|
Tofurkey?
On Dec 1, 3:09*pm, John H wrote:
On Tue, 1 Dec 2009 11:59:24 -0800 (PST), Loogypicker wrote: On Dec 1, 2:05*pm, John H wrote: On Tue, 1 Dec 2009 06:12:07 -0800 (PST), Loogypicker wrote: On Nov 30, 7:25 pm, John H wrote: On Mon, 30 Nov 2009 19:02:52 -0500, I am Tosk wrote: In article 24bf95f9-03f0-4a63-8a67-5f62a4922a83 , says... On Nov 30, 4:38 pm, John H wrote: On Mon, 30 Nov 2009 10:12:51 -0800 (PST), Loogypicker wrote: On Nov 30, 12:58 pm, John H wrote: On Mon, 30 Nov 2009 09:31:09 -0800 (PST), Loogypicker wrote: On Nov 30, 11:59 am, John H wrote: On Nov 30, 10:43 am, Loogypicker wrote: On Nov 30, 9:57 am, I am Tosk wrote: In article b63abc79-a82f-4a95-be4d- , says... On Nov 29, 8:07 pm, Frogwatch wrote: ALL of my seven sisters have become veggie nut cases although fortunately their kids have not succumbed. So, I was naturally skeptical to see a vague meat-looking waaaaay too symmetrical blob covered with gravy and dressing at Thanksgiving AND, there was an identical one next to it. Yeah, sorta meat-like texture but no internal structure. I just had to ask, Yup, it was Tofurkey and to be nice I had to take some. If you smothered it with enough gravy and had a few drinks, MAYBE you could accept it. Fortunately, my brother had made some smoked turkey and brother in law made some smoked mullet. Why would someone be branded a "nut case" because they've decided on a healthier lifestyle? Seems as though you wingnuts instantly brand someone that doesn't live your exact lifestyle as nutcases or some such. Why is that? And I LOVE smoked mullet. It's not so much being the veggie head that makes them "nut cases". It's the other aspects of their personalities that seems to go along with that lifestyle, at least up here in the North :) I had a friend that was a vegatarian. It was just crazy in her mid thirties hearing her try to tell us that "no animal in the world really eats meat, only us". What I said? What about Lions I asked? She explained to me that Lions don't eat meat, "they rip open the animals and only eat the stomach contents of grass and stuff"! That was about when I admitted I was an animal and a terrible person for eating meat, and went on with it...- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Most vegetarians aren't concerned with whether animals in the wild eat meat or not. Most are concerned with human consumption gone wild. What we have in this country now days is NOTHING short of animal factories. I've seen it first hand. Animals aren't treated with any regard to pain, living conditions or anything short of getting them fattened up and ready for sale. There is also the aspect about what those huge farms are doing to the environment, let alone eating diseased animals. Isn't this a lovely sight:http://www.goveg.com/factoryFarming_cows.asp http://www.disclose.tv/action/viewvi...eet_your_Meat/ I really doubt that if there is a God, he'd want us treating his creatures like this. Loogy, why jump on this as a political thing? I have a niece who is a veggan. She's also a conservative. She's also weird, which she wasn't until she started the veggan stuff. Nothing political about it.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Where did I say anything political? Gosh, perhaps I misinterpreted this line you wrote earlier: "Seems as though you wingnuts instantly brand someone that doesn't live your exact lifestyle as nutcases or some such." Usually you use the term 'wingnuts' when you're referring to conservatives, i.e. 'right wingers' (as opposed to 'wrong wingers', I guess). I suppose you're using the term 'wingnuts' to refer to anyone who isn't a 'veggan' or other non-meat eater? -- John H- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I'm referring to a wingnut as what it is: From the Online Slang Dictionary: wingnut ?someone lacking in mental abilities, uneducated, rather than mentally handicapped. he's a a real wingnut! From Merriam Webster: Main Entry: wing nut Function: noun Date: circa 1900 1 : a nut with wings that provide a grip for the thumb and finger 2 slang : a mentally deranged person 3 slang : one who advocates extreme measures or changes : radical So, the question would be asked, why are YOU making this political? Oh wow, I didn't even know such a dictionary existed. I must apologize then for thinking that you were turning an informative post into a political statement. You were actually just 'name-calling', like Harry does all the time. Sorry, I should have known that you weren't saying anything political. Not to mention trolling for the Christian response bringing God into it in such a manner. You shouldn't apologize, it was a troll... -- Apology accepted. Well, I know it was a troll, but I don't have a problem apologizing to Loogy. After all, he's going to man up and apologize for calling us names, right? -- John H- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - What names did I call you and Scotty? Wingnuts. You don't remember this: "Seems as though you wingnuts..." Only Scotty and I had a post going. Or were you talking to the F-18 pilot making 'whoooooooshing' sounds over your head? -- John H- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Huh???? The reply was to Froggy....... Yeah. You called us both a bad name. Shame on you. Oh, and check out the order of the posts above. -- John H- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - What did I call *you* John? Are you saying that if someone doesn't live your exact lifestyle that you brand them nutcases or some such? If so, then the shoe fits. |
Tofurkey?
