On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 10:07:27 -0500, I am Tosk wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 08:07:46 -0500, I am Tosk wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 19:47:55 -0500, I am Tosk wrote:


How can these Lemmings ignore all the faked science? I just don't get
it, only because they are stuck on ideology?? Must be.. Bunch of good
little Harrys...

"Faked science" is easy to ignore. OTOH, how do you ignore the real
science? ;-)

What real science? I am of the school of thought that looks at
a commercial for instance where trick photography or tricky editing
makes a product look good. If they have to trick you to make it look
good I tend to dismiss the product completely. For instance, there is
that annoying guy with the over priced orange towels. He has a part in
the commercial where he pours soda on a piece of carpet then cleans it
all up by pressing the towel into the carpet. If you watch carefully you
see that the clip is cut and a drier carpet is substituted... I won't
buy his towels knowing he is selling snake oil...

Sounds like a cardboard boat project. Perhaps that is why it is fresh in
your mind.

Before all the technology and computers, most decent boat projects
started with scale models. Problem?

The problem is that in most OT discussions in this group you are in way
over your head. I suspect you have tried to sail a full sized cardboard
boat. Lucky for you the mooring line was still attached to the dock cleat.

I also suspect you have tried it more than once.

In article ,
says...

On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 10:07:27 -0500, I am Tosk wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 08:07:46 -0500, I am Tosk wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 19:47:55 -0500, I am Tosk wrote:


How can these Lemmings ignore all the faked science? I just don't get
it, only because they are stuck on ideology?? Must be.. Bunch of good
little Harrys...

"Faked science" is easy to ignore. OTOH, how do you ignore the real
science? ;-)

What real science? I am of the school of thought that looks at
a commercial for instance where trick photography or tricky editing
makes a product look good. If they have to trick you to make it look
good I tend to dismiss the product completely. For instance, there is
that annoying guy with the over priced orange towels. He has a part in
the commercial where he pours soda on a piece of carpet then cleans it
all up by pressing the towel into the carpet. If you watch carefully you
see that the clip is cut and a drier carpet is substituted... I won't
buy his towels knowing he is selling snake oil...

Sounds like a cardboard boat project. Perhaps that is why it is fresh in
your mind.

Before all the technology and computers, most decent boat projects
started with scale models. Problem?

The problem is that in most OT discussions in this group you are in way
over your head. I suspect you have tried to sail a full sized cardboard
boat. Lucky for you the mooring line was still attached to the dock cleat.

I also suspect you have tried it more than once.

And I suppose you find yourself much more qualified? ploink

On 11/23/09 10:26 AM, I am Tosk wrote:
In ,
says...

On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 10:07:27 -0500, I am Tosk wrote:

In ,
says...

On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 08:07:46 -0500, I am Tosk wrote:

In inet,
says...

On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 19:47:55 -0500, I am Tosk wrote:


How can these Lemmings ignore all the faked science? I just don't get
it, only because they are stuck on ideology?? Must be.. Bunch of good
little Harrys...

"Faked science" is easy to ignore. OTOH, how do you ignore the real
science? ;-)

What real science? I am of the school of thought that looks at
a commercial for instance where trick photography or tricky editing
makes a product look good. If they have to trick you to make it look
good I tend to dismiss the product completely. For instance, there is
that annoying guy with the over priced orange towels. He has a part in
the commercial where he pours soda on a piece of carpet then cleans it
all up by pressing the towel into the carpet. If you watch carefully you
see that the clip is cut and a drier carpet is substituted... I won't
buy his towels knowing he is selling snake oil...

Sounds like a cardboard boat project. Perhaps that is why it is fresh in
your mind.

Before all the technology and computers, most decent boat projects
started with scale models. Problem?

The problem is that in most OT discussions in this group you are in way
over your head. I suspect you have tried to sail a full sized cardboard
boat. Lucky for you the mooring line was still attached to the dock cleat.

I also suspect you have tried it more than once.

And I suppose you find yourself much more qualified?ploink


Everyone is more qualified, Scotty Sham-wow.






--
If you are flajim, herring, loogy, GC boater, johnson, topbassdog, rob,
achmed the sock puppet, or one of a half dozen others, you're wasting
your time by trying to *communicate* with me through rec.boats, because,
well, you are among the permanent members of my dumbfoch dumpster, and I
don't read the vomit you post, except by accident on occasion. As
always, have a nice, simple-minded day.

On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 10:26:23 -0500, I am Tosk wrote:

ploink
Thank you!

On 11/23/09 10:37 AM, RLM wrote:
On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 10:26:23 -0500, I am Tosk wrote:

ploink
Thank you!


If only Snotty Scotty would "ploink" himself...and mean it, this time.


--
If you are flajim, herring, loogy, GC boater, johnson, topbassdog, rob,
achmed the sock puppet, or one of a half dozen others, you're wasting
your time by trying to *communicate* with me through rec.boats, because,
well, you are among the permanent members of my dumbfoch dumpster, and I
don't read the vomit you post, except by accident on occasion. As
always, have a nice, simple-minded day.

On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 11:10:03 -0500, H the K wrote:

On 11/23/09 10:37 AM, RLM wrote:
On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 10:26:23 -0500, I am Tosk wrote:

ploink
Thank you!


If only Snotty Scotty would "ploink" himself...and mean it, this time.

He believes himself to be a great leader on Usenet and can't help himself.
Let him relish in his corner of fame.

On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 11:17:45 -0500, RLM wrote:

On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 11:10:03 -0500, H the K wrote:

On 11/23/09 10:37 AM, RLM wrote:
On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 10:26:23 -0500, I am Tosk wrote:

ploink
Thank you!


If only Snotty Scotty would "ploink" himself...and mean it, this time.

He believes himself to be a great leader on Usenet and can't help himself.
Let him relish in his corner of fame.

And what do you call yourself?

You attempted to steer the conversation away from the facts, that much
of the 'science' is made up bull****.

Good try.
--

John H

On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 15:08:33 -0500, John H wrote:

On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 11:17:45 -0500, RLM wrote:

On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 11:10:03 -0500, H the K wrote:

On 11/23/09 10:37 AM, RLM wrote:
On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 10:26:23 -0500, I am Tosk wrote:

ploink
Thank you!


If only Snotty Scotty would "ploink" himself...and mean it, this time.

He believes himself to be a great leader on Usenet and can't help
himself. Let him relish in his corner of fame.

And what do you call yourself?

You attempted to steer the conversation away from the facts, that much
of the 'science' is made up bull****.

Good try.

There are never any facts. Only opinion or mindless links as if no one
knows what a search engine is. Provided most of the time as OT BS from
Tommy and the band of losers that include you. It is repetitious on a
daily basis and boring much the same as you.

It must be for points to be the most prolific posters of the group
that no longer has a subject to discuss. It has become the losers support
group of the last election chat room.

Wayne B. will come by to stroke any bruised egos.

Great place if you have a stick to poke and prod. Watch the losers squirm.

Get over it!

On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 10:26:23 -0500, I am Tosk wrote:

ploink
Thank you!