|
Approval ratings not the best...
|
Approval ratings not the best...
In article ,
om says... On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 15:16:01 -0600, thunder wrote: On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 14:34:22 -0500, John H wrote: Yeah, and he hasn't noticed the Democrats falling numbers haven't shown a corresponding rise in Republican numbers. I would say, what you are seeing is a disgust in all things Washington, and they wonder why there is voter apathy. If the Democrats don't pass adequate health care reform, it will hurt them, but I see that as hurting the country, not helping the "Party of No". Don't be too sad. I'm OK. If the Democrats would propose an adequate health care plan, it would probably pass. To blame the non-passage on the Republicans is very Reid-like, but also bull****. If this health plan is so great, why hasn't it been made public? Why are Republican senators prevented from seeing the bill? Read this. It's from a liberal newspaper, so it must be true. http://tinyurl.com/y8tlw2l In the meantime, keep blaming the Republicans for the bill not passing. Not even Howard Dean does that. Read for content, John. I didn't blame the Republicans for the bill not passing. The Republican party is irrelevant, and it will remain irrelevant until they get there house in order. Pandering to their "base", all 20% of the population, will keep them irrelevant. You're right. I misread. I thought your reference to the "Party of No" was a jab at Republicans. But it seems as if the Democrats are doing it to themselves. If the Democrats would propose an adequate health care bill it would pass with support from both sides. It would also stand the test of daylight. I am sorry but it bugs me big time that no democrats are concerned about the secret meetings and the lack of any time to review the biggest bill in history. That has got to set off bells with even the lowest level thinkers... |
Approval ratings not the best...
On 12/18/09 10:28 AM, I am Tosk wrote:
In article07536aba-258a-429a-8b0a-a6eaa61e2f10 @a21g2000yqc.googlegroups.com, says... On Dec 17, 2:41 pm, John wrote: On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 14:32:27 -0500, wrote: On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 10:24:55 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: wrote in message ... On Dec 17, 7:03 am, John wrote: On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 23:15:37 -0800, "Bill McKee" wrote: I am an equal opportunity disliker. Both the Republicans and the Democrats suck. At the present, the Democrats suck more as they are in control and screwing us big time. How about Howard Dean's take on the health care bill? Hee, hee. The Democrats are in a free fall, but 'Bama keeps blaming the Republicans. Pass the popcorn. -- Have a Blessed Chrismahanukwanzakah and a Spectacular New Year! John H Your blind hatred still won't allow you to spell your president's name correctly, huh? That's just sad. Very sad... says a lot about John. I will point out, you reap what you sow. I remember the way the left mangled Bush's name. Either you respect the office or personal attacks are fine, your choice. I have great respect for the office. It's the current occupant I find somewhat problematic. I guess I'm just not in favor of the government running everything. The Russians tried it, even added 'socialist' to the name of their country. The folks who got ahead were not the common folks, they were the politicians who had the good spots in the government. Liberals just can't seem to understand that. -- Have a Blessed Chrismahanukwanzakah and a Spectacular New Year! John H- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - There you go. Lumping all liberals into you very narrow minded definition. You are the one who breaks everything into "liberal vs. conservative". Take a look back.. This is really funny...you, loogy, herring, and bilious bill...the dumbed down horsemen of the apocalypse of the eternally stupid. |
Approval ratings not the best...
|
Approval ratings not the best...
On 12/18/09 10:32 AM, I am Tosk wrote:
In , om says... On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 15:16:01 -0600, wrote: On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 14:34:22 -0500, John H wrote: Yeah, and he hasn't noticed the Democrats falling numbers haven't shown a corresponding rise in Republican numbers. I would say, what you are seeing is a disgust in all things Washington, and they wonder why there is voter apathy. If the Democrats don't pass adequate health care reform, it will hurt them, but I see that as hurting the country, not helping the "Party of No". Don't be too sad. I'm OK. If the Democrats would propose an adequate health care plan, it would probably pass. To blame the non-passage on the Republicans is very Reid-like, but also bull****. If this health plan is so great, why hasn't it been made public? Why are Republican senators prevented from seeing the bill? Read this. It's from a liberal newspaper, so it must be true. http://tinyurl.com/y8tlw2l In the meantime, keep blaming the Republicans for the bill not passing. Not even Howard Dean does that. Read for content, John. I didn't blame the Republicans for the bill not passing. The Republican party is irrelevant, and it will remain irrelevant until they get there house in order. Pandering to their "base", all 20% of the population, will keep them irrelevant. You're right. I misread. I thought your reference to the "Party of No" was a jab at Republicans. But it seems as if the Democrats are doing it to themselves. If the Democrats would propose an adequate health care bill it would pass with support from both sides. It would also stand the test of daylight. I am sorry but it bugs me big time that no democrats are concerned about the secret meetings and the lack of any time to review the biggest bill in history. That has got to set off bells with even the lowest level thinkers... Why are you concerned? You don't have health insurance. |
Approval ratings not the best...
