On 12/26/09 10:48 AM, wrote:
On Sat, 26 Dec 2009 06:49:48 -0500,
wrote:

Jon Stewart pointed out that these climate savers managed to lease
every limo in western europe, some couriered in from as far away as
Germany so nobody had to share a ride.

Well, you can't have people who are interested in saving the planet have to
ride two to a limo or two to a jet, now can you. It's just not done.

I wonder how many heating oil tanks could have been filled for what was
spent on that extravaganza.

BTW, what's a caviar wedge? I understand they ate a lot of caviar. That
would have bought a lot of turkeys at the shelters.

I bet they had expensive cognac and real Cuban cigars, too.

Nothing too good for our tax dollars.

Steve



Does anyone recall "stevie" objecting when bush was spending like a
drunken sailor, and cutting taxes for the wealthy at the same time?

Hypocrisy, thy real name is republican/conservative. Nothing is piled
higher than republican/conservative b.s.



I was complaining about the Bush/Clinton/Bush war long before it
became Obama's war. Is that the spending you are talking about?

Is stevie a sockpuppet of yours?

On Sat, 26 Dec 2009 10:48:18 -0500, wrote:

On Sat, 26 Dec 2009 06:49:48 -0500, Harry
wrote:

Jon Stewart pointed out that these climate savers managed to lease
every limo in western europe, some couriered in from as far away as
Germany so nobody had to share a ride.

Well, you can't have people who are interested in saving the planet have to
ride two to a limo or two to a jet, now can you. It's just not done.

I wonder how many heating oil tanks could have been filled for what was
spent on that extravaganza.

BTW, what's a caviar wedge? I understand they ate a lot of caviar. That
would have bought a lot of turkeys at the shelters.

I bet they had expensive cognac and real Cuban cigars, too.

Nothing too good for our tax dollars.

Steve



Does anyone recall "stevie" objecting when bush was spending like a
drunken sailor, and cutting taxes for the wealthy at the same time?

Hypocrisy, thy real name is republican/conservative. Nothing is piled
higher than republican/conservative b.s.



I was complaining about the Bush/Clinton/Bush war long before it
became Obama's war. Is that the spending you are talking about?

Just because it was bad then doesn't mean it's bad now. Obama is doing
it now, therefore it's a good thing. He's just emulating a bad
precedent, but since it *is* a precedent, it's a good thing to
emulate.

I think this is the correct loogic.
--

John H

"Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the
gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery."

Churchill

In article ,
om says...

On Sat, 26 Dec 2009 10:48:18 -0500, wrote:

On Sat, 26 Dec 2009 06:49:48 -0500, Harry
wrote:

Jon Stewart pointed out that these climate savers managed to lease
every limo in western europe, some couriered in from as far away as
Germany so nobody had to share a ride.

Well, you can't have people who are interested in saving the planet have to
ride two to a limo or two to a jet, now can you. It's just not done.

I wonder how many heating oil tanks could have been filled for what was
spent on that extravaganza.

BTW, what's a caviar wedge? I understand they ate a lot of caviar. That
would have bought a lot of turkeys at the shelters.

I bet they had expensive cognac and real Cuban cigars, too.

Nothing too good for our tax dollars.

Steve



Does anyone recall "stevie" objecting when bush was spending like a
drunken sailor, and cutting taxes for the wealthy at the same time?

Hypocrisy, thy real name is republican/conservative. Nothing is piled
higher than republican/conservative b.s.



I was complaining about the Bush/Clinton/Bush war long before it
became Obama's war. Is that the spending you are talking about?

Just because it was bad then doesn't mean it's bad now. Obama is doing
it now, therefore it's a good thing. He's just emulating a bad
precedent, but since it *is* a precedent, it's a good thing to
emulate.

I think this is the correct loogic.

"Loogic", I like it...

On Dec 25, 7:14*pm, John H wrote:
...Change is coming!

