their 50s. It is just a way to make your bottom line look better and offload the problem onto the taxpayer. I believe Detroit management and the UAW share responsibility here. You righties seem to have no understanding whatsoever about the purpose of a labor union. That purpose is to advocate for its members for better wages, hours, working conditions and fringe benefits, and to protect its members from the arbitrary decisions of management. Unions are not responsible for the screw-ups of management. |
BREAKING: Brown Wins in Mass. Race
|
BREAKING: Brown Wins in Mass. Race
On 24/01/2010 5:23 PM, bpuharic wrote:
He was trying to say stocks are overpriced right now. If "right now" is last week I agree There was a big correction Thursday and Friday after Obama announced he was cracking down on wall street. great the thieves are getting worried No, the thieves like me have already cashed out waiting for dips and good prices as people panic. Made 30%+ last year on this trick. I was cashing out in December and the first week of January. Have to love this volitily. Cha-ching! All possible for lib-dimwits insatiable need for cheap easy debt. The real question is if that will blow over and people will continue to buy the market up or whether they will cash in and wait for better news before the start buying again. the real question is if congress will let the president reign in the banks or will they start the traditional crap about class warfare like one republican did last week Hot air tought talk on Obama is a ruse, BS, sucker bait. Banks has him by the balls. A better position than GM had, and GM got $100 billion for it's criminal debt problems. Just hot air from talk a lot. Sounds like a street jive,w e will get the money back. Who is he BSing? GM on the books only owes US treasury $6.7 billion. You do the math. Just flack. Obama is mad because China is pulling his credit. Just like a spoiled debtor that didn't pay the car loan blaming the bank. |
BREAKING: Brown Wins in Mass. Race
"Harry" wrote in message ... wrote: It didn't help that GM has been buying out the boomers with full pensions and benefits when they are in their 50s. It is just a way to make your bottom line look better and offload the problem onto the taxpayer. I believe Detroit management and the UAW share responsibility here. You righties seem to have no understanding whatsoever about the purpose of a labor union. That purpose is to advocate for its members for better wages, hours, working conditions and fringe benefits, and to protect its members from the arbitrary decisions of management. Unions are not responsible for the screw-ups of management. Wait a minute. The labor unions have had a mighty strong negotiating positions with management for many years. Those negotiations affect management decisions, good or bad. You can't say that unions don't have an affect on the company's direction or future, as you have already stated that their purpose includes "to protect its members from the arbitrary decisions of management." Eisboch |
BREAKING: Brown Wins in Mass. Race
"bpuharic" wrote in message ... On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 09:13:12 -0700, Canuck57 wrote: On 23/01/2010 12:01 PM, bpuharic wrote: it's not that government is too large. it's that it's been captured by the very people it's supposed to regulate, and has often turned against the people who give it its power And because the voters are politically corrupted themselves. "Obama will pay for my gas and morgage...". the biggest spender in US history was george bush again and again you keep telling me obama was president for 8 years got proof, or do right winger have a short attention span? ... Low morals, low wisdom, low life entitlement mentality. you guys go on about small govt THEN tell us you want the govt to be in the morals business another contradiction in right wing theology Why do you say Bush is the Biggest Spender? At the rate that Obama and Congress are burning through money, they have almost caught up in a year what it took Congress, both Republican and Democrat controlled versions, and Bush 8 years to spend. The current people in control are talking another stimulus bill. They may pass Bush in 18 months. And set records that will doom us to 3rd world status. Use your boat now, as you will not be able to afford to at the rate Congress and Obama are piling up debt. |
BREAKING: Brown Wins in Mass. Race
"bpuharic" wrote in message
... On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 15:51:04 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: wrote in message . .. On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 12:23:09 -0500, bpuharic wrote: It sure sounds like that was a bi-partisan screwing if those 2 deregulation bills were the cause. The democrats and Bill Clinton were leading the charge to pump up the market and increase corporate power over us. Stop blaming Clinton and the democrats for something that's obviously been supported far longer and with more fervor by the right wing. yeah that's plain nuts. if he could, he'd blame obama for the civil war... Well, he's half black and half white, so it fits. :) -- Nom=de=Plume |
