UN may curtail 400-year-old 'freedom of the seas'
 

The one world /globalist government. Has anyone voted for giving up our
freedoms and submitting to UN rule???

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/new...cle6950905.ece

UN may curtail 400-year-old 'freedom of the seas'
 

On Sat, 12 Dec 2009 11:05:29 -0500, lil abner wrote:

The one world /globalist government. Has anyone voted for giving up our
freedoms and submitting to UN rule???

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/new...cle6950905.ece

Well, this may sound like heresy, but it's about freakin' time they
regulated the ocean rapists.

UN may curtail 400-year-old 'freedom of the seas'
 

On Dec 12, 11:35*am, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:
On Sat, 12 Dec 2009 11:05:29 -0500, lil abner wrote:
The one world /globalist government. Has anyone voted for giving up our
freedoms and submitting to UN rule???

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/new...cle6950905.ece

Well, this may sound like heresy, but it's about freakin' time they
regulated the ocean rapists.

I agree.

UN may curtail 400-year-old 'freedom of the seas'
 

"Tom Francis - SWSports" wrote in
message ...
On Sat, 12 Dec 2009 11:05:29 -0500, lil abner wrote:

The one world /globalist government. Has anyone voted for giving up our
freedoms and submitting to UN rule???

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/new...cle6950905.ece

Well, this may sound like heresy, but it's about freakin' time they
regulated the ocean rapists.

Yes sir... the cod fishery was almost fished to extincion off our waters.
I say it's about time something meaningful was done.
http://archive.greenpeace.org/comms/cbio/cancod.html

UN may curtail 400-year-old 'freedom of the seas'
 

On Sat, 12 Dec 2009 11:35:43 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:

On Sat, 12 Dec 2009 11:05:29 -0500, lil abner wrote:

The one world /globalist government. Has anyone voted for giving up our
freedoms and submitting to UN rule???

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/new...cle6950905.ece

Well, this may sound like heresy, but it's about freakin' time they
regulated the ocean rapists.

'Bout time.
--

John H

UN may curtail 400-year-old 'freedom of the seas'
 

On Sat, 12 Dec 2009 10:06:29 -0800, "Steve B"
wrote:


"lil abner" wrote in message
...
The one world /globalist government. Has anyone voted for giving up our
freedoms and submitting to UN rule???

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/new...cle6950905.ece

Freedoms such as pirates being able to roam without confrontation. I
personally vote for putting gunnys and 50 cal. and 20 mm guns on merchant
ships, or at least a train cadre of anti-pirate personnel. And give them
plenty of lethal hardware. A LAW missle oughta do it against one of those
little pirate boats. It's simple math. One LAW, one boat, nothing left
over.

Steve


The range of a LAW isn't sufficient. It would allow the pirates to get
within RPG range of a *much* bigger target. Good ole' Ma Deuce should
do the trick.

http://tinyurl.com/yefk3zr
--

John H

UN may curtail 400-year-old 'freedom of the seas'
 

On Dec 12, 12:13*pm, John H wrote:
On Sat, 12 Dec 2009 11:35:43 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports

wrote:
On Sat, 12 Dec 2009 11:05:29 -0500, lil abner wrote:

The one world /globalist government. Has anyone voted for giving up our
freedoms and submitting to UN rule???

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/new...cle6950905.ece

Well, this may sound like heresy, but it's about freakin' time they
regulated the ocean rapists.

'Bout time.
--

John H

Aren't conservatives for LESS government?

UN may curtail 400-year-old 'freedom of the seas'
 

Steve B wrote:
"lil abner" wrote in message
...
The one world /globalist government. Has anyone voted for giving up our
freedoms and submitting to UN rule???

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/new...cle6950905.ece

Freedoms such as pirates being able to roam without confrontation. I
personally vote for putting gunnys and 50 cal. and 20 mm guns on merchant
ships, or at least a train cadre of anti-pirate personnel. And give them
plenty of lethal hardware. A LAW missle oughta do it against one of those
little pirate boats. It's simple math. One LAW, one boat, nothing left
over.

Steve


The ones not permitting defense of vessels, are Company Owners,
Insurance Carriers and National Governments.
Once on the ocean they can do as they please about being armed. Once
they port is the problem.
As far as fisheries, it won't make any difference. The ones devastating
the fisheries are the new using the UN. They have no use for the UN
except if it will get them their way.
Bi bad ole USA would get regulated while gumbia, and numbia, rape and
pillage.
I'm sure Somalia war lords will sing on the dotted line.....not.

UN may curtail 400-year-old 'freedom of the seas'
 

In article , lil abner
says...

Steve B wrote:
"lil abner" wrote in message
...
The one world /globalist government. Has anyone voted for giving up our
freedoms and submitting to UN rule???