The NYTimes is giving seniors a Christmas present to ponder.

http://tinyurl.com/yl9vumo

"Peter R. Orszag, the White House budget director and a disciple of
the Dartmouth data, has noted. We can no longer afford an overall
health care system in which the thought is more is always better,
because it s not. "

Another - "Because Dartmouth s analysis focuses solely on patients who
have died, a case like Mr. Putrus s would not show up in its data.
That is why critics say Dartmouth s approach takes an overly
pessimistic view of medicine: if you consider only the patients who
die, there is really no way to know whether it makes sense to spend
more on one case than another."

A preview of things to come?
--

Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year!

John H

John, couldn't you, at least during the holidays stop your stupid and
inane everything Obama is bad bull****?

"Loogypicker" wrote in message
...
On Dec 25, 7:14 pm, John H wrote:
...Change is coming!

The NYTimes is giving seniors a Christmas present to ponder.

http://tinyurl.com/yl9vumo

"Peter R. Orszag, the White House budget director and a disciple of
the Dartmouth data, has noted. We can no longer afford an overall
health care system in which the thought is more is always better,
because it s not. "

Another - "Because Dartmouth s analysis focuses solely on patients who
have died, a case like Mr. Putrus s would not show up in its data.
That is why critics say Dartmouth s approach takes an overly
pessimistic view of medicine: if you consider only the patients who
die, there is really no way to know whether it makes sense to spend
more on one case than another."

A preview of things to come?
--

Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year!

John H

John, couldn't you, at least during the holidays stop your stupid and
inane everything Obama is bad bull****?


He can't help it. He and Rob are truly losers. Rob is obnoxious, so I've
decided to just ignore his posts.. call it a New Year resolution.

--
Nom=de=Plume

On 12/26/09 11:50 AM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Dec 25, 7:14 pm, John wrote:
...Change is coming!

The NYTimes is giving seniors a Christmas present to ponder.

http://tinyurl.com/yl9vumo

"Peter R. Orszag, the White House budget director and a disciple of
the Dartmouth data, has noted. We can no longer afford an overall
health care system in which the thought is more is always better,
because it s not. "

Another - "Because Dartmouth s analysis focuses solely on patients who
have died, a case like Mr. Putrus s would not show up in its data.
That is why critics say Dartmouth s approach takes an overly
pessimistic view of medicine: if you consider only the patients who
die, there is really no way to know whether it makes sense to spend
more on one case than another."

A preview of things to come?
--

Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year!

John H

John, couldn't you, at least during the holidays stop your stupid and
inane everything Obama is bad bull****?


He can't help it. He and Rob are truly losers. Rob is obnoxious, so I've
decided to just ignore his posts.. call it a New Year resolution.


"Rob" changes his handles here more frequently than he changes his
underwear, his wife says.

nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Dec 25, 7:14 pm, John wrote:

...Change is coming!

The NYTimes is giving seniors a Christmas present to ponder.

http://tinyurl.com/yl9vumo

"Peter R. Orszag, the White House budget director and a disciple of
the Dartmouth data, has noted. We can no longer afford an overall
health care system in which the thought is more is always better,
because it s not. "

Another - "Because Dartmouth s analysis focuses solely on patients who
have died, a case like Mr. Putrus s would not show up in its data.
That is why critics say Dartmouth s approach takes an overly
pessimistic view of medicine: if you consider only the patients who
die, there is really no way to know whether it makes sense to spend
more on one case than another."

A preview of things to come?
--

Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year!

John H


John, couldn't you, at least during the holidays stop your stupid and
inane everything Obama is bad bull****?


He can't help it. He and Rob are truly losers. Rob is obnoxious, so I've
decided to just ignore his posts.. call it a New Year resolution.


Rob had nothing to do with this post. Kill file and run is so typical
of those who can't debate.

Peace

On 12/26/09 10:20 PM, Rob wrote:
nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Dec 25, 7:14 pm, John wrote:
...Change is coming!

