In article 58044b30-9ed7-43a1-a895-8b8a08e62f70
@p8g2000yqb.googlegroups.com, says...

On Jan 5, 10:41*am, I am Tosk wrote:
In article ,
says...







Las Vegas, Nevada. *Federal Building. *A Social Security recipient, upset
about a cut in benefits came into the building with a shotgun under his
coat. *Before it was all over, a security guard was dead, a U.S. Marshall
was wounded, and the perp was dead.

Lots of people with no hope living on subsistence levels who might be dead
in six months are going to be wanting to fight the beast. *Especially when
they get the letter telling them that their benefits have been reduced or
cancelled.

It's the next thing to receive a PC label. *Just to insure that it doesn't
have a derogatory meaning, and therefore the people involved don't feel bad
about themselves.

Steve

RIP - The dead SO was a retired Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Sergeant, 66
years old, who had given of himself his whole career.

There is starting to be reports this was a guy who was known for extreme
racial prejudice toward er, um... "white people". Being this may have
been black on white hate crime, I am sure that aspect of the crime will
be ignored in the minority media though...- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Cite?

I can't if the news doesn't carry it. Take it for what it's worth, I saw
a report that neighbors had been interviewed by a local news station and
it was noted specifically that he had a strong dislike for white people
and wasn't shy about telling folks that. Either way, you can call me a
liar if you want.

In article b83c1bc0-7689-4b1e-9179-c6a8b2d99f54
@r5g2000yqb.googlegroups.com, says...

On Jan 4, 10:10*pm, Harry wrote:
Steve B wrote:
Las Vegas, Nevada. *Federal Building. *A Social Security recipient, upset
about a cut in benefits came into the building with a shotgun under his
coat. *Before it was all over, a security guard was dead, a U.S. Marshall
was wounded, and the perp was dead.

Lots of people with no hope living on subsistence levels who might be dead
in six months are going to be wanting to fight the beast. *Especially when
they get the letter telling them that their benefits have been reduced or
cancelled.

It's the next thing to receive a PC label. *Just to insure that it doesn't
have a derogatory meaning, and therefore the people involved don't feel bad
about themselves.

Steve

RIP - The dead SO was a retired Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Sergeant, 66
years old, who had given of himself his whole career.

You ought to at least try to get some important facts straight:

"Wicks (the gunman) filed a discrimination claim against Social Security
in 2008, alleging he was denied full benefits because of his race,
according to court papers. A federal judge ruled against him in September.

A law enforcement official said Wicks set fire to his residence before
the shooting, and surveillance video indicates he was a lone gunman with
no accomplices.

The deputy marshal and the security officer were taken to a hospital,
where the security officer, Stanley W. Cooper, died, said U.S. Marshals
spokesman Jeff Carter. Cooper, an employee of Akal Security, had been a
contracted court security officer with the U.S. marshals in Las Vegas
since 1994, Carter said."

1. It wasn't about a "cut" in his benefits.

2. He was upset about losing a court case.

3. He went off his rocker before the shootings, setting his residence on
fire.

Wicks likely was receiving a policeman's retirement, social security,
and pay from his retirement job as a "contracted court security
officer." Was he living at subsistence levels? Unknown, but unlikely.

Perhaps posters should have to score at least average on an IQ test
before being allow to make misinformed, moronic posts like Steve B's.
Wait...that would clear out loogy, justhate, BAR, flajim, Bob the
Krueger, and a few others.

Oh well.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

They won't let some little facts get in the way of their intellectual
dishonesty!

Man, sometimes you are worst than Harry. He does it to be an asshole,
you actually believe that anybody with an opposing opinion must be a
liar and nothing else. Do you understand the complexity of humanity,
that two honest folks can have completely opposite opinions on an issue
without lying?? I have never seen evidence of that from you..

On Jan 6, 9:33*am, I am Tosk wrote:
In article b83c1bc0-7689-4b1e-9179-c6a8b2d99f54
@r5g2000yqb.googlegroups.com, says...







On Jan 4, 10:10*pm, Harry wrote:
Steve B wrote:
Las Vegas, Nevada. *Federal Building. *A Social Security recipient, upset
about a cut in benefits came into the building with a shotgun under his
coat. *Before it was all over, a security guard was dead, a U.S. Marshall
was wounded, and the perp was dead.

Lots of people with no hope living on subsistence levels who might be dead
in six months are going to be wanting to fight the beast. *Especially when
they get the letter telling them that their benefits have been reduced or
cancelled.

