|
This is a good post by someone else!
This really tells the story about the dishonesty of the right about
Clinton! This blaming Clinton bull**** has got to stop! I've been thinking about this since the questions on last night's debate were pointing in this direction and it seems to have been an RNC talking point for some time now and is starting to pick up steam. Remember that when Clinton came into office he inherited: U.S. troops in Somalia An enormous deficit A recession And shortly afterward the WTC was bombed! Did he whine about it? Did he complain and blame it on the previous administration? Hell no! He sucked it up and got to work doing something about it. Granted Somalia didn't turn out good at all but the record deficit was turned into a record surplus, the recession became the largest economic expansion ever and the people who bombed the WTC were caught, tried and jailed. Now lets talk about how many 9/11 type events within our own borders were stopped while Clinton was in the White House -- of course we can't know absolutely how many there were but I can think of at least three: - There were the people who were arrested in Brooklyn with the plans to blow up the bridges and tunnels in NYC. - There was the plan to blow up LAX - And there was the millennium, when we know there was at least one plan thwarted and that was to blow up the space needle in Seattle. On top of that Clinton as we're beginning to find out, may have destroyed what remained of Saddam's WMD during the Desert Fox bombing that was trashed by the Republicans because it was interrupting their investigation of his penis. All of this was done while the Repubs were doing everything in their power to topple our head of state. If that is not treasonous then I sure as hell don't know what is. Bush was told by the outgoing admin that terrorism and Al Qaeda would be where they needed to focus their energies. They were given reports by the Clinton administration and they were given the Gary Hart report as well. They did nothing - absolutely nothing. They took no action whatsoever. They frankly didn't give a ****. Now, Bush can do nothing but whine and blame everybody else for everything that's ever gone wrong in his administration, and god knows it's a lot. The Republicans have to face up to the fact that their boy (and I do mean boy) seriously dropped the ball. |
This is a good post by someone else!
"Loogypicker" wrote in message ... This really tells the story about the dishonesty of the right about Clinton! This blaming Clinton bull**** has got to stop! I've been thinking about this since the questions on last night's debate were pointing in this direction and it seems to have been an RNC talking point for some time now and is starting to pick up steam. Remember that when Clinton came into office he inherited: U.S. troops in Somalia An enormous deficit A recession And shortly afterward the WTC was bombed! Did he whine about it? Did he complain and blame it on the previous administration? Hell no! He sucked it up and got to work doing something about it. Granted Somalia didn't turn out good at all but the record deficit was turned into a record surplus, the recession became the largest economic expansion ever and the people who bombed the WTC were caught, tried and jailed. Now lets talk about how many 9/11 type events within our own borders were stopped while Clinton was in the White House -- of course we can't know absolutely how many there were but I can think of at least three: - There were the people who were arrested in Brooklyn with the plans to blow up the bridges and tunnels in NYC. - There was the plan to blow up LAX - And there was the millennium, when we know there was at least one plan thwarted and that was to blow up the space needle in Seattle. On top of that Clinton as we're beginning to find out, may have destroyed what remained of Saddam's WMD during the Desert Fox bombing that was trashed by the Republicans because it was interrupting their investigation of his penis. All of this was done while the Repubs were doing everything in their power to topple our head of state. If that is not treasonous then I sure as hell don't know what is. Bush was told by the outgoing admin that terrorism and Al Qaeda would be where they needed to focus their energies. They were given reports by the Clinton administration and they were given the Gary Hart report as well. They did nothing - absolutely nothing. They took no action whatsoever. They frankly didn't give a ****. Now, Bush can do nothing but whine and blame everybody else for everything that's ever gone wrong in his administration, and god knows it's a lot. The Republicans have to face up to the fact that their boy (and I do mean boy) seriously dropped the ball. I'm no defender of Bush. BUT he has taken the high road since he left office, declining to criticize The Anointed One. You really should get a life. |
This is a good post by someone else!
On Mon, 11 Jan 2010 10:29:39 -0500, Anony Mouse wrote:
I'm no defender of Bush. BUT he has taken the high road since he left office, declining to criticize The Anointed One. You really should get a life. Yes, he has. He's shown considerable class all through the transition, and today. Unfortunately, the same can't be said of his second in command. Republicans should tell Cheney to zip it. He's not doing the party any favors. |
This is a good post by someone else!
