Do we need more of this?
 

TopBassDog wrote:
On Jan 4, 6:08 am, Harry wrote:
TopBassDog wrote:
On Jan 3, 1:59 pm, bpuharic wrote:
On Sun, 03 Jan 2010 01:07:49 -0800, jps wrote:
I think not.
Why do we let manufacturers flood the market with cheap weapons?
DECATUR, Ga. -- A 4-year-old boy who was struck by a stray bullet
while at church died Friday.
doesn't matter. the american people dont care how many kids get
killed. the NRA has the american people convinced that that only their
.25 automatics can stop an M1A2 abrams main battle tank if the govt
decides to take over.
I know you are talking foolishness, but still it would beat using
bricks like when the USSR invaded Czechoslovakia in 1968. After the
Czech's had been disarmed, that is all they had left.
Watching *you* face down a Sov T-55 main battle tank with your choice of
light arms would be a pay TV event I'd pay up to $2.00 American to
watch. Maybe your seeeeeeester could sue the tank, eh?

Armed American civilians on the far right might think they have what it
takes to be effective guerrilla fighters and take on temporarily a
modern, well-equipped army, but that's just a wet dream perpetrated by
watching Red Dawn too many times.

"Herr Krause. I can understand why you would make such an idiotic
comment for chances are, you probably never had any relatives held
behind the communist bloc. And no, Kerr Krause. There was no mention
of supposedly "small arms" facing off with a Soviet tank. Please re-
read.
He prefers Commie Krause to Herr Krause.

Do we need more of this?
 

In article , naled24511
@mypacks.net says...

TopBassDog wrote:
On Jan 4, 6:08 am, Harry wrote:
TopBassDog wrote:
On Jan 3, 1:59 pm, bpuharic wrote:
On Sun, 03 Jan 2010 01:07:49 -0800, jps wrote:
I think not.
Why do we let manufacturers flood the market with cheap weapons?
DECATUR, Ga. -- A 4-year-old boy who was struck by a stray bullet
while at church died Friday.
doesn't matter. the american people dont care how many kids get
killed. the NRA has the american people convinced that that only their
.25 automatics can stop an M1A2 abrams main battle tank if the govt
decides to take over.
I know you are talking foolishness, but still it would beat using
bricks like when the USSR invaded Czechoslovakia in 1968. After the
Czech's had been disarmed, that is all they had left.
Watching *you* face down a Sov T-55 main battle tank with your choice of
light arms would be a pay TV event I'd pay up to $2.00 American to
watch. Maybe your seeeeeeester could sue the tank, eh?

Armed American civilians on the far right might think they have what it
takes to be effective guerrilla fighters and take on temporarily a
modern, well-equipped army, but that's just a wet dream perpetrated by
watching Red Dawn too many times.

"Herr Krause. I can understand why you would make such an idiotic
comment for chances are, you probably never had any relatives held
behind the communist bloc. And no, Kerr Krause. There was no mention
of supposedly "small arms" facing off with a Soviet tank. Please re-
read.
He prefers Commie Krause to Herr Krause.

Quit calling me names, dumbfoch. I have guns.

Do we need more of this?
 

"Gene" wrote Any idea how many hand guns
have been manufactured and sold in the US
in the past 20 years?

Not nearly enough to drive the price down to make them cheap.....


Who would want a cheap gun? You can get a good gun on the street for a
cheap price. No waiting period. No paperwork.

Steve

Do we need more of this?
 

"Gene" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 03 Jan 2010 19:03:59 -0800, jps wrote:

The vast availability of weapons,
especially cheap ones, has flooded the market with availability.

Simply not true.....

You have to consider the source of that statement. jps is "challenged".

Steve

Do we need more of this?
 

Steve B wrote:
"Gene" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 03 Jan 2010 19:03:59 -0800, jps wrote:

The vast availability of weapons,
especially cheap ones, has flooded the market with availability.
Simply not true.....

You have to consider the source of that statement. jps is "challenged".

