Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
Often I'm accused of "avoiding" truth when it comes to AGW. I'm the
"creationist" in a sense that I don't understand the highly complex
nature of climate anatomy. I'm picking on "details". I'm a corporate
schill. I don't understand "peer review" (even though I have "peer
reviewed" over 600 math texts, dissertations and master's thesis in my
life). Yada, yada, yada.

Ok - without getting into the politics, I want Loogy and the other AGW
types to defend this.


http://www.financialpost.com/opinion...d-5078af9cb409

Remember - this is your side - this is how you are presenting your
information. This describes what happens when one of the most widely
used sources of information is controlled and massaged and only one
side of the "science" is presented.

Go ahead - defend this.

I'll wait.

Defend what? Junk Science or science for profit? Can't do that.

As a boater, I welcome warming if in fact they are right, and I have
reasons to doubt they are right. But lets say in January I go bass
fishing in Trout Lake in January, or all of Minnesota, Michigan or
Wisconsin, or even north into Ontario and Manitoba is that so bad?

Even the costs of boating would go down as the docks would be used for
12 months and not 4 months. Allowing operators to make boating more
affordable. And I would rather spend my money on boating than heat for
the home.

I for one hope they are right that is it warming, I view it good for all
boaters as a boat does not work well on a 12" of solid ice. And the
fish grow very slow in the cold. With warmer winters natural fishery
production goes right up. Longer summers give them lots of food so we
can catch them and have a great time doing it. And bigger fish too!

So what Darwinian disease do the global warmists have that they would
rather see us hit the ice age were not much of anything lives? Because
if your not warming, you be getting colder. So I fail to see the locic
of eco freeks.