|
Brown Wins, Democrats bit the dust
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 19:49:53 -0500, "D.Duck" wrote:
bpuharic wrote: you're right. let's reserve socialism for the ultra rich. the middle class deserves nothing but the bill The capital gains tax applies equally to everyone. The "middle class" can buy and sell securities just like the "ultra rich". capital gains, however, dont another sign of the delusion of the right wing |
Brown Wins, Democrats bit the dust
On 20/01/2010 4:27 PM, bpuharic wrote:
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 06:17:19 -0700, wrote: On 20/01/2010 4:17 AM, bpuharic wrote: On Tue, 19 Jan 2010 20:17:09 -0700, wrote: Democrats bit the dust, a hint of what November will bring... probably right. americans always will vote for politicians who cater to the rich. How long was that seat liberal-democrat? 46 years or more? Well, tells you what people think about Obamanomics, liberal corruption-debt-spend and liberal health care tax grab. i love it. this guy thinks obama's been president for 8 years. the depression started in dec. 2007. guess he forgot bush was president back then. I know full well when the depression started, and agree. When Democrat congress say interest rates invert over inflation, they did squat with the banks to raise raise rates. It isn't Bush that deterimines interest rates, this ia congress-federal reserve. actually congress has zip to do with it. the fed is an independent institution But like most liberal debt mongers, they insisted on low rates and to hell with the pending depression. Now you have a president that thinks he can debt-bailout-spend his way out of debt. a policy developed under bush because the GOP stole SO much money from the middle class it has zip left to spend it's no wonder rich incomes increased by over 200% in the last 10 years while middle class incomes went DOWN Obama's honeymoon just ended with one year in office. One year of Ombama has democrats voting republican. LMAO. yep. the american voter will ALWAYS vote to protect the rich. Yu mean protect themselves. Obamanomics is dangerious, he should have had the 10 years of his child hood in an American school to learn about 1929. Then he would be less likely to make the same damned misakes. yeah let's bring back socialism for the rich, like god meant it to be Don't you liberal twits ever wonder why the average people don't see the effects of $2 trillion of democrat debt-corruption-bailout spend? Because it democrats are litterly giving the farm to the ubber-ultra-rich. You could eliminate personal income tax and it would be less than $2 trillion. Now that would firestart the economy big time as working people would have more money. It would instantly end the recession to eliminate federal income tax for a few years. http://www.taxpolicycenter.org/brief...rs/revenue.cfm Read and weap. The reason the USA has a failing economy is because of government corruption and special emphasis on Washington DC democrats. The biggest debt spenders of all time when rated as debt/time. No one is corrupt like a democrat. Screwing Americans silly. And I mean screwing working Americans like a herd of dumb sheep to slaughter. Democrats are selling out American financial liberty. The people have no idea how bad they are being screwed. |
Brown Wins, Democrats bit the dust
"Canuck57" wrote in message ... On 20/01/2010 4:27 PM, bpuharic wrote: On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 06:17:19 -0700, wrote: On 20/01/2010 4:17 AM, bpuharic wrote: On Tue, 19 Jan 2010 20:17:09 -0700, wrote: Democrats bit the dust, a hint of what November will bring... probably right. americans always will vote for politicians who cater to the rich. How long was that seat liberal-democrat? 46 years or more? Well, tells you what people think about Obamanomics, liberal corruption-debt-spend and liberal health care tax grab. i love it. this guy thinks obama's been president for 8 years. the depression started in dec. 2007. guess he forgot bush was president back then. I know full well when the depression started, and agree. When Democrat congress say interest rates invert over inflation, they did squat with the banks to raise raise rates. It isn't Bush that deterimines interest rates, this ia congress-federal reserve. actually congress has zip to do with it. the fed is an independent institution But like most liberal debt mongers, they insisted on low rates and to hell with the pending depression. Now you have a president that thinks he can debt-bailout-spend his way out of debt. a policy developed under bush because the GOP stole SO much money from the middle class it has zip left to spend it's no wonder rich incomes increased by over 200% in the last 10 years while middle class incomes went DOWN Obama's honeymoon just ended with one year in office. One year of Ombama has democrats voting republican. LMAO. yep. the american voter will ALWAYS vote to protect the rich. Yu mean protect themselves. Obamanomics is dangerious, he should have had the 10 years of his child hood in an American school to learn about 1929. Then he would be less likely to make the same damned misakes. yeah let's bring back socialism for the rich, like god meant it to be Don't you liberal twits ever wonder why the average people don't see the effects of $2 trillion of democrat debt-corruption-bailout spend? Because it democrats are litterly giving the farm to the ubber-ultra-rich. You could eliminate personal income tax and it would be less than $2 trillion. Now that would firestart the economy big time as working people would have more money. It would instantly end the recession to eliminate federal income tax for a few years. http://www.taxpolicycenter.org/brief...rs/revenue.cfm Read and weap. The reason the USA has a failing economy is because of government corruption and special emphasis on Washington DC democrats. The biggest debt spenders of all time when rated as debt/time. No one is corrupt like a democrat. Screwing Americans silly. And I mean screwing working Americans like a herd of dumb sheep to slaughter. Democrats are selling out American financial liberty. The people have no idea how bad they are being screwed. Yes. Most people are totally ignorant of the way government, finances, economics, or most other things work. The man on the street interviews are chilling when people cannot name their representatives either at a local, state, or federal level. And yet, they are so opinionated, and they all write on usenet. Unlike you, who seems at least informed. Your comments above are profound. Steve |
Brown Wins, Democrats bit the dust
