In article ,
says...

On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 19:47:55 -0500, I am Tosk wrote:


How can these Lemmings ignore all the faked science? I just don't get
it, only because they are stuck on ideology?? Must be.. Bunch of good
little Harrys...

"Faked science" is easy to ignore. OTOH, how do you ignore the real
science? ;-)

What real science? I am of the school of thought that looks at
a commercial for instance where trick photography or tricky editing
makes a product look good. If they have to trick you to make it look
good I tend to dismiss the product completely. For instance, there is
that annoying guy with the over priced orange towels. He has a part in
the commercial where he pours soda on a piece of carpet then cleans it
all up by pressing the towel into the carpet. If you watch carefully you
see that the clip is cut and a drier carpet is substituted... I won't
buy his towels knowing he is selling snake oil...

On 11/23/09 8:07 AM, I am Tosk wrote:
In inet,
says...

On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 19:47:55 -0500, I am Tosk wrote:


How can these Lemmings ignore all the faked science? I just don't get
it, only because they are stuck on ideology?? Must be.. Bunch of good
little Harrys...

"Faked science" is easy to ignore. OTOH, how do you ignore the real
science? ;-)

What real science?


Why are you commenting on *science*? Unlikely you completed high school.

In article ,
says...

On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 21:47:48 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:


I'm not saying that pollution isn't an issue, that eco systems don't
need to be protected, fish stocks replenished, research done on
non-fossil fuel energy delivery, etc. These are important issues, but
they've been lost in the great Global Warming Wars which, as it is
turning out, is a bogus crisis.

How do you jibe this, with your following statement? I mean, how do you
know it's a "bogus crisis", when there is no "real research and science"?

Hopefully we can start doing real research and science once this blows
over.

Isn't that exactly what is happening right now, albeit more publicly than
is normal for most science? The process is, by nature, ugly, but science
*is* doing it's job.

For those flat earthers, those that think these emails are some sort of
smoking gun, you may want to consider:

"More interesting is what is not contained in the emails. There is no
evidence of any worldwide conspiracy, no mention of George Soros
nefariously funding climate research, no grand plan to ?get rid of the
MWP?, no admission that global warming is a hoax, no evidence of the
falsifying of data, and no ?marching orders? from our socialist/communist/
vegetarian overlords. The truly paranoid will put this down to the
hackers also being in on the plot though."

From:

http://www.realclimate.org/index.php.../the-cru-hack/

Your attempt to minimalize the information brought into the public
domain by stating that it can't be a world-wide conspiracy because
George Soros isn't involved is a nice try at deflection.

What we have is a collection of "scientists" from around the world who
saw global warming as a way to fatten their research budgets, bring them
national and international prominence and pad their CV's. The part that
is really nefarious is that they are trying with every "trick" they know
to beat their critics into submission by calling the global warming
deniers at the least and idiots at the most.

Keep pushing the it can't be a conspiracy because George Soros isn't
behind it line of crap if you want.

On 11/23/09 8:18 AM, BAR wrote:
In inet,
says...

On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 21:47:48 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:


I'm not saying that pollution isn't an issue, that eco systems don't
need to be protected, fish stocks replenished, research done on
non-fossil fuel energy delivery, etc. These are important issues, but
they've been lost in the great Global Warming Wars which, as it is
turning out, is a bogus crisis.

How do you jibe this, with your following statement? I mean, how do you
know it's a "bogus crisis", when there is no "real research and science"?

Hopefully we can start doing real research and science once this blows
over.

Isn't that exactly what is happening right now, albeit more publicly than
is normal for most science? The process is, by nature, ugly, but science
*is* doing it's job.

For those flat earthers, those that think these emails are some sort of
smoking gun, you may want to consider:

"More interesting is what is not contained in the emails. There is no
evidence of any worldwide conspiracy, no mention of George Soros
nefariously funding climate research, no grand plan to ?get rid of the
MWP?, no admission that global warming is a hoax, no evidence of the
falsifying of data, and no ?marching orders? from our socialist/communist/
vegetarian overlords. The truly paranoid will put this down to the
hackers also being in on the plot though."

