On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 11:50:32 -0600, thunder
wrote:

On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 10:07:07 -0500, John H wrote:


From the second article:
"...the United States backed what amounts to the single biggest transfer
of wealth from rich to poor nations for any one cause -- in a sense
offering compensation for decades of warming the Earth.

There are lots of weasel words in the above, but by far, the largest
transfer of wealth is our purchase of foreign oil. Or, did you think
Saudi Arabia was always a wealthy country?

Explain this to me - why is it necessary to transfer money to under
developed nations to keep them under developed and at or near the
poverty level forever?

That's what this is about you know - keeping the undeveloped or under
developed nations and citizens in perpetual poverty not being able to
develop their own energy resources all in the name of global warming.

Why is that a good thing?