It's the next thing to receive a PC label. *Just to insure that it doesn't
have a derogatory meaning, and therefore the people involved don't feel bad
about themselves.

Steve

RIP - The dead SO was a retired Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Sergeant, 66
years old, who had given of himself his whole career.

You ought to at least try to get some important facts straight:

"Wicks (the gunman) filed a discrimination claim against Social Security
in 2008, alleging he was denied full benefits because of his race,
according to court papers. A federal judge ruled against him in September.

A law enforcement official said Wicks set fire to his residence before
the shooting, and surveillance video indicates he was a lone gunman with
no accomplices.

The deputy marshal and the security officer were taken to a hospital,
where the security officer, Stanley W. Cooper, died, said U.S. Marshals
spokesman Jeff Carter. Cooper, an employee of Akal Security, had been a
contracted court security officer with the U.S. marshals in Las Vegas
since 1994, Carter said."

1. It wasn't about a "cut" in his benefits.

2. He was upset about losing a court case.

3. He went off his rocker before the shootings, setting his residence on
fire.

Wicks likely was receiving a policeman's retirement, social security,
and pay from his retirement job as a "contracted court security
officer." Was he living at subsistence levels? Unknown, but unlikely.

Perhaps posters should have to score at least average on an IQ test
before being allow to make misinformed, moronic posts like Steve B's.
Wait...that would clear out loogy, justhate, BAR, flajim, Bob the
Krueger, and a few others.

Oh well.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

They won't let some little facts get in the way of their intellectual
dishonesty!

Man, sometimes you are worst than Harry. He does it to be an asshole,
you actually believe that anybody with an opposing opinion must be a
liar and nothing else. Do you understand the complexity of humanity,
that two honest folks can have completely opposite opinions on an issue
without lying?? I have never seen evidence of that from you..- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

You didn't see the dishonesty in the original post? Would you like me
to point each one out?

Loogypicker wrote:
On Jan 6, 9:33 am, I am Tosk wrote:
In article b83c1bc0-7689-4b1e-9179-c6a8b2d99f54
@r5g2000yqb.googlegroups.com, says...







On Jan 4, 10:10 pm, Harry wrote:
Steve B wrote:
Las Vegas, Nevada. Federal Building. A Social Security recipient, upset
about a cut in benefits came into the building with a shotgun under his
coat. Before it was all over, a security guard was dead, a U.S. Marshall
was wounded, and the perp was dead.
Lots of people with no hope living on subsistence levels who might be dead
in six months are going to be wanting to fight the beast. Especially when
they get the letter telling them that their benefits have been reduced or
cancelled.
It's the next thing to receive a PC label. Just to insure that it doesn't
have a derogatory meaning, and therefore the people involved don't feel bad
about themselves.
Steve
RIP - The dead SO was a retired Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Sergeant, 66
years old, who had given of himself his whole career.
You ought to at least try to get some important facts straight:
"Wicks (the gunman) filed a discrimination claim against Social Security
in 2008, alleging he was denied full benefits because of his race,
according to court papers. A federal judge ruled against him in September.
A law enforcement official said Wicks set fire to his residence before
the shooting, and surveillance video indicates he was a lone gunman with
no accomplices.
The deputy marshal and the security officer were taken to a hospital,
where the security officer, Stanley W. Cooper, died, said U.S. Marshals
spokesman Jeff Carter. Cooper, an employee of Akal Security, had been a
contracted court security officer with the U.S. marshals in Las Vegas
since 1994, Carter said."
1. It wasn't about a "cut" in his benefits.
2. He was upset about losing a court case.
3. He went off his rocker before the shootings, setting his residence on
fire.
Wicks likely was receiving a policeman's retirement, social security,
and pay from his retirement job as a "contracted court security
officer." Was he living at subsistence levels? Unknown, but unlikely.
Perhaps posters should have to score at least average on an IQ test
before being allow to make misinformed, moronic posts like Steve B's.
Wait...that would clear out loogy, justhate, BAR, flajim, Bob the
Krueger, and a few others.
Oh well.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
They won't let some little facts get in the way of their intellectual
dishonesty!
Man, sometimes you are worst than Harry. He does it to be an asshole,
you actually believe that anybody with an opposing opinion must be a
liar and nothing else. Do you understand the complexity of humanity,
that two honest folks can have completely opposite opinions on an issue
without lying?? I have never seen evidence of that from you..- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

You didn't see the dishonesty in the original post? Would you like me
to point each one out?

Sure. Go ahead.

In article ,
says...