Steve



Are you seriously disputing the indisputable fact that there are
kazillions of firearms available for under $100?

Do we need more of this?
 

On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 07:08:07 -0500, Harry wrote:


Watching *you* face down a Sov T-55 main battle tank with your choice of
light arms would be a pay TV event I'd pay up to $2.00 American to
watch. Maybe your seeeeeeester could sue the tank, eh?

IIRC, there was a Chinese man at Tiananmen Square who faced them down
with nothing but a smile.

Do we need more of this?
 

thunder wrote:
On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 07:08:07 -0500, Harry wrote:


Watching *you* face down a Sov T-55 main battle tank with your choice of
light arms would be a pay TV event I'd pay up to $2.00 American to
watch. Maybe your seeeeeeester could sue the tank, eh?

IIRC, there was a Chinese man at Tiananmen Square who faced them down
with nothing but a smile.


And reportedly was dragged away and executed.

There were many deaths there, some caused by people crushed under tank
treads.

Do we need more of this?
 

Harry wrote:
In article , naled24511
@mypacks.net says...
TopBassDog wrote:
On Jan 4, 6:08 am, Harry wrote:
TopBassDog wrote:
On Jan 3, 1:59 pm, bpuharic wrote:
On Sun, 03 Jan 2010 01:07:49 -0800, jps wrote:
I think not.
Why do we let manufacturers flood the market with cheap weapons?
DECATUR, Ga. -- A 4-year-old boy who was struck by a stray bullet
while at church died Friday.
doesn't matter. the american people dont care how many kids get
killed. the NRA has the american people convinced that that only their
.25 automatics can stop an M1A2 abrams main battle tank if the govt
decides to take over.
I know you are talking foolishness, but still it would beat using
bricks like when the USSR invaded Czechoslovakia in 1968. After the
Czech's had been disarmed, that is all they had left.
Watching *you* face down a Sov T-55 main battle tank with your choice of
light arms would be a pay TV event I'd pay up to $2.00 American to
watch. Maybe your seeeeeeester could sue the tank, eh?

Armed American civilians on the far right might think they have what it
takes to be effective guerrilla fighters and take on temporarily a
modern, well-equipped army, but that's just a wet dream perpetrated by
watching Red Dawn too many times.
"Herr Krause. I can understand why you would make such an idiotic
comment for chances are, you probably never had any relatives held
behind the communist bloc. And no, Kerr Krause. There was no mention
of supposedly "small arms" facing off with a Soviet tank. Please re-
read.
He prefers Commie Krause to Herr Krause.

Quit calling me names, dumbfoch. I have guns.
I know you do. You have one German one you are quite proud of. You can't
even be a respectable Commie.

--
If it's not posted with a mac, it's the real deal.

Do we need more of this?
 

Harry wrote:
Steve B wrote:
"Gene" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 03 Jan 2010 19:03:59 -0800, jps wrote:

The vast availability of weapons,
especially cheap ones, has flooded the market with availability.
Simply not true.....

You have to consider the source of that statement. jps is "challenged".

Steve


Are you seriously disputing the indisputable fact that there are
kazillions of firearms available for under $100?

Cite

--
If it's not posted with a mac, it's the real deal.

Do we need more of this?
 

"Gene" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 4 Jan 2010 07:43:59 -0800, "Steve B"
wrote:


"Gene" wrote Any idea how many hand
guns
have been manufactured and sold in the US
in the past 20 years?

Not nearly enough to drive the price down to make them cheap.....


Who would want a cheap gun? You can get a good gun on the street for a
cheap price. No waiting period. No paperwork.

Steve


And you can steal one for an even better price..... or if you are so
inclined, just pick out an undefended house and take everything you
want.....


So, help me with the math on this. I can go spend $800 on a "good" gun. Or
I can buy the same gun on the street for $100 or less. Or I can get it for
free. Wait. Wait. I know the answer to this one........... and the good
thing is that I don't have to settle for some "cheap" gun.

Steve