Jim wrote:
C. Mor Butts wrote:
On Tue, 19 Jan 2010 21:08:52 -0800, "Steve B"
wrote:

"Canuck57" wrote in message
...
Democrats bit the dust, a hint of what November will bring...

How long was that seat liberal-democrat? 46 years or more? Well,
tells you what people think about Obamanomics, liberal
corruption-debt-spend and liberal health care tax grab.

Obama's honeymoon just ended with one year in office. One year of
Ombama has democrats voting republican. LMAO.

Some democrat aught to email this to Obama:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UiM6JAQZwHI
The Dems can still put the bill through with the "reconciliation"
clause which requires a vote of 51, so the fat lady hasn't sung yet.
It WILL be interesting now to see the tap-dancing and posturing of
Democrats who are up for re-election. Some have already declared,
"I'm out of here" and won't be running. They are smart men who know
they can take their spoils and retire comfortably. The greedy and
stupid will stay, and take what they get. An armed insurrection is
in order to clean the Halls of Congress.

Steve

You really ought to run for congress, Steve. I don't know anyone in
rec.boats who has a better take on things. We really need to promote
people who don't have big lips, bulging eyes and nappy hair.

I'm with ya when you decide to run.

Nice spoofing Harry, except your writing style and sore ass shines
through the camouflage.


Sorry, ****-for-brains...not one of mine. I've been...busy. My new photo
printer arrived late yesterday, and I've been occupied setting it up,
calibrating my monitor and loading in various paper profiles. I suppose
I could have bought a golf club, but the printer was more expensive.

As always, ESAD.

D.Duck wrote:
mgg wrote:
"Canuck57" wrote in message
...
Democrats bit the dust, a hint of what November will bring...

How long was that seat liberal-democrat? 46 years or more? Well,
tells you what people think about Obamanomics, liberal
corruption-debt-spend and liberal health care tax grab.

Obama's honeymoon just ended with one year in office. One year of
Ombama has democrats voting republican. LMAO.

Some democrat aught to email this to Obama:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UiM6JAQZwHI


Hehe, especially since 3 out of 4 voters in MA are democrat... that
says A LOT!!!

Time to listen to the lefties (harry mainly) WHINE.

--Mike



He hasn't received the official D spin by special courier yet or he
would have been here by now.


Y-A-W-N.

"thunder" wrote in message
t...
On Tue, 19 Jan 2010 19:53:39 -0800, mgg wrote:


Hehe, especially since 3 out of 4 voters in MA are democrat... that says
A LOT!!!

Not exactly true. Of those that registered with a party, Democrats
outnumber Republicans 3 to 1. However, 50% of the voters are
Independents.


Massachusetts politics is a bit different than in most states, I think.
Although generally regarded as
one of the "bluest" of the blue states, it has often amazed me at the number
of conservative political
views that are expressed and held here, even among registered Democrats.

Overall, those who are registered Democrats tend to be far more conservative
than those more liberal Democrats found in other states. If you recall,
these MA conservative Democrats swung MA for Reagan twice, and although
still predominately Democratic, MA often elects a Republican governor.

Eisboch

Harry wrote:
D.Duck wrote:
mgg wrote:
"Canuck57" wrote in message
...
Democrats bit the dust, a hint of what November will bring...

How long was that seat liberal-democrat? 46 years or more? Well,
tells you what people think about Obamanomics, liberal
corruption-debt-spend and liberal health care tax grab.

Obama's honeymoon just ended with one year in office. One year of
Ombama has democrats voting republican. LMAO.

Some democrat aught to email this to Obama:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UiM6JAQZwHI


Hehe, especially since 3 out of 4 voters in MA are democrat... that
says A LOT!!!

Time to listen to the lefties (harry mainly) WHINE.

--Mike



He hasn't received the official D spin by special courier yet or he
would have been here by now.


Y-A-W-N.

Thats it? That's your spin? That's your contempt for the voters in Mass.
that have seen the light? You are truly whipped by this upset election,
aren't you?
Y A W N indeed. Waa ha ha.

On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 06:47:56 -0500, Eisboch wrote:

"thunder" wrote in message
t...
On Tue, 19 Jan 2010 19:53:39 -0800, mgg wrote:


Hehe, especially since 3 out of 4 voters in MA are democrat... that
says A LOT!!!

Not exactly true. Of those that registered with a party, Democrats
outnumber Republicans 3 to 1. However, 50% of the voters are
Independents.