In article b83c1bc0-7689-4b1e-9179-c6a8b2d99f54
@r5g2000yqb.googlegroups.com, says...

On Jan 4, 10:10*pm, Harry wrote:
Steve B wrote:
Las Vegas, Nevada. *Federal Building. *A Social Security recipient, upset
about a cut in benefits came into the building with a shotgun under his
coat. *Before it was all over, a security guard was dead, a U.S. Marshall
was wounded, and the perp was dead.

Lots of people with no hope living on subsistence levels who might be dead
in six months are going to be wanting to fight the beast. *Especially when
they get the letter telling them that their benefits have been reduced or
cancelled.

It's the next thing to receive a PC label. *Just to insure that it doesn't
have a derogatory meaning, and therefore the people involved don't feel bad
about themselves.

Steve

RIP - The dead SO was a retired Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Sergeant, 66
years old, who had given of himself his whole career.

You ought to at least try to get some important facts straight:

"Wicks (the gunman) filed a discrimination claim against Social Security
in 2008, alleging he was denied full benefits because of his race,
according to court papers. A federal judge ruled against him in September.

A law enforcement official said Wicks set fire to his residence before
the shooting, and surveillance video indicates he was a lone gunman with
no accomplices.

The deputy marshal and the security officer were taken to a hospital,
where the security officer, Stanley W. Cooper, died, said U.S. Marshals
spokesman Jeff Carter. Cooper, an employee of Akal Security, had been a
contracted court security officer with the U.S. marshals in Las Vegas
since 1994, Carter said."

1. It wasn't about a "cut" in his benefits.

2. He was upset about losing a court case.

3. He went off his rocker before the shootings, setting his residence on
fire.

Wicks likely was receiving a policeman's retirement, social security,
and pay from his retirement job as a "contracted court security
officer." Was he living at subsistence levels? Unknown, but unlikely.

Perhaps posters should have to score at least average on an IQ test
before being allow to make misinformed, moronic posts like Steve B's.
Wait...that would clear out loogy, justhate, BAR, flajim, Bob the
Krueger, and a few others.

Oh well.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

They won't let some little facts get in the way of their intellectual
dishonesty!

Man, sometimes you are worst than Harry. He does it to be an asshole,
you actually believe that anybody with an opposing opinion must be a
liar and nothing else. Do you understand the complexity of humanity,
that two honest folks can have completely opposite opinions on an issue
without lying?? I have never seen evidence of that from you..

The original post was FULL of mistruths. Do you need me to post them one
by one?

On Jan 6, 10:02*am, Jim wrote:
Loogypicker wrote:
On Jan 6, 9:33 am, I am Tosk wrote:
In article b83c1bc0-7689-4b1e-9179-c6a8b2d99f54
@r5g2000yqb.googlegroups.com, says...

On Jan 4, 10:10 pm, Harry wrote:
Steve B wrote:
Las Vegas, Nevada. *Federal Building. *A Social Security recipient, upset
about a cut in benefits came into the building with a shotgun under his
coat. *Before it was all over, a security guard was dead, a U.S. Marshall
was wounded, and the perp was dead.
Lots of people with no hope living on subsistence levels who might be dead
in six months are going to be wanting to fight the beast. *Especially when
they get the letter telling them that their benefits have been reduced or
cancelled.
It's the next thing to receive a PC label. *Just to insure that it doesn't
have a derogatory meaning, and therefore the people involved don't feel bad
about themselves.
Steve
RIP - The dead SO was a retired Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Sergeant, 66
years old, who had given of himself his whole career.
You ought to at least try to get some important facts straight:
"Wicks (the gunman) filed a discrimination claim against Social Security
in 2008, alleging he was denied full benefits because of his race,
according to court papers. A federal judge ruled against him in September.
A law enforcement official said Wicks set fire to his residence before
the shooting, and surveillance video indicates he was a lone gunman with
no accomplices.
The deputy marshal and the security officer were taken to a hospital,
where the security officer, Stanley W. Cooper, died, said U.S. Marshals
spokesman Jeff Carter. Cooper, an employee of Akal Security, had been a
contracted court security officer with the U.S. marshals in Las Vegas
since 1994, Carter said."
1. It wasn't about a "cut" in his benefits.
2. He was upset about losing a court case.
3. He went off his rocker before the shootings, setting his residence on
fire.
Wicks likely was receiving a policeman's retirement, social security,
and pay from his retirement job as a "contracted court security
officer." Was he living at subsistence levels? Unknown, but unlikely..
Perhaps posters should have to score at least average on an IQ test
before being allow to make misinformed, moronic posts like Steve B's..
Wait...that would clear out loogy, justhate, BAR, flajim, Bob the
Krueger, and a few others.
Oh well.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
They won't let some little facts get in the way of their intellectual
dishonesty!
Man, sometimes you are worst than Harry. He does it to be an asshole,
you actually believe that anybody with an opposing opinion must be a
liar and nothing else. Do you understand the complexity of humanity,
that two honest folks can have completely opposite opinions on an issue
without lying?? I have never seen evidence of that from you..- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

You didn't see the dishonesty in the original post? Would you like me
to point each one out?