On Dec 1, 10:02*am, I am Tosk wrote:
In article 68a4946f-9593-4fa7-9b5e-1b9348955483 @r5g2000yqb.googlegroups.com, says... On Nov 30, 7:02*pm, I am Tosk wrote: In article 24bf95f9-03f0-4a63-8a67-5f62a4922a83 @f16g2000yqm.googlegroups.com, says... On Nov 30, 4:38*pm, John H wrote: On Mon, 30 Nov 2009 10:12:51 -0800 (PST), Loogypicker wrote: On Nov 30, 12:58*pm, John H wrote: On Mon, 30 Nov 2009 09:31:09 -0800 (PST), Loogypicker wrote: On Nov 30, 11:59*am, John H wrote: On Nov 30, 10:43*am, Loogypicker wrote: On Nov 30, 9:57*am, I am Tosk wrote: In article b63abc79-a82f-4a95-be4d- , says... On Nov 29, 8:07*pm, Frogwatch wrote: ALL of my seven sisters have become veggie nut cases although fortunately their kids have not succumbed. *So, I was naturally skeptical to see a vague meat-looking waaaaay too symmetrical blob covered with gravy and dressing at Thanksgiving AND, there was an identical one next to it. *Yeah, sorta meat-like texture but no internal structure. *I just had to ask, Yup, it was Tofurkey and to be nice I had to take some. *If you smothered *it with enough gravy and had a few drinks, MAYBE you could accept it. Fortunately, my brother had made some smoked turkey and brother in law made some smoked mullet. Why would someone be branded a "nut case" because they've decided on a healthier lifestyle? Seems as though you wingnuts instantly brand someone that doesn't live your exact lifestyle as nutcases or some such. Why is that? And I LOVE smoked mullet. It's not so much being the veggie head that makes them "nut cases". It's the other aspects of their personalities that seems to go along with that lifestyle, at least up here in the North :) I had a friend that was a vegatarian. It was just crazy in her mid thirties hearing her try to tell us that "no animal in the world really eats meat, only us". What I said? What about Lions I asked? She explained to me that Lions don't eat meat, "they rip open the animals and only eat the stomach contents of grass and stuff"! That was about when I admitted I was an animal and a terrible person for eating meat, and went on with it...- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Most vegetarians aren't concerned with whether animals in the wild eat meat or not. Most are concerned with human consumption gone wild. What we have in this country now days is NOTHING short of animal factories. I've seen it first hand. Animals aren't treated with any regard to pain, living conditions or anything short of getting them fattened up and ready for sale. There is also the aspect about what those huge farms are doing to the environment, let alone eating diseased animals. Isn't this a lovely sight:http://www.goveg.com/factoryFarming_cows.asp http://www.disclose.tv/action/viewvi...eet_your_Meat/ I really doubt that if there is a God, he'd want us treating his creatures like this. Loogy, why jump on this as a political thing? I have a niece who is a veggan. She's also a conservative. She's also weird, which she wasn't until she started the veggan stuff. Nothing political about it.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Where did I say anything political? Gosh, perhaps I misinterpreted this line you wrote earlier: "Seems as though you wingnuts instantly brand *someone that doesn't live your exact lifestyle as nutcases or some *such." Usually you use the term 'wingnuts' when you're referring to conservatives, i.e. 'right wingers' (as opposed to 'wrong wingers', I guess). I suppose you're using the term 'wingnuts' to refer to anyone who isn't a 'veggan' or other non-meat eater? -- John H- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I'm referring to a wingnut as what it is: From the Online Slang Dictionary: wingnut ?someone lacking in mental abilities, uneducated, rather than mentally handicapped. he's a a real wingnut! From Merriam Webster: Main Entry: wing nut Function: noun Date: circa 1900 1 : a nut with wings that provide a grip for the thumb and finger 2 slang : a mentally deranged person 3 slang : one who advocates extreme measures or changes : radical So, the question would be asked, why are YOU making this political? Oh wow, I didn't even know such a dictionary existed. I must apologize then for thinking that you were turning an informative post into a political statement. You were actually just 'name-calling', like Harry does all the time. Sorry, I should have known that you weren't saying anything political. Not to mention trolling for the Christian response bringing God into it in such a manner. You shouldn't apologize, it was a troll... -- Apology accepted.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - No, it was a sincere comment. You believe in God, correct? Do you think He'd approve of someone treating animals as in the vid?Do Do you think Obama does?? How about Pelosi and Reid, they have a clean majority in the house and senate and a lock in the Whitehouse? It was another wrong winger slap at conservative values just like the comments above about being against all change.. Just political crap strewn into a non-political conversation... again...- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I made NO political replies in this thread, you have made several however. |
Tofurkey?
