On 12/26/09 11:30 PM, Frogwatch wrote:
On Dec 26, 10:28 pm, wrote:
On 12/26/09 10:25 PM, Rob wrote:



Harry wrote:
On 12/26/09 8:35 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 26 Dec 2009 15:17:44 -0800 (PST), Frogwatch
wrote:

TSA

Again Jon Stewart points out things the real news missed

Obama still hasn't filled the office of director of TSA.

Bush's TSA is a department of idiots. The best thing Obama could do is
restructure it, replace every bit of management, and retrain the
entire staff. Leaving SF for Chicago and then DC a couple of weeks
ago, I ran into a TSA'er who spent five minutes shining a blue
flashlight onto my state driver's license. She was looking in the
wrong place for the "invisible" part. So I said, "Want to examine one
of my concealed carry permits?" They all have my photo on them, too. I
thought she was going to loogy her pants.

Sure. You know that never happened you ****ing liar.

Carry on...

Another example of Rob's "debate" skills.

The Obamination has had nearly a year to appoint somebody to TSA and
to alter it in any way he chooses but he does NOTHING so this incident
happens. Pure Dem incompetence.


So, in your simple little frogwatch brain, you think that because there
is no chief administrator at TSA, terrorist wanna-be's are free to have
their way with our planes? Is that what you think?

The way to alter the TSA is to scrap it and start over. It was the
product of the incompetent Bush admin, and a clean sheet of paper is
needed to design something that can be competent at its job.

"Frogwatch" wrote in message
...
On Dec 26, 10:28 pm, Harry wrote:
On 12/26/09 10:25 PM, Rob wrote:



Harry wrote:
On 12/26/09 8:35 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 26 Dec 2009 15:17:44 -0800 (PST), Frogwatch
wrote:

TSA

Again Jon Stewart points out things the real news missed

Obama still hasn't filled the office of director of TSA.

Bush's TSA is a department of idiots. The best thing Obama could do is
restructure it, replace every bit of management, and retrain the
entire staff. Leaving SF for Chicago and then DC a couple of weeks
ago, I ran into a TSA'er who spent five minutes shining a blue
flashlight onto my state driver's license. She was looking in the
wrong place for the "invisible" part. So I said, "Want to examine one
of my concealed carry permits?" They all have my photo on them, too. I
thought she was going to loogy her pants.

Sure. You know that never happened you ****ing liar.

Carry on...

Another example of Rob's "debate" skills.

The Obamination has had nearly a year to appoint somebody to TSA and
to alter it in any way he chooses but he does NOTHING so this incident
happens. Pure Dem incompetence.


You're lying, and you're not very good at it.

--
Nom=de=Plume

"Frogwatch" wrote in message
...
On Dec 26, 10:28 pm, Harry wrote:
On 12/26/09 10:25 PM, Rob wrote:



Harry wrote:
On 12/26/09 8:35 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 26 Dec 2009 15:17:44 -0800 (PST), Frogwatch
wrote:

TSA

Again Jon Stewart points out things the real news missed

Obama still hasn't filled the office of director of TSA.

Bush's TSA is a department of idiots. The best thing Obama could do is
restructure it, replace every bit of management, and retrain the
entire staff. Leaving SF for Chicago and then DC a couple of weeks
ago, I ran into a TSA'er who spent five minutes shining a blue
flashlight onto my state driver's license. She was looking in the
wrong place for the "invisible" part. So I said, "Want to examine one
of my concealed carry permits?" They all have my photo on them, too. I
thought she was going to loogy her pants.

Sure. You know that never happened you ****ing liar.

Carry on...

Another example of Rob's "debate" skills.

The Obamination has had nearly a year to appoint somebody to TSA and
to alter it in any way he chooses but he does NOTHING so this incident
happens. Pure Dem incompetence.

---------
"The Dems hate us for our freedom".
Oh, I may have the next hot bumper sticker! How many do you want?
BTW, was the "Shoe Bomber" pure Rep incompetence? They had some ass clown as
TSA director so does that make it/them even more incompetent? Just trying to
see how your statement makes the slightest bit of sense.

On 12/26/09 9:16 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 26 Dec 2009 20:52:21 -0500,
wrote:

On 12/26/09 8:35 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 26 Dec 2009 15:17:44 -0800 (PST), Frogwatch
wrote:


TSA

Again Jon Stewart points out things the real news missed

Obama still hasn't filled the office of director of TSA.