Sure. Go ahead.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

With pleasure!

1. It wasn't about a "cut" in his benefits.


2. He was upset about losing a court case.


3. He went off his rocker before the shootings, setting his residence
on
fire

Loogypicker wrote:
On Jan 6, 10:02 am, Jim wrote:
Loogypicker wrote:
On Jan 6, 9:33 am, I am Tosk wrote:
In article b83c1bc0-7689-4b1e-9179-c6a8b2d99f54
@r5g2000yqb.googlegroups.com, says...
On Jan 4, 10:10 pm, Harry wrote:
Steve B wrote:
Las Vegas, Nevada. Federal Building. A Social Security recipient, upset
about a cut in benefits came into the building with a shotgun under his
coat. Before it was all over, a security guard was dead, a U.S. Marshall
was wounded, and the perp was dead.
Lots of people with no hope living on subsistence levels who might be dead
in six months are going to be wanting to fight the beast. Especially when
they get the letter telling them that their benefits have been reduced or
cancelled.
It's the next thing to receive a PC label. Just to insure that it doesn't
have a derogatory meaning, and therefore the people involved don't feel bad
about themselves.
Steve
RIP - The dead SO was a retired Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Sergeant, 66
years old, who had given of himself his whole career.
You ought to at least try to get some important facts straight:
"Wicks (the gunman) filed a discrimination claim against Social Security
in 2008, alleging he was denied full benefits because of his race,
according to court papers. A federal judge ruled against him in September.
A law enforcement official said Wicks set fire to his residence before
the shooting, and surveillance video indicates he was a lone gunman with
no accomplices.
The deputy marshal and the security officer were taken to a hospital,
where the security officer, Stanley W. Cooper, died, said U.S. Marshals
spokesman Jeff Carter. Cooper, an employee of Akal Security, had been a
contracted court security officer with the U.S. marshals in Las Vegas
since 1994, Carter said."
1. It wasn't about a "cut" in his benefits.
2. He was upset about losing a court case.
3. He went off his rocker before the shootings, setting his residence on
fire.
Wicks likely was receiving a policeman's retirement, social security,
and pay from his retirement job as a "contracted court security
officer." Was he living at subsistence levels? Unknown, but unlikely.
Perhaps posters should have to score at least average on an IQ test
before being allow to make misinformed, moronic posts like Steve B's.
Wait...that would clear out loogy, justhate, BAR, flajim, Bob the
Krueger, and a few others.
Oh well.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
They won't let some little facts get in the way of their intellectual
dishonesty!
Man, sometimes you are worst than Harry. He does it to be an asshole,
you actually believe that anybody with an opposing opinion must be a
liar and nothing else. Do you understand the complexity of humanity,
that two honest folks can have completely opposite opinions on an issue
without lying?? I have never seen evidence of that from you..- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
You didn't see the dishonesty in the original post? Would you like me
to point each one out?
Sure. Go ahead.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

With pleasure!

1. It wasn't about a "cut" in his benefits.


2. He was upset about losing a court case.


3. He went off his rocker before the shootings, setting his residence
on
fire

If I'm not mistaken, Harry said that in response to the initial post. To
answer your question, I see a lot of dishonesty in the majority of
Harry's posts when I see them.

