On Sat, 26 Dec 2009 09:54:54 -0500, John H wrote:


"His boy?" I think you mean *our* President. You can live in denial,
but I'll point out Obama's main legislative agenda, health care reform,
looks to be on track for passage. The recession is over and jobs *will*
rebound. Not at all bad for his *first* year in office. I'm thinking
Obama is becoming unstoppable.

As for Palin, I was recently talking to a diehard Republican who is
convinced she is working for the Democrats. In his opinion, nothing
else explains the damage she is doing the Republican Party.

Obama gets my vote as Messiah of the year! Your boy can do no wrong.

http://tinyurl.com/y8ov56y

Yup, it sure is starting to look that way. Sure does suck to be a
Republican these days, doesn't it?

Loogypicker wrote:
On Dec 26, 8:34 am, John H wrote:
On Sat, 26 Dec 2009 08:21:51 -0500, Jim wrote:
Harry wrote:
On 12/26/09 12:20 AM, Steve B wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Fri, 25 Dec 2009 20:23:51 -0800, "Steve B"
wrote:
"John wrote in message
...
...Change is coming!
The NYTimes is giving seniors a Christmas present to ponder.
http://tinyurl.com/yl9vumo
"Peter R. Orszag, the White House budget director and a disciple of
the Dartmouth data, has noted. "We can no longer afford an overall
health care system in which the thought is more is always better,
because it's not.""
Another - "Because Dartmouth's analysis focuses solely on patients who
have died, a case like Mr. Putrus's would not show up in its data.
That is why critics say Dartmouth's approach takes an overly
pessimistic view of medicine: if you consider only the patients who
die, there is really no way to know whether it makes sense to spend
more on one case than another."
A preview of things to come?
--
Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year!
John H
If they were serious about saving money, wouldn't they just all get
on a
conference call instead of flying their jets to Denmark to schmooze
around?
Barry has some expensive tastes, and so does Michelle.
Steve
Jon Stewart pointed out that these climate savers managed to lease
every limo in western europe, some couriered in from as far away as
Germany so nobody had to share a ride.
Well, you can't have people who are interested in saving the planet
have to
ride two to a limo or two to a jet, now can you. It's just not done.
I wonder how many heating oil tanks could have been filled for what was
spent on that extravaganza.
BTW, what's a caviar wedge? I understand they ate a lot of caviar. That
would have bought a lot of turkeys at the shelters.
I bet they had expensive cognac and real Cuban cigars, too.
Nothing too good for our tax dollars.
Steve
Does anyone recall "stevie" objecting when bush was spending like a
drunken sailor, and cutting taxes for the wealthy at the same time?
Hypocrisy, thy real name is republican/conservative. Nothing is piled
higher than republican/conservative b.s.
Nothing except the burgeoning public debt.
Did someone justify Obama's spending using Bush as a rationale?

How silly.
--

John H

"Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the
gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery."

Churchill- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Ever hear of the word "precedent"? It's used legally binding all of
the time.


Can you clarify?

thunder wrote:
On Sat, 26 Dec 2009 09:54:54 -0500, John H wrote:


"His boy?" I think you mean *our* President. You can live in denial,
but I'll point out Obama's main legislative agenda, health care reform,
looks to be on track for passage. The recession is over and jobs *will*
rebound. Not at all bad for his *first* year in office. I'm thinking
Obama is becoming unstoppable.

As for Palin, I was recently talking to a diehard Republican who is
convinced she is working for the Democrats. In his opinion, nothing
else explains the damage she is doing the Republican Party.
Obama gets my vote as Messiah of the year! Your boy can do no wrong.

http://tinyurl.com/y8ov56y

Yup, it sure is starting to look that way. Sure does suck to be a
Republican these days, doesn't it?

I guess he's your boy as well.
Americans are nervous about your boy running amok in our candy store
handing out goodies to his friends.

In article ,
says...