On Jan 11, 12:50*pm, NotNow wrote:
In article , says... On Mon, 11 Jan 2010 05:55:50 -0800 (PST), Loogypicker wrote: This really tells the story about the dishonesty of the right about Clinton! This blaming Clinton bull**** has got to stop! The relative thing to todays financial problems is that Clinton gave us the 1999 Gramm, Leach Bliley bill (allowing banks to be brokerage houses) and the 2000 commodities reform act that allowed the derivatives trading that crushed Wall Street. (overturning almost 100 years of regulation) ... or do you want to ignore that. Why would I ignore that? What's bad about the Gramm, Leach Bliley bill? Here, this is bad??? The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLB Act), also known as the Financial Modernization Act of 1999, is a federal law enacted in the United States to control the ways that financial institutions deal with the private information of individuals. The Act consists of three sections: The Financial Privacy Rule, which regulates the collection and disclosure of private financial information; the Safeguards Rule, which stipulates that financial institutions must implement security programs to protect such information; and the Pretexting provisions, which prohibit the practice of pretexting (accessing private information using false pretenses). The Act also requires financial institutions to give customers written privacy notices that explain their information-sharing practices. You notice Loogy (aka Kevin Noble) posts with many sock-puppets. That's so he can drop double the amount of ****, and garbage here. |
This is a good post by someone else!
On Mon, 11 Jan 2010 09:54:59 -0600, thunder
wrote: On Mon, 11 Jan 2010 10:29:39 -0500, Anony Mouse wrote: I'm no defender of Bush. BUT he has taken the high road since he left office, declining to criticize The Anointed One. You really should get a life. Yes, he has. He's shown considerable class all through the transition, and today. Unfortunately, the same can't be said of his second in command. Republicans should tell Cheney to zip it. He's not doing the party any favors. Nope, Cheney is doing what must be done to get Obama focused. He's doing this country a favor. -- America needs Obamacare like Nancy Pelosi needs a Halloween mask. John H |
This is a good post by someone else!
"John H" wrote in message
... On Mon, 11 Jan 2010 09:54:59 -0600, thunder wrote: On Mon, 11 Jan 2010 10:29:39 -0500, Anony Mouse wrote: I'm no defender of Bush. BUT he has taken the high road since he left office, declining to criticize The Anointed One. You really should get a life. Yes, he has. He's shown considerable class all through the transition, and today. Unfortunately, the same can't be said of his second in command. Republicans should tell Cheney to zip it. He's not doing the party any favors. Nope, Cheney is doing what must be done to get Obama focused. He's doing this country a favor. You're right. He's reminding us about Bush's failed administration. -- Nom=de=Plume |
This is a good post by someone else!
nom=de=plume wrote:
"John H" wrote in message ... On Mon, 11 Jan 2010 09:54:59 -0600, thunder wrote: On Mon, 11 Jan 2010 10:29:39 -0500, Anony Mouse wrote: I'm no defender of Bush. BUT he has taken the high road since he left office, declining to criticize The Anointed One. You really should get a life. Yes, he has. He's shown considerable class all through the transition, and today. Unfortunately, the same can't be said of his second in command. Republicans should tell Cheney to zip it. He's not doing the party any favors. Nope, Cheney is doing what must be done to get Obama focused. He's doing this country a favor. You're right. He's reminding us about Bush's failed administration. Herring probably approves of cheney's treasonous actions of inviting attacks on this country. But that's what the righties want...attacks on this country. |
This is a good post by someone else!
On Mon, 11 Jan 2010 10:29:39 -0500, "Anony Mouse" wrote:
I'm no defender of Bush. BUT he has taken the high road since he left office, declining to criticize The Anointed One. You really should get a life. bush doesn't know who the president is. cheney has to tell him |
This is a good post by someone else!
On Mon, 11 Jan 2010 16:46:14 -0500, John H
wrote: On Mon, 11 Jan 2010 09:54:59 -0600, thunder wrote: On Mon, 11 Jan 2010 10:29:39 -0500, Anony Mouse wrote: I'm no defender of Bush. BUT he has taken the high road since he left office, declining to criticize The Anointed One. You really should get a life. Yes, he has. He's shown considerable class all through the transition, and today. Unfortunately, the same can't be said of his second in command. Republicans should tell Cheney to zip it. He's not doing the party any favors. Nope, Cheney is doing what must be done to get Obama focused. too bad he didn't take his own advice when he had power He's doing this country a favor. he would have done a bigger one if he'd shut up and not draw attention to his incompetence |
This is a good post by someone else!
|
This is a good post by someone else!
