On Jan 20, 7:20*am, Harry wrote:
Canuck57 wrote:
On 20/01/2010 4:17 AM, bpuharic wrote:
On Tue, 19 Jan 2010 20:17:09 -0700,
wrote:

Democrats bit the dust, a hint of what November will bring...

probably right. americans always will vote for politicians who cater
to the rich.

How long was that seat liberal-democrat? *46 years or more? *Well, tells
you what people think about Obamanomics, *liberal corruption-debt-spend
and liberal health care tax grab.

i love it. this guy thinks obama's been president for 8 years. the
depression started in dec. 2007. guess he forgot bush was president
back then.

I know full well when the depression started, and agree. *When Democrat
congress say interest rates invert over inflation, they did squat with
the banks to raise raise rates. *It isn't Bush that deterimines interest
rates, this ia congress-federal reserve.

But like most liberal debt mongers, they insisted on low rates and to
hell with the pending depression.

Now you have a president that thinks he can debt-bailout-spend his way
out of debt.

Obama's honeymoon just ended with one year in office. *One year of
Ombama has democrats voting republican. *LMAO.

yep. the american voter will ALWAYS vote to protect the rich.

Yu mean protect themselves. *Obamanomics is dangerious, he should have
had the 10 years of his child hood in an American school to learn about
1929. *Then he would be less likely to make the same damned misakes.

1929...the first major GOP-caused financial disaster of the 20th Century.

Read ups a bit on Joseph Kennedy, will you, Krause?