| Page 2 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
This is a good post by someone else!
|
This is a good post by someone else!
In article ,
says... In article , says... In article 3f387376-7033-4e9d-a77d- , says... This really tells the story about the dishonesty of the right about Clinton! This blaming Clinton bull**** has got to stop! I've been thinking about this since the questions on last night's debate were pointing in this direction and it seems to have been an RNC talking point for some time now and is starting to pick up steam. Remember that when Clinton came into office he inherited: U.S. troops in Somalia An enormous deficit A recession And shortly afterward the WTC was bombed! Did he whine about it? Did he complain and blame it on the previous administration? Hell no! He sucked it up and got to work doing something about it. Granted Somalia didn't turn out good at all but the record deficit was turned into a record surplus, the recession became the largest economic expansion ever and the people who bombed the WTC were caught, tried and jailed. Now lets talk about how many 9/11 type events within our own borders were stopped while Clinton was in the White House -- of course we can't know absolutely how many there were but I can think of at least three: - There were the people who were arrested in Brooklyn with the plans to blow up the bridges and tunnels in NYC. - There was the plan to blow up LAX - And there was the millennium, when we know there was at least one plan thwarted and that was to blow up the space needle in Seattle. On top of that Clinton as we're beginning to find out, may have destroyed what remained of Saddam's WMD during the Desert Fox bombing that was trashed by the Republicans because it was interrupting their investigation of his penis. All of this was done while the Repubs were doing everything in their power to topple our head of state. If that is not treasonous then I sure as hell don't know what is. Bush was told by the outgoing admin that terrorism and Al Qaeda would be where they needed to focus their energies. They were given reports by the Clinton administration and they were given the Gary Hart report as well. They did nothing - absolutely nothing. They took no action whatsoever. They frankly didn't give a ****. Now, Bush can do nothing but whine and blame everybody else for everything that's ever gone wrong in his administration, and god knows it's a lot. The Republicans have to face up to the fact that their boy (and I do mean boy) seriously dropped the ball. You were doing all right till you went on the obligatory Bush Bash... What did you find incorrect? Pfffttt... You again, deciding what people think and want. It is useless with you, you are more partisan than Harry... |
This is a good post by someone else!
On Jan 12, 10:15*am, I am Tosk
wrote: In article , says... In article , says... In article 3f387376-7033-4e9d-a77d- , says... This really tells the story about the dishonesty of the right about Clinton! This blaming Clinton bull**** has got to stop! I've been thinking about this since the questions on last night's debate were pointing in this direction and it seems to have been an RNC talking point for some time now and is starting to pick up steam. Remember that when Clinton came into office he inherited: U.S. troops in Somalia An enormous deficit A recession And shortly afterward the WTC was bombed! Did he whine about it? Did he complain and blame it on the previous administration? Hell no! He sucked it up and got to work doing something about it. Granted Somalia didn't turn out good at all but the record deficit was turned into a record surplus, the recession became the largest economic expansion ever and the people who bombed the WTC were caught, tried and jailed. Now lets talk about how many 9/11 type events within our own borders were stopped while Clinton was in the White House -- of course we can't know absolutely how many there were but I can think of at least three: - There were the people who were arrested in Brooklyn with the plans to blow up the bridges and tunnels in NYC. - There was the plan to blow up LAX - And there was the millennium, when we know there was at least one plan thwarted and that was to blow up the space needle in Seattle. On top of that Clinton as we're beginning to find out, may have destroyed what remained of Saddam's WMD during the Desert Fox bombing that was trashed by the Republicans because it was interrupting their investigation of his penis. All of this was done while the Repubs were doing everything in their power to topple our head of state. If that is not treasonous then I sure as hell don't know what is. Bush was told by the outgoing admin that terrorism and Al Qaeda would be where they needed to focus their energies. They were given reports by the Clinton administration and they were given the Gary Hart report as well. They did nothing - absolutely nothing. They took no action whatsoever. They frankly didn't give a ****. Now, Bush can do nothing but whine and blame everybody else for everything that's ever gone wrong in his administration, and god knows it's a lot. The Republicans have to face up to the fact that their boy (and I do mean boy) seriously dropped the ball. You were doing all right till you went on the obligatory Bush Bash... What did you find incorrect? Pfffttt... You again, deciding what people think and want. It is useless with you, you are more partisan than Harry...- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Ummm, show me where in hell I "decided what people think and want". I asked a direct question. What in the above do you find incorrect? And why? Hell, I didn't even right the piece, yet you are saying I said or did something I did not. That's John's MO too. |
This is a good post by someone else!
|
This is a good post by someone else!