In article ,
says... In article 3f387376-7033-4e9d-a77d- , says... This really tells the story about the dishonesty of the right about Clinton! This blaming Clinton bull**** has got to stop! I've been thinking about this since the questions on last night's debate were pointing in this direction and it seems to have been an RNC talking point for some time now and is starting to pick up steam. Remember that when Clinton came into office he inherited: U.S. troops in Somalia An enormous deficit A recession And shortly afterward the WTC was bombed! Did he whine about it? Did he complain and blame it on the previous administration? Hell no! He sucked it up and got to work doing something about it. Granted Somalia didn't turn out good at all but the record deficit was turned into a record surplus, the recession became the largest economic expansion ever and the people who bombed the WTC were caught, tried and jailed. Now lets talk about how many 9/11 type events within our own borders were stopped while Clinton was in the White House -- of course we can't know absolutely how many there were but I can think of at least three: - There were the people who were arrested in Brooklyn with the plans to blow up the bridges and tunnels in NYC. - There was the plan to blow up LAX - And there was the millennium, when we know there was at least one plan thwarted and that was to blow up the space needle in Seattle. On top of that Clinton as we're beginning to find out, may have destroyed what remained of Saddam's WMD during the Desert Fox bombing that was trashed by the Republicans because it was interrupting their investigation of his penis. All of this was done while the Repubs were doing everything in their power to topple our head of state. If that is not treasonous then I sure as hell don't know what is. Bush was told by the outgoing admin that terrorism and Al Qaeda would be where they needed to focus their energies. They were given reports by the Clinton administration and they were given the Gary Hart report as well. They did nothing - absolutely nothing. They took no action whatsoever. They frankly didn't give a ****. Now, Bush can do nothing but whine and blame everybody else for everything that's ever gone wrong in his administration, and god knows it's a lot. The Republicans have to face up to the fact that their boy (and I do mean boy) seriously dropped the ball. You were doing all right till you went on the obligatory Bush Bash... What did you find incorrect? |
This is a good post by someone else!
In article ,
says... In article , says... In article 3f387376-7033-4e9d-a77d- , says... This really tells the story about the dishonesty of the right about Clinton! This blaming Clinton bull**** has got to stop! I've been thinking about this since the questions on last night's debate were pointing in this direction and it seems to have been an RNC talking point for some time now and is starting to pick up steam. Remember that when Clinton came into office he inherited: U.S. troops in Somalia An enormous deficit A recession And shortly afterward the WTC was bombed! Did he whine about it? Did he complain and blame it on the previous administration? Hell no! He sucked it up and got to work doing something about it. Granted Somalia didn't turn out good at all but the record deficit was turned into a record surplus, the recession became the largest economic expansion ever and the people who bombed the WTC were caught, tried and jailed. Now lets talk about how many 9/11 type events within our own borders were stopped while Clinton was in the White House -- of course we can't know absolutely how many there were but I can think of at least three: - There were the people who were arrested in Brooklyn with the plans to blow up the bridges and tunnels in NYC. - There was the plan to blow up LAX - And there was the millennium, when we know there was at least one plan thwarted and that was to blow up the space needle in Seattle. On top of that Clinton as we're beginning to find out, may have destroyed what remained of Saddam's WMD during the Desert Fox bombing that was trashed by the Republicans because it was interrupting their investigation of his penis. All of this was done while the Repubs were doing everything in their power to topple our head of state. If that is not treasonous then I sure as hell don't know what is. Bush was told by the outgoing admin that terrorism and Al Qaeda would be where they needed to focus their energies. They were given reports by the Clinton administration and they were given the Gary Hart report as well. They did nothing - absolutely nothing. They took no action whatsoever. They frankly didn't give a ****. Now, Bush can do nothing but whine and blame everybody else for everything that's ever gone wrong in his administration, and god knows it's a lot. The Republicans have to face up to the fact that their boy (and I do mean boy) seriously dropped the ball. You were doing all right till you went on the obligatory Bush Bash... What did you find incorrect? Pfffttt... You again, deciding what people think and want. It is useless with you, you are more partisan than Harry... |
This is a good post by someone else!