On Sat, 26 Dec 2009 09:54:54 -0500, John H wrote:


"His boy?" I think you mean *our* President. You can live in denial,
but I'll point out Obama's main legislative agenda, health care reform,
looks to be on track for passage. The recession is over and jobs *will*
rebound. Not at all bad for his *first* year in office. I'm thinking
Obama is becoming unstoppable.

As for Palin, I was recently talking to a diehard Republican who is
convinced she is working for the Democrats. In his opinion, nothing
else explains the damage she is doing the Republican Party.

Obama gets my vote as Messiah of the year! Your boy can do no wrong.

http://tinyurl.com/y8ov56y

Yup, it sure is starting to look that way. Sure does suck to be a
Republican these days, doesn't it?

Obama and Emanuel had better stop running afoul of the Daley machine.

On Dec 26, 10:15Â*am, "D.Duck" wrote:
Loogypicker wrote:
On Dec 26, 8:34 am, John H wrote:
On Sat, 26 Dec 2009 08:21:51 -0500, Jim wrote:
Harry wrote:
On 12/26/09 12:20 AM, Steve B wrote:
Â*wrote in message
om...
On Fri, 25 Dec 2009 20:23:51 -0800, "Steve B"
Â*wrote:
"John Â*wrote in message
news:b5laj5hrbqgpego8r6tiulf9jca9k39aig@4ax .com...
...Change is coming!
The NYTimes is giving seniors a Christmas present to ponder.
http://tinyurl.com/yl9vumo
"Peter R. Orszag, the White House budget director and a disciple of
the Dartmouth data, has noted. "We can no longer afford an overall
health care system in which the thought is more is always better,
because it's not.""
Another - "Because Dartmouth's analysis focuses solely on patients who
have died, a case like Mr. Putrus's would not show up in its data.
That is why critics say Dartmouth's approach takes an overly
pessimistic view of medicine: if you consider only the patients who
die, there is really no way to know whether it makes sense to spend
more on one case than another."
A preview of things to come?
--
Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year!
John H
If they were serious about saving money, wouldn't they just all get
on a
conference call instead of flying their jets to Denmark to schmooze
around?
Barry has some expensive tastes, and so does Michelle.
Steve
Jon Stewart pointed out that these climate savers managed to lease
every limo in western europe, some couriered in from as far away as
Germany so nobody had to share a ride.
Well, you can't have people who are interested in saving the planet
have to
ride two to a limo or two to a jet, now can you. Â*It's just not done.
I wonder how many heating oil tanks could have been filled for what was
spent on that extravaganza.
BTW, what's a caviar wedge? Â*I understand they ate a lot of caviar. Â*That
would have bought a lot of turkeys at the shelters.
I bet they had expensive cognac and real Cuban cigars, too.
Nothing too good for our tax dollars.
Steve
Does anyone recall "stevie" objecting when bush was spending like a
drunken sailor, and cutting taxes for the wealthy at the same time?
Hypocrisy, thy real name is republican/conservative. Nothing is piled
higher than republican/conservative b.s.
Nothing except the burgeoning public debt.
Did someone justify Obama's spending using Bush as a rationale?

How silly.
--

John H

"Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the
gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery."

Churchill- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Ever hear of the word "precedent"? It's used legally binding all of
the time.

Can you clarify?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Yes:

prec⋅e⋅dent  /n. ˈprɛsɪdənt; adj. prɪˈsidnt, ˈprɛsɪdənt/ Show Spelled
Pronunciation [n. pres-i-duhnt; adj. pri-seed-nt, pres-i-duhnt] Show
IPA

–noun
1. Law. a legal decision or form of proceeding serving as an
authoritative rule or pattern in future similar or analogous cases.

On 12/26/09 10:48 AM, wrote:
On Sat, 26 Dec 2009 06:49:48 -0500,
wrote:

Jon Stewart pointed out that these climate savers managed to lease
every limo in western europe, some couriered in from as far away as
Germany so nobody had to share a ride.

Well, you can't have people who are interested in saving the planet have to
ride two to a limo or two to a jet, now can you. It's just not done.

I wonder how many heating oil tanks could have been filled for what was
spent on that extravaganza.

