wrote in message
...
On Sun, 27 Dec 2009 12:04:02 -0800, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

It wasn't that Perot was a serious candidate, it was the questions he
made everyone else answer.

No one answered anything. He was mostly ignored.

I guess you didn't watch the debates

Nothing came of anything he said. He was wrong on many things, and he
faded
away as most kook should.

That kook did get people thinking about the deficit for a few years.
That is not a bad thing


That kook didn't do much for informed debate because he was a kook. Same
goes for Ron Paul.

--
Nom=de=Plume