BoatBanter.com

BoatBanter.com (https://www.boatbanter.com/)
-   General (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/)
-   -   Well, well, well... (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/112250-well-well-well.html)

Tom Francis - SWSports December 12th 09 03:01 AM

Well, well, well...
 
Lookee here...

WASHINGTON – A loophole in the Senate health care bill would let
insurers place annual dollar limits on medical care for people
struggling with costly illnesses such as cancer, prompting a rebuke
from patient advocates.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091211/...enate_loophole

How about that.

mgg December 12th 09 04:38 AM

Well, well, well...
 

"Tom Francis - SWSports" wrote in
message ...
Lookee here...

WASHINGTON - A loophole in the Senate health care bill would let
insurers place annual dollar limits on medical care for people
struggling with costly illnesses such as cancer, prompting a rebuke
from patient advocates.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091211/...enate_loophole

How about that.


In my best Gomer Pyle voice, "Surprise, surprise, surprise!"

--Mike



nom=de=plume December 12th 09 06:24 AM

Well, well, well...
 
"Tom Francis - SWSports" wrote in
message ...
Lookee here...

WASHINGTON - A loophole in the Senate health care bill would let
insurers place annual dollar limits on medical care for people
struggling with costly illnesses such as cancer, prompting a rebuke
from patient advocates.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091211/...enate_loophole

How about that.



How about that the bill hasn't been signed into law yet. How about we
petition the gov't and tell them to fix things.

--
Nom=de=Plume



jps December 12th 09 09:14 AM

Well, well, well...
 
On Fri, 11 Dec 2009 22:24:23 -0800, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"Tom Francis - SWSports" wrote in
message ...
Lookee here...

WASHINGTON - A loophole in the Senate health care bill would let
insurers place annual dollar limits on medical care for people
struggling with costly illnesses such as cancer, prompting a rebuke
from patient advocates.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091211/...enate_loophole

How about that.



How about that the bill hasn't been signed into law yet. How about we
petition the gov't and tell them to fix things.


Chicken little running around telling everyone how bad things are
going to be but is likely against the whole notion of improvement in
the first place.

H the K (I post with a Mac) December 12th 09 11:39 AM

Well, well, well...
 
nom=de=plume wrote:
"Tom Francis - SWSports" wrote in
message ...
Lookee here...

WASHINGTON - A loophole in the Senate health care bill would let
insurers place annual dollar limits on medical care for people
struggling with costly illnesses such as cancer, prompting a rebuke
from patient advocates.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091211/...enate_loophole

How about that.



How about that the bill hasn't been signed into law yet. How about we
petition the gov't and tell them to fix things.


Good idea. You go ahead and draft up the petition and I'll put my old HK
on it.

--


Imagine being such a worthless p.o.s. that you post on usenet using
someone else's ID

Jim December 12th 09 12:04 PM

Well, well, well...
 
mgg wrote:
"Tom Francis - SWSports" wrote in
message ...
Lookee here...

WASHINGTON - A loophole in the Senate health care bill would let
insurers place annual dollar limits on medical care for people
struggling with costly illnesses such as cancer, prompting a rebuke
from patient advocates.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091211/...enate_loophole

How about that.


In my best Gomer Pyle voice, "Surprise, surprise, surprise!"

--Mike


Gollll-eee.

Loogypicker[_2_] December 12th 09 03:27 PM

Well, well, well...
 
On Dec 11, 10:01*pm, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:
Lookee here...

WASHINGTON – A loophole in the Senate health care bill would let
insurers place annual dollar limits on medical care for people
struggling with costly illnesses such as cancer, prompting a rebuke
from patient advocates.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091211/...th_overhaul_se...

How about that.


Okay, and how do you know that that loophole will still be there when
the bill is signed into law......in the future? Can you see into the
future, or just pretending you can?

I am Tosk December 12th 09 03:54 PM

Well, well, well...
 
In article ,
says...

Lookee here...

WASHINGTON ? A loophole in the Senate health care bill would let
insurers place annual dollar limits on medical care for people
struggling with costly illnesses such as cancer, prompting a rebuke
from patient advocates.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091211/...enate_loophole

How about that.


The issue isn't so much that it is in the bill, but the fact that the
senate debated this to no end yesterday, and it's still in the bill!
Somebody sold out to the "big bad insurance companies"... And it wasn't
the republicans!

I am Tosk December 12th 09 03:57 PM

Well, well, well...
 
In article ,
says...

"Tom Francis - SWSports" wrote in
message ...
Lookee here...

WASHINGTON - A loophole in the Senate health care bill would let
insurers place annual dollar limits on medical care for people
struggling with costly illnesses such as cancer, prompting a rebuke
from patient advocates.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091211/...enate_loophole

How about that.


In my best Gomer Pyle voice, "Surprise, surprise, surprise!"

--Mike


You probably don't even have a Gomer Pyle voice;) Or, maybe you do!?

I am Tosk December 12th 09 04:21 PM

Well, well, well...
 
In article e4d2d363-8022-40c5-883e-49fbd2405633
@d20g2000yqh.googlegroups.com, says...

