BoatBanter.com

BoatBanter.com (https://www.boatbanter.com/)
-   General (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/)
-   -   UN may curtail 400-year-old 'freedom of the seas' (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/112254-un-may-curtail-400-year-old-freedom-seas.html)

lil abner December 12th 09 04:05 PM

UN may curtail 400-year-old 'freedom of the seas'
 
The one world /globalist government. Has anyone voted for giving up our
freedoms and submitting to UN rule???

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/new...cle6950905.ece

Tom Francis - SWSports December 12th 09 04:35 PM

UN may curtail 400-year-old 'freedom of the seas'
 
On Sat, 12 Dec 2009 11:05:29 -0500, lil abner wrote:

The one world /globalist government. Has anyone voted for giving up our
freedoms and submitting to UN rule???

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/new...cle6950905.ece


Well, this may sound like heresy, but it's about freakin' time they
regulated the ocean rapists.

Loogypicker[_2_] December 12th 09 04:40 PM

UN may curtail 400-year-old 'freedom of the seas'
 
On Dec 12, 11:35*am, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:
On Sat, 12 Dec 2009 11:05:29 -0500, lil abner wrote:
The one world /globalist government. Has anyone voted for giving up our
freedoms and submitting to UN rule???


http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/new...cle6950905.ece


Well, this may sound like heresy, but it's about freakin' time they
regulated the ocean rapists.


I agree.

Don White December 12th 09 04:50 PM

UN may curtail 400-year-old 'freedom of the seas'
 

"Tom Francis - SWSports" wrote in
message ...
On Sat, 12 Dec 2009 11:05:29 -0500, lil abner wrote:

The one world /globalist government. Has anyone voted for giving up our
freedoms and submitting to UN rule???

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/new...cle6950905.ece


Well, this may sound like heresy, but it's about freakin' time they
regulated the ocean rapists.


Yes sir... the cod fishery was almost fished to extincion off our waters.
I say it's about time something meaningful was done.
http://archive.greenpeace.org/comms/cbio/cancod.html



John H[_11_] December 12th 09 05:13 PM

UN may curtail 400-year-old 'freedom of the seas'
 
On Sat, 12 Dec 2009 11:35:43 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:

On Sat, 12 Dec 2009 11:05:29 -0500, lil abner wrote:

The one world /globalist government. Has anyone voted for giving up our
freedoms and submitting to UN rule???

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/new...cle6950905.ece


Well, this may sound like heresy, but it's about freakin' time they
regulated the ocean rapists.


'Bout time.
--

John H

John H[_11_] December 12th 09 05:20 PM

UN may curtail 400-year-old 'freedom of the seas'
 
On Sat, 12 Dec 2009 10:06:29 -0800, "Steve B"
wrote:


"lil abner" wrote in message
...
The one world /globalist government. Has anyone voted for giving up our
freedoms and submitting to UN rule???

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/new...cle6950905.ece


Freedoms such as pirates being able to roam without confrontation. I
personally vote for putting gunnys and 50 cal. and 20 mm guns on merchant
ships, or at least a train cadre of anti-pirate personnel. And give them
plenty of lethal hardware. A LAW missle oughta do it against one of those
little pirate boats. It's simple math. One LAW, one boat, nothing left
over.

Steve


The range of a LAW isn't sufficient. It would allow the pirates to get
within RPG range of a *much* bigger target. Good ole' Ma Deuce should
do the trick.

http://tinyurl.com/yefk3zr
--

John H

Loogypicker[_2_] December 12th 09 05:31 PM

UN may curtail 400-year-old 'freedom of the seas'
 
On Dec 12, 12:13*pm, John H wrote:
On Sat, 12 Dec 2009 11:35:43 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports

wrote:
On Sat, 12 Dec 2009 11:05:29 -0500, lil abner wrote:


The one world /globalist government. Has anyone voted for giving up our
freedoms and submitting to UN rule???


http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/new...cle6950905.ece


Well, this may sound like heresy, but it's about freakin' time they
regulated the ocean rapists.


'Bout time.
--

John H


Aren't conservatives for LESS government?

lil abner December 12th 09 05:38 PM

UN may curtail 400-year-old 'freedom of the seas'
 
Steve B wrote:
"lil abner" wrote in message
...
The one world /globalist government. Has anyone voted for giving up our
freedoms and submitting to UN rule???

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/new...cle6950905.ece


Freedoms such as pirates being able to roam without confrontation. I
personally vote for putting gunnys and 50 cal. and 20 mm guns on merchant
ships, or at least a train cadre of anti-pirate personnel. And give them
plenty of lethal hardware. A LAW missle oughta do it against one of those
little pirate boats. It's simple math. One LAW, one boat, nothing left
over.

Steve


The ones not permitting defense of vessels, are Company Owners,
Insurance Carriers and National Governments.
Once on the ocean they can do as they please about being armed. Once
they port is the problem.
As far as fisheries, it won't make any difference. The ones devastating
the fisheries are the new using the UN. They have no use for the UN
except if it will get them their way.
Bi bad ole USA would get regulated while gumbia, and numbia, rape and
pillage.
I'm sure Somalia war lords will sing on the dotted line.....not.

BAR[_2_] December 12th 09 05:54 PM

UN may curtail 400-year-old 'freedom of the seas'
 
In article , lil abner
says...

Steve B wrote:
"lil abner" wrote in message
...
The one world /globalist government. Has anyone voted for giving up our
freedoms and submitting to UN rule???

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/new...cle6950905.ece


Freedoms such as pirates being able to roam without confrontation. I
personally vote for putting gunnys and 50 cal. and 20 mm guns on merchant
ships, or at least a train cadre of anti-pirate personnel. And give them
plenty of lethal hardware. A LAW missle oughta do it against one of those
little pirate boats. It's simple math. One LAW, one boat, nothing left
over.

Steve


The ones not permitting defense of vessels, are Company Owners,
Insurance Carriers and National Governments.
Once on the ocean they can do as they please about being armed. Once
they port is the problem.
As far as fisheries, it won't make any difference. The ones devastating
the fisheries are the new using the UN. They have no use for the UN
except if it will get them their way.
Bi bad ole USA would get regulated while gumbia, and numbia, rape and
pillage.
I'm sure Somalia war lords will sing on the dotted line.....not.


The US Navy is supposed to protect US merchant shipping on the high
seas.

George Ewart December 12th 09 05:56 PM

UN may curtail 400-year-old 'freedom of the seas'
 
Let me get this straight. You want the UN to come in and take over the fish
waters of the United States AND top American fishermen from fishing there
AND allow Japan and other Countrys to come in and take all the fish.

You people do not make any sense at all. I guess that is why you are
LIBERALS





"Don White" wrote in message
...

"Tom Francis - SWSports" wrote in
message ...
On Sat, 12 Dec 2009 11:05:29 -0500, lil abner wrote:

The one world /globalist government. Has anyone voted for giving up our
freedoms and submitting to UN rule???

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/new...cle6950905.ece


Well, this may sound like heresy, but it's about freakin' time they
regulated the ocean rapists.


Yes sir... the cod fishery was almost fished to extincion off our
waters. I say it's about time something meaningful was done.
http://archive.greenpeace.org/comms/cbio/cancod.html





All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:58 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com