On Wed, 2 Dec 2009 07:36:03 -0800 (PST), Loogypicker
wrote: On Dec 1, 3:09*pm, John H wrote: On Tue, 1 Dec 2009 11:59:24 -0800 (PST), Loogypicker wrote: On Dec 1, 2:05*pm, John H wrote: On Tue, 1 Dec 2009 06:12:07 -0800 (PST), Loogypicker wrote: On Nov 30, 7:25 pm, John H wrote: On Mon, 30 Nov 2009 19:02:52 -0500, I am Tosk wrote: In article 24bf95f9-03f0-4a63-8a67-5f62a4922a83 , says... On Nov 30, 4:38 pm, John H wrote: On Mon, 30 Nov 2009 10:12:51 -0800 (PST), Loogypicker wrote: On Nov 30, 12:58 pm, John H wrote: On Mon, 30 Nov 2009 09:31:09 -0800 (PST), Loogypicker wrote: On Nov 30, 11:59 am, John H wrote: On Nov 30, 10:43 am, Loogypicker wrote: On Nov 30, 9:57 am, I am Tosk wrote: In article b63abc79-a82f-4a95-be4d- , says... On Nov 29, 8:07 pm, Frogwatch wrote: ALL of my seven sisters have become veggie nut cases although fortunately their kids have not succumbed. So, I was naturally skeptical to see a vague meat-looking waaaaay too symmetrical blob covered with gravy and dressing at Thanksgiving AND, there was an identical one next to it. Yeah, sorta meat-like texture but no internal structure. I just had to ask, Yup, it was Tofurkey and to be nice I had to take some. If you smothered it with enough gravy and had a few drinks, MAYBE you could accept it. Fortunately, my brother had made some smoked turkey and brother in law made some smoked mullet. Why would someone be branded a "nut case" because they've decided on a healthier lifestyle? Seems as though you wingnuts instantly brand someone that doesn't live your exact lifestyle as nutcases or some such. Why is that? And I LOVE smoked mullet. It's not so much being the veggie head that makes them "nut cases". It's the other aspects of their personalities that seems to go along with that lifestyle, at least up here in the North :) I had a friend that was a vegatarian. It was just crazy in her mid thirties hearing her try to tell us that "no animal in the world really eats meat, only us". What I said? What about Lions I asked? She explained to me that Lions don't eat meat, "they rip open the animals and only eat the stomach contents of grass and stuff"! That was about when I admitted I was an animal and a terrible person for eating meat, and went on with it...- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Most vegetarians aren't concerned with whether animals in the wild eat meat or not. Most are concerned with human consumption gone wild. What we have in this country now days is NOTHING short of animal factories. I've seen it first hand. Animals aren't treated with any regard to pain, living conditions or anything short of getting them fattened up and ready for sale. There is also the aspect about what those huge farms are doing to the environment, let alone eating diseased animals. Isn't this a lovely sight:http://www.goveg.com/factoryFarming_cows.asp http://www.disclose.tv/action/viewvi...eet_your_Meat/ I really doubt that if there is a God, he'd want us treating his creatures like this. Loogy, why jump on this as a political thing? I have a niece who is a veggan. She's also a conservative. She's also weird, which she wasn't until she started the veggan stuff. Nothing political about it.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Where did I say anything political? Gosh, perhaps I misinterpreted this line you wrote earlier: "Seems as though you wingnuts instantly brand someone that doesn't live your exact lifestyle as nutcases or some such." Usually you use the term 'wingnuts' when you're referring to conservatives, i.e. 'right wingers' (as opposed to 'wrong wingers', I guess). I suppose you're using the term 'wingnuts' to refer to anyone who isn't a 'veggan' or other non-meat eater? -- John H- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I'm referring to a wingnut as what it is: From the Online Slang Dictionary: wingnut ?someone lacking in mental abilities, uneducated, rather than mentally handicapped. he's a a real wingnut! From Merriam Webster: Main Entry: wing nut Function: noun Date: circa 1900 1 : a nut with wings that provide a grip for the thumb and finger 2 slang : a mentally deranged person 3 slang : one who advocates extreme measures or changes : radical So, the question would be asked, why are YOU making this political? Oh wow, I didn't even know such a dictionary existed. I must apologize then for thinking that you were turning an informative post into a political statement. You were actually just 'name-calling', like Harry does all the time. Sorry, I should have known that you weren't saying anything political. Not to mention trolling for the Christian response bringing God into it in such a manner. You shouldn't apologize, it was a troll... -- Apology accepted. Well, I know it was a troll, but I don't have a problem apologizing to Loogy. After all, he's going to man up and apologize for calling us names, right? -- John H- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - What names did I call you and Scotty? Wingnuts. You don't remember this: "Seems as though you wingnuts..." Only Scotty and I had a post going. Or were you talking to the F-18 pilot making 'whoooooooshing' sounds over your head? -- John H- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Huh???? The reply was to Froggy....... Yeah. You called us both a bad name. Shame on you. Oh, and check out the order of the posts above. -- John H- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - What did I call *you* John? Are you saying that if someone doesn't live your exact lifestyle that you brand them nutcases or some such? If so, then the shoe fits. Wingnut. Shame on you. Apology is expected. Why must you so often ask, "Are you saying..." A person who posts says what he posted. Why is that so difficult to understand? -- John H |
Tofurkey?