On Dec 11, 10:01*pm, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:
Lookee here...

WASHINGTON ? A loophole in the Senate health care bill would let
insurers place annual dollar limits on medical care for people
struggling with costly illnesses such as cancer, prompting a rebuke
from patient advocates.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091211/...th_overhaul_se...

How about that.


Okay, and how do you know that that loophole will still be there when
the bill is signed into law......in the future? Can you see into the
future, or just pretending you can?


Come on, when so many democrats (who are not allowing any input from
across the table) are fighting so hard yesterday to keep it in, there is
enough chance it will be in that is should be noted, calm down man. Open
your eyes, it's there now, so how do you feel about it? That would be a
question for you to answer...

thunder December 12th 09 04:49 PM

Well, well, well...
 
On Sat, 12 Dec 2009 07:27:39 -0800, Loogypicker wrote:


Okay, and how do you know that that loophole will still be there when
the bill is signed into law......in the future? Can you see into the
future, or just pretending you can?


It won't be. First, it's not in the House bill. Secondly:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091211/ap_on_he_me/
us_health_overhaul_senate_loophole

John H[_11_] December 12th 09 05:04 PM

Well, well, well...
 
On Sat, 12 Dec 2009 07:04:43 -0500, Jim wrote:

mgg wrote:
"Tom Francis - SWSports" wrote in
message ...
Lookee here...

WASHINGTON - A loophole in the Senate health care bill would let
insurers place annual dollar limits on medical care for people
struggling with costly illnesses such as cancer, prompting a rebuke
from patient advocates.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091211/...enate_loophole

How about that.


In my best Gomer Pyle voice, "Surprise, surprise, surprise!"

--Mike


Gollll-eee.


Gosh, isn't that amazing?
--

John H

John H[_11_] December 12th 09 05:08 PM

Well, well, well...
 
On Sat, 12 Dec 2009 11:21:49 -0500, I am Tosk
wrote:

In article e4d2d363-8022-40c5-883e-49fbd2405633
, says...

On Dec 11, 10:01*pm, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:
Lookee here...

WASHINGTON ? A loophole in the Senate health care bill would let
insurers place annual dollar limits on medical care for people
struggling with costly illnesses such as cancer, prompting a rebuke
from patient advocates.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091211/...th_overhaul_se...

How about that.


Okay, and how do you know that that loophole will still be there when
the bill is signed into law......in the future? Can you see into the
future, or just pretending you can?


Come on, when so many democrats (who are not allowing any input from
across the table) are fighting so hard yesterday to keep it in, there is
enough chance it will be in that is should be noted, calm down man. Open
your eyes, it's there now, so how do you feel about it? That would be a
question for you to answer...


I think, Scotty, that you've just discovered a new way to waste time.
--

John H

Loogypicker[_2_] December 12th 09 05:12 PM

Well, well, well...
 
On Dec 12, 11:49*am, thunder wrote:
On Sat, 12 Dec 2009 07:27:39 -0800, Loogypicker wrote:
Okay, and how do you know that that loophole will still be there when
the bill is signed into law......in the future? Can you see into the
future, or just pretending you can?


It won't be. *First, it's not in the House bill. *Secondly:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091211/ap_on_he_me/
us_health_overhaul_senate_loophole


Damn it! That doesn't matter! If you are the right wing faction, the
truth has no bearing in anything. You MUST step in line and believe
any lie or intellectual dishonesty that Hannity, Rush, and O'Reilly
tell you.

Loogypicker[_2_] December 12th 09 05:14 PM

Well, well, well...
 
On Dec 12, 11:21*am, I am Tosk
wrote:
In article e4d2d363-8022-40c5-883e-49fbd2405633
@d20g2000yqh.googlegroups.com, says...







On Dec 11, 10:01*pm, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:
Lookee here...


WASHINGTON ? A loophole in the Senate health care bill would let
insurers place annual dollar limits on medical care for people
struggling with costly illnesses such as cancer, prompting a rebuke
from patient advocates.


http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091211/...th_overhaul_se....


How about that.


Okay, and how do you know that that loophole will still be there when
the bill is signed into law......in the future? Can you see into the
future, or just pretending you can?


Come on, when so many democrats (who are not allowing any input from
across the table) are fighting so hard yesterday to keep it in, there is
enough chance it will be in that is should be noted, calm down man. Open
your eyes, it's there now, so how do you feel about it? That would be a
question for you to answer...- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


Pssssst..........
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091211/...enate_loophole

Open YOUR eyes.

Loogypicker[_2_] December 12th 09 05:15 PM

Well, well, well...
 
On Dec 12, 12:08*pm, John H wrote:
On Sat, 12 Dec 2009 11:21:49 -0500, I am Tosk





wrote:
In article e4d2d363-8022-40c5-883e-49fbd2405633
, says...


On Dec 11, 10:01*pm, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:
Lookee here...


WASHINGTON ? A loophole in the Senate health care bill would let
insurers place annual dollar limits on medical care for people
struggling with costly illnesses such as cancer, prompting a rebuke
from patient advocates.


http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091211/...th_overhaul_se....


