Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#12
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "lil abner" wrote in message ... jps wrote: On Wed, 02 Dec 2009 23:51:01 -0500, lil abner wrote: The animal was killed a lot less humanely than a Hunter would. I beg to differ. Unless every hunter *always* gets a clean head shot, your statement is in error. In the US, slaughtered animals are stunned and rendered insensible (unconscious), before they are bled out (unless it is a kosher kill). Done correctly, there is little if any pain. Let me put it this way; Would you rather be stunned and rendered unconcious, then killed (dead before you awoke), or shot in the chest and left to bleed, fully conscious of the fact that you are dying... until you finally died? I'm not against hunting by any means, nor firearms. It's just that I've heard hunters use that defense before, and it just aint true. Base your defense on the constitution... it don't get any better than that. --Mike |