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 22:12:51 -0800, "Steve B"
wrote: "bpuharic" wrote in message .. . On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 16:44:18 -0800, "Steve B" you seem to think the GOP proposed tax cuts for middle class wage earners they never have What I do know is that you are a pompous uneducated twit, and becoming a bore. Buh bye. Steve IOW it just ****es you off to have the truth told bye bye! |
Brown Wins, Democrats bit the dust
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 22:03:28 -0700, Canuck57
wrote: On 20/01/2010 4:27 PM, bpuharic wrote: On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 06:17:19 -0700, yeah let's bring back socialism for the rich, like god meant it to be Don't you liberal twits ever wonder why the average people don't see the effects of $2 trillion of democrat debt-corruption-bailout spend? Because it democrats are litterly giving the farm to the ubber-ultra-rich. ROFLMAO!! the GOP controlled the banking system deregulation and made it IMPOSSIBLE NOT TO RESCUE the banks. that's the whole POINT Read and weap. The reason the USA has a failing economy is because of government corruption and special emphasis on Washington DC democrats. The biggest debt spenders of all time when rated as debt/time. the biggest spenders of all time were ronald reagan and george bush II. No one is corrupt like a democrat. Screwing Americans silly. And I mean screwing working Americans like a herd of dumb sheep to slaughter. gee. whens the last time the GOP proposed a middle class tax cut? ever? Democrats are selling out American financial liberty. The people have no idea how bad they are being screwed. and the current rescue package? developed by bernanke under bush |
Brown Wins, Democrats bit the dust
Yes. Most people are totally ignorant of the way government, finances, economics, or most other things work. The man on the street interviews are chilling when people cannot name their representatives either at a local, state, or federal level. And yet, they are so opinionated, and they all write on usenet. Unlike you, who seems at least informed. Your comments above are profound. Steve t think they're deep. just like a cesspool |
Brown Wins, Democrats bit the dust
|
Brown Wins, Democrats bit the dust
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 20:32:49 -0500, I am Tosk wrote:
The results are phenomenal. Remember, the dems who are saying "the pendulum swings, this is normal", less than a year ago were saying the Republican party was dead, "and might not come back for decades". Looks like Pelosi and Reid ruined things for President Obama. To bad really, it will be a shame for the first Black President to go down in history as another failure like Jimi Carter... Ugh, who I voted for;) Scotty Personally, I think the Republican Party is still dead in the water. There is considerable anger at the Democrats ineffectual administration, but you make a big mistake if you think that translates to happiness with Republicans. It doesn't. Take a look at Scott Brown. He should be a new model for the Republican Party. A man who is fiscally conservative, with a social conscience, but he won't be. Instead, the Republican Party will cater to it's fundamentalist Christian base, with a few racist fossils like Herring thrown in. Just look at the numbers, 20 to 25% of the population doesn't make a national party. It's a shrinking and dying demographic. Unless Republicans become more inclusive, their ideas will not be heard. They will continue to wither away. |
Brown Wins, Democrats bit the dust
|
Brown Wins, Democrats bit the dust
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 19:49:53 -0500, "D.Duck" wrote:
bpuharic wrote: On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 08:07:16 -0800, "Steve B" wrote: "bpuharic" wrote in message ... yep. the american voter will ALWAYS vote to protect the rich. Nowadays, anyone who works is deemed rich, so, yes, the republicans cater to the rich. really? capital gains taxes were about 38% when reagan took office today after 30 years of the GOP, they're down to 15% when's the last time the middle class had a 50% tax cut? Apparently, there are a lot of "rich" people in MASS who voted Brown in. The Dems, on the other hand, cater to illegal aliens, lazy ne'er do wells, shiftless welfare cases, lazy *******s, and everyone who wants to increase their monthly bucket of free cash and cheese from the government but won't work. I'M ENTITLED! WHERE'S MAHHHHH CHECK? you're right. let's reserve socialism for the ultra rich. the middle class deserves nothing but the bill The capital gains tax applies equally to everyone. The "middle class" can buy and sell securities just like the "ultra rich". I'll bet this year the capital gains tax is small because most of the gains will be used to cover previous years' losses. Obama could make a lot of folks happy by doing away with the capital gains tax this year. Probably wouldn't cost the government much, but he'd make a lot of folks think he was doing something really special. -- John H All decisions are the result of binary thinking. |
Brown Wins, Democrats bit the dust
On Thu, 21 Jan 2010 06:12:14 -0600, thunder
wrote: On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 20:32:49 -0500, I am Tosk wrote: The results are phenomenal. Remember, the dems who are saying "the pendulum swings, this is normal", less than a year ago were saying the Republican party was dead, "and might not come back for decades". Looks like Pelosi and Reid ruined things for President Obama. To bad really, it will be a shame for the first Black President to go down in history as another failure like Jimi Carter... Ugh, who I voted for;) Scotty Personally, I think the Republican Party is still dead in the water. There is considerable anger at the Democrats ineffectual administration, but you make a big mistake if you think that translates to happiness with Republicans. It doesn't. Take a look at Scott Brown. He should be a new model for the Republican Party. A man who is fiscally conservative, with a social conscience, but he won't be. Instead, the Republican Party will cater to it's fundamentalist Christian base, with a few racist fossils like Herring thrown in. Just look at the numbers, 20 to 25% of the population doesn't make a national party. It's a shrinking and dying demographic. Unless Republicans become more inclusive, their ideas will not be heard. They will continue to wither away. I hope all of you Harry wanabees maintain that attitude. -- John H All decisions are the result of binary thinking. |
