On Mon, 15 Sep 2003 22:58:11 -0500, rickb308 wrote:


Thinking more along the lines of Syria or Libya.

I just don't see it. Since Reagan bombed Qaddafi, Libya has been trying
to rehabilitate it's image. It recently accepted responsibility for the
Pam Am bombing and paid reparations. Syria and Iraq may share a hatred
for Israel, but Syria sided with Iran in the Iran-Iraq war. It is true
that the relationship has been improving, but not to the point that they
would be willing to risk our wrath by accepting Iraq's weapons.

If you want to know about the WMD, I would look closer to home, to
Rumsfeld's Office of Special Plans. I would suggest they cooked the
intell on Iraq and I personally feel Rumsfeld should be fired.

Some interesting reads:

http://www.newyorker.com/printable/?fact/030512fa_fact

http://search.csmonitor.com/durable/1999/09/13/p7s1.htm

http://www.meib.org/articles/0103_s1.htm