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/new...cle6950905.ece

Freedoms such as pirates being able to roam without confrontation. I
personally vote for putting gunnys and 50 cal. and 20 mm guns on merchant
ships, or at least a train cadre of anti-pirate personnel. And give them
plenty of lethal hardware. A LAW missle oughta do it against one of those
little pirate boats. It's simple math. One LAW, one boat, nothing left
over.

Steve


The ones not permitting defense of vessels, are Company Owners,
Insurance Carriers and National Governments.
Once on the ocean they can do as they please about being armed. Once
they port is the problem.
As far as fisheries, it won't make any difference. The ones devastating
the fisheries are the new using the UN. They have no use for the UN
except if it will get them their way.
Bi bad ole USA would get regulated while gumbia, and numbia, rape and
pillage.
I'm sure Somalia war lords will sing on the dotted line.....not.

The US Navy is supposed to protect US merchant shipping on the high
seas.

UN may curtail 400-year-old 'freedom of the seas'
 

Let me get this straight. You want the UN to come in and take over the fish
waters of the United States AND top American fishermen from fishing there
AND allow Japan and other Countrys to come in and take all the fish.

You people do not make any sense at all. I guess that is why you are
LIBERALS





"Don White" wrote in message
...

"Tom Francis - SWSports" wrote in
message ...
On Sat, 12 Dec 2009 11:05:29 -0500, lil abner wrote:

The one world /globalist government. Has anyone voted for giving up our
freedoms and submitting to UN rule???

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/new...cle6950905.ece

Well, this may sound like heresy, but it's about freakin' time they
regulated the ocean rapists.

Yes sir... the cod fishery was almost fished to extincion off our
waters. I say it's about time something meaningful was done.
http://archive.greenpeace.org/comms/cbio/cancod.html

UN may curtail 400-year-old 'freedom of the seas'
 

"lil abner" wrote in message
...
The one world /globalist government. Has anyone voted for giving up our
freedoms and submitting to UN rule???

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/new...cle6950905.ece

Freedoms such as pirates being able to roam without confrontation. I
personally vote for putting gunnys and 50 cal. and 20 mm guns on merchant
ships, or at least a train cadre of anti-pirate personnel. And give them
plenty of lethal hardware. A LAW missle oughta do it against one of those
little pirate boats. It's simple math. One LAW, one boat, nothing left
over.

Steve

UN may curtail 400-year-old 'freedom of the seas'
 

On Sat, 12 Dec 2009 11:56:50 -0600, "George Ewart"
wrote:

Let me get this straight. You want the UN to come in and take over the fish
waters of the United States AND top American fishermen from fishing there
AND allow Japan and other Countrys to come in and take all the fish.

Reading comprehension problem there?

International waters - not territorial waters.

UN may curtail 400-year-old 'freedom of the seas'
 

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 12 Dec 2009 10:06:29 -0800, "Steve B"
wrote:


"lil abner" wrote in message
...
The one world /globalist government. Has anyone voted for giving up our
freedoms and submitting to UN rule???

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/new...cle6950905.ece

Freedoms such as pirates being able to roam without confrontation. I
personally vote for putting gunnys and 50 cal. and 20 mm guns on merchant
ships, or at least a train cadre of anti-pirate personnel. And give them
plenty of lethal hardware. A LAW missle oughta do it against one of those
little pirate boats. It's simple math. One LAW, one boat, nothing left
over.

Steve


The range of a LAW isn't sufficient. It would allow the pirates to get
within RPG range of a *much* bigger target. Good ole' Ma Deuce should
do the trick.

http://tinyurl.com/yefk3zr
--

John H

Now yer talking. In Nevada, there are lots and lots and lots of places
where one can ride ATVs to dry lakes that were used in WWII for training.
One is on the outskirts of NW LV, and houses are being built up to it. Lots
of 50 BMG shells laying all over the place. Thousands and thousands,
actually. Many live. We find some 20mm but not a lot. Bazillions of 30
cal, some with the connectors on them. But the neat thing is finding a
bullet that has hit something hard, and the copper jacket peeled back like a
banana, and that little armor piercing core still sharp after sixty some
years. I can't imagine getting hit by one of those, although nowdays they
use an explosive round, and they are very nasty if you've ever seen the
videos from Iraq. mwv.iraqinight is my favorite. NastyMeds is a good
sniper one from Afghanistan.

I can't understand why the shippers won't put a Ma Deuce on the bow and one
on the stern and just blow these little punks **** into the water. Do that
a couple of times, and all this hoopla would end.

Steve

UN may curtail 400-year-old 'freedom of the seas'
 

On Sat, 12 Dec 2009 11:05:29 -0500, lil abner wrote:

The one world /globalist government. Has anyone voted for giving up our
freedoms and submitting to UN rule???

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/new...cle6950905.ece

time to change his tin foil hat