In article ,
says... In article 349d0dd6-6502-48d1-b49d- , says... On Dec 1, 10:02*am, I am Tosk wrote: In article 68a4946f-9593-4fa7-9b5e-1b9348955483 @r5g2000yqb.googlegroups.com, says... On Nov 30, 7:02*pm, I am Tosk wrote: In article 24bf95f9-03f0-4a63-8a67-5f62a4922a83 @f16g2000yqm.googlegroups.com, says... On Nov 30, 4:38*pm, John H wrote: On Mon, 30 Nov 2009 10:12:51 -0800 (PST), Loogypicker wrote: On Nov 30, 12:58*pm, John H wrote: On Mon, 30 Nov 2009 09:31:09 -0800 (PST), Loogypicker wrote: On Nov 30, 11:59*am, John H wrote: On Nov 30, 10:43*am, Loogypicker wrote: On Nov 30, 9:57*am, I am Tosk wrote: In article b63abc79-a82f-4a95-be4d- , says... On Nov 29, 8:07*pm, Frogwatch wrote: ALL of my seven sisters have become veggie nut cases although fortunately their kids have not succumbed. *So, I was naturally skeptical to see a vague meat-looking waaaaay too symmetrical blob covered with gravy and dressing at Thanksgiving AND, there was an identical one next to it. *Yeah, sorta meat-like texture but no internal structure. *I just had to ask, Yup, it was Tofurkey and to be nice I had to take some. *If you smothered *it with enough gravy and had a few drinks, MAYBE you could accept it. Fortunately, my brother had made some smoked turkey and brother in law made some smoked mullet. Why would someone be branded a "nut case" because they've decided on a healthier lifestyle? Seems as though you wingnuts instantly brand someone that doesn't live your exact lifestyle as nutcases or some such. Why is that? And I LOVE smoked mullet. It's not so much being the veggie head that makes them "nut cases". It's the other aspects of their personalities that seems to go along with that lifestyle, at least up here in the North :) I had a friend that was a vegatarian. It was just crazy in her mid thirties hearing her try to tell us that "no animal in the world really eats meat, only us". What I said? What about Lions I asked? She explained to me that Lions don't eat meat, "they rip open the animals and only eat the stomach contents of grass and stuff"! That was about when I admitted I was an animal and a terrible person for eating meat, and went on with it...- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Most vegetarians aren't concerned with whether animals in the wild eat meat or not. Most are concerned with human consumption gone wild. What we have in this country now days is NOTHING short of animal factories. I've seen it first hand. Animals aren't treated with any regard to pain, living conditions or anything short of getting them fattened up and ready for sale. There is also the aspect about what those huge farms are doing to the environment, let alone eating diseased animals. Isn't this a lovely sight:http://www.goveg.com/factoryFarming_cows.asp http://www.disclose.tv/action/viewvi...eet_your_Meat/ I really doubt that if there is a God, he'd want us treating his creatures like this. Loogy, why jump on this as a political thing? I have a niece who is a veggan. She's also a conservative. She's also weird, which she wasn't until she started the veggan stuff. Nothing political about it.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Where did I say anything political? Gosh, perhaps I misinterpreted this line you wrote earlier: "Seems as though you wingnuts instantly brand *someone that doesn't live your exact lifestyle as nutcases or some *such." Usually you use the term 'wingnuts' when you're referring to conservatives, i.e. 'right wingers' (as opposed to 'wrong wingers', I guess). I suppose you're using the term 'wingnuts' to refer to anyone who isn't a 'veggan' or other non-meat eater? -- John H- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I'm referring to a wingnut as what it is: From the Online Slang Dictionary: wingnut ?someone lacking in mental abilities, uneducated, rather than mentally handicapped. he's a a real wingnut! From Merriam Webster: Main Entry: wing nut Function: noun Date: circa 1900 1 : a nut with wings that provide a grip for the thumb and finger 2 slang : a mentally deranged person 3 slang : one who advocates extreme measures or changes : radical So, the question would be asked, why are YOU making this political? Oh wow, I didn't even know such a dictionary existed. I must apologize then for thinking that you were turning an informative post into a political statement. You were actually just 'name-calling', like Harry does all the time. Sorry, I should have known that you weren't saying anything political. Not to mention trolling for the Christian response bringing God into it in such a manner. You shouldn't apologize, it was a troll... -- Apology accepted.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - No, it was a sincere comment. You believe in God, correct? Do you think He'd approve of someone treating animals as in the vid?Do Do you think Obama does?? How about Pelosi and Reid, they have a clean majority in the house and senate and a lock in the Whitehouse? It was another wrong winger slap at conservative values just like the comments above about being against all change.. Just political crap strewn into a non-political conversation... again...- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I made NO political replies in this thread, you have made several however. Maybe you wouldn't understand, but when you bring God in, you also bring in my conservative side... You bring in politics. Bull****. Are you really saying that you must believe in God to be conservative and if you do believe in God you HAVE to be conservative???? Christianity has absolutely NOTHING to do with politics. NOTHING. -- WAFA the newsgroup liar free! |
Tofurkey?
