On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 08:29:04 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:

On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 07:10:05 -0500, John H
wrote:

...and from what I hear, a small part of the award is due to his golf
prowess.

Travesty. Clearly, Lance Armstrong is the athelete of the century
because he's actually an athelete.

Golfers aren't atheletes.

You don't know much, evidently.

On 12/17/09 11:36 AM, jps wrote:
On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 08:29:04 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:

On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 07:10:05 -0500, John
wrote:

...and from what I hear, a small part of the award is due to his golf
prowess.

Travesty. Clearly, Lance Armstrong is the athelete of the century
because he's actually an athelete.

Golfers aren't atheletes.

You don't know much, evidently.


Are you second-guessing rec.boats' own Mr. Non-Science? :)

On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 11:39:15 -0500, Harry
wrote:

On 12/17/09 11:36 AM, jps wrote:
On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 08:29:04 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:

On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 07:10:05 -0500, John
wrote:

...and from what I hear, a small part of the award is due to his golf
prowess.

Travesty. Clearly, Lance Armstrong is the athelete of the century
because he's actually an athelete.

Golfers aren't atheletes.

You don't know much, evidently.


Are you second-guessing rec.boats' own Mr. Non-Science? :)

Oh, I thought he was our lawnmower expert. He knows about science?

If he knew anything about science, he'd marvel at the multitude of
effects Tiger Woods can put on a ball with any one of the 14 clubs in
his bag.

And, if he knew what it took to develop such skills, he may not be
among the mob of idiots who'd like to string him up. He's like any
pampered athlete. They're denied a normal life and live on clouds of
adulation and worship. False sense of security. It's among the
hazards of professional sports.