|
Approval ratings not the best...
|
Approval ratings not the best...
|
Approval ratings not the best...
On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 20:38:19 -0500, I am Tosk wrote:
In article , says... On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 10:32:51 -0500, I am Tosk wrote: Garbage. "If we?re able to stop Obama on this it will be his Waterloo. It will break him." Want to guess who said that? It doesn't sound much like they are interested in health care, just interested in defeating Obama. Who said that? Rush? Really man, stop listening to blather radio... We don't... No, it was Senator Jim DeMint. Wow, pretty tame compared to what Murtha and that moron from Florida have said;) Hey, I never said it was a big deal. I did use it to dispute John's statement "an adequate health care bill it would pass with support from both sides". I don't buy it. IMO, the Republicans would vote No on anything the Democrats proposed. |
Approval ratings not the best...
On 12/18/09 8:56 PM, thunder wrote:
On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 20:38:19 -0500, I am Tosk wrote: In inet, says... On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 10:32:51 -0500, I am Tosk wrote: Garbage. "If we?re able to stop Obama on this it will be his Waterloo. It will break him." Want to guess who said that? It doesn't sound much like they are interested in health care, just interested in defeating Obama. Who said that? Rush? Really man, stop listening to blather radio... We don't... No, it was Senator Jim DeMint. Wow, pretty tame compared to what Murtha and that moron from Florida have said;) Hey, I never said it was a big deal. I did use it to dispute John's statement "an adequate health care bill it would pass with support from both sides". I don't buy it. IMO, the Republicans would vote No on anything the Democrats proposed. There's a fairly long blog here that explains why there is no GOP health care plan alternative: http://www.anonymousliberal.com/ |
Approval ratings not the best...
"thunder" wrote in message
... On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 20:38:19 -0500, I am Tosk wrote: In article , says... On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 10:32:51 -0500, I am Tosk wrote: Garbage. "If we?re able to stop Obama on this it will be his Waterloo. It will break him." Want to guess who said that? It doesn't sound much like they are interested in health care, just interested in defeating Obama. Who said that? Rush? Really man, stop listening to blather radio... We don't... No, it was Senator Jim DeMint. Wow, pretty tame compared to what Murtha and that moron from Florida have said;) Hey, I never said it was a big deal. I did use it to dispute John's statement "an adequate health care bill it would pass with support from both sides". I don't buy it. IMO, the Republicans would vote No on anything the Democrats proposed. It wouldn't just be an opinion. It's a guarantee, which is sad. -- Nom=de=Plume |
Approval ratings not the best...
"I am Tosk" wrote in message
... In article , says... On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 10:32:00 -0500, I am Tosk wrote: I am sorry but it bugs me big time that no democrats are concerned about the secret meetings and the lack of any time to review the biggest bill in history. That has got to set off bells with even the lowest level thinkers... Is this the first time you have paid attention to the legislative process? Frankly, this is how it's done. It's ugly, untidy, but there's nothing new here. Sunshine and openness were the footblocks of Obama's campaign. You hold repubs more accountable for screwing around on their wives because they campaign on "family values", so we can hold you to "change and openness", right?? He's an order of magnitude more open than the Bush adm. -- Nom=de=Plume |
Approval ratings not the best...
On Dec 18, 8:38*pm, I am Tosk wrote:
In article , says... On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 10:32:51 -0500, I am Tosk wrote: Garbage. *"If we?re able to stop Obama on this it will be his Waterloo. It will break him." *Want to guess who said that? *It doesn't sound much like they are interested in health care, just interested in defeating Obama. Who said that? Rush? Really man, stop listening to blather radio... We don't... No, it was Senator Jim DeMint. Wow, pretty tame compared to what Murtha and that moron from Florida have said;) What does what Murtha has to say have anything to do with what DeMint has to say? |
Approval ratings not the best...
On Dec 18, 8:36*pm, I am Tosk wrote:
In article 15924f43-92b2-4d45-941c-2e6538b91760 @g26g2000yqe.googlegroups.com, says... On Dec 18, 1:23*pm, Jim wrote: John H wrote: On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 12:06:03 -0600, thunder wrote: On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 10:32:00 -0500, I am Tosk wrote: I am sorry but it bugs me big time that no democrats are concerned about the secret meetings and the lack of any time to review the biggest bill in history. That has got to set off bells with even the lowest level thinkers... Is this the first time you have paid attention to the legislative process? *Frankly, this is how it's done. *It's ugly, untidy, but there's nothing new here. * Bull****. But if you have to defend them, it's as good a bull**** as anyone puts out. Blindly following, indeed! I was HOPEing for Some CHANGE up there but it seems like it's business as usual. Oh Well.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Yep, the right will do anything at any cost to derail anything the left does, not matter how good it is, how many people will benefit, or what it will do. It seems arrogant of you to assume that nobody can have a truly opposing point of view. And when one is as one sided as "some here", everybody will seem to be on the "other side"....- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - When did I say that someone can't have an opposing point of view? |
Approval ratings not the best...
|
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:02 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com