On Dec 27, 7:35*pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"TopBassDog" wrote in message

...
On Dec 27, 12:18 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:

Thirdly, their involvement should be shutdown, as they're a corrupt,
ultra-right-wing organization.

D'Plume. Are you Napolitano in disguise?

http://www.getliberty.org/content_im...Here%20in%20My...

I think she's smarter and I know I'm better looking.

--
Nom=de=Plume

But, D'Plume. I would never call you average.

TopBassDog wrote:
On Dec 27, 7:35 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"TopBassDog" wrote in message

...
On Dec 27, 12:18 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:

Thirdly, their involvement should be shutdown, as they're a corrupt,
ultra-right-wing organization.
D'Plume. Are you Napolitano in disguise?
http://www.getliberty.org/content_im...Here%20in%20My...
I think she's smarter and I know I'm better looking.

--
Nom=de=Plume

But, D'Plume. I would never call you average.

I'll bet she/he gives himself/ a woodie I haven't seen such narcissism
since Krausie fell in love with himself.

On 27/12/2009 1:08 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...
On 26/12/2009 9:38 PM, Harry wrote:
On 12/26/09 11:30 PM, Frogwatch wrote:
On Dec 26, 10:28 pm, wrote:
On 12/26/09 10:25 PM, Rob wrote:



Harry wrote:
On 12/26/09 8:35 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 26 Dec 2009 15:17:44 -0800 (PST), Frogwatch
wrote:

TSA

Again Jon Stewart points out things the real news missed

Obama still hasn't filled the office of director of TSA.

Bush's TSA is a department of idiots. The best thing Obama could do
is
restructure it, replace every bit of management, and retrain the
entire staff. Leaving SF for Chicago and then DC a couple of weeks
ago, I ran into a TSA'er who spent five minutes shining a blue
flashlight onto my state driver's license. She was looking in the
wrong place for the "invisible" part. So I said, "Want to examine one
of my concealed carry permits?" They all have my photo on them, too.
I
thought she was going to loogy her pants.

Sure. You know that never happened you ****ing liar.

Carry on...

Another example of Rob's "debate" skills.

The Obamination has had nearly a year to appoint somebody to TSA and
to alter it in any way he chooses but he does NOTHING so this incident
happens. Pure Dem incompetence.


So, in your simple little frogwatch brain, you think that because there
is no chief administrator at TSA, terrorist wanna-be's are free to have
their way with our planes? Is that what you think?

The way to alter the TSA is to scrap it and start over. It was the
product of the incompetent Bush admin, and a clean sheet of paper is
needed to design something that can be competent at its job.

So we can replace Bush incompetance with Obamanation incompetance?

We can replace Bush incompetence with intelligence. Oh wait, we did.

I hear lots of cheap talk. Talk a lot Obama even makes good sounding
excuses. Lots of talk, same old hole.

On 27/12/2009 1:08 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...
On 27/12/2009 11:21 AM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Sat, 26 Dec 2009 23:00:39 -0800, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

wrote in message
...
On Sat, 26 Dec 2009 21:52:57 -0800, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

wrote in message
...
On Sat, 26 Dec 2009 15:17:44 -0800 (PST), Frogwatch
wrote:


TSA

Again Jon Stewart points out things the real news missed

Obama still hasn't filled the office of director of TSA.



They have an acting director. It's not like there's no one in charge.

I wonder why the Senate hasn't gotten around to it... perhaps it's
been
the
obstructionism going on by the Republicans, who are continually
threatening
the filibuster, even with Defense bills? Nah, couldn't be that...


The TSA is an executive branch department. Obama has to appoint the
director.
I am not even sure they have to be ratified by the senate at that
level. It would be a rubber stamp thing anyway.


It's an appointment and it needs to be approved by the senate. It's
being
held up, as I said, by the right-wing.

If you're not sure, look it up instead of guessing.


OK that was easy, there is no hit on TSA confirmation on Thomas.
There has not been a bill with those words introduced in the senate or
the house.
Now back to you. Who's confirmation IS being held up?


The Senate. Try again.

In any case, be it Obamanation hasn't submitted a name or the senate
hasn't got off their pork barrel asses, in either case it is a Democrat
issue.


Also untrue.

Only in your mind.

On 27/12/2009 1:12 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...
On 27/12/2009 12:00 AM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Sat, 26 Dec 2009 21:52:57 -0800, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

wrote in message
...
On Sat, 26 Dec 2009 15:17:44 -0800 (PST), Frogwatch
wrote:


TSA

Again Jon Stewart points out things the real news missed

Obama still hasn't filled the office of director of TSA.



They have an acting director. It's not like there's no one in charge.

I wonder why the Senate hasn't gotten around to it... perhaps it's been
the
obstructionism going on by the Republicans, who are continually
threatening
the filibuster, even with Defense bills? Nah, couldn't be that...


The TSA is an executive branch department. Obama has to appoint the
director.
I am not even sure they have to be ratified by the senate at that
level. It would be a rubber stamp thing anyway.


It's an appointment and it needs to be approved by the senate. It's being
held up, as I said, by the right-wing.

If you're not sure, look it up instead of guessing.

plume du BS what do you not understand about a 58 to 40 democrat majority
in the senate?

Dumb democrats can't agree amongst themselves is more like it. Probably
some dim wants pork to support it.


You're the dimwit, apparently:

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com...age-screeners/

Usual liberal BS slant. Since when can one minority senator hold up the
show?

On 27/12/2009 1:13 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
news
On 27/12/2009 5:58 AM, Harry wrote:
nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Sat, 26 Dec 2009 15:17:44 -0800 (PST), Frogwatch
wrote:


TSA
Again Jon Stewart points out things the real news missed

Obama still hasn't filled the office of director of TSA.