How about that.


Okay, and how do you know that that loophole will still be there when
the bill is signed into law......in the future? Can you see into the
future, or just pretending you can?


Come on, when so many democrats (who are not allowing any input from
across the table) are fighting so hard yesterday to keep it in, there is
enough chance it will be in that is should be noted, calm down man. Open
your eyes, it's there now, so how do you feel about it? That would be a
question for you to answer...


I think, Scotty, that you've just discovered a new way to waste time.
--

John H- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


Hey, John, take a look here. Of course, I know you won't apologize.
Harry doesn't either.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091211/...enate_loophole


lil abner December 12th 09 05:32 PM

Well, well, well...
 
Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
Lookee here...

WASHINGTON ? A loophole in the Senate health care bill would let
insurers place annual dollar limits on medical care for people
struggling with costly illnesses such as cancer, prompting a rebuke
from patient advocates.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091211/...enate_loophole

How about that.

Insurance Companies spend big bucks to make sure Congress gives them
what they want.
It would be nice if Congress represented the People of theUnited States
and not Foreign/Global Business.

nom=de=plume December 12th 09 05:57 PM

Well, well, well...
 
"I am Tosk" wrote in message
...
In article e4d2d363-8022-40c5-883e-49fbd2405633
@d20g2000yqh.googlegroups.com, says...

On Dec 11, 10:01 pm, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:
Lookee here...

WASHINGTON ? A loophole in the Senate health care bill would let
insurers place annual dollar limits on medical care for people
struggling with costly illnesses such as cancer, prompting a rebuke
from patient advocates.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091211/...th_overhaul_se...

How about that.


Okay, and how do you know that that loophole will still be there when
the bill is signed into law......in the future? Can you see into the
future, or just pretending you can?


Come on, when so many democrats (who are not allowing any input from
across the table) are fighting so hard yesterday to keep it in, there is
enough chance it will be in that is should be noted, calm down man. Open
your eyes, it's there now, so how do you feel about it? That would be a
question for you to answer...



That's just completely false. The Repubs. have offered many and many have
been incorporated.

--
Nom=de=Plume



Loogypicker[_2_] December 12th 09 06:06 PM

Well, well, well...
 
On Dec 12, 12:15*pm, Loogypicker wrote:
On Dec 12, 12:08*pm, John H wrote:





On Sat, 12 Dec 2009 11:21:49 -0500, I am Tosk


wrote:
In article e4d2d363-8022-40c5-883e-49fbd2405633
, says...


On Dec 11, 10:01*pm, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:
Lookee here...


WASHINGTON ? A loophole in the Senate health care bill would let
insurers place annual dollar limits on medical care for people
struggling with costly illnesses such as cancer, prompting a rebuke
from patient advocates.


http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091211/...th_overhaul_se...


How about that.


Okay, and how do you know that that loophole will still be there when
the bill is signed into law......in the future? Can you see into the
future, or just pretending you can?


Come on, when so many democrats (who are not allowing any input from
across the table) are fighting so hard yesterday to keep it in, there is
enough chance it will be in that is should be noted, calm down man. Open
your eyes, it's there now, so how do you feel about it? That would be a
question for you to answer...


I think, Scotty, that you've just discovered a new way to waste time.
--


John H- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


Hey, John, take a look here. Of course, I know you won't apologize.
Harry doesn't either.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091211/...verhaul_se...- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


crickets

Jim December 12th 09 07:44 PM

Well, well, well...
 
Loogypicker wrote:
On Dec 12, 11:49 am, thunder wrote:
On Sat, 12 Dec 2009 07:27:39 -0800, Loogypicker wrote:
Okay, and how do you know that that loophole will still be there when
the bill is signed into law......in the future? Can you see into the
future, or just pretending you can?

It won't be. First, it's not in the House bill. Secondly:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091211/ap_on_he_me/
us_health_overhaul_senate_loophole


Damn it! That doesn't matter! If you are the right wing faction, the
truth has no bearing in anything. You MUST step in line and believe
any lie or intellectual dishonesty that Hannity, Rush, and O'Reilly
tell you.

Those three don't bother me. What does is those lying sacks of **** in
congress and at #1600 Penn. Ave.

I am Tosk December 13th 09 01:19 PM

Well, well, well...
 
In article 97a78ab6-86f4-4c93-ac72-7ccd5a117cd5
@r24g2000yqd.googlegroups.com, says...

On Dec 12, 11:49*am, thunder wrote:
On Sat, 12 Dec 2009 07:27:39 -0800, Loogypicker wrote:
Okay, and how do you know that that loophole will still be there when
the bill is signed into law......in the future? Can you see into the
future, or just pretending you can?


It won't be. *First, it's not in the House bill. *Secondly:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091211/ap_on_he_me/
us_health_overhaul_senate_loophole


Damn it! That doesn't matter! If you are the right wing faction, the
truth has no bearing in anything. You MUST step in line and believe
any lie or intellectual dishonesty that Hannity, Rush, and O'Reilly
tell you.


Jesus Harry, I thought you were on vacation...