On Jan 12, 10:15*am, I am Tosk
wrote: In article , says... In article , says... In article 3f387376-7033-4e9d-a77d- , says... This really tells the story about the dishonesty of the right about Clinton! This blaming Clinton bull**** has got to stop! I've been thinking about this since the questions on last night's debate were pointing in this direction and it seems to have been an RNC talking point for some time now and is starting to pick up steam. Remember that when Clinton came into office he inherited: U.S. troops in Somalia An enormous deficit A recession And shortly afterward the WTC was bombed! Did he whine about it? Did he complain and blame it on the previous administration? Hell no! He sucked it up and got to work doing something about it. Granted Somalia didn't turn out good at all but the record deficit was turned into a record surplus, the recession became the largest economic expansion ever and the people who bombed the WTC were caught, tried and jailed. Now lets talk about how many 9/11 type events within our own borders were stopped while Clinton was in the White House -- of course we can't know absolutely how many there were but I can think of at least three: - There were the people who were arrested in Brooklyn with the plans to blow up the bridges and tunnels in NYC. - There was the plan to blow up LAX - And there was the millennium, when we know there was at least one plan thwarted and that was to blow up the space needle in Seattle. On top of that Clinton as we're beginning to find out, may have destroyed what remained of Saddam's WMD during the Desert Fox bombing that was trashed by the Republicans because it was interrupting their investigation of his penis. All of this was done while the Repubs were doing everything in their power to topple our head of state. If that is not treasonous then I sure as hell don't know what is. Bush was told by the outgoing admin that terrorism and Al Qaeda would be where they needed to focus their energies. They were given reports by the Clinton administration and they were given the Gary Hart report as well. They did nothing - absolutely nothing. They took no action whatsoever. They frankly didn't give a ****. Now, Bush can do nothing but whine and blame everybody else for everything that's ever gone wrong in his administration, and god knows it's a lot. The Republicans have to face up to the fact that their boy (and I do mean boy) seriously dropped the ball. You were doing all right till you went on the obligatory Bush Bash... What did you find incorrect? Pfffttt... You again, deciding what people think and want. It is useless with you, you are more partisan than Harry...- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Ummm, show me where in hell I "decided what people think and want". I asked a direct question. What in the above do you find incorrect? And why? Hell, I didn't even right the piece, yet you are saying I said or did something I did not. That's John's MO too. |
This is a good post by someone else!
|
This is a good post by someone else!
On Jan 12, 12:01*pm, I am Tosk
wrote: In article aa4f1d68-4346-4fd1-91bb-038fb3a341f0 @j14g2000yqm.googlegroups.com, says... On Jan 12, 10:15*am, I am Tosk wrote: In article , says... In article , says... In article 3f387376-7033-4e9d-a77d- , says... This really tells the story about the dishonesty of the right about Clinton! This blaming Clinton bull**** has got to stop! I've been thinking about this since the questions on last night's debate were pointing in this direction and it seems to have been an RNC talking point for some time now and is starting to pick up steam. Remember that when Clinton came into office he inherited: U.S. troops in Somalia An enormous deficit A recession And shortly afterward the WTC was bombed! Did he whine about it? Did he complain and blame it on the previous administration? Hell no! He sucked it up and got to work doing something about it. Granted Somalia didn't turn out good at all but the record deficit was turned into a record surplus, the recession became the largest economic expansion ever and the people who bombed the WTC were caught, tried and jailed. Now lets talk about how many 9/11 type events within our own borders were stopped while Clinton was in the White House -- of course we can't know absolutely how many there were but I can think of at least three: - There were the people who were arrested in Brooklyn with the plans to blow up the bridges and tunnels in NYC. - There was the plan to blow up LAX - And there was the millennium, when we know there was at least one plan thwarted and that was to blow up the space needle in Seattle. On top of that Clinton as we're beginning to find out, may have destroyed what remained of Saddam's WMD during the Desert Fox bombing that was trashed by the Republicans because it was interrupting their investigation of his penis. All of this was done while the Repubs were doing everything in their power to topple our head of state. If that is not treasonous then I sure as hell don't know what is. Bush was told by the outgoing admin that terrorism and Al Qaeda would be where they needed to focus their energies. They were given reports by the Clinton administration and they were given the Gary Hart report as well. They did nothing - absolutely nothing. They took no action whatsoever. They frankly didn't give a ****. Now, Bush can do nothing but whine and blame everybody else for everything that's ever gone wrong in his administration, and god knows it's a lot. The Republicans have to face up to the fact that their boy (and I do mean boy) seriously dropped the ball. You were doing all right till you went on the obligatory Bush Bash... What did you find incorrect? Pfffttt... You again, deciding what people think and want. It is useless with you, you are more partisan than Harry...- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Ummm, show me where in hell I "decided what people think and want". I asked a direct question. What in the above do you find incorrect? And why? Hell, I didn't even right the piece, yet you are saying I said or did something I did not. That's John's MO too. You said specifically: *"They took no action whatsoever. They frankly didn't give a ****." Now it looks like you owe me an apology. snerk- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Again, *I* didn't SAY THAT..... The original poster did. And even if those WERE my words, how in HELL does that in any way mean that I am "deciding what people think and want"??? It's a statement by an individual. |
This is a good post by someone else!