Brown Wins, Democrats bit the dust
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 20:06:23 -0500, Bruce wrote:
Harry wrote: Jim wrote: C. Mor Butts wrote: On Tue, 19 Jan 2010 21:08:52 -0800, "Steve B" wrote: "Canuck57" wrote in message ... Democrats bit the dust, a hint of what November will bring... How long was that seat liberal-democrat? 46 years or more? Well, tells you what people think about Obamanomics, liberal corruption-debt-spend and liberal health care tax grab. Obama's honeymoon just ended with one year in office. One year of Ombama has democrats voting republican. LMAO. Some democrat aught to email this to Obama: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UiM6JAQZwHI The Dems can still put the bill through with the "reconciliation" clause which requires a vote of 51, so the fat lady hasn't sung yet. It WILL be interesting now to see the tap-dancing and posturing of Democrats who are up for re-election. Some have already declared, "I'm out of here" and won't be running. They are smart men who know they can take their spoils and retire comfortably. The greedy and stupid will stay, and take what they get. An armed insurrection is in order to clean the Halls of Congress. Steve You really ought to run for congress, Steve. I don't know anyone in rec.boats who has a better take on things. We really need to promote people who don't have big lips, bulging eyes and nappy hair. I'm with ya when you decide to run. Nice spoofing Harry, except your writing style and sore ass shines through the camouflage. Sorry, ****-for-brains...not one of mine. I've been...busy. My new photo printer arrived late yesterday, and I've been occupied setting it up, calibrating my monitor and loading in various paper profiles. I suppose I could have bought a golf club, but the printer was more expensive. As always, ESAD. Do you know what a good driver (golf club) can cost? Enjoy your new printer. You should be proud! Callaway Diablo. Probably get three or four new printers. Printers don't come with graphite shafts. But then, Callaway drivers don't come with WalMart stickers. ~snerk~ -- John H All decisions are the result of binary thinking. |
Brown Wins, Democrats bit the dust
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 22:03:28 -0700, Canuck57
wrote: snipped Don't you liberal twits ever wonder why the average people don't see the effects of $2 trillion of democrat debt-corruption-bailout spend? Because it democrats are litterly giving the farm to the ubber-ultra-rich. You could eliminate personal income tax and it would be less than $2 trillion. Now that would firestart the economy big time as working people would have more money. It would instantly end the recession to eliminate federal income tax for a few years. http://www.taxpolicycenter.org/brief...rs/revenue.cfm Read and weap. The reason the USA has a failing economy is because of government corruption and special emphasis on Washington DC democrats. The biggest debt spenders of all time when rated as debt/time. No one is corrupt like a democrat. Screwing Americans silly. And I mean screwing working Americans like a herd of dumb sheep to slaughter. Democrats are selling out American financial liberty. The people have no idea how bad they are being screwed. It's time to resurrect this. The problem is that anytime one mentions the plight of the blacks or Hispanics in the middle cities, the percent of unwed mothers, the high-school dropout rate, or any of the other problems caused and maintained by Democrats, one is called a racist. [Right, Thunder?] The Democrats have contributed greatly to the poor - by keeping them poor. Interesting........ City, State, % of People Below the Poverty Level 1. Detroit, MI 32.5% 2. Buffalo, NY 29..9% 3. Cincinnati, OH 27.8% 4. Cleveland, OH 27.0% 5. Miami, FL 26.9% 5. St. Louis, MO 26.8% 7. El Paso, TX 26.4% 8. Milwaukee, WI 26.2% 9. Philadelphia, PA 25.1% 10. Newark, NJ 24.2% U.S. Census Bureau, 2006 American Community Survey, August 2007 What do the top ten cities (over 250,000) with the highest poverty rate all have in common? Democrat mayors. Detroit, MI (1st on the poverty rate list) hasn't elected a Republican mayor since 1961; Buffalo, NY (2nd) hasn't elected one since 1954; Cincinnati, OH (3rd)...since 1984; Cleveland, OH (4th)...since 1989; Miami, FL (5th) has never had a Republican mayor; St. Louis, MO (6th)....since 1949; El Paso, TX (7th) has never had a Republican mayor; Milwaukee, WI (8th)...since 1908; Philadelphia, PA (9th)...since 1952; Newark, NJ (10th)...since 1907. Einstein once said, 'The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.' -- John H All decisions are the result of binary thinking. |
Brown Wins, Democrats bit the dust
In article ,
says... On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 20:06:23 -0500, Bruce wrote: Harry wrote: Jim wrote: C. Mor Butts wrote: On Tue, 19 Jan 2010 21:08:52 -0800, "Steve B" wrote: "Canuck57" wrote in message ... Democrats bit the dust, a hint of what November will bring... How long was that seat liberal-democrat? 46 years or more? Well, tells you what people think about Obamanomics, liberal corruption-debt-spend and liberal health care tax grab. Obama's honeymoon just ended with one year in office. One year of Ombama has democrats voting republican. LMAO. Some democrat aught to email this to Obama: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UiM6JAQZwHI The Dems can still put the bill through with the "reconciliation" clause which requires a vote of 51, so the fat lady hasn't sung yet. It WILL be interesting now to see the tap-dancing and posturing of Democrats who are up for re-election. Some have already declared, "I'm out of here" and won't be running. They are smart men who know they can take their spoils and retire comfortably. The greedy and stupid will stay, and take what they get. An armed insurrection is in order to clean the Halls of Congress. Steve You really ought to run for congress, Steve. I don't know anyone in rec.boats who has a better take on things. We really need to promote people who don't have big lips, bulging eyes and nappy hair. I'm with ya when you decide to run. Nice spoofing Harry, except your writing style and sore ass shines through the camouflage. Sorry, ****-for-brains...not one of mine. I've been...busy. My new photo printer arrived late yesterday, and I've been occupied setting it up, calibrating my monitor and loading in various paper profiles. I suppose I could have bought a golf club, but the printer was more expensive. As always, ESAD. Do you know what a good driver (golf club) can cost? Enjoy your new printer. You should be proud! Callaway Diablo. Probably get three or four new printers. Printers don't come with graphite shafts. But then, Callaway drivers don't come with WalMart stickers. ~snerk~ LOL... It really is too bad we don't have a scrapbook of Harrys adventures... I do remember the "special order" 700 dollar office chair, didn't it show up in a picture with a Walmart sticker on it, or was that his last ring ding dingley doo platinum printer with built in spa and wetbar??? |