I am Tosk December 13th 09 01:19 PM

Well, well, well...
 
In article ,
om says...

On Sat, 12 Dec 2009 11:21:49 -0500, I am Tosk
wrote:

In article e4d2d363-8022-40c5-883e-49fbd2405633
,
says...

On Dec 11, 10:01*pm, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:
Lookee here...

WASHINGTON ? A loophole in the Senate health care bill would let
insurers place annual dollar limits on medical care for people
struggling with costly illnesses such as cancer, prompting a rebuke
from patient advocates.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091211/...th_overhaul_se...

How about that.

Okay, and how do you know that that loophole will still be there when
the bill is signed into law......in the future? Can you see into the
future, or just pretending you can?


Come on, when so many democrats (who are not allowing any input from
across the table) are fighting so hard yesterday to keep it in, there is
enough chance it will be in that is should be noted, calm down man. Open
your eyes, it's there now, so how do you feel about it? That would be a
question for you to answer...


I think, Scotty, that you've just discovered a new way to waste time.


I have been pretty busy lately.

John H[_11_] December 13th 09 01:23 PM

Well, well, well...
 
On Sun, 13 Dec 2009 08:19:54 -0500, I am Tosk
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Sat, 12 Dec 2009 11:21:49 -0500, I am Tosk
wrote:

In article e4d2d363-8022-40c5-883e-49fbd2405633
, says...

On Dec 11, 10:01*pm, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:
Lookee here...

WASHINGTON ? A loophole in the Senate health care bill would let
insurers place annual dollar limits on medical care for people
struggling with costly illnesses such as cancer, prompting a rebuke
from patient advocates.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091211/...th_overhaul_se...

How about that.

Okay, and how do you know that that loophole will still be there when
the bill is signed into law......in the future? Can you see into the
future, or just pretending you can?

Come on, when so many democrats (who are not allowing any input from
across the table) are fighting so hard yesterday to keep it in, there is
enough chance it will be in that is should be noted, calm down man. Open
your eyes, it's there now, so how do you feel about it? That would be a
question for you to answer...


I think, Scotty, that you've just discovered a new way to waste time.


I have been pretty busy lately.


I was referring to responding to Loogy. I've given up on him.
--

John H

Loogypicker[_2_] December 13th 09 01:51 PM

Well, well, well...
 
On Dec 13, 8:23*am, John H wrote:
On Sun, 13 Dec 2009 08:19:54 -0500, I am Tosk





wrote:
In article ,
says...


On Sat, 12 Dec 2009 11:21:49 -0500, I am Tosk
wrote:


In article e4d2d363-8022-40c5-883e-49fbd2405633
, says...


On Dec 11, 10:01*pm, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:
Lookee here...


WASHINGTON ? A loophole in the Senate health care bill would let
insurers place annual dollar limits on medical care for people
struggling with costly illnesses such as cancer, prompting a rebuke
from patient advocates.


http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091211/...th_overhaul_se...


How about that.


Okay, and how do you know that that loophole will still be there when
the bill is signed into law......in the future? Can you see into the
future, or just pretending you can?


Come on, when so many democrats (who are not allowing any input from
across the table) are fighting so hard yesterday to keep it in, there is
enough chance it will be in that is should be noted, calm down man. Open
your eyes, it's there now, so how do you feel about it? That would be a
question for you to answer...


I think, Scotty, that you've just discovered a new way to waste time.


I have been pretty busy lately.


I was referring to responding to Loogy. I've given up on him.
--

John H- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


Good, then I guess I won't be seeing any idiotic responses like the
above, huh?

Don White December 13th 09 02:30 PM

Well, well, well...
 

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 13 Dec 2009 08:19:54 -0500, I am Tosk
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Sat, 12 Dec 2009 11:21:49 -0500, I am Tosk
wrote:

In article e4d2d363-8022-40c5-883e-49fbd2405633
, says...

On Dec 11, 10:01 pm, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:
Lookee here...

WASHINGTON ? A loophole in the Senate health care bill would let
insurers place annual dollar limits on medical care for people
struggling with costly illnesses such as cancer, prompting a rebuke
from patient advocates.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091211/...th_overhaul_se...

How about that.

Okay, and how do you know that that loophole will still be there when
the bill is signed into law......in the future? Can you see into the
future, or just pretending you can?

Come on, when so many democrats (who are not allowing any input from
across the table) are fighting so hard yesterday to keep it in, there
is
enough chance it will be in that is should be noted, calm down man.
Open
your eyes, it's there now, so how do you feel about it? That would be a
question for you to answer...

I think, Scotty, that you've just discovered a new way to waste time.


I have been pretty busy lately.


I was referring to responding to Loogy. I've given up on him.
--

John H


You telling The Freak who to associate with?

Hhe seems to be friends with Looney...at least most of the time.... you know
'two birds of a feather................'



Scott Dickson December 13th 09 02:53 PM

Well, well, well...
 
On Dec 12, 12:08*pm, John H wrote:
On Sat, 12 Dec 2009 11:21:49 -0500, I am Tosk



wrote:
In article e4d2d363-8022-40c5-883e-49fbd2405633
, says...