Jim wrote:
Loogypicker wrote:
On Jan 6, 10:02 am, Jim wrote:
Loogypicker wrote:
On Jan 6, 9:33 am, I am Tosk wrote:
In article b83c1bc0-7689-4b1e-9179-c6a8b2d99f54
@r5g2000yqb.googlegroups.com, says...
On Jan 4, 10:10 pm, Harry wrote:
Steve B wrote:
Las Vegas, Nevada. Federal Building. A Social Security
recipient, upset
about a cut in benefits came into the building with a shotgun
under his
coat. Before it was all over, a security guard was dead, a U.S.
Marshall
was wounded, and the perp was dead.
Lots of people with no hope living on subsistence levels who
might be dead
in six months are going to be wanting to fight the beast.
Especially when
they get the letter telling them that their benefits have been
reduced or
cancelled.
It's the next thing to receive a PC label. Just to insure that
it doesn't
have a derogatory meaning, and therefore the people involved
don't feel bad
about themselves.
Steve
RIP - The dead SO was a retired Las Vegas Metropolitan Police
Sergeant, 66
years old, who had given of himself his whole career.
You ought to at least try to get some important facts straight:
"Wicks (the gunman) filed a discrimination claim against Social
Security
in 2008, alleging he was denied full benefits because of his race,
according to court papers. A federal judge ruled against him in
September.
A law enforcement official said Wicks set fire to his residence
before
the shooting, and surveillance video indicates he was a lone
gunman with
no accomplices.
The deputy marshal and the security officer were taken to a
hospital,
where the security officer, Stanley W. Cooper, died, said U.S.
Marshals
spokesman Jeff Carter. Cooper, an employee of Akal Security, had
been a
contracted court security officer with the U.S. marshals in Las
Vegas
since 1994, Carter said."
1. It wasn't about a "cut" in his benefits.
2. He was upset about losing a court case.
3. He went off his rocker before the shootings, setting his
residence on
fire.
Wicks likely was receiving a policeman's retirement, social
security,
and pay from his retirement job as a "contracted court security
officer." Was he living at subsistence levels? Unknown, but
unlikely.
Perhaps posters should have to score at least average on an IQ test
before being allow to make misinformed, moronic posts like Steve
B's.
Wait...that would clear out loogy, justhate, BAR, flajim, Bob the
Krueger, and a few others.
Oh well.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
They won't let some little facts get in the way of their intellectual
dishonesty!
Man, sometimes you are worst than Harry. He does it to be an asshole,
you actually believe that anybody with an opposing opinion must be a
liar and nothing else. Do you understand the complexity of humanity,
that two honest folks can have completely opposite opinions on an
issue
without lying?? I have never seen evidence of that from you..- Hide
quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
You didn't see the dishonesty in the original post? Would you like me
to point each one out?
Sure. Go ahead.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

With pleasure!

1. It wasn't about a "cut" in his benefits.


2. He was upset about losing a court case.


3. He went off his rocker before the shootings, setting his residence
on
fire

If I'm not mistaken, Harry said that in response to the initial post. To
answer your question, I see a lot of dishonesty in the majority of
Harry's posts when I see them.


Don't blame me for your useless life and your roaming wife.

On Jan 6, 1:47*pm, Jim wrote:
Loogypicker wrote:
On Jan 6, 10:02 am, Jim wrote:
Loogypicker wrote:
On Jan 6, 9:33 am, I am Tosk wrote:
In article b83c1bc0-7689-4b1e-9179-c6a8b2d99f54
@r5g2000yqb.googlegroups.com, says...
On Jan 4, 10:10 pm, Harry wrote:
Steve B wrote:
Las Vegas, Nevada. *Federal Building. *A Social Security recipient, upset
about a cut in benefits came into the building with a shotgun under his
coat. *Before it was all over, a security guard was dead, a U.S.. Marshall
was wounded, and the perp was dead.
Lots of people with no hope living on subsistence levels who might be dead
in six months are going to be wanting to fight the beast. *Especially when
they get the letter telling them that their benefits have been reduced or
cancelled.
It's the next thing to receive a PC label. *Just to insure that it doesn't
have a derogatory meaning, and therefore the people involved don't feel bad
about themselves.
Steve
RIP - The dead SO was a retired Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Sergeant, 66
years old, who had given of himself his whole career.
You ought to at least try to get some important facts straight:
"Wicks (the gunman) filed a discrimination claim against Social Security
in 2008, alleging he was denied full benefits because of his race,
according to court papers. A federal judge ruled against him in September.
A law enforcement official said Wicks set fire to his residence before
the shooting, and surveillance video indicates he was a lone gunman with
no accomplices.
The deputy marshal and the security officer were taken to a hospital,
where the security officer, Stanley W. Cooper, died, said U.S. Marshals
spokesman Jeff Carter. Cooper, an employee of Akal Security, had been a
contracted court security officer with the U.S. marshals in Las Vegas
since 1994, Carter said."
1. It wasn't about a "cut" in his benefits.
2. He was upset about losing a court case.
3. He went off his rocker before the shootings, setting his residence on
fire.
Wicks likely was receiving a policeman's retirement, social security,
and pay from his retirement job as a "contracted court security
officer." Was he living at subsistence levels? Unknown, but unlikely.
Perhaps posters should have to score at least average on an IQ test
before being allow to make misinformed, moronic posts like Steve B's.
Wait...that would clear out loogy, justhate, BAR, flajim, Bob the
Krueger, and a few others.
Oh well.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
They won't let some little facts get in the way of their intellectual
dishonesty!
Man, sometimes you are worst than Harry. He does it to be an asshole,
you actually believe that anybody with an opposing opinion must be a
liar and nothing else. Do you understand the complexity of humanity,
that two honest folks can have completely opposite opinions on an issue
without lying?? I have never seen evidence of that from you..- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
You didn't see the dishonesty in the original post? Would you like me
to point each one out?
Sure. Go ahead.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