Brown Wins, Democrats bit the dust
John H wrote:
Do you know what a good driver (golf club) can cost? Enjoy your new printer. You should be proud! Callaway Diablo. Probably get three or four new printers. Printers don't come with graphite shafts. But then, Callaway drivers don't come with WalMart stickers. ~snerk~ Herring needs a chinese knockoff callaway to shoot in the 90's...my uncle shot in the low to mid 70's most of his life with a set of cheap wilson clubs from a sporting goods store. BTW, I'd guess my new printer cost at least twice as much as your $200 driver. |
Brown Wins, Democrats bit the dust
On 21/01/2010 6:23 AM, John H wrote:
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 22:03:28 -0700, wrote: snipped Don't you liberal twits ever wonder why the average people don't see the effects of $2 trillion of democrat debt-corruption-bailout spend? Because it democrats are litterly giving the farm to the ubber-ultra-rich. You could eliminate personal income tax and it would be less than $2 trillion. Now that would firestart the economy big time as working people would have more money. It would instantly end the recession to eliminate federal income tax for a few years. http://www.taxpolicycenter.org/brief...rs/revenue.cfm Read and weap. The reason the USA has a failing economy is because of government corruption and special emphasis on Washington DC democrats. The biggest debt spenders of all time when rated as debt/time. No one is corrupt like a democrat. Screwing Americans silly. And I mean screwing working Americans like a herd of dumb sheep to slaughter. Democrats are selling out American financial liberty. The people have no idea how bad they are being screwed. It's time to resurrect this. The problem is that anytime one mentions the plight of the blacks or Hispanics in the middle cities, the percent of unwed mothers, the high-school dropout rate, or any of the other problems caused and maintained by Democrats, one is called a racist. [Right, Thunder?] The Democrats have contributed greatly to the poor - by keeping them poor. Interesting........ City, State, % of People Below the Poverty Level 1. Detroit, MI 32.5% 2. Buffalo, NY 29..9% 3. Cincinnati, OH 27.8% 4. Cleveland, OH 27.0% 5. Miami, FL 26.9% 5. St. Louis, MO 26.8% 7. El Paso, TX 26.4% 8. Milwaukee, WI 26.2% 9. Philadelphia, PA 25.1% 10. Newark, NJ 24.2% U.S. Census Bureau, 2006 American Community Survey, August 2007 What do the top ten cities (over 250,000) with the highest poverty rate all have in common? Democrat mayors. Detroit, MI (1st on the poverty rate list) hasn't elected a Republican mayor since 1961; Buffalo, NY (2nd) hasn't elected one since 1954; Cincinnati, OH (3rd)...since 1984; Cleveland, OH (4th)...since 1989; Miami, FL (5th) has never had a Republican mayor; St. Louis, MO (6th)....since 1949; El Paso, TX (7th) has never had a Republican mayor; Milwaukee, WI (8th)...since 1908; Philadelphia, PA (9th)...since 1952; Newark, NJ (10th)...since 1907. Einstein once said, 'The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.' But it is what liberal-statism does best. |
Brown Wins, Democrats bit the dust
John H wrote:
On Thu, 21 Jan 2010 06:12:14 -0600, thunder wrote: On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 20:32:49 -0500, I am Tosk wrote: The results are phenomenal. Remember, the dems who are saying "the pendulum swings, this is normal", less than a year ago were saying the Republican party was dead, "and might not come back for decades". Looks like Pelosi and Reid ruined things for President Obama. To bad really, it will be a shame for the first Black President to go down in history as another failure like Jimi Carter... Ugh, who I voted for;) Scotty Personally, I think the Republican Party is still dead in the water. There is considerable anger at the Democrats ineffectual administration, but you make a big mistake if you think that translates to happiness with Republicans. It doesn't. Take a look at Scott Brown. He should be a new model for the Republican Party. A man who is fiscally conservative, with a social conscience, but he won't be. Instead, the Republican Party will cater to it's fundamentalist Christian base, with a few racist fossils like Herring thrown in. Just look at the numbers, 20 to 25% of the population doesn't make a national party. It's a shrinking and dying demographic. Unless Republicans become more inclusive, their ideas will not be heard. They will continue to wither away. I hope all of you Harry wanabees maintain that attitude. Youbecha. We can hope. We can dream. Yes we can. |
Brown Wins, Democrats bit the dust
Harry wrote:
John H wrote: On Thu, 21 Jan 2010 06:12:14 -0600, thunder wrote: On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 20:32:49 -0500, I am Tosk wrote: The results are phenomenal. Remember, the dems who are saying "the pendulum swings, this is normal", less than a year ago were saying the Republican party was dead, "and might not come back for decades". Looks like Pelosi and Reid ruined things for President Obama. To bad really, it will be a shame for the first Black President to go down in history as another failure like Jimi Carter... Ugh, who I voted for;) Scotty Personally, I think the Republican Party is still dead in the water. There is considerable anger at the Democrats ineffectual administration, but you make a big mistake if you think that translates to happiness with Republicans. It doesn't. Take a look at Scott Brown. He should be a new model for the Republican Party. A man who is fiscally conservative, with a social conscience, but he won't be. Instead, the Republican Party will cater to it's fundamentalist Christian base, with a few racist fossils like Herring thrown in. Just look at the numbers, 20 to 25% of the population doesn't make a national party. It's a shrinking and dying demographic. Unless Republicans become more inclusive, their ideas will not be heard. They will continue to wither away. I hope all of you Harry wanabees maintain that attitude. Youbecha. We can hope. We can dream. Yes we can. Oh ****. I forgot the most important thing. CHANGE. On second thought, you keep the change. |