On Dec 11, 10:01*pm, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:
Lookee here...


WASHINGTON ? A loophole in the Senate health care bill would let
insurers place annual dollar limits on medical care for people
struggling with costly illnesses such as cancer, prompting a rebuke
from patient advocates.


http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091211/...th_overhaul_se....


How about that.


Okay, and how do you know that that loophole will still be there when
the bill is signed into law......in the future? Can you see into the
future, or just pretending you can?


Come on, when so many democrats (who are not allowing any input from
across the table) are fighting so hard yesterday to keep it in, there is
enough chance it will be in that is should be noted, calm down man. Open
your eyes, it's there now, so how do you feel about it? That would be a
question for you to answer...


I think, Scotty, that you've just discovered a new way to waste time.
--

John H


Just like your stupid, non boat related garbage, asswipe?
Here's "its" picture.

http://i539.photobucket.com/albums/f...32218_8642.jpg

Loogypicker[_2_] December 13th 09 03:59 PM

Well, well, well...
 
On Dec 13, 9:30*am, "Don White" wrote:
"John H" wrote in message

...





On Sun, 13 Dec 2009 08:19:54 -0500, I am Tosk
wrote:


In article ,
says...


On Sat, 12 Dec 2009 11:21:49 -0500, I am Tosk
wrote:


In article e4d2d363-8022-40c5-883e-49fbd2405633
, says...


On Dec 11, 10:01 pm, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:
Lookee here...


WASHINGTON ? A loophole in the Senate health care bill would let
insurers place annual dollar limits on medical care for people
struggling with costly illnesses such as cancer, prompting a rebuke
from patient advocates.


http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091211/...th_overhaul_se...


How about that.


Okay, and how do you know that that loophole will still be there when
the bill is signed into law......in the future? Can you see into the
future, or just pretending you can?


Come on, when so many democrats (who are not allowing any input from
across the table) are fighting so hard yesterday to keep it in, there
is
enough chance it will be in that is should be noted, calm down man.
Open
your eyes, it's there now, so how do you feel about it? That would be a
question for you to answer...


I think, Scotty, that you've just discovered a new way to waste time.


I have been pretty busy lately.


I was referring to responding to Loogy. I've given up on him.
--


John H


You telling The Freak who to associate with?

Hhe seems to be friends with Looney...at least most of the time.... you know
'two birds of a feather................'- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


Go get your worthless son some beer before he beats the hell out of
you.

I am Tosk December 13th 09 11:56 PM

Well, well, well...
 
In article ,
om says...

On Sun, 13 Dec 2009 08:19:54 -0500, I am Tosk
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Sat, 12 Dec 2009 11:21:49 -0500, I am Tosk
wrote:

In article e4d2d363-8022-40c5-883e-49fbd2405633
,
says...

On Dec 11, 10:01*pm, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:
Lookee here...

WASHINGTON ? A loophole in the Senate health care bill would let
insurers place annual dollar limits on medical care for people
struggling with costly illnesses such as cancer, prompting a rebuke
from patient advocates.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091211/...th_overhaul_se...

How about that.

Okay, and how do you know that that loophole will still be there when
the bill is signed into law......in the future? Can you see into the
future, or just pretending you can?

Come on, when so many democrats (who are not allowing any input from
across the table) are fighting so hard yesterday to keep it in, there is
enough chance it will be in that is should be noted, calm down man. Open
your eyes, it's there now, so how do you feel about it? That would be a
question for you to answer...

I think, Scotty, that you've just discovered a new way to waste time.


I have been pretty busy lately.


I was referring to responding to Loogy. I've given up on him.


Loogie's a good guy, I have been falling way behind here lately, as you
can see by where I am in the response rotation.. ;) I have been ignoring
the political bx as much as possible from both sides.

I am Tosk December 14th 09 12:00 AM

Well, well, well...
 
In article 982e334e-86f3-492c-93f8-
,
says...

On Dec 13, 9:30*am, "Don White" wrote:
"John H" wrote in message

...





On Sun, 13 Dec 2009 08:19:54 -0500, I am Tosk
wrote:


In article ,
says...


On Sat, 12 Dec 2009 11:21:49 -0500, I am Tosk
wrote:


In article e4d2d363-8022-40c5-883e-49fbd2405633
, says...


On Dec 11, 10:01 pm, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:
Lookee here...


WASHINGTON ? A loophole in the Senate health care bill would let
insurers place annual dollar limits on medical care for people
struggling with costly illnesses such as cancer, prompting a rebuke
from patient advocates.


http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091211/...th_overhaul_se...

How about that.


Okay, and how do you know that that loophole will still be there when
the bill is signed into law......in the future? Can you see into the
future, or just pretending you can?


Come on, when so many democrats (who are not allowing any input from
across the table) are fighting so hard yesterday to keep it in, there
is
enough chance it will be in that is should be noted, calm down man.
Open
your eyes, it's there now, so how do you feel about it? That would be a
question for you to answer...


I think, Scotty, that you've just discovered a new way to waste time.