In article ,
says... In article , says... In article 349d0dd6-6502-48d1-b49d- , says... On Dec 1, 10:02*am, I am Tosk wrote: In article 68a4946f-9593-4fa7-9b5e-1b9348955483 @r5g2000yqb.googlegroups.com, says... On Nov 30, 7:02*pm, I am Tosk wrote: In article 24bf95f9-03f0-4a63-8a67-5f62a4922a83 @f16g2000yqm.googlegroups.com, says... On Nov 30, 4:38*pm, John H wrote: On Mon, 30 Nov 2009 10:12:51 -0800 (PST), Loogypicker wrote: On Nov 30, 12:58*pm, John H wrote: On Mon, 30 Nov 2009 09:31:09 -0800 (PST), Loogypicker wrote: On Nov 30, 11:59*am, John H wrote: On Nov 30, 10:43*am, Loogypicker wrote: On Nov 30, 9:57*am, I am Tosk wrote: In article b63abc79-a82f-4a95-be4d- , says... On Nov 29, 8:07*pm, Frogwatch wrote: ALL of my seven sisters have become veggie nut cases although fortunately their kids have not succumbed. *So, I was naturally skeptical to see a vague meat-looking waaaaay too symmetrical blob covered with gravy and dressing at Thanksgiving AND, there was an identical one next to it. *Yeah, sorta meat-like texture but no internal structure. *I just had to ask, Yup, it was Tofurkey and to be nice I had to take some. *If you smothered *it with enough gravy and had a few drinks, MAYBE you could accept it. Fortunately, my brother had made some smoked turkey and brother in law made some smoked mullet. Why would someone be branded a "nut case" because they've decided on a healthier lifestyle? Seems as though you wingnuts instantly brand someone that doesn't live your exact lifestyle as nutcases or some such. Why is that? And I LOVE smoked mullet. It's not so much being the veggie head that makes them "nut cases". It's the other aspects of their personalities that seems to go along with that lifestyle, at least up here in the North :) I had a friend that was a vegatarian. It was just crazy in her mid thirties hearing her try to tell us that "no animal in the world really eats meat, only us". What I said? What about Lions I asked? She explained to me that Lions don't eat meat, "they rip open the animals and only eat the stomach contents of grass and stuff"! That was about when I admitted I was an animal and a terrible person for eating meat, and went on with it...- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Most vegetarians aren't concerned with whether animals in the wild eat meat or not. Most are concerned with human consumption gone wild. What we have in this country now days is NOTHING short of animal factories. I've seen it first hand. Animals aren't treated with any regard to pain, living conditions or anything short of getting them fattened up and ready for sale. There is also the aspect about what those huge farms are doing to the environment, let alone eating diseased animals. Isn't this a lovely sight:http://www.goveg.com/factoryFarming_cows.asp http://www.disclose.tv/action/viewvi...eet_your_Meat/ I really doubt that if there is a God, he'd want us treating his creatures like this. Loogy, why jump on this as a political thing? I have a niece who is a veggan. She's also a conservative. She's also weird, which she wasn't until she started the veggan stuff. Nothing political about it.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Where did I say anything political? Gosh, perhaps I misinterpreted this line you wrote earlier: "Seems as though you wingnuts instantly brand *someone that doesn't live your exact lifestyle as nutcases or some *such." Usually you use the term 'wingnuts' when you're referring to conservatives, i.e. 'right wingers' (as opposed to 'wrong wingers', I guess). I suppose you're using the term 'wingnuts' to refer to anyone who isn't a 'veggan' or other non-meat eater? -- John H- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I'm referring to a wingnut as what it is: From the Online Slang Dictionary: wingnut ?someone lacking in mental abilities, uneducated, rather than mentally handicapped. he's a a real wingnut! From Merriam Webster: Main Entry: wing nut Function: noun Date: circa 1900 1 : a nut with wings that provide a grip for the thumb and finger 2 slang : a mentally deranged person 3 slang : one who advocates extreme measures or changes : radical So, the question would be asked, why are YOU making this political? Oh wow, I didn't even know such a dictionary existed. I must apologize then for thinking that you were turning an informative post into a political statement. You were actually just 'name-calling', like Harry does all the time. Sorry, I should have known that you weren't saying anything political. Not to mention trolling for the Christian response bringing God into it in such a manner. You shouldn't apologize, it was a troll... -- Apology accepted.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - No, it was a sincere comment. You believe in God, correct? Do you think He'd approve of someone treating animals as in the vid?Do Do you think Obama does?? How about Pelosi and Reid, they have a clean majority in the house and senate and a lock in the Whitehouse? It was another wrong winger slap at conservative values just like the comments above about being against all change.. Just political crap strewn into a non-political conversation... again...- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I made NO political replies in this thread, you have made several however. Maybe you wouldn't understand, but when you bring God in, you also bring in my conservative side... You bring in politics. Bull****. Are you really saying that you must believe in God to be conservative and if you do believe in God you HAVE to be conservative???? Christianity has absolutely NOTHING to do with politics. NOTHING. Easy for you to say, as you don't believe, thus you don't understand how we feel. God is not conservative or liberal, but he is a part of many folks "politics"... Like I said, if you have to ask, you wouldn't understand. Your quote out of the blue, was a shot at Christianity. You are so desensitized, you don't even get it. It's ok, but don't prove your lack of understanding with insistence that you know how "we" feel... That is just too Harryish... |
Tofurkey?
