Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 10:07:07 -0500, John H wrote:
From the second article: "...the United States backed what amounts to the single biggest transfer of wealth from rich to poor nations for any one cause -- in a sense offering compensation for decades of warming the Earth. There are lots of weasel words in the above, but by far, the largest transfer of wealth is our purchase of foreign oil. Or, did you think Saudi Arabia was always a wealthy country? |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 12/18/09 12:50 PM, thunder wrote:
On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 10:07:07 -0500, John H wrote: From the second article: "...the United States backed what amounts to the single biggest transfer of wealth from rich to poor nations for any one cause -- in a sense offering compensation for decades of warming the Earth. There are lots of weasel words in the above, but by far, the largest transfer of wealth is our purchase of foreign oil. Or, did you think Saudi Arabia was always a wealthy country? Wait, don't tell me...herring is trying to convince readers he knows something... :) |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 11:50:32 -0600, thunder
wrote: On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 10:07:07 -0500, John H wrote: From the second article: "...the United States backed what amounts to the single biggest transfer of wealth from rich to poor nations for any one cause -- in a sense offering compensation for decades of warming the Earth. There are lots of weasel words in the above, but by far, the largest transfer of wealth is our purchase of foreign oil. Or, did you think Saudi Arabia was always a wealthy country? You're right. But at least we're getting something for our money. We should definitely be doing a lot more drilling at home and building a lot more nuclear plants. You've got the right attitude. -- Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year! John H |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"John H" wrote in message
... On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 11:50:32 -0600, thunder wrote: On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 10:07:07 -0500, John H wrote: From the second article: "...the United States backed what amounts to the single biggest transfer of wealth from rich to poor nations for any one cause -- in a sense offering compensation for decades of warming the Earth. There are lots of weasel words in the above, but by far, the largest transfer of wealth is our purchase of foreign oil. Or, did you think Saudi Arabia was always a wealthy country? You're right. But at least we're getting something for our money. We should definitely be doing a lot more drilling at home and building a lot more nuclear plants. You've got the right attitude. -- Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year! John H We're getting plenty of rope from the Saudis. You know what you do with plenty of rope, right? -- Nom=de=Plume |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 18, 12:50*pm, thunder wrote:
On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 10:07:07 -0500, John H wrote: From the second article: "...the United States backed what amounts to the single biggest transfer of wealth from rich to poor nations for any one cause -- in a sense offering compensation for decades of warming the Earth. There are lots of weasel words in the above, but by far, the largest transfer of wealth is our purchase of foreign oil. *Or, did you think Saudi Arabia was always a wealthy country? But that's okay, because as a whole, the democrats want to lessen our need for oil, and pollutants so that MUST be a bad thing. |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 12/18/09 8:44 PM, I am Tosk wrote:
In article9447f5fd-78c4-4463-a85f- , says... On Dec 18, 12:50 pm, wrote: On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 10:07:07 -0500, John H wrote: From the second article: "...the United States backed what amounts to the single biggest transfer of wealth from rich to poor nations for any one cause -- in a sense offering compensation for decades of warming the Earth. There are lots of weasel words in the above, but by far, the largest transfer of wealth is our purchase of foreign oil. Or, did you think Saudi Arabia was always a wealthy country? But that's okay, because as a whole, the democrats want to lessen our need for oil, and pollutants so that MUST be a bad thing. What makes your thinking narrow is your assumption that we don't or couldn't, just because we don't see the same solution you do... One wonders who this "we" is that Hate-a-Tosk refers to constantly...is it the group of certified morons? |
#8
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"I am Tosk" wrote in message
... In article 9447f5fd-78c4-4463-a85f- , says... On Dec 18, 12:50 pm, thunder wrote: On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 10:07:07 -0500, John H wrote: From the second article: "...the United States backed what amounts to the single biggest transfer of wealth from rich to poor nations for any one cause -- in a sense offering compensation for decades of warming the Earth. There are lots of weasel words in the above, but by far, the largest transfer of wealth is our purchase of foreign oil. Or, did you think Saudi Arabia was always a wealthy country? But that's okay, because as a whole, the democrats want to lessen our need for oil, and pollutants so that MUST be a bad thing. What makes your thinking narrow is your assumption that we don't or couldn't, just because we don't see the same solution you do... We've all been waiting for the right-wing solution to the damage that we're doing to the Earth... drum roll please..... -- Nom=de=Plume |
#9
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 18, 10:07*pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"I am Tosk" wrote in ... In article 9447f5fd-78c4-4463-a85f- , says... On Dec 18, 12:50 pm, thunder wrote: On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 10:07:07 -0500, John H wrote: From the second article: "...the United States backed what amounts to the single biggest transfer of wealth from rich to poor nations for any one cause -- in a sense offering compensation for decades of warming the Earth. There are lots of weasel words in the above, but by far, the largest transfer of wealth is our purchase of foreign oil. Or, did you think Saudi Arabia was always a wealthy country? But that's okay, because as a whole, the democrats want to lessen our need for oil, and pollutants so that MUST be a bad thing. What makes your thinking narrow is your assumption that we don't or couldn't, just because we don't see the same solution you do... We've all been waiting for the right-wing solution to the damage that we're doing to the Earth... drum roll please..... -- Nom=de=Plume- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Hell, that's easy. Most of them claim that we aren't doing anything negative to the earth. |
#10
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article 8fff69e2-7531-426d-b8a6-
, says... On Dec 18, 10:07*pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote: "I am Tosk" wrote in ... In article 9447f5fd-78c4-4463-a85f- , says... On Dec 18, 12:50 pm, thunder wrote: On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 10:07:07 -0500, John H wrote: From the second article: "...the United States backed what amounts to the single biggest transfer of wealth from rich to poor nations for any one cause -- in a sense offering compensation for decades of warming the Earth. There are lots of weasel words in the above, but by far, the largest transfer of wealth is our purchase of foreign oil. Or, did you think Saudi Arabia was always a wealthy country? But that's okay, because as a whole, the democrats want to lessen our need for oil, and pollutants so that MUST be a bad thing. What makes your thinking narrow is your assumption that we don't or couldn't, just because we don't see the same solution you do... We've all been waiting for the right-wing solution to the damage that we're doing to the Earth... drum roll please..... -- Nom=de=Plume- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Hell, that's easy. Most of them claim that we aren't doing anything negative to the earth. Man, you are completely unhinged here. |