I have been pretty busy lately.


I was referring to responding to Loogy. I've given up on him.
--


John H


You telling The Freak who to associate with?

Hhe seems to be friends with Looney...at least most of the time.... you know
'two birds of a feather................'- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


Go get your worthless son some beer before he beats the hell out of
you.


Hah, Loogie is all right. There is no hope for him politically, but...

you know. A lot of my buds are die hard Obama worshippers, all the same,
nothing phases them, no matter how damning it seems to "rational"
people;)

I think I am about a day behind on the group now even with the pink Army
blocked... Commendations to most here for leaving them to talk to
themselves, I have seen very little of them;)

John H[_11_] December 14th 09 12:39 AM

Well, well, well...
 
On Sun, 13 Dec 2009 18:56:17 -0500, I am Tosk
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Sun, 13 Dec 2009 08:19:54 -0500, I am Tosk
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Sat, 12 Dec 2009 11:21:49 -0500, I am Tosk
wrote:

In article e4d2d363-8022-40c5-883e-49fbd2405633
, says...

On Dec 11, 10:01*pm, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:
Lookee here...

WASHINGTON ? A loophole in the Senate health care bill would let
insurers place annual dollar limits on medical care for people
struggling with costly illnesses such as cancer, prompting a rebuke
from patient advocates.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091211/...th_overhaul_se...

How about that.

Okay, and how do you know that that loophole will still be there when
the bill is signed into law......in the future? Can you see into the
future, or just pretending you can?

Come on, when so many democrats (who are not allowing any input from
across the table) are fighting so hard yesterday to keep it in, there is
enough chance it will be in that is should be noted, calm down man. Open
your eyes, it's there now, so how do you feel about it? That would be a
question for you to answer...

I think, Scotty, that you've just discovered a new way to waste time.

I have been pretty busy lately.


I was referring to responding to Loogy. I've given up on him.


Loogie's a good guy, I have been falling way behind here lately, as you
can see by where I am in the response rotation.. ;) I have been ignoring
the political bx as much as possible from both sides.


I believe you. I'm just underwhelmed by his responses - especially to
those most rational folks have filtered.
--

John H

Rob December 14th 09 01:41 AM

Well, well, well...
 
Don White wrote:

You telling The Freak who to associate with?

Hhe seems to be friends with Looney...at least most of the time.... you know
'two birds of a feather................'



"Hhe", eh? What is that in English, dumbass?


TopBassDog December 14th 09 01:51 AM

Well, well, well...
 
On Dec 12, 1:44*pm, Jim wrote:
Loogypicker wrote:
On Dec 12, 11:49 am, thunder wrote:
On Sat, 12 Dec 2009 07:27:39 -0800, Loogypicker wrote:
Okay, and how do you know that that loophole will still be there when
the bill is signed into law......in the future? Can you see into the
future, or just pretending you can?
It won't be. *First, it's not in the House bill. *Secondly:


http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091211/ap_on_he_me/
us_health_overhaul_senate_loophole


Damn it! That doesn't matter! If you are the right wing faction, the
truth has no bearing in anything. You MUST step in line and believe
any lie or intellectual dishonesty that Hannity, Rush, and O'Reilly
tell you.


Those three don't bother me. What does is those lying sacks of **** in
congress and at #1600 Penn. Ave.


The picture says much

http://www.hardrite.com/wp-content/u.../obamavan1.jpg

nom=de=plume December 14th 09 06:07 AM

Well, well, well...
 
"Rob" wrote in message
...
Don White wrote:

You telling The Freak who to associate with?

Hhe seems to be friends with Looney...at least most of the time.... you
know
'two birds of a feather................'



"Hhe", eh? What is that in English, dumbass?



I thought you don't care about typos... are ya tellin us ya do?

--
Nom=de=Plume



nom=de=plume December 14th 09 06:08 AM

Well, well, well...
 
"TopBassDog" wrote in message
...
On Dec 12, 1:44 pm, Jim wrote:
Loogypicker wrote:
On Dec 12, 11:49 am, thunder wrote:
On Sat, 12 Dec 2009 07:27:39 -0800, Loogypicker wrote:
Okay, and how do you know that that loophole will still be there when
the bill is signed into law......in the future? Can you see into the
future, or just pretending you can?
It won't be. First, it's not in the House bill. Secondly:


http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091211/ap_on_he_me/
us_health_overhaul_senate_loophole


Damn it! That doesn't matter! If you are the right wing faction, the
truth has no bearing in anything. You MUST step in line and believe
any lie or intellectual dishonesty that Hannity, Rush, and O'Reilly
tell you.


Those three don't bother me. What does is those lying sacks of **** in
congress and at #1600 Penn. Ave.


The picture says much

http://www.hardrite.com/wp-content/u.../obamavan1.jpg



Yes. It says that the van owner and you are not to bright.

--
Nom=de=Plume



TopBassDog December 14th 09 06:28 AM

Well, well, well...
 