Bush's TSA is a department of idiots. The best thing Obama could do is
restructure it, replace every bit of management, and retrain the entire
staff. Leaving SF for Chicago and then DC a couple of weeks ago, I ran
into a TSA'er who spent five minutes shining a blue flashlight onto my
state driver's license. She was looking in the wrong place for the
"invisible" part. So I said, "Want to examine one of my concealed carry
permits?" They all have my photo on them, too. I thought she was going
to loogy her pants.

It was the Democrats who demanded that we fire the private security
people and make them "fireproof" government dweebs.

I remember the "private" security guards. They were even worse than what
TSA is today.

wrote in message
...
On Sat, 26 Dec 2009 20:52:21 -0500, Harry
wrote:

On 12/26/09 8:35 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 26 Dec 2009 15:17:44 -0800 (PST), Frogwatch
wrote:


TSA

Again Jon Stewart points out things the real news missed

Obama still hasn't filled the office of director of TSA.



Bush's TSA is a department of idiots. The best thing Obama could do is
restructure it, replace every bit of management, and retrain the entire
staff. Leaving SF for Chicago and then DC a couple of weeks ago, I ran
into a TSA'er who spent five minutes shining a blue flashlight onto my
state driver's license. She was looking in the wrong place for the
"invisible" part. So I said, "Want to examine one of my concealed carry
permits?" They all have my photo on them, too. I thought she was going
to loogy her pants.

It was the Democrats who demanded that we fire the private security
people and make them "fireproof" government dweebs.


You're in favor of Blackwater running the TSA?? I don't think so...

--
Nom=de=Plume

nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Sat, 26 Dec 2009 20:52:21 -0500, Harry
wrote:

On 12/26/09 8:35 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 26 Dec 2009 15:17:44 -0800 (PST), Frogwatch
wrote:


TSA
Again Jon Stewart points out things the real news missed

Obama still hasn't filled the office of director of TSA.


Bush's TSA is a department of idiots. The best thing Obama could do is
restructure it, replace every bit of management, and retrain the entire
staff. Leaving SF for Chicago and then DC a couple of weeks ago, I ran
into a TSA'er who spent five minutes shining a blue flashlight onto my
state driver's license. She was looking in the wrong place for the
"invisible" part. So I said, "Want to examine one of my concealed carry
permits?" They all have my photo on them, too. I thought she was going
to loogy her pants.
It was the Democrats who demanded that we fire the private security
people and make them "fireproof" government dweebs.


You're in favor of Blackwater running the TSA?? I don't think so...


I think He is reserving Blackwater to run his proposed 100000 man,
executive branch controlled, police force.

--

It's flattering to see so many of you turds spoofing me.

On 12/27/09 1:56 AM, wrote:
On Sat, 26 Dec 2009 21:53:30 -0800, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

wrote in message
...
On Sat, 26 Dec 2009 20:52:21 -0500,
wrote:

On 12/26/09 8:35 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 26 Dec 2009 15:17:44 -0800 (PST), Frogwatch
wrote:


TSA

Again Jon Stewart points out things the real news missed

Obama still hasn't filled the office of director of TSA.



Bush's TSA is a department of idiots. The best thing Obama could do is
restructure it, replace every bit of management, and retrain the entire
staff. Leaving SF for Chicago and then DC a couple of weeks ago, I ran
into a TSA'er who spent five minutes shining a blue flashlight onto my
state driver's license. She was looking in the wrong place for the
"invisible" part. So I said, "Want to examine one of my concealed carry
permits?" They all have my photo on them, too. I thought she was going
to loogy her pants.

It was the Democrats who demanded that we fire the private security
people and make them "fireproof" government dweebs.


You're in favor of Blackwater running the TSA?? I don't think so...


Blackwater is the group protecting Hillary right now so somebody likes
them.
There was still no reason why the actual screeners could not be
contracted and working under TSA guidance. The way it is, we own those
people forever, even if they came up with a lot less labor intensive
way to screen passengers. If anything, having 45,000 minimally
skilled employees, you can't fire, will stifle innovation. "Thinking"
was never a job requirement for this job.


Are you under the delusion that federal employees are immune from layoffs?

They aren't.

Harry wrote:
On 12/27/09 1:56 AM, wrote:
On Sat, 26 Dec 2009 21:53:30 -0800, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

wrote in message
...
On Sat, 26 Dec 2009 20:52:21 -0500,
wrote:

On 12/26/09 8:35 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 26 Dec 2009 15:17:44 -0800 (PST), Frogwatch
wrote:


TSA

Again Jon Stewart points out things the real news missed

Obama still hasn't filled the office of director of TSA.