Brown Wins, Democrats bit the dust
On Thu, 21 Jan 2010 08:07:32 -0500, I am Tosk wrote:
Personally, I think the Republican Party is still dead in the water. There is considerable anger at the Democrats ineffectual administration, but you make a big mistake if you think that translates to happiness with Republicans. It doesn't. Whooo boy.... Denial is more than just a river;) But you just keep thinking that, hopefully the democrats won't learn anything from this and will continue trying to steal as much money from us as possible until November... Oh no, it's a wake up call that the Democrats ignore at their peril, and yes, there are lessons to be learned. Now, while you are all giddy, let me know the lessons you learned from New York 23? It has been a long time since Massachusetts has elected a Republican Senator. All the way back to the late 1960s, when they elected Edward Brooke, IIRC. New York, 23, *had* been Republican, however, since the 1800s. Again, lessons learned? |
Brown Wins, Democrats bit the dust
|
Brown Wins, Democrats bit the dust
"thunder" wrote in message
... On Thu, 21 Jan 2010 08:07:32 -0500, I am Tosk wrote: Personally, I think the Republican Party is still dead in the water. There is considerable anger at the Democrats ineffectual administration, but you make a big mistake if you think that translates to happiness with Republicans. It doesn't. Whooo boy.... Denial is more than just a river;) But you just keep thinking that, hopefully the democrats won't learn anything from this and will continue trying to steal as much money from us as possible until November... Oh no, it's a wake up call that the Democrats ignore at their peril, and yes, there are lessons to be learned. Now, while you are all giddy, let me know the lessons you learned from New York 23? It has been a long time since Massachusetts has elected a Republican Senator. All the way back to the late 1960s, when they elected Edward Brooke, IIRC. New York, 23, *had* been Republican, however, since the 1800s. Again, lessons learned? I think the teabaggets are going to give Brown a pass on his less than perfect rightwing credentials for at least a while. The question is, is he electable in the next election, which is only 35 weeks (or so) away. I doubt it. I'm more concerned about the recent Supreme Court decision to relax the limits on corporate and union campaign contributions. This does not help the continued feeding frenzy in DC. -- Nom=de=Plume |
Brown Wins, Democrats bit the dust
jps wrote:
On Thu, 21 Jan 2010 08:34:15 -0500, wrote: John H wrote: Do you know what a good driver (golf club) can cost? Enjoy your new printer. You should be proud! Callaway Diablo. Probably get three or four new printers. Printers don't come with graphite shafts. But then, Callaway drivers don't come with WalMart stickers. ~snerk~ Herring needs a chinese knockoff callaway to shoot in the 90's...my uncle shot in the low to mid 70's most of his life with a set of cheap wilson clubs from a sporting goods store. BTW, I'd guess my new printer cost at least twice as much as your $200 driver. Callaway Diablo can be had for $186 from Overstock. In Herring's hands, it'll just put him that much further into the woods. I can hit my $29 second hand Taylormade 540HD 100 yards further than Herring with his new Diablo. Waste of money on a feeble old man. Maybe he should have donated that money to a worthy cause, like Race for the Cure. You really researched the prices for a driver? Bored today, or is this your life? |
Brown Wins, Democrats bit the dust
Harry wrote:
jps wrote: On Thu, 21 Jan 2010 08:34:15 -0500, Harry wrote: John H wrote: Do you know what a good driver (golf club) can cost? Enjoy your new printer. You should be proud! Callaway Diablo. Probably get three or four new printers. Printers don't come with graphite shafts. But then, Callaway drivers don't come with WalMart stickers. ~snerk~ Herring needs a chinese knockoff callaway to shoot in the 90's...my uncle shot in the low to mid 70's most of his life with a set of cheap wilson clubs from a sporting goods store. BTW, I'd guess my new printer cost at least twice as much as your $200 driver. Callaway Diablo can be had for $186 from Overstock. In Herring's hands, it'll just put him that much further into the woods. I can hit my $29 second hand Taylormade 540HD 100 yards further than Herring with his new Diablo. Waste of money on a feeble old man. Maybe he should have donated that money to a worthy cause, like Race for the Cure. Heheh...my new printer was $414...though I suppose with herring's taste, he could have bought "three or four" printers that serve his needs for that amount of money. I don't know anything about golf. I played one or two rounds almost 40 years ago. My 93-year-old uncle played 18 holes four times a week until his 90th...he's slowed down a bit but he did play and win a good number of local senior tournaments as an amateur. Uncle retired at 55 and moved to Boca Raton from Salem, Massachusetts. He plays with a cheap, old set of clubs. Wow! $414! My new Colt AR15 was $1700. Do I win a prize? |
Brown Wins, Democrats bit the dust
"bpuharic" wrote in message ... On Thu, 21 Jan 2010 12:10:00 -0500, wrote: On Thu, 21 Jan 2010 06:46:40 -0500, bpuharic wrote: capital gains, however, dont another sign of the delusion of the right wing Actually the cap gains tax under Bush favors the bottom 2 brackets ( $65k) with a 5% rate and that is pro rated. except, of course, those in this bracket have no capital gains. ah well, another right wing truism shot to hell the middle class works for a living. the GOP steals for a living Bull****, there are plenty of seniors living off investments who do not make more than $65000. compared to working folks? no. I dare say there are a lot of people in the middle class who buy and sell stocks and they got a great tax break from this. i dare say there aren't. You are wrong. That was the whole point of this legislation, to make investing more attractive to people who normally just spend every dime they make on **** they don't need. actually it was targeted at working people because the GOP realized they 1. dont have the money for stockbrokers 2. dont have the discretionary income to invest so this was a way to steal a BIT more money while convincing the middle class they were getting a BIG tax break if they REALLY wanted to give the middle class a tax break, they'd reduce income taxes, NOT capital gains taxes but the GOP has NEVER done this. When did the Democrats lower the middle class income tax rate? They have had control of Congress the majority of the last 50 years. |