On Jan 12, 12:01*pm, I am Tosk
wrote: In article aa4f1d68-4346-4fd1-91bb-038fb3a341f0 @j14g2000yqm.googlegroups.com, says... On Jan 12, 10:15*am, I am Tosk wrote: In article , says... In article , says... In article 3f387376-7033-4e9d-a77d- , says... This really tells the story about the dishonesty of the right about Clinton! This blaming Clinton bull**** has got to stop! I've been thinking about this since the questions on last night's debate were pointing in this direction and it seems to have been an RNC talking point for some time now and is starting to pick up steam. Remember that when Clinton came into office he inherited: U.S. troops in Somalia An enormous deficit A recession And shortly afterward the WTC was bombed! Did he whine about it? Did he complain and blame it on the previous administration? Hell no! He sucked it up and got to work doing something about it. Granted Somalia didn't turn out good at all but the record deficit was turned into a record surplus, the recession became the largest economic expansion ever and the people who bombed the WTC were caught, tried and jailed. Now lets talk about how many 9/11 type events within our own borders were stopped while Clinton was in the White House -- of course we can't know absolutely how many there were but I can think of at least three: - There were the people who were arrested in Brooklyn with the plans to blow up the bridges and tunnels in NYC. - There was the plan to blow up LAX - And there was the millennium, when we know there was at least one plan thwarted and that was to blow up the space needle in Seattle. On top of that Clinton as we're beginning to find out, may have destroyed what remained of Saddam's WMD during the Desert Fox bombing that was trashed by the Republicans because it was interrupting their investigation of his penis. All of this was done while the Repubs were doing everything in their power to topple our head of state. If that is not treasonous then I sure as hell don't know what is. Bush was told by the outgoing admin that terrorism and Al Qaeda would be where they needed to focus their energies. They were given reports by the Clinton administration and they were given the Gary Hart report as well. They did nothing - absolutely nothing. They took no action whatsoever. They frankly didn't give a ****. Now, Bush can do nothing but whine and blame everybody else for everything that's ever gone wrong in his administration, and god knows it's a lot. The Republicans have to face up to the fact that their boy (and I do mean boy) seriously dropped the ball. You were doing all right till you went on the obligatory Bush Bash... What did you find incorrect? Pfffttt... You again, deciding what people think and want. It is useless with you, you are more partisan than Harry...- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Ummm, show me where in hell I "decided what people think and want". I asked a direct question. What in the above do you find incorrect? And why? Hell, I didn't even right the piece, yet you are saying I said or did something I did not. That's John's MO too. You said specifically: *"They took no action whatsoever. They frankly didn't give a ****." Now it looks like you owe me an apology. snerk- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Again, *I* didn't SAY THAT..... The original poster did. And even if those WERE my words, how in HELL does that in any way mean that I am "deciding what people think and want"??? It's a statement by an individual. |
This is a good post by someone else!
On Jan 12, 1:44*pm, John H wrote:
On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 12:01:05 -0500, I am Tosk wrote: In article aa4f1d68-4346-4fd1-91bb-038fb3a341f0 , says... On Jan 12, 10:15 am, I am Tosk wrote: In article , says... In article , says... In article 3f387376-7033-4e9d-a77d- , says... This really tells the story about the dishonesty of the right about Clinton! This blaming Clinton bull**** has got to stop! I've been thinking about this since the questions on last night's debate were pointing in this direction and it seems to have been an RNC talking point for some time now and is starting to pick up steam. Remember that when Clinton came into office he inherited: U.S. troops in Somalia An enormous deficit A recession And shortly afterward the WTC was bombed! Did he whine about it? Did he complain and blame it on the previous administration? Hell no! He sucked it up and got to work doing something about it. Granted Somalia didn't turn out good at all but the record deficit was turned into a record surplus, the recession became the largest economic expansion ever and the people who bombed the WTC were caught, tried and jailed. Now lets talk about how many 9/11 type events within our own borders were stopped while Clinton was in the White House -- of course we can't know absolutely how many there were but I can think of at least three: - There were the people who were arrested in Brooklyn with the plans to blow up the bridges and tunnels in NYC. - There was the plan to blow up LAX - And there was the millennium, when we know there was at least one plan thwarted and that was to blow up the space needle in Seattle. On top of that Clinton as we're beginning to find out, may have destroyed what remained of Saddam's WMD during the Desert Fox bombing that was trashed by the Republicans because it was interrupting their investigation of his penis. All of this was done while the Repubs were doing everything in their power to topple our head of state. If that is not treasonous then I sure as hell don't know what is. Bush was told by the outgoing admin that terrorism and Al Qaeda would be where they needed to focus their energies. They were given reports by the Clinton administration and they were given the Gary Hart report as well. They did nothing - absolutely nothing. They took no action whatsoever. They frankly didn't give a ****. Now, Bush can do nothing but whine and blame everybody else for everything that's ever gone wrong in his administration, and god knows it's a lot. The Republicans have to face up to the fact that their boy (and I do mean boy) seriously dropped the ball. You were doing all right till you went on the obligatory Bush Bash... What did you find incorrect? Pfffttt... You again, deciding what people think and want. It is useless with you, you are more partisan than Harry...- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Ummm, show me where in hell I "decided what people think and want". I asked a direct question. What in the above do you find incorrect? And why? Hell, I didn't even right the piece, yet you are saying I said or did something I did not. That's John's MO too. You said specifically: "They took no action whatsoever. They frankly didn't give a ****." Now it looks like you owe me an apology. snerk I can't understand where you find the courage to argue with the most knowledgeable, educated, vociferous, brightest, and most articulate liberal on rec.boats. Wow! -- America needs Obamacare like Nancy Pelosi needs a Halloween mask or slammer's hemorrhoids.. John H- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - At least I don't come here and tell lies like you and Harry. |
This is a good post by someone else!