Massachusetts politics is a bit different than in most states, I think.
Although generally regarded as
one of the "bluest" of the blue states, it has often amazed me at the
number of conservative political
views that are expressed and held here, even among registered Democrats.

Overall, those who are registered Democrats tend to be far more
conservative than those more liberal Democrats found in other states.
If you recall, these MA conservative Democrats swung MA for Reagan
twice, and although still predominately Democratic, MA often elects a
Republican governor.

Eisboch

I'd also suspect your state's conservatives aren't as conservative as in
many states. As an example, your newest Senator would be considered
quite Liberal in some states. What do you think of him? He seems like a
good balance of fiscal conservancy and social consciousness.

On Jan 20, 6:17*am, bpuharic wrote:
On Tue, 19 Jan 2010 20:17:09 -0700, Canuck57
wrote:



Democrats bit the dust, a hint of what November will bring...

Obama's honeymoon just ended with one year in office. *One year of
Ombama has democrats voting republican. *LMAO.

yep. the american voter will ALWAYS vote to protect the rich.

What about BO and the recent super majority of dems? I suppose they
"always" do except when they don't.

Face it, the American voters are tired of the big-spending democrats
after only a year. This attempt at socialism is on its way out.

Buh-bye.

"thunder" wrote in message
t...

I'd also suspect your state's conservatives aren't as conservative as in
many states. As an example, your newest Senator would be considered
quite Liberal in some states. What do you think of him? He seems like a
good balance of fiscal conservancy and social consciousness.


I like his truck.


Eisboch

"thunder" wrote in message
t...

I'd also suspect your state's conservatives aren't as conservative as in
many states. As an example, your newest Senator would be considered
quite Liberal in some states.


I would agree. I have friends here that have been lifetime Democrats and
others
who are lifetime Republicans. The Dems tend to be more conservative than
those
elsewhere and the Republicans tend to be more liberal.

Virtually all of them are disgusted with the current crop of Washington DC
bureaucrats, on both sides
of the political spectrum.

Eisboch

On 20/01/2010 4:17 AM, bpuharic wrote:
On Tue, 19 Jan 2010 20:17:09 -0700,
wrote:


Democrats bit the dust, a hint of what November will bring...

probably right. americans always will vote for politicians who cater
to the rich.


How long was that seat liberal-democrat? 46 years or more? Well, tells
you what people think about Obamanomics, liberal corruption-debt-spend
and liberal health care tax grab.

i love it. this guy thinks obama's been president for 8 years. the
depression started in dec. 2007. guess he forgot bush was president
back then.

I know full well when the depression started, and agree. When Democrat
congress say interest rates invert over inflation, they did squat with
the banks to raise raise rates. It isn't Bush that deterimines interest
rates, this ia congress-federal reserve.

But like most liberal debt mongers, they insisted on low rates and to
hell with the pending depression.

Now you have a president that thinks he can debt-bailout-spend his way
out of debt.

Obama's honeymoon just ended with one year in office. One year of
Ombama has democrats voting republican. LMAO.

yep. the american voter will ALWAYS vote to protect the rich.

Yu mean protect themselves. Obamanomics is dangerious, he should have
had the 10 years of his child hood in an American school to learn about
1929. Then he would be less likely to make the same damned misakes.

Canuck57 wrote:
On 20/01/2010 4:17 AM, bpuharic wrote:
On Tue, 19 Jan 2010 20:17:09 -0700,
wrote:


Democrats bit the dust, a hint of what November will bring...

probably right. americans always will vote for politicians who cater
to the rich.


How long was that seat liberal-democrat? 46 years or more? Well, tells
you what people think about Obamanomics, liberal corruption-debt-spend
and liberal health care tax grab.

i love it. this guy thinks obama's been president for 8 years. the
depression started in dec. 2007. guess he forgot bush was president
back then.

I know full well when the depression started, and agree. When Democrat
congress say interest rates invert over inflation, they did squat with
the banks to raise raise rates. It isn't Bush that deterimines interest
rates, this ia congress-federal reserve.

But like most liberal debt mongers, they insisted on low rates and to
hell with the pending depression.

Now you have a president that thinks he can debt-bailout-spend his way
out of debt.

Obama's honeymoon just ended with one year in office. One year of
Ombama has democrats voting republican. LMAO.

yep. the american voter will ALWAYS vote to protect the rich.

Yu mean protect themselves. Obamanomics is dangerious, he should have
had the 10 years of his child hood in an American school to learn about
1929. Then he would be less likely to make the same damned misakes.


1929...the first major GOP-caused financial disaster of the 20th Century.