BREAKING: Brown Wins in Mass. Race
"Eisboch" wrote in message
... "Harry" wrote in message ... wrote: It didn't help that GM has been buying out the boomers with full pensions and benefits when they are in their 50s. It is just a way to make your bottom line look better and offload the problem onto the taxpayer. I believe Detroit management and the UAW share responsibility here. You righties seem to have no understanding whatsoever about the purpose of a labor union. That purpose is to advocate for its members for better wages, hours, working conditions and fringe benefits, and to protect its members from the arbitrary decisions of management. Unions are not responsible for the screw-ups of management. Wait a minute. The labor unions have had a mighty strong negotiating positions with management for many years. Those negotiations affect management decisions, good or bad. You can't say that unions don't have an affect on the company's direction or future, as you have already stated that their purpose includes "to protect its members from the arbitrary decisions of management." Eisboch Yes. They have had strong positions in the past. Not so much in recent times. Blame is universal. Now that we've solved this, it's time to get back to the other, more pressing issues, such as John Edward's love child, ummm... the Supreme Court decision. :) -- Nom=de=Plume |
BREAKING: Brown Wins in Mass. Race
"Canuck57" wrote in message
... On 24/01/2010 5:23 PM, bpuharic wrote: He was trying to say stocks are overpriced right now. If "right now" is last week I agree There was a big correction Thursday and Friday after Obama announced he was cracking down on wall street. great the thieves are getting worried No, the thieves like me have already cashed out waiting for dips and good prices as people panic. Made 30%+ last year on this trick. I was cashing out in December and the first week of January. Have to love this volitily. Cha-ching! All possible for lib-dimwits insatiable need for cheap easy debt. The real question is if that will blow over and people will continue to buy the market up or whether they will cash in and wait for better news before the start buying again. the real question is if congress will let the president reign in the banks or will they start the traditional crap about class warfare like one republican did last week Hot air tought talk on Obama is a ruse, BS, sucker bait. Banks has him by the balls. A better position than GM had, and GM got $100 billion for it's criminal debt problems. Just hot air from talk a lot. Sounds like a street jive,w e will get the money back. Who is he BSing? GM on the books only owes US treasury $6.7 billion. You do the math. Just flack. Obama is mad because China is pulling his credit. Just like a spoiled debtor that didn't pay the car loan blaming the bank. Wow... $100B. Let me guess, you pulled that number out of your butt. Actually, I didn't have to guess. -- Nom=de=Plume |
BREAKING: Brown Wins in Mass. Race
|
BREAKING: Brown Wins in Mass. Race
"CalifBill" wrote in message
... "bpuharic" wrote in message ... On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 10:29:22 -0500, John H wrote: Them's blasphemous words around here, my friend. If there's the slightest chance a post can be called 'racist', the libs here will do so, unless a lib made the post, of course. the right thinks that racism never existed in this country...unless it's blacks against poor, innocent, concerned whites... the history of lynching not withstanding Blacks in the south were racist also. Yeah, all those lynchings and cross-burnings. The blacks did it! -- Nom=de=Plume |
BREAKING: Brown Wins in Mass. Race
"CalifBill" wrote in message
... "bpuharic" wrote in message ... On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 09:13:12 -0700, Canuck57 wrote: On 23/01/2010 12:01 PM, bpuharic wrote: it's not that government is too large. it's that it's been captured by the very people it's supposed to regulate, and has often turned against the people who give it its power And because the voters are politically corrupted themselves. "Obama will pay for my gas and morgage...". the biggest spender in US history was george bush again and again you keep telling me obama was president for 8 years got proof, or do right winger have a short attention span? ... Low morals, low wisdom, low life entitlement mentality. you guys go on about small govt THEN tell us you want the govt to be in the morals business another contradiction in right wing theology Why do you say Bush is the Biggest Spender? At the rate that Obama and Congress are burning through money, they have almost caught up in a year what it took Congress, both Republican and Democrat controlled versions, and Bush 8 years to spend. The current people in control are talking another stimulus bill. They may pass Bush in 18 months. And set records that will doom us to 3rd world status. Use your boat now, as you will not be able to afford to at the rate Congress and Obama are piling up debt. Sounds like a paranoid delusion to me... -- Nom=de=Plume |