BTW, what's a caviar wedge? I understand they ate a lot of caviar. That
would have bought a lot of turkeys at the shelters.

I bet they had expensive cognac and real Cuban cigars, too.

Nothing too good for our tax dollars.

Steve



Does anyone recall "stevie" objecting when bush was spending like a
drunken sailor, and cutting taxes for the wealthy at the same time?

Hypocrisy, thy real name is republican/conservative. Nothing is piled
higher than republican/conservative b.s.



I was complaining about the Bush/Clinton/Bush war long before it
became Obama's war. Is that the spending you are talking about?

Is stevie a sockpuppet of yours?

On Dec 26, 9:33*am, thunder wrote:
On Sat, 26 Dec 2009 08:54:19 -0500, Jim wrote:
I think it was Krausie that first introduced that insane
rationalization. Now that his boy isn't doing so well, we can look
forward to Krausie vocalizing the DNCs lame apologies for their shining
star tripping all over himself.
It's going to be a busy two years for Krausie. I'll bet that even Sarah
Palin could beat his boy in 2012.

"His boy?" *I think you mean *our* President. *You can live in denial,
but I'll point out Obama's main legislative agenda, health care reform,
looks to be on track for passage. *The recession is over and jobs *will*
rebound. *Not at all bad for his *first* year in office. *I'm thinking
Obama is becoming unstoppable. *

You'd better start working harder to get the word out. Your opinion
is now in the overwhelming minority.

On 12/26/09 9:33 AM, thunder wrote:
On Sat, 26 Dec 2009 08:54:19 -0500, Jim wrote:


I think it was Krausie that first introduced that insane
rationalization. Now that his boy isn't doing so well, we can look
forward to Krausie vocalizing the DNCs lame apologies for their shining
star tripping all over himself.
It's going to be a busy two years for Krausie. I'll bet that even Sarah
Palin could beat his boy in 2012.

"His boy?" I think you mean *our* President. You can live in denial,
but I'll point out Obama's main legislative agenda, health care reform,
looks to be on track for passage. The recession is over and jobs *will*
rebound. Not at all bad for his *first* year in office. I'm thinking
Obama is becoming unstoppable.

As for Palin, I was recently talking to a diehard Republican who is
convinced she is working for the Democrats. In his opinion, nothing else
explains the damage she is doing the Republican Party.


Ahhh...Sarah Palin. I wonder if she's read her book *yet* - - - the one
she didn't write. Of course, the literate among us also wonder what
newspapers and magazines she reads.

What a dumb douchebag she is - - - and perfect as the new GOP leader.

On Sat, 26 Dec 2009 08:12:54 -0800, Jack wrote:


"His boy?" Â*I think you mean *our* President. Â*You can live in denial,
but I'll point out Obama's main legislative agenda, health care reform,
looks to be on track for passage. Â*The recession is over and jobs
*will* rebound. Â*Not at all bad for his *first* year in office. Â*I'm
thinking Obama is becoming unstoppable.

You'd better start working harder to get the word out. Your opinion is
now in the overwhelming minority.

LOL, more denial from the right.

On 12/26/09 11:12 AM, Jack wrote:
On Dec 26, 9:33 am, wrote:
On Sat, 26 Dec 2009 08:54:19 -0500, Jim wrote:
I think it was Krausie that first introduced that insane
rationalization. Now that his boy isn't doing so well, we can look
forward to Krausie vocalizing the DNCs lame apologies for their shining
star tripping all over himself.
It's going to be a busy two years for Krausie. I'll bet that even Sarah
Palin could beat his boy in 2012.

"His boy?" I think you mean *our* President. You can live in denial,
but I'll point out Obama's main legislative agenda, health care reform,
looks to be on track for passage. The recession is over and jobs *will*
rebound. Not at all bad for his *first* year in office. I'm thinking
Obama is becoming unstoppable.

You'd better start working harder to get the word out. Your opinion
is now in the overwhelming minority.

Uh-huh. Go back to bed, jackoff.