On Dec 14, 12:08*am, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"TopBassDog" wrote in message

...
On Dec 12, 1:44 pm, Jim wrote:



Loogypicker wrote:
On Dec 12, 11:49 am, thunder wrote:
On Sat, 12 Dec 2009 07:27:39 -0800, Loogypicker wrote:
Okay, and how do you know that that loophole will still be there when
the bill is signed into law......in the future? Can you see into the
future, or just pretending you can?
It won't be. First, it's not in the House bill. Secondly:


http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091211/ap_on_he_me/
us_health_overhaul_senate_loophole


Damn it! That doesn't matter! If you are the right wing faction, the
truth has no bearing in anything. You MUST step in line and believe
any lie or intellectual dishonesty that Hannity, Rush, and O'Reilly
tell you.


Those three don't bother me. What does is those lying sacks of **** in
congress and at #1600 Penn. Ave.
The picture says much


http://www.hardrite.com/wp-content/u.../obamavan1.jpg


Yes. It says that the van owner and you are not to bright.

--
Nom=de=Plume


Contrary. It says the van owner is questioning the health care bill
that Obama is pushing. But your response says that you aren't very
bright.

Loogypicker[_2_] December 14th 09 02:02 PM

Well, well, well...
 
On Dec 13, 7:00*pm, I am Tosk wrote:
In article 982e334e-86f3-492c-93f8-
,
says...







On Dec 13, 9:30*am, "Don White" wrote:
"John H" wrote in message


.. .


On Sun, 13 Dec 2009 08:19:54 -0500, I am Tosk
wrote:


In article ,
says...


On Sat, 12 Dec 2009 11:21:49 -0500, I am Tosk
wrote:


In article e4d2d363-8022-40c5-883e-49fbd2405633
, says...


On Dec 11, 10:01 pm, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:
Lookee here...


WASHINGTON ? A loophole in the Senate health care bill would let
insurers place annual dollar limits on medical care for people
struggling with costly illnesses such as cancer, prompting a rebuke
from patient advocates.


http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091211/...th_overhaul_se...


How about that.


Okay, and how do you know that that loophole will still be there when
the bill is signed into law......in the future? Can you see into the
future, or just pretending you can?


Come on, when so many democrats (who are not allowing any input from
across the table) are fighting so hard yesterday to keep it in, there
is
enough chance it will be in that is should be noted, calm down man.
Open
your eyes, it's there now, so how do you feel about it? That would be a
question for you to answer...


I think, Scotty, that you've just discovered a new way to waste time.


I have been pretty busy lately.


I was referring to responding to Loogy. I've given up on him.
--


John H


You telling The Freak who to associate with?


Hhe seems to be friends with Looney...at least most of the time.... you know
'two birds of a feather................'- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


Go get your worthless son some beer before he beats the hell out of
you.


Hah, Loogie is all right. There is no hope for him politically, but...

you know. A lot of my buds are die hard Obama worshippers, all the same,
nothing phases them, no matter how damning it seems to "rational"
people;)

I think I am about a day behind on the group now even with the pink Army
blocked... Commendations to most here for leaving them to talk to
themselves, I have seen very little of them;)- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


What in hell makes you think that I'm a "die hard Obama worshipper"?
Did you notice that BofA and Citigroup are repaying the bail out loans
earlier than anticipated?

Don White December 14th 09 02:33 PM

Well, well, well...
 

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"Rob" wrote in message
...
Don White wrote:

You telling The Freak who to associate with?

Hhe seems to be friends with Looney...at least most of the time.... you
know
'two birds of a feather................'



"Hhe", eh? What is that in English, dumbass?



I thought you don't care about typos... are ya tellin us ya do?

--
Nom=de=Plume


Looks like Ditzy Dan uses any opportunity to sniff my butt.
Pathetic!



nom=de=plume December 14th 09 03:09 PM

Well, well, well...
 
"TopBassDog" wrote in message
...
On Dec 14, 12:08 am, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"TopBassDog" wrote in message

...
On Dec 12, 1:44 pm, Jim wrote:



Loogypicker wrote:
On Dec 12, 11:49 am, thunder wrote:
On Sat, 12 Dec 2009 07:27:39 -0800, Loogypicker wrote:
Okay, and how do you know that that loophole will still be there
when
the bill is signed into law......in the future? Can you see into the
future, or just pretending you can?
It won't be. First, it's not in the House bill. Secondly:


http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091211/ap_on_he_me/
us_health_overhaul_senate_loophole


Damn it! That doesn't matter! If you are the right wing faction, the
truth has no bearing in anything. You MUST step in line and believe
any lie or intellectual dishonesty that Hannity, Rush, and O'Reilly
tell you.


Those three don't bother me. What does is those lying sacks of **** in
congress and at #1600 Penn. Ave.
The picture says much


http://www.hardrite.com/wp-content/u.../obamavan1.jpg


Yes. It says that the van owner and you are not to bright.

--
Nom=de=Plume


Contrary. It says the van owner is questioning the health care bill
that Obama is pushing. But your response says that you aren't very
bright.



On the contrary, if he was, he and you might want to consider the actual
facts instead of having an actual discussion.

--
Nom=de=Plume



I am Tosk December 14th 09 05:59 PM

Well, well, well...
 
