Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,525
Default Another physicist not on the AGW payroll;

YIKES, another physicist not funded by the anthropogenic global
warming funds:
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/12/2...ng/#more-14426
Warming caused by cosmic rays and ozone he says. Peer reviewed and
published in a real journal. He just did not get paid off in time but
you can bet he'll lose his funding.
  #2   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Aug 2009
Posts: 5,427
Default Another physicist not on the AGW payroll;

"Frogwatch" wrote in message
...
YIKES, another physicist not funded by the anthropogenic global
warming funds:
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/12/2...ng/#more-14426
Warming caused by cosmic rays and ozone he says. Peer reviewed and
published in a real journal. He just did not get paid off in time but
you can bet he'll lose his funding.



I guess you missed the part about chlorofluorocarbons. Let me guess...
they're not created by humans.

--
Nom=de=Plume


  #3   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,525
Default Another physicist not on the AGW payroll;

On Dec 22, 3:18*pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Frogwatch" wrote in message

...

YIKES, another physicist not funded by the anthropogenic global
warming funds:
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/12/2...cosmic-rays-ma...
Warming caused by cosmic rays and ozone he says. *Peer reviewed and
published in a real journal. *He just did not get paid off in time but
you can bet he'll lose his funding.


I guess you missed the part about chlorofluorocarbons. Let me guess...
they're not created by humans.

--
Nom=de=Plume


We are not using those CFCs anymore so no need for the huge UN
bureaucracy you want if this guy is correct.
  #4   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Nov 2009
Posts: 623
Default Another physicist not on the AGW payroll;

On Tue, 22 Dec 2009 13:57:34 -0800 (PST), Frogwatch
wrote:

On Dec 22, 3:18*pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Frogwatch" wrote in message

...

YIKES, another physicist not funded by the anthropogenic global
warming funds:
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/12/2...cosmic-rays-ma...
Warming caused by cosmic rays and ozone he says. *Peer reviewed and
published in a real journal. *He just did not get paid off in time but
you can bet he'll lose his funding.


I guess you missed the part about chlorofluorocarbons. Let me guess...
they're not created by humans.

--
Nom=de=Plume


We are not using those CFCs anymore so no need for the huge UN
bureaucracy you want if this guy is correct.


More smart Canadians.
--

Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year!

John H
  #5   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Aug 2009
Posts: 5,427
Default Another physicist not on the AGW payroll;

"Frogwatch" wrote in message
...
On Dec 22, 3:18 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Frogwatch" wrote in message

...

YIKES, another physicist not funded by the anthropogenic global
warming funds:
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/12/2...cosmic-rays-ma...
Warming caused by cosmic rays and ozone he says. Peer reviewed and
published in a real journal. He just did not get paid off in time but
you can bet he'll lose his funding.


I guess you missed the part about chlorofluorocarbons. Let me guess...
they're not created by humans.

--
Nom=de=Plume


We are not using those CFCs anymore so no need for the huge UN
bureaucracy you want if this guy is correct.



Bzzzt. Wrong answer.

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/in...9044919AAeN4Ek

--
Nom=de=Plume




  #6   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Aug 2009
Posts: 5,427
Default Another physicist not on the AGW payroll;

"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m...

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Frogwatch" wrote in message
...
On Dec 22, 3:18 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Frogwatch" wrote in message

...

YIKES, another physicist not funded by the anthropogenic global
warming funds:
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/12/2...cosmic-rays-ma...
Warming caused by cosmic rays and ozone he says. Peer reviewed and
published in a real journal. He just did not get paid off in time but
you can bet he'll lose his funding.

I guess you missed the part about chlorofluorocarbons. Let me guess...
they're not created by humans.

--
Nom=de=Plume


We are not using those CFCs anymore so no need for the huge UN
bureaucracy you want if this guy is correct.



Bzzzt. Wrong answer.