Brown Wins, Democrats bit the dust
Bruce wrote:
Harry wrote: Bruce wrote: Harry wrote: Jim wrote: C. Mor Butts wrote: On Tue, 19 Jan 2010 21:08:52 -0800, "Steve B" wrote: "Canuck57" wrote in message ... Democrats bit the dust, a hint of what November will bring... How long was that seat liberal-democrat? 46 years or more? Well, tells you what people think about Obamanomics, liberal corruption-debt-spend and liberal health care tax grab. Obama's honeymoon just ended with one year in office. One year of Ombama has democrats voting republican. LMAO. Some democrat aught to email this to Obama: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UiM6JAQZwHI The Dems can still put the bill through with the "reconciliation" clause which requires a vote of 51, so the fat lady hasn't sung yet. It WILL be interesting now to see the tap-dancing and posturing of Democrats who are up for re-election. Some have already declared, "I'm out of here" and won't be running. They are smart men who know they can take their spoils and retire comfortably. The greedy and stupid will stay, and take what they get. An armed insurrection is in order to clean the Halls of Congress. Steve You really ought to run for congress, Steve. I don't know anyone in rec.boats who has a better take on things. We really need to promote people who don't have big lips, bulging eyes and nappy hair. I'm with ya when you decide to run. Nice spoofing Harry, except your writing style and sore ass shines through the camouflage. Sorry, ****-for-brains...not one of mine. I've been...busy. My new photo printer arrived late yesterday, and I've been occupied setting it up, calibrating my monitor and loading in various paper profiles. I suppose I could have bought a golf club, but the printer was more expensive. As always, ESAD. Do you know what a good driver (golf club) can cost? Enjoy your new printer. You should be proud! As bad a golfer as herring is, if he spent $50 on a golf club, it was too much. I have no idea what his handicap is, but to play that often - in odd conditions, too! - he can't be that bad. Paying a few grand for a good set of clubs is no different than paying hundreds of thousands on a fishing boat. I wouldn't want to guess what a pound of fish costs with all costs considered. It's about the sport and the enjoyment of the sport in both cases. He shoots in the 90's or worse usually. |
Brown Wins, Democrats bit the dust
"Bruce" wrote in message ... Harry wrote: John H wrote: Do you know what a good driver (golf club) can cost? Enjoy your new printer. You should be proud! Callaway Diablo. Probably get three or four new printers. Printers don't come with graphite shafts. But then, Callaway drivers don't come with WalMart stickers. ~snerk~ Herring needs a chinese knockoff callaway to shoot in the 90's...my uncle shot in the low to mid 70's most of his life with a set of cheap wilson clubs from a sporting goods store. BTW, I'd guess my new printer cost at least twice as much as your $200 driver. It's amazing what little things bother you, Harry. You need a long break from this place so you can interact with people in person and act accordingly. He overpaid for the printer. |
Brown Wins, Democrats bit the dust
Bruce wrote:
Harry wrote: John H wrote: Do you know what a good driver (golf club) can cost? Enjoy your new printer. You should be proud! Callaway Diablo. Probably get three or four new printers. Printers don't come with graphite shafts. But then, Callaway drivers don't come with WalMart stickers. ~snerk~ Herring needs a chinese knockoff callaway to shoot in the 90's...my uncle shot in the low to mid 70's most of his life with a set of cheap wilson clubs from a sporting goods store. BTW, I'd guess my new printer cost at least twice as much as your $200 driver. It's amazing what little things bother you, Harry. You need a long break from this place so you can interact with people in person and act accordingly. ESAD, brucie. |
Brown Wins, Democrats bit the dust
Bruce wrote:
Harry wrote: jps wrote: On Thu, 21 Jan 2010 08:34:15 -0500, Harry wrote: John H wrote: Do you know what a good driver (golf club) can cost? Enjoy your new printer. You should be proud! Callaway Diablo. Probably get three or four new printers. Printers don't come with graphite shafts. But then, Callaway drivers don't come with WalMart stickers. ~snerk~ Herring needs a chinese knockoff callaway to shoot in the 90's...my uncle shot in the low to mid 70's most of his life with a set of cheap wilson clubs from a sporting goods store. BTW, I'd guess my new printer cost at least twice as much as your $200 driver. Callaway Diablo can be had for $186 from Overstock. In Herring's hands, it'll just put him that much further into the woods. I can hit my $29 second hand Taylormade 540HD 100 yards further than Herring with his new Diablo. Waste of money on a feeble old man. Maybe he should have donated that money to a worthy cause, like Race for the Cure. Heheh...my new printer was $414...though I suppose with herring's taste, he could have bought "three or four" printers that serve his needs for that amount of money. I don't know anything about golf. I played one or two rounds almost 40 years ago. My 93-year-old uncle played 18 holes four times a week until his 90th...he's slowed down a bit but he did play and win a good number of local senior tournaments as an amateur. Uncle retired at 55 and moved to Boca Raton from Salem, Massachusetts. He plays with a cheap, old set of clubs. Wow! $414! My new Colt AR15 was $1700. Do I win a prize? Trophy for Newbie Asshole of Rec.Boats. I have a sig pistol that cost more than that chunk of plastic rifle. BFD. |
Brown Wins, Democrats bit the dust
On Thu, 21 Jan 2010 17:09:34 -0800, "Bill McKee"
wrote: "bpuharic" wrote in message .. . On Thu, 21 Jan 2010 12:10:00 -0500, wrote: actually it was targeted at working people because the GOP realized they 1. dont have the money for stockbrokers 2. dont have the discretionary income to invest so this was a way to steal a BIT more money while convincing the middle class they were getting a BIG tax break if they REALLY wanted to give the middle class a tax break, they'd reduce income taxes, NOT capital gains taxes but the GOP has NEVER done this. When did the Democrats lower the middle class income tax rate? They have had control of Congress the majority of the last 50 years. you're missing the point. we ALL have to pay taxes. the GOP just thinks the rich shouldnt pay taxes and the burden should be borne by the middle class i have no problem paying my taxes. i DO have a problem paying MY taxes AND subsidizing the lazy socialist welfare cheats of goldman sachs, etc. |