BREAKING: Brown Wins in Mass. Race
Eisboch wrote:
"Harry" wrote in message ... wrote: It didn't help that GM has been buying out the boomers with full pensions and benefits when they are in their 50s. It is just a way to make your bottom line look better and offload the problem onto the taxpayer. I believe Detroit management and the UAW share responsibility here. You righties seem to have no understanding whatsoever about the purpose of a labor union. That purpose is to advocate for its members for better wages, hours, working conditions and fringe benefits, and to protect its members from the arbitrary decisions of management. Unions are not responsible for the screw-ups of management. Wait a minute. The labor unions have had a mighty strong negotiating positions with management for many years. Those negotiations affect management decisions, good or bad. You can't say that unions don't have an affect on the company's direction or future, as you have already stated that their purpose includes "to protect its members from the arbitrary decisions of management." Eisboch I did not state or imply that unions have no effect on management decisions. I did say a union's responsibility is to its members, not to corporate management or shareholders. |
BREAKING: Brown Wins in Mass. Race
"nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... "CalifBill" wrote in message m... "nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... "CalifBill" wrote in message m... "bpuharic" wrote in message ... You earn $100. You get to keep $90. You earn $100,000. You get to keep $90,000. Which would you pick? Dumb example. People who choose to ignore an education and/or are lazy don't have the option to choose a $100K income. or they could be black, jewish, women, latino, etc. Uneducated black, Jewish, women, Latino, etc. I worked in the Silicon Valley as an engineer. Lots of Jewish, Black and Latino coworkers making in excess of $100k. All had university educations. Lots of black, Jewish, women, Latino, etc. Working as assemblers and janitors and secretaries that made a hell of a lot less than the engineers. They also did not have advanced education. And most of us making a $100k plus were working more hours than those making $35k or so. Probably working harder also. I worked and put myself through college, did take advantage of the corporate tuition reimbursement to help pay for that. Evil corporation, making it advantageous for me to go to school. My nephew, makes very little, mostly odd jobs, 45 years old. Thought he was a computer guru, but never went to JC, or night school to get a certificate, etc. Lazy. Problem with most of those in dire straights, other than those with major health problems, is lack of education or lazy. All true no doubt, but that doesn't include all people making $35K/year. -- Nom=de=Plume 35k is not dire straights. With four kids???? You're cracked. -- Nom=de=Plume And you are clueless to the real world. |
BREAKING: Brown Wins in Mass. Race
|
BREAKING: Brown Wins in Mass. Race
On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 20:09:44 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote:
"Harry" wrote in message ... wrote: It didn't help that GM has been buying out the boomers with full pensions and benefits when they are in their 50s. It is just a way to make your bottom line look better and offload the problem onto the taxpayer. I believe Detroit management and the UAW share responsibility here. You righties seem to have no understanding whatsoever about the purpose of a labor union. That purpose is to advocate for its members for better wages, hours, working conditions and fringe benefits, and to protect its members from the arbitrary decisions of management. Unions are not responsible for the screw-ups of management. Wait a minute. The labor unions have had a mighty strong negotiating positions with management for many years. how? if management didnt like the deal, they shut down the plant and move to a right to work state that the right wing has so thoughtfully provided. or they just wait out the strike then hire scabs, legal because of the right wing unions have no power at all. that's why they dont exist in this country |
BREAKING: Brown Wins in Mass. Race
On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 17:58:45 -0700, Canuck57
