Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
snip
Known. Key operating word. If we had "known", we would have gotten Saddam. We would have "known" where he was. Thanks to budget cuts, and not being able to hire "thieves", our humint assests were mighty thin on the ground. We don't "know" everything they did. Hell, we didn't "KNOW" that they buried 30 fully armed MIG fighters in the sand. We found those by accident. And we admitted they were found by accident. Would have been easy to claim we knew where THEY were. snip Saddam effectively destroyed these arms. A turbine does not take well to being buried in sand; without extensive refitting those birds will never fly again. I can't begin to imagine why he chose to comply with the orders to disarm, but not to let the inspectors verify the fact. One working theory: it may have been in Saddams best interest to make his neighbors think he still possessed them so that he could maintain some control of his political rivals. Mark Browne |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 16 Sep 2003 04:50:55 GMT, "Mark Browne"
wrote: snip Known. Key operating word. If we had "known", we would have gotten Saddam. We would have "known" where he was. Thanks to budget cuts, and not being able to hire "thieves", our humint assests were mighty thin on the ground. We don't "know" everything they did. Hell, we didn't "KNOW" that they buried 30 fully armed MIG fighters in the sand. We found those by accident. And we admitted they were found by accident. Would have been easy to claim we knew where THEY were. snip Saddam effectively destroyed these arms. A turbine does not take well to being buried in sand; without extensive refitting those birds will never fly again. I can't begin to imagine why he chose to comply with the orders to disarm, but not to let the inspectors verify the fact. One working theory: it may have been in Saddams best interest to make his neighbors think he still possessed them so that he could maintain some control of his political rivals. Mark Browne Were they cucooned or were they simply bulldozed over? Gunner " ......The world has gone crazy. Guess I'm showing my age... I think it dates from when we started looking at virtues as funny. It's embarrassing to speak of honor, integrity, bravery, patriotism, 'doing the right thing', charity, fairness. You have Seinfeld making cowardice an acceptable choice; our politicians changing positions of honor with every poll; we laugh at servicemen and patriotic fervor; we accept corruption in our police and bias in our judges; we kill our children, and wonder why they have no respect for Life. We deny children their childhood and innocence- and then we denigrate being a Man, as opposed to a 'person'. We *assume* that anyone with a weapon will use it against his fellowman- if only he has the chance. Nah; in our agitation to keep the State out of the church business, we've destroyed our value system and replaced it with *nothing*. Turns my stomach- " Chas , rec.knives |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Gunner" wrote in message ... On Tue, 16 Sep 2003 04:50:55 GMT, "Mark Browne" wrote: snip Known. Key operating word. If we had "known", we would have gotten Saddam. We would have "known" where he was. Thanks to budget cuts, and not being able to hire "thieves", our humint assests were mighty thin on the ground. We don't "know" everything they did. Hell, we didn't "KNOW" that they buried 30 fully armed MIG fighters in the sand. We found those by accident. And we admitted they were found by accident. Would have been easy to claim we knew where THEY were. snip Saddam effectively destroyed these arms. A turbine does not take well to being buried in sand; without extensive refitting those birds will never fly again. I can't begin to imagine why he chose to comply with the orders to disarm, but not to let the inspectors verify the fact. One working theory: it may have been in Saddams best interest to make his neighbors think he still possessed them so that he could maintain some control of his political rivals. Mark Browne Were they cucooned or were they simply bulldozed over? Gunner snip The pictures I saw looked like they had just dug a ditch, pushed them in, and covered them up. The sand was in direct contact with the birds. Mark Browne |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mark Browne wrote:
I can't begin to imagine why he chose to comply with the orders to disarm, but not to let the inspectors verify the fact. One working theory: it may have been in Saddams best interest to make his neighbors think he still possessed them so that he could maintain some control of his political rivals. A good theory. But one that ultimately led to this war and his ultimate fall from power. Dave |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|