In article ,
says... In article , says... In article , says... In article 349d0dd6-6502-48d1-b49d- , says... On Dec 1, 10:02*am, I am Tosk wrote: In article 68a4946f-9593-4fa7-9b5e-1b9348955483 @r5g2000yqb.googlegroups.com, says... On Nov 30, 7:02*pm, I am Tosk wrote: In article 24bf95f9-03f0-4a63-8a67-5f62a4922a83 @f16g2000yqm.googlegroups.com, says... On Nov 30, 4:38*pm, John H wrote: On Mon, 30 Nov 2009 10:12:51 -0800 (PST), Loogypicker wrote: On Nov 30, 12:58*pm, John H wrote: On Mon, 30 Nov 2009 09:31:09 -0800 (PST), Loogypicker wrote: On Nov 30, 11:59*am, John H wrote: On Nov 30, 10:43*am, Loogypicker wrote: On Nov 30, 9:57*am, I am Tosk wrote: In article b63abc79-a82f-4a95-be4d- , says... On Nov 29, 8:07*pm, Frogwatch wrote: ALL of my seven sisters have become veggie nut cases although fortunately their kids have not succumbed. *So, I was naturally skeptical to see a vague meat-looking waaaaay too symmetrical blob covered with gravy and dressing at Thanksgiving AND, there was an identical one next to it. *Yeah, sorta meat-like texture but no internal structure. *I just had to ask, Yup, it was Tofurkey and to be nice I had to take some. *If you smothered *it with enough gravy and had a few drinks, MAYBE you could accept it. Fortunately, my brother had made some smoked turkey and brother in law made some smoked mullet. Why would someone be branded a "nut case" because they've decided on a healthier lifestyle? Seems as though you wingnuts instantly brand someone that doesn't live your exact lifestyle as nutcases or some such. Why is that? And I LOVE smoked mullet. It's not so much being the veggie head that makes them "nut cases". It's the other aspects of their personalities that seems to go along with that lifestyle, at least up here in the North :) I had a friend that was a vegatarian. It was just crazy in her mid thirties hearing her try to tell us that "no animal in the world really eats meat, only us". What I said? What about Lions I asked? She explained to me that Lions don't eat meat, "they rip open the animals and only eat the stomach contents of grass and stuff"! That was about when I admitted I was an animal and a terrible person for eating meat, and went on with it...- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Most vegetarians aren't concerned with whether animals in the wild eat meat or not. Most are concerned with human consumption gone wild. What we have in this country now days is NOTHING short of animal factories. I've seen it first hand. Animals aren't treated with any regard to pain, living conditions or anything short of getting them fattened up and ready for sale. There is also the aspect about what those huge farms are doing to the environment, let alone eating diseased animals. Isn't this a lovely sight:http://www.goveg.com/factoryFarming_cows.asp http://www.disclose.tv/action/viewvi...eet_your_Meat/ I really doubt that if there is a God, he'd want us treating his creatures like this. Loogy, why jump on this as a political thing? I have a niece who is a veggan. She's also a conservative. She's also weird, which she wasn't until she started the veggan stuff. Nothing political about it.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Where did I say anything political? Gosh, perhaps I misinterpreted this line you wrote earlier: "Seems as though you wingnuts instantly brand *someone that doesn't live your exact lifestyle as nutcases or some *such." Usually you use the term 'wingnuts' when you're referring to conservatives, i.e. 'right wingers' (as opposed to 'wrong wingers', I guess). I suppose you're using the term 'wingnuts' to refer to anyone who isn't a 'veggan' or other non-meat eater? -- John H- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I'm referring to a wingnut as what it is: From the Online Slang Dictionary: wingnut ?someone lacking in mental abilities, uneducated, rather than mentally handicapped. he's a a real wingnut! From Merriam Webster: Main Entry: wing nut Function: noun Date: circa 1900 1 : a nut with wings that provide a grip for the thumb and finger 2 slang : a mentally deranged person 3 slang : one who advocates extreme measures or changes : radical So, the question would be asked, why are YOU making this political? Oh wow, I didn't even know such a dictionary existed. I must apologize then for thinking that you were turning an informative post into a political statement. You were actually just 'name-calling', like Harry does all the time. Sorry, I should have known that you weren't saying anything political. Not to mention trolling for the Christian response bringing God into it in such a manner. You shouldn't apologize, it was a troll... -- Apology accepted.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - No, it was a sincere comment. You believe in God, correct? Do you think He'd approve of someone treating animals as in the vid?Do Do you think Obama does?? How about Pelosi and Reid, they have a clean majority in the house and senate and a lock in the Whitehouse? It was another wrong winger slap at conservative values just like the comments above about being against all change.. Just political crap strewn into a non-political conversation... again...- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I made NO political replies in this thread, you have made several however. Maybe you wouldn't understand, but when you bring God in, you also bring in my conservative side... You bring in politics. Bull****. Are you really saying that you must believe in God to be conservative and if you do believe in God you HAVE to be conservative???? Christianity has absolutely NOTHING to do with politics. NOTHING. Easy for you to say, as you don't believe, thus you don't understand how we feel. God is not conservative or liberal, but he is a part of many folks "politics"... Like I said, if you have to ask, you wouldn't understand. Your quote out of the blue, was a shot at Christianity. You are so desensitized, you don't even get it. It's ok, but don't prove your lack of understanding with insistence that you know how "we" feel... That is just too Harryish... No it was NOT a "shot at Christianity" in any shape or form. I simply asked if you think that God would approve of the way they were treating His animals in the video. To which I NEVER got an answer, by the way. -- WAFA the newsgroup liar free! |
Tofurkey?