On Jan 12, 1:44*pm, John H wrote:
On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 12:01:05 -0500, I am Tosk wrote: In article aa4f1d68-4346-4fd1-91bb-038fb3a341f0 , says... On Jan 12, 10:15 am, I am Tosk wrote: In article , says... In article , says... In article 3f387376-7033-4e9d-a77d- , says... This really tells the story about the dishonesty of the right about Clinton! This blaming Clinton bull**** has got to stop! I've been thinking about this since the questions on last night's debate were pointing in this direction and it seems to have been an RNC talking point for some time now and is starting to pick up steam. Remember that when Clinton came into office he inherited: U.S. troops in Somalia An enormous deficit A recession And shortly afterward the WTC was bombed! Did he whine about it? Did he complain and blame it on the previous administration? Hell no! He sucked it up and got to work doing something about it. Granted Somalia didn't turn out good at all but the record deficit was turned into a record surplus, the recession became the largest economic expansion ever and the people who bombed the WTC were caught, tried and jailed. Now lets talk about how many 9/11 type events within our own borders were stopped while Clinton was in the White House -- of course we can't know absolutely how many there were but I can think of at least three: - There were the people who were arrested in Brooklyn with the plans to blow up the bridges and tunnels in NYC. - There was the plan to blow up LAX - And there was the millennium, when we know there was at least one plan thwarted and that was to blow up the space needle in Seattle. On top of that Clinton as we're beginning to find out, may have destroyed what remained of Saddam's WMD during the Desert Fox bombing that was trashed by the Republicans because it was interrupting their investigation of his penis. All of this was done while the Repubs were doing everything in their power to topple our head of state. If that is not treasonous then I sure as hell don't know what is. Bush was told by the outgoing admin that terrorism and Al Qaeda would be where they needed to focus their energies. They were given reports by the Clinton administration and they were given the Gary Hart report as well. They did nothing - absolutely nothing. They took no action whatsoever. They frankly didn't give a ****. Now, Bush can do nothing but whine and blame everybody else for everything that's ever gone wrong in his administration, and god knows it's a lot. The Republicans have to face up to the fact that their boy (and I do mean boy) seriously dropped the ball. You were doing all right till you went on the obligatory Bush Bash... What did you find incorrect? Pfffttt... You again, deciding what people think and want. It is useless with you, you are more partisan than Harry...- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Ummm, show me where in hell I "decided what people think and want". I asked a direct question. What in the above do you find incorrect? And why? Hell, I didn't even right the piece, yet you are saying I said or did something I did not. That's John's MO too. You said specifically: "They took no action whatsoever. They frankly didn't give a ****." Now it looks like you owe me an apology. snerk I can't understand where you find the courage to argue with the most knowledgeable, educated, vociferous, brightest, and most articulate liberal on rec.boats. Wow! -- America needs Obamacare like Nancy Pelosi needs a Halloween mask or slammer's hemorrhoids.. John H- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - At least I don't come here and tell lies like you and Harry. |
This is a good post by someone else!