wrote: On 24/01/2010 5:23 PM, bpuharic wrote: He was trying to say stocks are overpriced right now. If "right now" is last week I agree There was a big correction Thursday and Friday after Obama announced he was cracking down on wall street. great the thieves are getting worried No, the thieves like me have already cashed out waiting for dips and good prices as people panic. Made 30%+ last year on this trick. I was cashing out in December and the first week of January. no, the thieves are worried that they cant continue stealing. Have to love this volitily. Cha-ching! All possible for lib-dimwits insatiable need for cheap easy debt. unfortunately i work for a living. dont have time to do everything. unlike wall street i actually work in a productive capacity The real question is if that will blow over and people will continue to buy the market up or whether they will cash in and wait for better news before the start buying again. the real question is if congress will let the president reign in the banks or will they start the traditional crap about class warfare like one republican did last week Hot air tought talk on Obama is a ruse, BS, sucker bait. Banks has him by the balls. A better position than GM had, and GM got $100 billion for it's criminal debt problems. that may be right. we'll see. and GM? got the bailout from bush...that's when the plan was developed you right whiners think obama's been president for 8 years Just hot air from talk a lot. Sounds like a street jive,w e will get the money back. Who is he BSing? GM on the books only owes US treasury $6.7 billion. You do the math. Just flack. Obama is mad because China is pulling his credit. Just like a spoiled debtor that didn't pay the car loan blaming the bank. GM's bailout is 3% of TARP. how much did bush spend on AIG? |
BREAKING: Brown Wins in Mass. Race
On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 17:51:45 -0700, Canuck57
wrote: On 24/01/2010 4:45 PM, wrote: We are due for a correction, question is how deap will it go this time. My guess is below 10,000 on the Dow is almost certain. Maybe 9000 in two weeks? depends on how much wall street thinks it can steal With China pulling back on credit, Obama is broke and looking for $1.9 trillion for this years debt-spend, Japan is in toruble too, unemployment up again, I would say wild assed dips are a coming. Only the threat of currency deflation keeps stocks this high. Are we sure Obama isn't Osama's brother? bush maxed out the US credit card you j ust think obama's been president for 8 years and the crack about osama merely shows how paranoid the right really is. bush tortured american citizens. and you righties said zip |
BREAKING: Brown Wins in Mass. Race
On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 17:24:52 -0800, "nom=de=plume"
wrote: Are we sure Obama isn't Osama's brother? You're a racist. We're sure of that damn straight |
BREAKING: Brown Wins in Mass. Race
On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 17:41:22 -0700, Canuck57
wrote: On 24/01/2010 10:42 AM, bpuharic wrote: On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 12:22:41 -0500, wrote: On Sat, 23 Jan 2010 17:17:30 -0700, wrote: Time will tell but the market is over bought for the fundimentals which tells me inflation is the cause. Jobless recovery at best. Agreed, put in some stop loss orders if you want to lock in profits, although it would have been better done last week. I have unrealized sell orders in on a few items, looking for one more little bounce. Money does tend to pile onto anything that looks like it is going up, whether it is rational or not. Usually it isn't core inflation was about 2% last year. care to try again? Core inflation is higher, the 2% number is government BS. Take GDP growth, I think November. Up something like 1.3% while jobs losses still on the rise. That is inflation, not a recovery. more bull****. growth with fewer people is called 'productiivity' not inflation you're jus an idiot View a recovery as GSP grows more than infation and jobs follow suit. Haven't seen any indication of that at all. your view of the economy is based on your 5000 calorie a day diet at mcdonalds |
BREAKING: Brown Wins in Mass. Race
On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 17:01:55 -0800, "CalifBill"
wrote: "bpuharic" wrote in message .. . On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 08:15:44 -0700, Canuck57 wrote: so colleges that ran capitalist enterprises didnt admit women and yet the right winger said this had no influence on women's earning power more proof of the delusions of the right wing If white and a college education make for being rich, how come you are ****ing and moning about no money? i never said it did. i said being white, male and educated means you'll probably make more money than being black, male and educated |
BREAKING: Brown Wins in Mass. Race
On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 17:11:59 -0800, "CalifBill"