Brown Wins, Democrats bit the dust
"bpuharic" wrote in message
... On Thu, 21 Jan 2010 17:09:34 -0800, "Bill McKee" wrote: "bpuharic" wrote in message . .. On Thu, 21 Jan 2010 12:10:00 -0500, wrote: actually it was targeted at working people because the GOP realized they 1. dont have the money for stockbrokers 2. dont have the discretionary income to invest so this was a way to steal a BIT more money while convincing the middle class they were getting a BIG tax break if they REALLY wanted to give the middle class a tax break, they'd reduce income taxes, NOT capital gains taxes but the GOP has NEVER done this. When did the Democrats lower the middle class income tax rate? They have had control of Congress the majority of the last 50 years. you're missing the point. we ALL have to pay taxes. the GOP just thinks the rich shouldnt pay taxes and the burden should be borne by the middle class i have no problem paying my taxes. i DO have a problem paying MY taxes AND subsidizing the lazy socialist welfare cheats of goldman sachs, etc. Here's an interesting comparison: http://www.eriposte.com/economy/other/demovsrep.htm -- Nom=de=Plume |
Brown Wins, Democrats bit the dust
"bpuharic" wrote in message ... On Thu, 21 Jan 2010 17:09:34 -0800, "Bill McKee" wrote: "bpuharic" wrote in message . .. On Thu, 21 Jan 2010 12:10:00 -0500, wrote: actually it was targeted at working people because the GOP realized they 1. dont have the money for stockbrokers 2. dont have the discretionary income to invest so this was a way to steal a BIT more money while convincing the middle class they were getting a BIG tax break if they REALLY wanted to give the middle class a tax break, they'd reduce income taxes, NOT capital gains taxes but the GOP has NEVER done this. When did the Democrats lower the middle class income tax rate? They have had control of Congress the majority of the last 50 years. you're missing the point. we ALL have to pay taxes. the GOP just thinks the rich shouldnt pay taxes and the burden should be borne by the middle class i have no problem paying my taxes. i DO have a problem paying MY taxes AND subsidizing the lazy socialist welfare cheats of goldman sachs, etc. And who gave GS and AIG a bunch of money? Which party controlled Congress? The Congress who is the only governmental branch allowed to pass spending bills. |
Brown Wins, Democrats bit the dust
On Thu, 21 Jan 2010 17:52:34 -0800, "nom=de=plume"
wrote: "bpuharic" wrote in message .. . On Thu, 21 Jan 2010 17:09:34 -0800, "Bill McKee" wrote: "bpuharic" wrote in message ... On Thu, 21 Jan 2010 12:10:00 -0500, wrote: actually it was targeted at working people because the GOP realized they 1. dont have the money for stockbrokers 2. dont have the discretionary income to invest so this was a way to steal a BIT more money while convincing the middle class they were getting a BIG tax break if they REALLY wanted to give the middle class a tax break, they'd reduce income taxes, NOT capital gains taxes but the GOP has NEVER done this. When did the Democrats lower the middle class income tax rate? They have had control of Congress the majority of the last 50 years. you're missing the point. we ALL have to pay taxes. the GOP just thinks the rich shouldnt pay taxes and the burden should be borne by the middle class i have no problem paying my taxes. i DO have a problem paying MY taxes AND subsidizing the lazy socialist welfare cheats of goldman sachs, etc. Here's an interesting comparison: http://www.eriposte.com/economy/other/demovsrep.htm surprisingly enough, andrew sullivan last year posted information on his website shoiwng that middle class income grew under democrats and shrank under the GOP. but the GOP has the marketing geniuses. they've got everyone convince a tax cut for the ultra rich is a tax cut for the middle class |
Brown Wins, Democrats bit the dust
On Thu, 21 Jan 2010 18:10:23 -0800, "Bill McKee"
wrote: "bpuharic" wrote in message .. . On Thu, 21 Jan 2010 17:09:34 -0800, "Bill McKee" When did the Democrats lower the middle class income tax rate? They have had control of Congress the majority of the last 50 years. you're missing the point. we ALL have to pay taxes. the GOP just thinks the rich shouldnt pay taxes and the burden should be borne by the middle class i have no problem paying my taxes. i DO have a problem paying MY taxes AND subsidizing the lazy socialist welfare cheats of goldman sachs, etc. And who gave GS and AIG a bunch of money? Which party controlled Congress? The Congress who is the only governmental branch allowed to pass spending hey moron.... for 30 years the GOP coddled and protected their rich buddies so that the ONLY channel to provide economic relief WAS the banks. the banks OWNED EVERYTHING. so OF COURSE we had to bail 'em out and that program was developed by ben bernanke, under george w. bush bills. |
Brown Wins, Democrats bit the dust
Harry wrote:
Bruce wrote: Harry wrote: jps wrote: On Thu, 21 Jan 2010 08:34:15 -0500, Harry wrote: John H wrote: Do you know what a good driver (golf club) can cost? Enjoy your new printer. You should be proud! Callaway Diablo. Probably get three or four new printers. Printers don't come with graphite shafts. But then, Callaway drivers don't come with WalMart stickers. ~snerk~ Herring needs a chinese knockoff callaway to shoot in the 90's...my uncle shot in the low to mid 70's most of his life with a set of cheap wilson clubs from a sporting goods store. BTW, I'd guess my new printer cost at least twice as much as your $200 driver. Callaway Diablo can be had for $186 from Overstock. In Herring's hands, it'll just put him that much further into the woods. I can hit my $29 second hand Taylormade 540HD 100 yards further than Herring with his new Diablo. Waste of money on a feeble old man. Maybe he should have donated that money to a worthy cause, like Race for the Cure. Heheh...my new printer was $414...though I suppose with herring's taste, he could have bought "three or four" printers that serve his needs for that amount of money. I don't know anything about golf. I played one or two rounds almost 40 years ago. My 93-year-old uncle played 18 holes four times a week until his 90th...he's slowed down a bit but he did play and win a good number of local senior tournaments as an amateur. Uncle retired at 55 and moved to Boca Raton from Salem, Massachusetts. He plays with a cheap, old set of clubs. Wow! $414! My new Colt AR15 was $1700. Do I win a prize? Trophy for Newbie Asshole of Rec.Boats. I have a sig pistol that cost more than that chunk of plastic rifle. BFD. Big gun making up for a small penis eh? |
