| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#26
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Someone who makes sense
On 1/10/2010 9:20 AM, D.Duck wrote:
Loogypicker wrote: On Jan 9, 8:23 pm, bpuharic wrote: On Sat, 9 Jan 2010 09:44:15 -0800 (PST), John H wrote: OK. It's fair to kill 'supposed' enemy combatants, even though there's been no proof of same presented, and they're wearing nothing to distinguish them from the local population. However, if and when an enemy combatant can penetrate our border, then he is due the complete and full protection granted any citizen of the USA. how many cop cars do we have in yemen? Suppose the enemy combatant crossed our border as part of a battalion. Would he then, if captured, be entitled to the full protection of the law? the last time that happened was in 1812. please let me know if it happens again, m'kay? Or, should captured enemy combatants be treated as prisoners of war, which is what the little ****ers are. Maybe you and your liberal friends need a refresher in combat. At least your Messiah is learning to use the proper terminology, "We are at war." "Smartest words to come out of his mouth yet. Thank God he's listening to Cheney. bush tried richard reid, the shoe bomber, in federal court. so why you bitchin' about obama? (Sent through Google)- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Because Obama is a liberal, which can do no good ever, and Bush is a conservative which can do no bad ever. That's John's M.O. And the broken record continues to play. Of course, I have nothing to add here. I just whine. |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Now it all makes sense... | General | |||
| Larry Kudlo makes a lot of sense... | General | |||
| A consensus that makes sense! | ASA | |||
| Everybody with any sense....................... | General | |||
| Here's a guy who makes some sense! | General | |||
![D.Duck[_5_] is offline](https://www.boatbanter.com/images/SultanThemeVB3R/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
Threaded Mode