They have an acting director. It's not like there's no one in charge.

I wonder why the Senate hasn't gotten around to it... perhaps it's
been the obstructionism going on by the Republicans, who are
continually threatening the filibuster, even with Defense bills? Nah,
couldn't be that...

Let's be thankful we control both houses. Can you imagine Mr. Obama
trying to work with a republican Congress?

At least until 2010 elections.... and hopefully the congress will change
to a more conserative leaning with more integrity than the current pork
loving democrats.

Mind you, I am sure Obama will find an excuse...


Yeah more integrity... now that's funny!

Ya, I know. Wishful thinking. Need a Hackswa Jack type to clean house,
or wait until pigs fly.

On 27/12/2009 12:36 PM, BAR wrote:
In ,
says...

On 26/12/2009 10:52 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Sat, 26 Dec 2009 15:17:44 -0800 (PST), Frogwatch
wrote:


TSA

Again Jon Stewart points out things the real news missed

Obama still hasn't filled the office of director of TSA.



They have an acting director. It's not like there's no one in charge.

I wonder why the Senate hasn't gotten around to it... perhaps it's been the
obstructionism going on by the Republicans, who are continually threatening
the filibuster, even with Defense bills? Nah, couldn't be that...

Given the senate is democratic majority, it must be democratic
infighting for pork spending. No one thinks the position is worth the pork.

I like the Republicans are obstructing everything in Congress argument.
It is an easy deflection game for the Democrats in-fighting and failure
to work as a team.

Sure, the dim-wits have to give republicans air time, but after that
have the vote and I know this is tough for a dim-wit senator, but put
your balls on the line and vote Na or Ya.

Or are democrats having a hard time going sober for 8 whole hours?

"TopBassDog" wrote in message
...
On Dec 27, 7:35 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"TopBassDog" wrote in message

...
On Dec 27, 12:18 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:

Thirdly, their involvement should be shutdown, as they're a corrupt,
ultra-right-wing organization.

D'Plume. Are you Napolitano in disguise?

http://www.getliberty.org/content_im...Here%20in%20My...

I think she's smarter and I know I'm better looking.

--
Nom=de=Plume

But, D'Plume. I would never call you average.


Thanks. And your point?

--
Nom=de=Plume

"Canuck57" wrote in message
...
On 27/12/2009 1:08 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...
On 26/12/2009 9:38 PM, Harry wrote:
On 12/26/09 11:30 PM, Frogwatch wrote:
On Dec 26, 10:28 pm, wrote:
On 12/26/09 10:25 PM, Rob wrote:



Harry wrote:
On 12/26/09 8:35 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 26 Dec 2009 15:17:44 -0800 (PST), Frogwatch
wrote:

TSA

Again Jon Stewart points out things the real news missed

Obama still hasn't filled the office of director of TSA.

Bush's TSA is a department of idiots. The best thing Obama could do
is
restructure it, replace every bit of management, and retrain the
entire staff. Leaving SF for Chicago and then DC a couple of weeks
ago, I ran into a TSA'er who spent five minutes shining a blue
flashlight onto my state driver's license. She was looking in the
wrong place for the "invisible" part. So I said, "Want to examine
one
of my concealed carry permits?" They all have my photo on them,
too.
I
thought she was going to loogy her pants.

Sure. You know that never happened you ****ing liar.

Carry on...

Another example of Rob's "debate" skills.

The Obamination has had nearly a year to appoint somebody to TSA and
to alter it in any way he chooses but he does NOTHING so this incident
happens. Pure Dem incompetence.


So, in your simple little frogwatch brain, you think that because there
is no chief administrator at TSA, terrorist wanna-be's are free to have
their way with our planes? Is that what you think?

The way to alter the TSA is to scrap it and start over. It was the
product of the incompetent Bush admin, and a clean sheet of paper is
needed to design something that can be competent at its job.

So we can replace Bush incompetance with Obamanation incompetance?

We can replace Bush incompetence with intelligence. Oh wait, we did.

I hear lots of cheap talk. Talk a lot Obama even makes good sounding
excuses. Lots of talk, same old hole.


According to you... a guy who has no skin in the game. You left...
remember....

--
Nom=de=Plume

"Canuck57" wrote in message
...
On 27/12/2009 1:08 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...
On 27/12/2009 11:21 AM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Sat, 26 Dec 2009 23:00:39 -0800, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

wrote in message
...
On Sat, 26 Dec 2009 21:52:57 -0800, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

wrote in message
...
On Sat, 26 Dec 2009 15:17:44 -0800 (PST), Frogwatch
wrote:


TSA

Again Jon Stewart points out things the real news missed

Obama still hasn't filled the office of director of TSA.



They have an acting director. It's not like there's no one in
charge.

I wonder why the Senate hasn't gotten around to it... perhaps it's
been
the
obstructionism going on by the Republicans, who are continually
threatening
the filibuster, even with Defense bills? Nah, couldn't be that...


The TSA is an executive branch department. Obama has to appoint the
director.
I am not even sure they have to be ratified by the senate at that
level. It would be a rubber stamp thing anyway.


It's an appointment and it needs to be approved by the senate. It's
being
held up, as I said, by the right-wing.

If you're not sure, look it up instead of guessing.


OK that was easy, there is no hit on TSA confirmation on Thomas.
There has not been a bill with those words introduced in the senate or
the house.
Now back to you. Who's confirmation IS being held up?


The Senate. Try again.

In any case, be it Obamanation hasn't submitted a name or the senate
hasn't got off their pork barrel asses, in either case it is a Democrat
issue.


Also untrue.

Only in your mind.


Fortunately, I have one.

--
Nom=de=Plume