On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 22:47:32 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:

Whoopsie....

"It’s true, and it’s huge. Today another example of CRU having their
foot on the scale, Russian papers are reporting that the Russian
surface station data was sorted by CRU to use the highest warming
stations only."

http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/12/1...mest-stations/

That ain't nuttin' compared to what NASA, NOAA and DOE are going to be
forced to release.

Science fraud at it's best.

Just WHERE in THERE does it say the EARTH is cooling down and that
global warming is not a problem? Huh? Where does it say that??
--

Have a Blessed Chrismahanukwanzakah and a Spectacular New Year!

John H

On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 07:07:47 -0500, John H
wrote:

On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 22:47:32 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:

Whoopsie....

"It’s true, and it’s huge. Today another example of CRU having their
foot on the scale, Russian papers are reporting that the Russian
surface station data was sorted by CRU to use the highest warming
stations only."

http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/12/1...mest-stations/

That ain't nuttin' compared to what NASA, NOAA and DOE are going to be
forced to release.

Science fraud at it's best.

Just WHERE in THERE does it say the EARTH is cooling down and that
global warming is not a problem? Huh? Where does it say that??

I know. You want to see something really funny, look up the New
Scientist review of the issue - it's all variations on the same theme.