With pleasure!

1. It wasn't about a "cut" in his benefits.

2. He was upset about losing a court case.

3. He went off his rocker before the shootings, setting his residence
on
fire

If I'm not mistaken, Harry said that in response to the initial post. To
answer your question, I see a lot of dishonesty in the majority of
Harry's posts when I see them.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

As do I. It still stands, however, that he's right on this particular
instance. Sad but true!

Loogypicker wrote:
On Jan 6, 1:47 pm, Jim wrote:
Loogypicker wrote:
On Jan 6, 10:02 am, Jim wrote:
Loogypicker wrote:
On Jan 6, 9:33 am, I am Tosk wrote:
In article b83c1bc0-7689-4b1e-9179-c6a8b2d99f54
@r5g2000yqb.googlegroups.com, says...
On Jan 4, 10:10 pm, Harry wrote:
Steve B wrote:
Las Vegas, Nevada. Federal Building. A Social Security recipient, upset
about a cut in benefits came into the building with a shotgun under his
coat. Before it was all over, a security guard was dead, a U.S. Marshall
was wounded, and the perp was dead.
Lots of people with no hope living on subsistence levels who might be dead
in six months are going to be wanting to fight the beast. Especially when
they get the letter telling them that their benefits have been reduced or
cancelled.
It's the next thing to receive a PC label. Just to insure that it doesn't
have a derogatory meaning, and therefore the people involved don't feel bad
about themselves.
Steve
RIP - The dead SO was a retired Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Sergeant, 66
years old, who had given of himself his whole career.
You ought to at least try to get some important facts straight:
"Wicks (the gunman) filed a discrimination claim against Social Security
in 2008, alleging he was denied full benefits because of his race,
according to court papers. A federal judge ruled against him in September.
A law enforcement official said Wicks set fire to his residence before
the shooting, and surveillance video indicates he was a lone gunman with
no accomplices.
The deputy marshal and the security officer were taken to a hospital,
where the security officer, Stanley W. Cooper, died, said U.S. Marshals
spokesman Jeff Carter. Cooper, an employee of Akal Security, had been a
contracted court security officer with the U.S. marshals in Las Vegas
since 1994, Carter said."
1. It wasn't about a "cut" in his benefits.
2. He was upset about losing a court case.
3. He went off his rocker before the shootings, setting his residence on
fire.
Wicks likely was receiving a policeman's retirement, social security,
and pay from his retirement job as a "contracted court security
officer." Was he living at subsistence levels? Unknown, but unlikely.
Perhaps posters should have to score at least average on an IQ test
before being allow to make misinformed, moronic posts like Steve B's.
Wait...that would clear out loogy, justhate, BAR, flajim, Bob the
Krueger, and a few others.
Oh well.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
They won't let some little facts get in the way of their intellectual
dishonesty!
Man, sometimes you are worst than Harry. He does it to be an asshole,
you actually believe that anybody with an opposing opinion must be a
liar and nothing else. Do you understand the complexity of humanity,
that two honest folks can have completely opposite opinions on an issue
without lying?? I have never seen evidence of that from you..- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
You didn't see the dishonesty in the original post? Would you like me
to point each one out?
Sure. Go ahead.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
With pleasure!
1. It wasn't about a "cut" in his benefits.
2. He was upset about losing a court case.
3. He went off his rocker before the shootings, setting his residence
on
fire
If I'm not mistaken, Harry said that in response to the initial post. To
answer your question, I see a lot of dishonesty in the majority of
Harry's posts when I see them.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

As do I. It still stands, however, that he's right on this particular
instance. Sad but true!


It must be nice to be clairvoyant, you and Harry. You can read the mind
of a dead man. You two have more in common than you think.