In article 0b036b53-ce31-4b96-a5d1-2e4c9edae4e6
@k4g2000yqb.googlegroups.com, says...

On Dec 13, 7:00*pm, I am Tosk wrote:
In article 982e334e-86f3-492c-93f8-
,
says...







On Dec 13, 9:30*am, "Don White" wrote:
"John H" wrote in message


.. .


On Sun, 13 Dec 2009 08:19:54 -0500, I am Tosk
wrote:


In article ,
says...


On Sat, 12 Dec 2009 11:21:49 -0500, I am Tosk
wrote:


In article e4d2d363-8022-40c5-883e-49fbd2405633
, says...


On Dec 11, 10:01 pm, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:
Lookee here...


WASHINGTON ? A loophole in the Senate health care bill would let
insurers place annual dollar limits on medical care for people
struggling with costly illnesses such as cancer, prompting a rebuke
from patient advocates.


http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091211/...th_overhaul_se...

How about that.


Okay, and how do you know that that loophole will still be there when
the bill is signed into law......in the future? Can you see into the
future, or just pretending you can?


Come on, when so many democrats (who are not allowing any input from
across the table) are fighting so hard yesterday to keep it in, there
is
enough chance it will be in that is should be noted, calm down man.
Open
your eyes, it's there now, so how do you feel about it? That would be a
question for you to answer...


I think, Scotty, that you've just discovered a new way to waste time.


I have been pretty busy lately.


I was referring to responding to Loogy. I've given up on him.
--


John H


You telling The Freak who to associate with?


Hhe seems to be friends with Looney...at least most of the time.... you know
'two birds of a feather................'- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


Go get your worthless son some beer before he beats the hell out of
you.


Hah, Loogie is all right. There is no hope for him politically, but...

you know. A lot of my buds are die hard Obama worshippers, all the same,
nothing phases them, no matter how damning it seems to "rational"
people;)

I think I am about a day behind on the group now even with the pink Army
blocked... Commendations to most here for leaving them to talk to
themselves, I have seen very little of them;)- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


What in hell makes you think that I'm a "die hard Obama worshipper"?
Did you notice that BofA and Citigroup are repaying the bail out loans
earlier than anticipated?


If you read carefully, you will see that I never called you a "die hard
Obama Worshiper". I simply noted that several of my friends are... I am
pretty much out of this political bs, how about you?

Loogypicker[_2_] December 14th 09 08:01 PM

Well, well, well...
 
On Dec 14, 12:59*pm, I am Tosk
wrote:
In article 0b036b53-ce31-4b96-a5d1-2e4c9edae4e6
@k4g2000yqb.googlegroups.com, says...







On Dec 13, 7:00 pm, I am Tosk wrote:
In article 982e334e-86f3-492c-93f8-
,
says...


On Dec 13, 9:30 am, "Don White" wrote:
"John H" wrote in message


.. .


On Sun, 13 Dec 2009 08:19:54 -0500, I am Tosk
wrote:


In article ,
says...


On Sat, 12 Dec 2009 11:21:49 -0500, I am Tosk
wrote:


In article e4d2d363-8022-40c5-883e-49fbd2405633
, says....


On Dec 11, 10:01 pm, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:
Lookee here...


WASHINGTON ? A loophole in the Senate health care bill would let
insurers place annual dollar limits on medical care for people
struggling with costly illnesses such as cancer, prompting a rebuke
from patient advocates.


http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091211/...th_overhaul_se...


How about that.


Okay, and how do you know that that loophole will still be there when
the bill is signed into law......in the future? Can you see into the
future, or just pretending you can?


Come on, when so many democrats (who are not allowing any input from
across the table) are fighting so hard yesterday to keep it in, there
is
enough chance it will be in that is should be noted, calm down man.
Open
your eyes, it's there now, so how do you feel about it? That would be a
question for you to answer...


I think, Scotty, that you've just discovered a new way to waste time.


I have been pretty busy lately.


I was referring to responding to Loogy. I've given up on him.
--


John H


You telling The Freak who to associate with?


Hhe seems to be friends with Looney...at least most of the time..... you know
'two birds of a feather................'- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


Go get your worthless son some beer before he beats the hell out of
you.


Hah, Loogie is all right. There is no hope for him politically, but....


you know. A lot of my buds are die hard Obama worshippers, all the same,
nothing phases them, no matter how damning it seems to "rational"
people;)


I think I am about a day behind on the group now even with the pink Army
blocked... Commendations to most here for leaving them to talk to
themselves, I have seen very little of them;)- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


What in hell makes you think that I'm a "die hard Obama worshipper"?
Did you notice that BofA and Citigroup are repaying the bail out loans
earlier than anticipated?


If you read carefully, you will see that I never called you a "die hard
Obama Worshiper". I simply noted that several of my friends are... I am
pretty much out of this political bs, how about you?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


Yep, only when lies and bull**** are thrown in my face to I retaliate.
There isn't much here on rec.boats for me anyway. It's really turned
into a Obama's bad whine fest.


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:51 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com