The NYTimes is giving seniors a Christmas present to ponder.

http://tinyurl.com/yl9vumo

"Peter R. Orszag, the White House budget director and a disciple of
the Dartmouth data, has noted. We can no longer afford an overall
health care system in which the thought is more is always better,
because it s not. "

Another - "Because Dartmouth s analysis focuses solely on patients who
have died, a case like Mr. Putrus s would not show up in its data.
That is why critics say Dartmouth s approach takes an overly
pessimistic view of medicine: if you consider only the patients who
die, there is really no way to know whether it makes sense to spend
more on one case than another."

A preview of things to come?
--

Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year!

John H
John, couldn't you, at least during the holidays stop your stupid and
inane everything Obama is bad bull****?

He can't help it. He and Rob are truly losers. Rob is obnoxious, so I've
decided to just ignore his posts.. call it a New Year resolution.

Rob had nothing to do with this post. Kill file and run is so typical of
those who can't debate.

Peace


Debate? With a worthless piece of **** like you? What's the point? You
don't know anything. You don't stand for anything. You're just an
argumentative, nasty piece of right-wing ****. You were more likable
when you pretended to be freddy krueger's brother.

Harry wrote:
On 12/26/09 10:20 PM, Rob wrote:
nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Dec 25, 7:14 pm, John wrote:
...Change is coming!

The NYTimes is giving seniors a Christmas present to ponder.

http://tinyurl.com/yl9vumo

"Peter R. Orszag, the White House budget director and a disciple of
the Dartmouth data, has noted. We can no longer afford an overall
health care system in which the thought is more is always better,
because it s not. "

Another - "Because Dartmouth s analysis focuses solely on patients who
have died, a case like Mr. Putrus s would not show up in its data.
That is why critics say Dartmouth s approach takes an overly
pessimistic view of medicine: if you consider only the patients who
die, there is really no way to know whether it makes sense to spend
more on one case than another."

A preview of things to come?
--

Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year!

John H
John, couldn't you, at least during the holidays stop your stupid and
inane everything Obama is bad bull****?

He can't help it. He and Rob are truly losers. Rob is obnoxious, so I've
decided to just ignore his posts.. call it a New Year resolution.

Rob had nothing to do with this post. Kill file and run is so typical of
those who can't debate.

Peace


Debate? With a worthless piece of **** like you? What's the point? You
don't know anything. You don't stand for anything. You're just an
argumentative, nasty piece of right-wing ****. You were more likable
when you pretended to be freddy krueger's brother.


I will carry on lively debate with anyone who is 100% with me on the
issues. My past performances prove it. So come on. Anyone who hates bush
and Palin, lets debate.

--

It's flattering to see so many of you turds spoofing me.

"Rob" wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Dec 25, 7:14 pm, John wrote:

...Change is coming!

The NYTimes is giving seniors a Christmas present to ponder.

http://tinyurl.com/yl9vumo

"Peter R. Orszag, the White House budget director and a disciple of
the Dartmouth data, has noted. We can no longer afford an overall
health care system in which the thought is more is always better,
because it s not. "

Another - "Because Dartmouth s analysis focuses solely on patients who
have died, a case like Mr. Putrus s would not show up in its data.
That is why critics say Dartmouth s approach takes an overly
pessimistic view of medicine: if you consider only the patients who
die, there is really no way to know whether it makes sense to spend
more on one case than another."

A preview of things to come?
--

Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year!

John H


John, couldn't you, at least during the holidays stop your stupid and
inane everything Obama is bad bull****?


He can't help it. He and Rob are truly losers. Rob is obnoxious, so I've
decided to just ignore his posts.. call it a New Year resolution.


Rob had nothing to do with this post. Kill file and run is so typical of
those who can't debate.

Peace


I'm going to respond to this one post, then you can go do your own thing.

You've consistently tried to put me down, especially commenting about my
looks as though that's some major point you're trying to make, spout
completely regurgitate right-wing crap, and seem to be incapable of carrying
on a civil discussion. I'm a fairly tolerant person, and I've tried to humor
you, to be nice, and I hoped you'd get the message and start acting like an
adult. My mistake. You're just like Jim, if not the same person, someone
incapable of acting older than your shoe size.

Peace yourself. You can have the last word, and I won't be responding going
forward. Oh, and you're a jerk.

--
Nom=de=Plume