wrote: "bpuharic" wrote in message .. . On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 09:13:12 -0700, Canuck57 wrote: you guys go on about small govt THEN tell us you want the govt to be in the morals business another contradiction in right wing theology Why do you say Bush is the Biggest Spender? At the rate that Obama and Congress are burning through money, they have almost caught up in a year irrelevant. teh world tried your method. it was called the '29 crash. how'd that work out for you? what it took Congress, both Republican and Democrat controlled versions, and Bush 8 years to spend. The current people in control are talking another stimulus bill. They may pass Bush in 18 months. And set records that will doom us to 3rd world status. Use your boat now, as you will not be able to afford to at the rate Congress and Obama are piling up debt. of course you prefer 25% unemployment for the middle class. after all, let 'em eat cake, right? |
BREAKING: Brown Wins in Mass. Race
On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 19:00:30 -0700, Canuck57
wrote: On 24/01/2010 4:54 PM, nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... On It would only work if it went back up. In addition, there's no way to know when the bottom is reached, so your proposition of being able to time the market is nonsense. First, your fund manager is a fraud. Please, consider to fire them. every fund manager was a fraud. if they ALL were frauds then fraud was built into the system Your fund manager should be doing this. 8 hours a day and missed it? There were 100's of deals like this. Some much better, this was far from my best one. they dont give a **** about the middle class. they only care about their big investors. wall street views the middle class as a bottomless piggybank, courtesy of morons like you |
BREAKING: Brown Wins in Mass. Race
"CalifBill" wrote in message
m... "nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... "CalifBill" wrote in message m... "nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... "CalifBill" wrote in message m... "bpuharic" wrote in message ... You earn $100. You get to keep $90. You earn $100,000. You get to keep $90,000. Which would you pick? Dumb example. People who choose to ignore an education and/or are lazy don't have the option to choose a $100K income. or they could be black, jewish, women, latino, etc. Uneducated black, Jewish, women, Latino, etc. I worked in the Silicon Valley as an engineer. Lots of Jewish, Black and Latino coworkers making in excess of $100k. All had university educations. Lots of black, Jewish, women, Latino, etc. Working as assemblers and janitors and secretaries that made a hell of a lot less than the engineers. They also did not have advanced education. And most of us making a $100k plus were working more hours than those making $35k or so. Probably working harder also. I worked and put myself through college, did take advantage of the corporate tuition reimbursement to help pay for that. Evil corporation, making it advantageous for me to go to school. My nephew, makes very little, mostly odd jobs, 45 years old. Thought he was a computer guru, but never went to JC, or night school to get a certificate, etc. Lazy. Problem with most of those in dire straights, other than those with major health problems, is lack of education or lazy. All true no doubt, but that doesn't include all people making $35K/year. -- Nom=de=Plume 35k is not dire straights. With four kids???? You're cracked. -- Nom=de=Plume And you are clueless to the real world. Really. Please show us where in the US that $35K/year for a family with four kids is doing well... go for it. -- Nom=de=Plume |
BREAKING: Brown Wins in Mass. Race
wrote in message
... On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 11:01:46 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: What is the alternative, communism? Every time it has actually been tried you still ended up with a two tier society with rich aparachicks and slave workers. The only communist society that still survives from the early 20th century experiments is Cuba. Even Cuba is nibbling around the edges of the free market. The alternative is a well-regulated capitalistic economy. That actually works. We are agreeing again. I'm mostly an agreeable person. :) You were following the progression of the conversation about the two major bank de-regulation bills and who voted for them? You really can't blame either one of them on either party. In fact 51 of the 60 representatives who voted AGAINST the 2000 commodities deregulation act that allowed all of those credit default swaps were republicans. http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2000/roll603.xml The senate passed it with unanimous consent And, 133 voted for it. And, 157 others voted for it. Seems pretty evenly divided... -- Nom=de=Plume |
BREAKING: Brown Wins in Mass. Race