In article ,
says... In article , says... In article , says... In article , says... In article 349d0dd6-6502-48d1-b49d- , says... On Dec 1, 10:02*am, I am Tosk wrote: In article 68a4946f-9593-4fa7-9b5e-1b9348955483 @r5g2000yqb.googlegroups.com, says... On Nov 30, 7:02*pm, I am Tosk wrote: In article 24bf95f9-03f0-4a63-8a67-5f62a4922a83 @f16g2000yqm.googlegroups.com, says... On Nov 30, 4:38*pm, John H wrote: On Mon, 30 Nov 2009 10:12:51 -0800 (PST), Loogypicker wrote: On Nov 30, 12:58*pm, John H wrote: On Mon, 30 Nov 2009 09:31:09 -0800 (PST), Loogypicker wrote: On Nov 30, 11:59*am, John H wrote: On Nov 30, 10:43*am, Loogypicker wrote: On Nov 30, 9:57*am, I am Tosk wrote: In article b63abc79-a82f-4a95-be4d- , says... On Nov 29, 8:07*pm, Frogwatch wrote: ALL of my seven sisters have become veggie nut cases although fortunately their kids have not succumbed. *So, I was naturally skeptical to see a vague meat-looking waaaaay too symmetrical blob covered with gravy and dressing at Thanksgiving AND, there was an identical one next to it. *Yeah, sorta meat-like texture but no internal structure. *I just had to ask, Yup, it was Tofurkey and to be nice I had to take some. *If you smothered *it with enough gravy and had a few drinks, MAYBE you could accept it. Fortunately, my brother had made some smoked turkey and brother in law made some smoked mullet. Why would someone be branded a "nut case" because they've decided on a healthier lifestyle? Seems as though you wingnuts instantly brand someone that doesn't live your exact lifestyle as nutcases or some such. Why is that? And I LOVE smoked mullet. It's not so much being the veggie head that makes them "nut cases". It's the other aspects of their personalities that seems to go along with that lifestyle, at least up here in the North :) I had a friend that was a vegatarian. It was just crazy in her mid thirties hearing her try to tell us that "no animal in the world really eats meat, only us". What I said? What about Lions I asked? She explained to me that Lions don't eat meat, "they rip open the animals and only eat the stomach contents of grass and stuff"! That was about when I admitted I was an animal and a terrible person for eating meat, and went on with it...- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Most vegetarians aren't concerned with whether animals in the wild eat meat or not. Most are concerned with human consumption gone wild. What we have in this country now days is NOTHING short of animal factories. I've seen it first hand. Animals aren't treated with any regard to pain, living conditions or anything short of getting them fattened up and ready for sale. There is also the aspect about what those huge farms are doing to the environment, let alone eating diseased animals. Isn't this a lovely sight:http://www.goveg.com/factoryFarming_cows.asp http://www.disclose.tv/action/viewvi...eet_your_Meat/ I really doubt that if there is a God, he'd want us treating his creatures like this. Loogy, why jump on this as a political thing? I have a niece who is a veggan. She's also a conservative. She's also weird, which she wasn't until she started the veggan stuff. Nothing political about it.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Where did I say anything political? Gosh, perhaps I misinterpreted this line you wrote earlier: "Seems as though you wingnuts instantly brand *someone that doesn't live your exact lifestyle as nutcases or some *such." Usually you use the term 'wingnuts' when you're referring to conservatives, i.e. 'right wingers' (as opposed to 'wrong wingers', I guess). I suppose you're using the term 'wingnuts' to refer to anyone who isn't a 'veggan' or other non-meat eater? -- John H- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I'm referring to a wingnut as what it is: From the Online Slang Dictionary: wingnut ?someone lacking in mental abilities, uneducated, rather than mentally handicapped. he's a a real wingnut! From Merriam Webster: Main Entry: wing nut Function: noun Date: circa 1900 1 : a nut with wings that provide a grip for the thumb and finger 2 slang : a mentally deranged person 3 slang : one who advocates extreme measures or changes : radical So, the question would be asked, why are YOU making this political? Oh wow, I didn't even know such a dictionary existed. I must apologize then for thinking that you were turning an informative post into a political statement. You were actually just 'name-calling', like Harry does all the time. Sorry, I should have known that you weren't saying anything political. Not to mention trolling for the Christian response bringing God into it in such a manner. You shouldn't apologize, it was a troll... -- Apology accepted.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - No, it was a sincere comment. You believe in God, correct? Do you think He'd approve of someone treating animals as in the vid?Do Do you think Obama does?? How about Pelosi and Reid, they have a clean majority in the house and senate and a lock in the Whitehouse? It was another wrong winger slap at conservative values just like the comments above about being against all change.. Just political crap strewn into a non-political conversation... again...- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I made NO political replies in this thread, you have made several however. Maybe you wouldn't understand, but when you bring God in, you also bring in my conservative side... You bring in politics. Bull****. Are you really saying that you must believe in God to be conservative and if you do believe in God you HAVE to be conservative???? Christianity has absolutely NOTHING to do with politics. NOTHING. Easy for you to say, as you don't believe, thus you don't understand how we feel. God is not conservative or liberal, but he is a part of many folks "politics"... Like I said, if you have to ask, you wouldn't understand. Your quote out of the blue, was a shot at Christianity. You are so desensitized, you don't even get it. It's ok, but don't prove your lack of understanding with insistence that you know how "we" feel... That is just too Harryish... No it was NOT a "shot at Christianity" in any shape or form. I simply asked if you think that God would approve of the way they were treating His animals in the video. To which I NEVER got an answer, by the way. You never got an answer because I can not answer. Like I said before, if you gotta' ask, you wouldn't understand... |
Tofurkey?