Loogypicker wrote:
On Jan 12, 12:01 pm, I am Tosk wrote: In article aa4f1d68-4346-4fd1-91bb-038fb3a341f0 @j14g2000yqm.googlegroups.com, says... On Jan 12, 10:15 am, I am Tosk wrote: In article , says... In article , says... In article 3f387376-7033-4e9d-a77d- , says... This really tells the story about the dishonesty of the right about Clinton! This blaming Clinton bull**** has got to stop! I've been thinking about this since the questions on last night's debate were pointing in this direction and it seems to have been an RNC talking point for some time now and is starting to pick up steam. Remember that when Clinton came into office he inherited: U.S. troops in Somalia An enormous deficit A recession And shortly afterward the WTC was bombed! Did he whine about it? Did he complain and blame it on the previous administration? Hell no! He sucked it up and got to work doing something about it. Granted Somalia didn't turn out good at all but the record deficit was turned into a record surplus, the recession became the largest economic expansion ever and the people who bombed the WTC were caught, tried and jailed. Now lets talk about how many 9/11 type events within our own borders were stopped while Clinton was in the White House -- of course we can't know absolutely how many there were but I can think of at least three: - There were the people who were arrested in Brooklyn with the plans to blow up the bridges and tunnels in NYC. - There was the plan to blow up LAX - And there was the millennium, when we know there was at least one plan thwarted and that was to blow up the space needle in Seattle. On top of that Clinton as we're beginning to find out, may have destroyed what remained of Saddam's WMD during the Desert Fox bombing that was trashed by the Republicans because it was interrupting their investigation of his penis. All of this was done while the Repubs were doing everything in their power to topple our head of state. If that is not treasonous then I sure as hell don't know what is. Bush was told by the outgoing admin that terrorism and Al Qaeda would be where they needed to focus their energies. They were given reports by the Clinton administration and they were given the Gary Hart report as well. They did nothing - absolutely nothing. They took no action whatsoever. They frankly didn't give a ****. Now, Bush can do nothing but whine and blame everybody else for everything that's ever gone wrong in his administration, and god knows it's a lot. The Republicans have to face up to the fact that their boy (and I do mean boy) seriously dropped the ball. You were doing all right till you went on the obligatory Bush Bash... What did you find incorrect? Pfffttt... You again, deciding what people think and want. It is useless with you, you are more partisan than Harry...- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Ummm, show me where in hell I "decided what people think and want". I asked a direct question. What in the above do you find incorrect? And why? Hell, I didn't even right the piece, yet you are saying I said or did something I did not. That's John's MO too. You said specifically: "They took no action whatsoever. They frankly didn't give a ****." Now it looks like you owe me an apology. snerk- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Again, *I* didn't SAY THAT..... The original poster did. And even if those WERE my words, how in HELL does that in any way mean that I am "deciding what people think and want"??? It's a statement by an individual. Ahh, where else but rec.boats can you find morons like loogy and snottyscotty arguing? |
This is a good post by someone else!