Bush's TSA is a department of idiots. The best thing Obama could do is
restructure it, replace every bit of management, and retrain the
entire
staff. Leaving SF for Chicago and then DC a couple of weeks ago, I ran
into a TSA'er who spent five minutes shining a blue flashlight onto my
state driver's license. She was looking in the wrong place for the
"invisible" part. So I said, "Want to examine one of my concealed
carry
permits?" They all have my photo on them, too. I thought she was going
to loogy her pants.

It was the Democrats who demanded that we fire the private security
people and make them "fireproof" government dweebs.


You're in favor of Blackwater running the TSA?? I don't think so...


Blackwater is the group protecting Hillary right now so somebody likes
them.
There was still no reason why the actual screeners could not be
contracted and working under TSA guidance. The way it is, we own those
people forever, even if they came up with a lot less labor intensive
way to screen passengers. If anything, having 45,000 minimally
skilled employees, you can't fire, will stifle innovation. "Thinking"
was never a job requirement for this job.


Are you under the delusion that federal employees are immune from layoffs?

They aren't.


If you work for a crown corp, you have to be caught screwing a goat on
the CEO's desk during working hours to even be considered for time off
without pay.

That is the reason i loved working for a crown corp. I really didn't
mind the time off, it was sort of like extra vacation time.

Don White wrote:

If you work for a crown corp, you have to be caught screwing a goat on
the CEO's desk during working hours to even be considered for time off
without pay.

That is the reason i loved working for a crown corp. I really didn't
mind the time off, it was sort of like extra vacation time.
What did you name your goat?

On 12/27/09 12:52 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 27 Dec 2009 09:57:57 -0500,
wrote:

On 12/27/09 1:56 AM, wrote:
On Sat, 26 Dec 2009 21:53:30 -0800, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

wrote in message
...
On Sat, 26 Dec 2009 20:52:21 -0500,
wrote:

On 12/26/09 8:35 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 26 Dec 2009 15:17:44 -0800 (PST), Frogwatch
wrote:


TSA

Again Jon Stewart points out things the real news missed

Obama still hasn't filled the office of director of TSA.



Bush's TSA is a department of idiots. The best thing Obama could do is
restructure it, replace every bit of management, and retrain the entire
staff. Leaving SF for Chicago and then DC a couple of weeks ago, I ran
into a TSA'er who spent five minutes shining a blue flashlight onto my
state driver's license. She was looking in the wrong place for the
"invisible" part. So I said, "Want to examine one of my concealed carry
permits?" They all have my photo on them, too. I thought she was going
to loogy her pants.

It was the Democrats who demanded that we fire the private security
people and make them "fireproof" government dweebs.


You're in favor of Blackwater running the TSA?? I don't think so...


Blackwater is the group protecting Hillary right now so somebody likes
them.
There was still no reason why the actual screeners could not be
contracted and working under TSA guidance. The way it is, we own those
people forever, even if they came up with a lot less labor intensive
way to screen passengers. If anything, having 45,000 minimally
skilled employees, you can't fire, will stifle innovation. "Thinking"
was never a job requirement for this job.


Are you under the delusion that federal employees are immune from layoffs?

They aren't.


But it really hasn't happened since the Eisenhower administration.
Tell me about ONE year when federal employment actually went down
since 1960.
If you threaten to lay off a federal employee they start firing off
171s and get a new job before they lose a pay check. Usually that is
not even necessary because when they close an agency, another one
springs up in the same building with the same people. The only thing
that changed was the name on the building.
They changed so many signs during the Carter administration the joke
was GSA installed them with thumb screws.
Us Coast and Geodetic Survey on Montrose rd became ESSA and then NOAA.
AEC in Germantown became ERDA and then DOE (maybe something else I
forgot in between). HEW on Parklawn drive changed names a couple
times ending up being HHS.
If you were walking around in the building every day nothing changed
but the stationary.


Actually, the RIF I vaguely recall took place during the reagan
mis-administration, in the fall of his first year in office. I remember
it because I had as a client a couple of postal unions, and thanks to
the contract, they were exempt. The client contact was recruited by the
reagan admin to become deputy pmg, and I could have gone along as his
chief assistant. We both were not interested. The USPS was infected with
the worst management of any organization on the face of the earth.