In article ,
says... In article , says... In article , says... In article , says... In article , says... In article 349d0dd6-6502-48d1-b49d- , says... On Dec 1, 10:02*am, I am Tosk wrote: In article 68a4946f-9593-4fa7-9b5e-1b9348955483 @r5g2000yqb.googlegroups.com, says... On Nov 30, 7:02*pm, I am Tosk wrote: In article 24bf95f9-03f0-4a63-8a67-5f62a4922a83 @f16g2000yqm.googlegroups.com, says... On Nov 30, 4:38*pm, John H wrote: On Mon, 30 Nov 2009 10:12:51 -0800 (PST), Loogypicker wrote: On Nov 30, 12:58*pm, John H wrote: On Mon, 30 Nov 2009 09:31:09 -0800 (PST), Loogypicker wrote: On Nov 30, 11:59*am, John H wrote: On Nov 30, 10:43*am, Loogypicker wrote: On Nov 30, 9:57*am, I am Tosk wrote: In article b63abc79-a82f-4a95-be4d- , says... On Nov 29, 8:07*pm, Frogwatch wrote: ALL of my seven sisters have become veggie nut cases although fortunately their kids have not succumbed. *So, I was naturally skeptical to see a vague meat-looking waaaaay too symmetrical blob covered with gravy and dressing at Thanksgiving AND, there was an identical one next to it. *Yeah, sorta meat-like texture but no internal structure. *I just had to ask, Yup, it was Tofurkey and to be nice I had to take some. *If you smothered *it with enough gravy and had a few drinks, MAYBE you could accept it. Fortunately, my brother had made some smoked turkey and brother in law made some smoked mullet. Why would someone be branded a "nut case" because they've decided on a healthier lifestyle? Seems as though you wingnuts instantly brand someone that doesn't live your exact lifestyle as nutcases or some such. Why is that? And I LOVE smoked mullet. It's not so much being the veggie head that makes them "nut cases". It's the other aspects of their personalities that seems to go along with that lifestyle, at least up here in the North :) I had a friend that was a vegatarian. It was just crazy in her mid thirties hearing her try to tell us that "no animal in the world really eats meat, only us". What I said? What about Lions I asked? She explained to me that Lions don't eat meat, "they rip open the animals and only eat the stomach contents of grass and stuff"! That was about when I admitted I was an animal and a terrible person for eating meat, and went on with it...- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Most vegetarians aren't concerned with whether animals in the wild eat meat or not. Most are concerned with human consumption gone wild. What we have in this country now days is NOTHING short of animal factories. I've seen it first hand. Animals aren't treated with any regard to pain, living conditions or anything short of getting them fattened up and ready for sale. There is also the aspect about what those huge farms are doing to the environment, let alone eating diseased animals. Isn't this a lovely sight:http://www.goveg.com/factoryFarming_cows.asp http://www.disclose.tv/action/viewvi...eet_your_Meat/ I really doubt that if there is a God, he'd want us treating his creatures like this. Loogy, why jump on this as a political thing? I have a niece who is a veggan. She's also a conservative. She's also weird, which she wasn't until she started the veggan stuff. Nothing political about it.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Where did I say anything political? Gosh, perhaps I misinterpreted this line you wrote earlier: "Seems as though you wingnuts instantly brand *someone that doesn't live your exact lifestyle as nutcases or some *such." Usually you use the term 'wingnuts' when you're referring to conservatives, i.e. 'right wingers' (as opposed to 'wrong wingers', I guess). I suppose you're using the term 'wingnuts' to refer to anyone who isn't a 'veggan' or other non-meat eater? -- John H- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I'm referring to a wingnut as what it is: From the Online Slang Dictionary: wingnut ?someone lacking in mental abilities, uneducated, rather than mentally handicapped. he's a a real wingnut! From Merriam Webster: Main Entry: wing nut Function: noun Date: circa 1900 1 : a nut with wings that provide a grip for the thumb and finger 2 slang : a mentally deranged person 3 slang : one who advocates extreme measures or changes : radical So, the question would be asked, why are YOU making this political? Oh wow, I didn't even know such a dictionary existed. I must apologize then for thinking that you were turning an informative post into a political statement. You were actually just 'name-calling', like Harry does all the time. Sorry, I should have known that you weren't saying anything political. Not to mention trolling for the Christian response bringing God into it in such a manner. You shouldn't apologize, it was a troll... -- Apology accepted.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - No, it was a sincere comment. You believe in God, correct? Do you think He'd approve of someone treating animals as in the vid?Do Do you think Obama does?? How about Pelosi and Reid, they have a clean majority in the house and senate and a lock in the Whitehouse? It was another wrong winger slap at conservative values just like the comments above about being against all change.. Just political crap strewn into a non-political conversation... again...- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I made NO political replies in this thread, you have made several however. Maybe you wouldn't understand, but when you bring God in, you also bring in my conservative side... You bring in politics. Bull****. Are you really saying that you must believe in God to be conservative and if you do believe in God you HAVE to be conservative???? Christianity has absolutely NOTHING to do with politics. NOTHING. Easy for you to say, as you don't believe, thus you don't understand how we feel. God is not conservative or liberal, but he is a part of many folks "politics"... Like I said, if you have to ask, you wouldn't understand. Your quote out of the blue, was a shot at Christianity. You are so desensitized, you don't even get it. It's ok, but don't prove your lack of understanding with insistence that you know how "we" feel... That is just too Harryish... No it was NOT a "shot at Christianity" in any shape or form. I simply asked if you think that God would approve of the way they were treating His animals in the video. To which I NEVER got an answer, by the way. You never got an answer because I can not answer. Like I said before, if you gotta' ask, you wouldn't understand... What would be your gut feeling? -- WAFA the newsgroup liar free! |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:37 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com