Brown Wins, Democrats bit the dust
Harry wrote:
Harry wrote: Bruce wrote: Harry wrote: jps wrote: On Thu, 21 Jan 2010 08:34:15 -0500, Harry wrote: John H wrote: Do you know what a good driver (golf club) can cost? Enjoy your new printer. You should be proud! Callaway Diablo. Probably get three or four new printers. Printers don't come with graphite shafts. But then, Callaway drivers don't come with WalMart stickers. ~snerk~ Herring needs a chinese knockoff callaway to shoot in the 90's...my uncle shot in the low to mid 70's most of his life with a set of cheap wilson clubs from a sporting goods store. BTW, I'd guess my new printer cost at least twice as much as your $200 driver. Callaway Diablo can be had for $186 from Overstock. In Herring's hands, it'll just put him that much further into the woods. I can hit my $29 second hand Taylormade 540HD 100 yards further than Herring with his new Diablo. Waste of money on a feeble old man. Maybe he should have donated that money to a worthy cause, like Race for the Cure. Heheh...my new printer was $414...though I suppose with herring's taste, he could have bought "three or four" printers that serve his needs for that amount of money. I don't know anything about golf. I played one or two rounds almost 40 years ago. My 93-year-old uncle played 18 holes four times a week until his 90th...he's slowed down a bit but he did play and win a good number of local senior tournaments as an amateur. Uncle retired at 55 and moved to Boca Raton from Salem, Massachusetts. He plays with a cheap, old set of clubs. Wow! $414! My new Colt AR15 was $1700. Do I win a prize? Trophy for Newbie Asshole of Rec.Boats. I have a sig pistol that cost more than that chunk of plastic rifle. BFD. Big gun making up for a small penis eh? Oh, you have been reading my old posts, eh. Well I used to think people used guns to compensate for small a small penis, but that was before I became so obese, that my fat completely covers my package. So I decided it was time to change my mind. My new motto is: "Harry Krause, My pecker may be the size of a babies, but I own a **** load of guns." |
Brown Wins, Democrats bit the dust
In article , Bruce846
@gmail.com says... As bad a golfer as herring is, if he spent $50 on a golf club, it was too much. I have no idea what his handicap is, but to play that often - in odd conditions, too! - he can't be that bad. Paying a few grand for a good set of clubs is no different than paying hundreds of thousands on a fishing boat. I wouldn't want to guess what a pound of fish costs with all costs considered. It's about the sport and the enjoyment of the Bruce. You must be new here;) Harry knows nothing about how John plays, he is just spewing again, trying to get someone to listen. Scotty |
Brown Wins, Democrats bit the dust
I am Tosk wrote:
In article , Bruce846 @gmail.com says... As bad a golfer as herring is, if he spent $50 on a golf club, it was too much. I have no idea what his handicap is, but to play that often - in odd conditions, too! - he can't be that bad. Paying a few grand for a good set of clubs is no different than paying hundreds of thousands on a fishing boat. I wouldn't want to guess what a pound of fish costs with all costs considered. It's about the sport and the enjoyment of the Bruce. You must be new here;) Harry knows nothing about how John plays, he is just spewing again, trying to get someone to listen. Scotty Herring posts his scores. Therefore, we know how he plays. He plays lousy. |
Brown Wins, Democrats bit the dust
Harry Krause wrote:
Harry wrote: Harry wrote: Bruce wrote: Harry wrote: jps wrote: On Thu, 21 Jan 2010 08:34:15 -0500, Harry wrote: John H wrote: Do you know what a good driver (golf club) can cost? Enjoy your new printer. You should be proud! Callaway Diablo. Probably get three or four new printers. Printers don't come with graphite shafts. But then, Callaway drivers don't come with WalMart stickers. ~snerk~ Herring needs a chinese knockoff callaway to shoot in the 90's...my uncle shot in the low to mid 70's most of his life with a set of cheap wilson clubs from a sporting goods store. BTW, I'd guess my new printer cost at least twice as much as your $200 driver. Callaway Diablo can be had for $186 from Overstock. In Herring's hands, it'll just put him that much further into the woods. I can hit my $29 second hand Taylormade 540HD 100 yards further than Herring with his new Diablo. Waste of money on a feeble old man. Maybe he should have donated that money to a worthy cause, like Race for the Cure. Heheh...my new printer was $414...though I suppose with herring's taste, he could have bought "three or four" printers that serve his needs for that amount of money. I don't know anything about golf. I played one or two rounds almost 40 years ago. My 93-year-old uncle played 18 holes four times a week until his 90th...he's slowed down a bit but he did play and win a good number of local senior tournaments as an amateur. Uncle retired at 55 and moved to Boca Raton from Salem, Massachusetts. He plays with a cheap, old set of clubs. Wow! $414! My new Colt AR15 was $1700. Do I win a prize? Trophy for Newbie Asshole of Rec.Boats. I have a sig pistol that cost more than that chunk of plastic rifle. BFD. Big gun making up for a small penis eh? Oh, you have been reading my old posts, eh. Well I used to think people used guns to compensate for small a small penis, but that was before I became so obese, that my fat completely covers my package. So I decided it was time to change my mind. My new motto is: "Harry Krause, My pecker may be the size of a babies, but I own a **** load of guns." Maybe you should give your lady a pecker stretcher for valentines day. |
Brown Wins, Democrats bit the dust
Harry wrote:
I am Tosk wrote: In article , Bruce846 @gmail.com says... As bad a golfer as herring is, if he spent $50 on a golf club, it was too much. I have no idea what his handicap is, but to play that often - in odd conditions, too! - he can't be that bad. Paying a few grand for a good set of clubs is no different than paying hundreds of thousands on a fishing boat. I wouldn't want to guess what a pound of fish costs with all costs considered. It's about the sport and the enjoyment of the Bruce. You must be new here;) Harry knows nothing about how John plays, he is just spewing again, trying to get someone to listen. Scotty Herring posts his scores. Therefore, we know how he plays. He plays lousy. As opposed to you who doesn't play at all at anything. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:15 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com