On Dec 19, 12:33*pm, I am Tosk
wrote:
In article 8fff69e2-7531-426d-b8a6-
,
says...







On Dec 18, 10:07 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"I am Tosk" wrote in ...

In article 9447f5fd-78c4-4463-a85f-
,
says...

On Dec 18, 12:50 pm, thunder wrote:
On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 10:07:07 -0500, John H wrote:
From the second article:
"...the United States backed what amounts to the single biggest
transfer
of wealth from rich to poor nations for any one cause -- in a sense
offering compensation for decades of warming the Earth.

There are lots of weasel words in the above, but by far, the largest
transfer of wealth is our purchase of foreign oil. Or, did you think
Saudi Arabia was always a wealthy country?

But that's okay, because as a whole, the democrats want to lessen our
need for oil, and pollutants so that MUST be a bad thing.

What makes your thinking narrow is your assumption that we don't or
couldn't, just because we don't see the same solution you do...

We've all been waiting for the right-wing solution to the damage that we're
doing to the Earth... drum roll please.....

--
Nom=de=Plume- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Hell, that's easy. Most of them claim that we aren't doing anything
negative to the earth.

Man, you are completely unhinged here.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Oh, really? How many examples of republican politicians statements
that spewing millions of tons of CO2 into the atmosphere does NO HARM
to the earth would you like me to post?

http://mediamatters.org/research/200905210011

http://www.infowars.com/top-house-re...ul-is-comical/

Want more, just ask!