On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 18:43:42 -0800, "nom=de=plume"
wrote: "CalifBill" wrote in message om... 35k is not dire straights. With four kids???? You're cracked. -- Nom=de=Plume And you are clueless to the real world. Really. Please show us where in the US that $35K/year for a family with four kids is doing well... go for it. for the right wing, $35K is 35K too much for a family of 4. |
BREAKING: Brown Wins in Mass. Race
"Harry" wrote in message m... On 1/24/10 9:00 PM, Canuck57 wrote: Simple principles: - average in during bad times estimating dips. - average out in good times estimating peeks. - diversify. - before you buy know why and set a sell target. You are quite the trip...my guess is that you work as a stock boy at 7-11. I don't know what he does for a living, but I did almost exactly the same thing with Ford. I am not a big player in the stock market. Never was. Never invested any more than I could afford to lose. Never participated in a 401K. Never trusted or depended on anyone else to plan or provide for my retirement. But, back when all the uproar was going on with Ford, GM and Chrysler I had a hunch Ford was going to come out a winner when they announced they didn't want or need any government bailout money. So, I bought a bunch at $1.60. Sold a bunch at $8.60, a bunch more at $10. Still have some. So, count me in at the 7-11 school. I might buy a new boat this spring. Eisboch |
BREAKING: Brown Wins in Mass. Race
"bpuharic" wrote in message ... On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 18:36:06 -0500, wrote: On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 12:24:30 -0500, bpuharic wrote: What was GM's largest financial liability? it wasn't labor. labor accounts for less than 10% of a car's cost try again...you already proved how much right wingers hate the middle class when you blamed us for the financial meltdown, instead of your god, wall street. You try again, The biggest cost of a GM car was the pension and benefit obligation ... and we ARE the middle class and in many other countries, such costs are picked up by the govt. the US is engaged in a race to the bottom And where does the "government" get this mana from heaven? |
BREAKING: Brown Wins in Mass. Race
"bpuharic" wrote in message ... On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 15:54:46 -0800, "CalifBill" wrote: "bpuharic" wrote in message . .. On Sat, 23 Jan 2010 22:11:10 -0800, "CalifBill" wrote: i did my grad work at lehigh. they didn't admit women until '71. neither did princeton. there's still alot of bias in the system So you went to racist, sexist school. i went there in 1980 Bad for you. Every school I went to had blacks, Latinos, and every religion possible and all 3 sexes. lehigh didn't. MIT didnt. princeton didn't. believe it or not, those schools have SOME influence on corporate america I did go to school in San Francisco. Hell, I was a minority at San Francisco City College. And we even allowed a future murderer to matriculate there when I was going to school. OJ Simpson. My best friend growing up was Chinese and my mom's best friend and her LVN was black. Too bad you grew up in a racist area. Must have rubbed off on you. tell it to MIT and princeton. Both stupid and ignorant. MIT graduated the first black student in 1890 or so. Customer of mine in the 1980's was a black MIT graduate. May not have been a lot, but there were black students. |
BREAKING: Brown Wins in Mass. Race
"nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... "CalifBill" wrote in message ... "bpuharic" wrote in message ... On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 10:29:22 -0500, John H wrote: Them's blasphemous words around here, my friend. If there's the slightest chance a post can be called 'racist', the libs here will do so, unless a lib made the post, of course. the right thinks that racism never existed in this country...unless it's blacks against poor, innocent, concerned whites... the history of lynching not withstanding Blacks in the south were racist also. Yeah, all those lynchings and cross-burnings. The blacks did it! -- Nom=de=Plume Moron. |
BREAKING: Brown Wins in Mass. Race
"bpuharic" wrote in message ... On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 16:04:26 -0800, "CalifBill" wrote: "bpuharic" wrote in message . .. On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 08:24:26 -0700, Canuck57 wrote: BUT blacks never sat on the boards of big companies, were CEO's etc. until racism became disgusting which didn't happen all that long ago. so tell us how blacks used to lynch whites, and other right wing stories. i love a good fairy tale You are very uninformed. Blacks owned slaves in the south. Did you know that? ROFLMAO!! yes, i knew that. both of them. and it's the exception that proves the rule. you right wingers just love your little myths, don't you? Only 26% of North Carolina people owned slaves. Ignorant twit. |