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/in...9044919AAeN4Ek

--
Nom=de=Plume


Yup, just like cutting carbon emissions in America. Ruin what we have
left of any manufacturing, while the rest of the world ignores the edict.


Ruin? By using an alternative to an environmentally destructive chemical?

--
Nom=de=Plume


  #7   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,197
Default Another physicist not on the AGW payroll;


"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Frogwatch" wrote in message
...
On Dec 22, 3:18 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Frogwatch" wrote in message

...

YIKES, another physicist not funded by the anthropogenic global
warming funds:
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/12/2...cosmic-rays-ma...
Warming caused by cosmic rays and ozone he says. Peer reviewed and
published in a real journal. He just did not get paid off in time but
you can bet he'll lose his funding.


I guess you missed the part about chlorofluorocarbons. Let me guess...
they're not created by humans.

--
Nom=de=Plume


We are not using those CFCs anymore so no need for the huge UN
bureaucracy you want if this guy is correct.



Bzzzt. Wrong answer.

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/in...9044919AAeN4Ek

--
Nom=de=Plume


Yup, just like cutting carbon emissions in America. Ruin what we have left
of any manufacturing, while the rest of the world ignores the edict.


  #8   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,005
Default Another physicist not on the AGW payroll;

On Dec 22, 6:07*pm, "Bill McKee" wrote:
"nom=de=plume" wrote in message

...





"Frogwatch" wrote in message
...
On Dec 22, 3:18 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Frogwatch" wrote in message


....


YIKES, another physicist not funded by the anthropogenic global
warming funds:
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/12/2...cosmic-rays-ma....
Warming caused by cosmic rays and ozone he says. Peer reviewed and
published in a real journal. He just did not get paid off in time but
you can bet he'll lose his funding.


I guess you missed the part about chlorofluorocarbons. Let me guess...
they're not created by humans.


--
Nom=de=Plume


We are not using those CFCs anymore so no need for the huge UN
bureaucracy you want if this guy is correct.


Bzzzt. Wrong answer.


http://answers.yahoo.com/question/in...9044919AAeN4Ek


--
Nom=de=Plume


Yup, just like cutting carbon emissions in America. *Ruin what we have left
of any manufacturing, while the rest of the world ignores the edict.


Tried to buy any R12 lately? You can't. It's all been virtually put
out of existence, at least here in the states.
  #9   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,163
Default Another physicist not on the AGW payroll;

On Dec 22, 5:43*pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Bill McKee" wrote in message

m...





"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Frogwatch" wrote in message
....
On Dec 22, 3:18 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Frogwatch" wrote in message


....


YIKES, another physicist not funded by the anthropogenic global
warming funds:
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/12/2...cosmic-rays-ma...
Warming caused by cosmic rays and ozone he says. Peer reviewed and
published in a real journal. He just did not get paid off in time but
you can bet he'll lose his funding.


I guess you missed the part about chlorofluorocarbons. Let me guess....
they're not created by humans.


--
Nom=de=Plume


We are not using those CFCs anymore so no need for the huge UN
bureaucracy you want if this guy is correct.


Bzzzt. Wrong answer.


http://answers.yahoo.com/question/in...9044919AAeN4Ek


--
Nom=de=Plume


Yup, just like cutting carbon emissions in America. *Ruin what we have
left of any manufacturing, while the rest of the world ignores the edict.

  #10   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,310
Default Another physicist not on the AGW payroll;

On Tue, 22 Dec 2009 18:40:11 -0800 (PST), Frogwatch
wrote:



nom needs to learn some technology and chemistry. R12 and R22 were
the "bad" CFCs whereas the new CFCs do not cause ozone degradation.
We no longer use R12 and R22.


Most none-automobile HVAC, large and small, including industrial
chillers and kitchen fridges, still use R22.
It'll be 10 more years before R22 won't be produced.
http://www.epa.gov/Ozone/title6/phas...2phaseout.html

--Vic


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Manager Payroll in the USA Bolaleman Cruising 2 November 25th 08 05:12 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:58 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017