Loogypicker wrote:
On Jan 12, 12:01 pm, I am Tosk wrote: In article aa4f1d68-4346-4fd1-91bb-038fb3a341f0 @j14g2000yqm.googlegroups.com, says... On Jan 12, 10:15 am, I am Tosk wrote: In article , says... In article , says... In article 3f387376-7033-4e9d-a77d- , says... This really tells the story about the dishonesty of the right about Clinton! This blaming Clinton bull**** has got to stop! I've been thinking about this since the questions on last night's debate were pointing in this direction and it seems to have been an RNC talking point for some time now and is starting to pick up steam. Remember that when Clinton came into office he inherited: U.S. troops in Somalia An enormous deficit A recession And shortly afterward the WTC was bombed! Did he whine about it? Did he complain and blame it on the previous administration? Hell no! He sucked it up and got to work doing something about it. Granted Somalia didn't turn out good at all but the record deficit was turned into a record surplus, the recession became the largest economic expansion ever and the people who bombed the WTC were caught, tried and jailed. Now lets talk about how many 9/11 type events within our own borders were stopped while Clinton was in the White House -- of course we can't know absolutely how many there were but I can think of at least three: - There were the people who were arrested in Brooklyn with the plans to blow up the bridges and tunnels in NYC. - There was the plan to blow up LAX - And there was the millennium, when we know there was at least one plan thwarted and that was to blow up the space needle in Seattle. On top of that Clinton as we're beginning to find out, may have destroyed what remained of Saddam's WMD during the Desert Fox bombing that was trashed by the Republicans because it was interrupting their investigation of his penis. All of this was done while the Repubs were doing everything in their power to topple our head of state. If that is not treasonous then I sure as hell don't know what is. Bush was told by the outgoing admin that terrorism and Al Qaeda would be where they needed to focus their energies. They were given reports by the Clinton administration and they were given the Gary Hart report as well. They did nothing - absolutely nothing. They took no action whatsoever. They frankly didn't give a ****. Now, Bush can do nothing but whine and blame everybody else for everything that's ever gone wrong in his administration, and god knows it's a lot. The Republicans have to face up to the fact that their boy (and I do mean boy) seriously dropped the ball. You were doing all right till you went on the obligatory Bush Bash... What did you find incorrect? Pfffttt... You again, deciding what people think and want. It is useless with you, you are more partisan than Harry...- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Ummm, show me where in hell I "decided what people think and want". I asked a direct question. What in the above do you find incorrect? And why? Hell, I didn't even right the piece, yet you are saying I said or did something I did not. That's John's MO too. You said specifically: "They took no action whatsoever. They frankly didn't give a ****." Now it looks like you owe me an apology. snerk- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Again, *I* didn't SAY THAT..... The original poster did. And even if those WERE my words, how in HELL does that in any way mean that I am "deciding what people think and want"??? It's a statement by an individual. Ahh, where else but rec.boats can you find morons like loogy and snottyscotty arguing? |
This is a good post by someone else!
In article ,
says... In article aa4f1d68-4346-4fd1-91bb-038fb3a341f0 @j14g2000yqm.googlegroups.com, says... On Jan 12, 10:15*am, I am Tosk wrote: In article , says... In article , says... In article 3f387376-7033-4e9d-a77d- , says... This really tells the story about the dishonesty of the right about Clinton! This blaming Clinton bull**** has got to stop! I've been thinking about this since the questions on last night's debate were pointing in this direction and it seems to have been an RNC talking point for some time now and is starting to pick up steam. Remember that when Clinton came into office he inherited: U.S. troops in Somalia An enormous deficit A recession And shortly afterward the WTC was bombed! Did he whine about it? Did he complain and blame it on the previous administration? Hell no! He sucked it up and got to work doing something about it. Granted Somalia didn't turn out good at all but the record deficit was turned into a record surplus, the recession became the largest economic expansion ever and the people who bombed the WTC were caught, tried and jailed. Now lets talk about how many 9/11 type events within our own borders were stopped while Clinton was in the White House -- of course we can't know absolutely how many there were but I can think of at least three: - There were the people who were arrested in Brooklyn with the plans to blow up the bridges and tunnels in NYC. - There was the plan to blow up LAX - And there was the millennium, when we know there was at least one plan thwarted and that was to blow up the space needle in Seattle. On top of that Clinton as we're beginning to find out, may have destroyed what remained of Saddam's WMD during the Desert Fox bombing that was trashed by the Republicans because it was interrupting their investigation