BREAKING: Brown Wins in Mass. Race
wrote in message
... On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 15:51:04 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: Stop blaming Clinton and the democrats for something that's obviously been supported far longer and with more fervor by the right wing. Why? You have seen the votes by now. It was 51 GOP representatives and 9 democrats that opposed the deregulation of CDOs. And, it began long before that vote. You act like that was the beginning or the end of the situation. -- Nom=de=Plume |
BREAKING: Brown Wins in Mass. Race
wrote in message
... On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 15:52:19 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: wrote in message . .. On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 12:24:30 -0500, bpuharic wrote: What was GM's largest financial liability? it wasn't labor. labor accounts for less than 10% of a car's cost try again...you already proved how much right wingers hate the middle class when you blamed us for the financial meltdown, instead of your god, wall street. You try again, The biggest cost of a GM car was the pension and benefit obligation ... and we ARE the middle class Which were negotiated liabilities. You act like the unions were in charge. Management made the deals too. I have said it was a shared responsibility. Why do you think I am saying any one faction did this. That is you guys. This is not a right wing thing it is all a shared responsibility. Please show me where I said it was one side. -- Nom=de=Plume |
BREAKING: Brown Wins in Mass. Race
wrote in message
... On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 17:22:39 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: it's time to get back to the other, more pressing issues, such as John Edward's love child Which one? There are two now. Oh sh*t!!! lol -- Nom=de=Plume |
BREAKING: Brown Wins in Mass. Race
"bpuharic" wrote in message ... On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 17:01:55 -0800, "CalifBill" wrote: "bpuharic" wrote in message . .. On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 08:15:44 -0700, Canuck57 wrote: so colleges that ran capitalist enterprises didnt admit women and yet the right winger said this had no influence on women's earning power more proof of the delusions of the right wing If white and a college education make for being rich, how come you are ****ing and moning about no money? i never said it did. i said being white, male and educated means you'll probably make more money than being black, male and educated Not what you stated at all. |
BREAKING: Brown Wins in Mass. Race
"bpuharic" wrote in message ... On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 17:11:59 -0800, "CalifBill" wrote: "bpuharic" wrote in message . .. On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 09:13:12 -0700, Canuck57 wrote: you guys go on about small govt THEN tell us you want the govt to be in the morals business another contradiction in right wing theology Why do you say Bush is the Biggest Spender? At the rate that Obama and Congress are burning through money, they have almost caught up in a year irrelevant. teh world tried your method. it was called the '29 crash. how'd that work out for you? what it took Congress, both Republican and Democrat controlled versions, and Bush 8 years to spend. The current people in control are talking another stimulus bill. They may pass Bush in 18 months. And set records that will doom us to 3rd world status. Use your boat now, as you will not be able to afford to at the rate Congress and Obama are piling up debt. of course you prefer 25% unemployment for the middle class. after all, let 'em eat cake, right? We probably are near that now. Where ate the jobs? Where is the potential for private sector jobs under this stimulus stuff. |
BREAKING: Brown Wins in Mass. Race
wrote in message
... On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 18:46:25 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: You were following the progression of the conversation about the two major bank de-regulation bills and who voted for them? You really can't blame either one of them on either party. In fact 51 of the 60 representatives who voted AGAINST the 2000 commodities deregulation act that allowed all of those credit default swaps were republicans. http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2000/roll603.xml The senate passed it with unanimous consent And, 133 voted for it. And, 157 others voted for it. Seems pretty evenly divided... Look at who voted against it. Those are the guys who knew it was trouble. Maybe, it that one instance. I'm better they didn't vote against similar in the years prior or since. -- Nom=de=Plume |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:20 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com