In article 9b703227-7553-4759-867f-14cd605552a9
@b15g2000yqd.googlegroups.com, says... On Dec 17, 5:33*pm, thunder wrote: On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 16:56:00 -0500, John H wrote: If the Democrats would propose an adequate health care bill it would pass with support from both sides. It would also stand the test of daylight. Garbage. *"If we?re able to stop Obama on this it will be his Waterloo. It will break him." *Want to guess who said that? *It doesn't sound much like they are interested in health care, just interested in defeating Obama. Yes, indeed! That is all most of the republicans want. Hateful, bigoted, intolerant. Yeah, yeah, that's it, someone said it so it's how "you folks" all feel!! Yeah, that's the ticket!!! snerk |
Approval ratings not the best...
On 12/18/09 10:32 AM, I am Tosk wrote:
In inet, says... On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 16:56:00 -0500, John H wrote: If the Democrats would propose an adequate health care bill it would pass with support from both sides. It would also stand the test of daylight. Garbage. "If we?re able to stop Obama on this it will be his Waterloo. It will break him." Want to guess who said that? It doesn't sound much like they are interested in health care, just interested in defeating Obama. Who said that? Rush? Really man, stop listening to blather radio... We don't... A U.S. Senator, ****-for-brains. Jim Demint, from South Carolina, naturally. |
Approval ratings not the best...
On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 10:32:00 -0500, I am Tosk
wrote: In article , says... On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 15:16:01 -0600, thunder wrote: On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 14:34:22 -0500, John H wrote: Yeah, and he hasn't noticed the Democrats falling numbers haven't shown a corresponding rise in Republican numbers. I would say, what you are seeing is a disgust in all things Washington, and they wonder why there is voter apathy. If the Democrats don't pass adequate health care reform, it will hurt them, but I see that as hurting the country, not helping the "Party of No". Don't be too sad. I'm OK. If the Democrats would propose an adequate health care plan, it would probably pass. To blame the non-passage on the Republicans is very Reid-like, but also bull****. If this health plan is so great, why hasn't it been made public? Why are Republican senators prevented from seeing the bill? Read this. It's from a liberal newspaper, so it must be true. http://tinyurl.com/y8tlw2l In the meantime, keep blaming the Republicans for the bill not passing. Not even Howard Dean does that. Read for content, John. I didn't blame the Republicans for the bill not passing. The Republican party is irrelevant, and it will remain irrelevant until they get there house in order. Pandering to their "base", all 20% of the population, will keep them irrelevant. You're right. I misread. I thought your reference to the "Party of No" was a jab at Republicans. But it seems as if the Democrats are doing it to themselves. If the Democrats would propose an adequate health care bill it would pass with support from both sides. It would also stand the test of daylight. I am sorry but it bugs me big time that no democrats are concerned about the secret meetings and the lack of any time to review the biggest bill in history. That has got to set off bells with even the lowest level thinkers... They won't address the fact that the bill is kept hidden. Yet they'll talk about Republicans 'blindly' doing this or that. If pushing an unseen bill isn't 'blindly' following, then I don't know what it. -- Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year! John H |
Approval ratings not the best...
In article , naled24511
@mypacks.net says... On 12/18/09 10:28 AM, I am Tosk wrote: In article07536aba-258a-429a-8b0a-a6eaa61e2f10 @a21g2000yqc.googlegroups.com, says... On Dec 17, 2:41 pm, John wrote: On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 14:32:27 -0500, wrote: On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 10:24:55 -0800, "nom=de=plume" wrote: wrote in message ... On Dec 17, 7:03 am, John wrote: On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 23:15:37 -0800, "Bill McKee" wrote: I am an equal opportunity disliker. Both the Republicans and the Democrats suck. At the present, the Democrats suck more as they are in control and screwing us big time. How about Howard Dean's take on the health care bill? Hee, hee. The Democrats are in a free fall, but 'Bama keeps blaming the Republicans. Pass the popcorn. -- Have a Blessed Chrismahanukwanzakah and a Spectacular New Year! John H Your blind hatred still won't allow you to spell your president's name correctly, huh? That's just sad. Very sad... says a lot about John. I will point out, you reap what you sow. I remember the way the left mangled Bush's name. Either you respect the office or personal attacks are fine, your choice. I have great respect for the office. It's the current occupant I find somewhat problematic. I guess I'm just not in favor of the government running everything. The Russians tried it, even added 'socialist' to the name of their country. The folks who got ahead were not the common folks, they were the politicians who had the good spots in the government. Liberals just can't seem to understand that. -- Have a Blessed Chrismahanukwanzakah and a Spectacular New Year! John H- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - There you go. Lumping all liberals into you very narrow minded definition. You are the one who breaks everything into "liberal vs. conservative". Take a look back.. This is really funny...you, loogy, herring, and bilious bill...the dumbed down horsemen of the apocalypse of the eternally stupid. You are an impostor. I have guns and answer my door drawn and cocked. -- And now...back to flajim and others who are so obsessed with me, they use my handle here. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:02 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com