of his penis. All of this was done while the Repubs were doing everything in their power to topple our head of state. If that is not treasonous then I sure as hell don't know what is. Bush was told by the outgoing admin that terrorism and Al Qaeda would be where they needed to focus their energies. They were given reports by the Clinton administration and they were given the Gary Hart report as well. They did nothing - absolutely nothing. They took no action whatsoever. They frankly didn't give a ****. Now, Bush can do nothing but whine and blame everybody else for everything that's ever gone wrong in his administration, and god knows it's a lot. The Republicans have to face up to the fact that their boy (and I do mean boy) seriously dropped the ball. You were doing all right till you went on the obligatory Bush Bash... What did you find incorrect? Pfffttt... You again, deciding what people think and want. It is useless with you, you are more partisan than Harry...- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Ummm, show me where in hell I "decided what people think and want". I asked a direct question. What in the above do you find incorrect? And why? Hell, I didn't even right the piece, yet you are saying I said or did something I did not. That's John's MO too. You said specifically: "They took no action whatsoever. They frankly didn't give a ****." Now it looks like you owe me an apology. snerk No, I didn't say a THING. Did you happen to see the title of this post?????? And even if I said the above, how in hell does that in anyway shape or form tell anyone that I've "decided what people think and want"? It's someone's opinion. |
This is a good post by someone else!
"Don White" wrote in message ... In article , says... In article aa4f1d68-4346-4fd1-91bb-038fb3a341f0 @j14g2000yqm.googlegroups.com, says... On Jan 12, 10:15 am, I am Tosk wrote: In article , says... In article , says... In article 3f387376-7033-4e9d-a77d- , says... This really tells the story about the dishonesty of the right about Clinton! This blaming Clinton bull**** has got to stop! I've been thinking about this since the questions on last night's debate were pointing in this direction and it seems to have been an RNC talking point for some time now and is starting to pick up steam. Remember that when Clinton came into office he inherited: U.S. troops in Somalia An enormous deficit A recession And shortly afterward the WTC was bombed! Did he whine about it? Did he complain and blame it on the previous administration? Hell no! He sucked it up and got to work doing something about it. Granted Somalia didn't turn out good at all but the record deficit was turned into a record surplus, the recession became the largest economic expansion ever and the people who bombed the WTC were caught, tried and jailed. Now lets talk about how many 9/11 type events within our own borders were stopped while Clinton was in the White House -- of course we can't know absolutely how many there were but I can think of at least three: - There were the people who were arrested in Brooklyn with the plans to blow up the bridges and tunnels in NYC. - There was the plan to blow up LAX - And there was the millennium, when we know there was at least one plan thwarted and that was to blow up the space needle in Seattle. On top of that Clinton as we're beginning to find out, may have destroyed what remained of Saddam's WMD during the Desert Fox bombing that was trashed by the Republicans because it was interrupting their investigation of his penis. All of this was done while the Repubs were doing everything in their power to topple our head of state. If that is not treasonous then I sure as hell don't know what is. Bush was told by the outgoing admin that terrorism and Al Qaeda would be where they needed to focus their energies. They were given reports by the Clinton administration and they were given the Gary Hart report as well. They did nothing - absolutely nothing. They took no action whatsoever. They frankly didn't give a ****. Now, Bush can do nothing but whine and blame everybody else for everything that's ever gone wrong in his administration, and god knows it's a lot. The Republicans have to face up to the fact that their boy (and I do mean boy) seriously dropped the ball. You were doing all right till you went on the obligatory Bush Bash... What did you find incorrect? Pfffttt... You again, deciding what people think and want. It is useless with you, you are more partisan than Harry...- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Ummm, show me where in hell I "decided what people think and want". I asked a direct question. What in the above do you find incorrect? And why? Hell, I didn't even right the piece, yet you are saying I said or did something I did not. That's John's MO too. You said specifically: "They took no action whatsoever. They frankly didn't give a ****." Now it looks like you owe me an apology. snerk No, I didn't say a THING. Did you happen to see the title of this post?????? And even if I said the above, how in hell does that in anyway shape or form tell anyone that I've "decided what people think and want"? It's someone's opinion. Looney...you're really losing it. Now you're answering to your buddies as me. Get a grip...but not too tight. We don't want any more broken bones. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:44 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com