In article ,
says... In article aa4f1d68-4346-4fd1-91bb-038fb3a341f0 @j14g2000yqm.googlegroups.com, says... On Jan 12, 10:15*am, I am Tosk wrote: In article , says... In article , says... In article 3f387376-7033-4e9d-a77d- , says... This really tells the story about the dishonesty of the right about Clinton! This blaming Clinton bull**** has got to stop! I've been thinking about this since the questions on last night's debate were pointing in this direction and it seems to have been an RNC talking point for some time now and is starting to pick up steam. Remember that when Clinton came into office he inherited: U.S. troops in Somalia An enormous deficit A recession And shortly afterward the WTC was bombed! Did he whine about it? Did he complain and blame it on the previous administration? Hell no! He sucked it up and got to work doing something about it. Granted Somalia didn't turn out good at all but the record deficit was turned into a record surplus, the recession became the largest economic expansion ever and the people who bombed the WTC were caught, tried and jailed. Now lets talk about how many 9/11 type events within our own borders were stopped while Clinton was in the White House -- of course we can't know absolutely how many there were but I can think of at least three: - There were the people who were arrested in Brooklyn with the plans to blow up the bridges and tunnels in NYC. - There was the plan to blow up LAX - And there was the millennium, when we know there was at least one plan thwarted and that was to blow up the space needle in Seattle. On top of that Clinton as we're beginning to find out, may have destroyed what remained of Saddam's WMD during the Desert Fox bombing that was trashed by the Republicans because it was interrupting their investigation of his penis. All of this was done while the Repubs were doing everything in their power to topple our head of state. If that is not treasonous then I sure as hell don't know what is. Bush was told by the outgoing admin that terrorism and Al Qaeda would be where they needed to focus their energies. They were given reports by the Clinton administration and they were given the Gary Hart report as well. They did nothing - absolutely nothing. They took no action whatsoever. They frankly didn't give a ****. Now, Bush can do nothing but whine and blame everybody else for everything that's ever gone wrong in his administration, and god knows it's a lot. The Republicans have to face up to the fact that their boy (and I do mean boy) seriously dropped the ball. You were doing all right till you went on the obligatory Bush Bash... What did you find incorrect? Pfffttt... You again, deciding what people think and want. It is useless with you, you are more partisan than Harry...- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Ummm, show me where in hell I "decided what people think and want". I asked a direct question. What in the above do you find incorrect? And why? Hell, I didn't even right the piece, yet you are saying I said or did something I did not. That's John's MO too. You said specifically: "They took no action whatsoever. They frankly didn't give a ****." Now it looks like you owe me an apology. snerk No, I didn't say a THING. Did you happen to see the title of this post?????? And even if I said the above, how in hell does that in anyway shape or form tell anyone that I've "decided what people think and want"? It's someone's opinion. |
This is a good post by someone else!
"Don White" wrote in message ... In article , says... In article aa4f1d68-4346-4fd1-91bb-038fb3a341f0 @j14g2000yqm.googlegroups.com, says... On Jan 12, 10:15 am, I am Tosk wrote: In article , says... In article , says... In article 3f387376-7033-4e9d-a77d- , says... This really tells the story about the dishonesty of the right about Clinton! This blaming Clinton bull**** has got to stop! I've been thinking about this since the questions on last night's debate were pointing in this direction and it seems to have been an RNC talking point for some time now and is starting to pick up steam. Remember that when Clinton came into office he inherited: U.S. troops in Somalia An enormous deficit A recession And shortly afterward the WTC was bombed! Did he whine about it? Did he complain and blame it on the previous administration? Hell no! He sucked it up and got to work doing something about it. Granted Somalia didn't turn out good at all but the record deficit was turned into a record surplus, the recession became the largest economic expansion ever and the people who bombed the WTC were caught, tried and jailed. Now lets talk about how many 9/11 type events within our own borders were stopped while Clinton was in the White House -- of course we can't know absolutely how many there were but I can think of at least three: - There were the people who were arrested in Brooklyn with the plans to blow up the bridges and tunnels in NYC. - There was the plan to blow up LAX - And there was the millennium, when we know there was at least one plan thwarted and that was to blow up the space needle in Seattle. On top of that Clinton as we're beginning to find out, may have destroyed what remained of Saddam's WMD during the Desert Fox bombing that was trashed by the Republicans because it was interrupting their investigation of his penis. All of this was done while the Repubs were doing everything in their power to topple our head of state. If that is not treasonous then I sure as hell don't know what is. Bush was told by the outgoing admin that terrorism and Al Qaeda would be where they needed to focus their energies. They were given reports by the Clinton administration and they were given the Gary Hart report as well. They did nothing - absolutely nothing. They took no action whatsoever. They frankly didn't give a ****. Now, Bush can do nothing but whine and blame everybody else for everything that's ever gone wrong in his administration, and god knows it's a lot. The Republicans have to face up to the fact that their boy (and I do mean boy) seriously dropped the ball. You were doing all right till you went on the obligatory Bush Bash... What did you find incorrect? Pfffttt... You again, deciding what people think and want. It is useless with you, you are more partisan than Harry...- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Ummm, show me where in hell I "decided what people think and want". I asked a direct question. What in the above do you find incorrect? And why? Hell, I didn't even right the piece, yet you are saying I said or did something I did not. That's John's MO too. You said specifically: "They took no action whatsoever. They frankly didn't give a ****." Now it looks like you owe me an apology. snerk No, I didn't say a THING. Did you happen to see the title of this post?????? And even if I said the above, how in hell does that in anyway shape or form tell anyone that I've "decided what people think and want"? It's someone's opinion. Looney...you're really losing it. Now you're answering to your buddies as me. Get a grip...but not too tight. We don't want any more broken bones. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:34 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com