From:

http://www.realclimate.org/index.php.../the-cru-hack/

Your attempt to minimalize the information brought into the public
domain by stating that it can't be a world-wide conspiracy because
George Soros isn't involved is a nice try at deflection.

What we have is a collection of "scientists" from around the world who
saw global warming as a way to fatten their research budgets, bring them
national and international prominence and pad their CV's. The part that
is really nefarious is that they are trying with every "trick" they know
to beat their critics into submission by calling the global warming
deniers at the least and idiots at the most.

Keep pushing the it can't be a conspiracy because George Soros isn't
behind it line of crap if you want.




Crikey...BAR is another "scientist" who barely completed high school.

--
If you are flajim, herring, loogy, GC boater, johnson, topbassdog, rob,
achmed the sock puppet, or one of a half dozen others, you're wasting
your time by trying to *communicate* with me through rec.boats, because,
well, you are among the permanent members of my dumbfoch dumpster, and I
don't read the vomit you post, except by accident on occasion. As
always, have a nice, simple-minded day.

On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 08:07:46 -0500, I am Tosk wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 19:47:55 -0500, I am Tosk wrote:


How can these Lemmings ignore all the faked science? I just don't get
it, only because they are stuck on ideology?? Must be.. Bunch of good
little Harrys...

"Faked science" is easy to ignore. OTOH, how do you ignore the real
science? ;-)

What real science? I am of the school of thought that looks at
a commercial for instance where trick photography or tricky editing
makes a product look good. If they have to trick you to make it look
good I tend to dismiss the product completely. For instance, there is
that annoying guy with the over priced orange towels. He has a part in
the commercial where he pours soda on a piece of carpet then cleans it
all up by pressing the towel into the carpet. If you watch carefully you
see that the clip is cut and a drier carpet is substituted... I won't
buy his towels knowing he is selling snake oil...

Sounds like a cardboard boat project. Perhaps that is why it is fresh in
your mind.

On 11/23/09 9:45 AM, RLM wrote:
On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 08:07:46 -0500, I am Tosk wrote:

In inet,
says...

On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 19:47:55 -0500, I am Tosk wrote:


How can these Lemmings ignore all the faked science? I just don't get
it, only because they are stuck on ideology?? Must be.. Bunch of good
little Harrys...

"Faked science" is easy to ignore. OTOH, how do you ignore the real
science? ;-)

What real science? I am of the school of thought that looks at
a commercial for instance where trick photography or tricky editing
makes a product look good. If they have to trick you to make it look
good I tend to dismiss the product completely. For instance, there is
that annoying guy with the over priced orange towels. He has a part in
the commercial where he pours soda on a piece of carpet then cleans it
all up by pressing the towel into the carpet. If you watch carefully you
see that the clip is cut and a drier carpet is substituted... I won't
buy his towels knowing he is selling snake oil...

Sounds like a cardboard boat project. Perhaps that is why it is fresh in
your mind.



You gotta love it when Toskie comments on that which is beyond his
capability of understanding, and that would would science, math,
history, politics, sociology, childrearing and building of boats capable
of being launched into Long Island Sound.

The "over-priced orange towels..."commercial...

Yes, that's something worth pondering and analyzing.





--
If you are flajim, herring, loogy, GC boater, johnson, topbassdog, rob,
achmed the sock puppet, or one of a half dozen others, you're wasting
your time by trying to *communicate* with me through rec.boats, because,
well, you are among the permanent members of my dumbfoch dumpster, and I
don't read the vomit you post, except by accident on occasion. As
always, have a nice, simple-minded day.

In article ,
says...

On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 08:07:46 -0500, I am Tosk wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 19:47:55 -0500, I am Tosk wrote:


How can these Lemmings ignore all the faked science? I just don't get
it, only because they are stuck on ideology?? Must be.. Bunch of good
little Harrys...

"Faked science" is easy to ignore. OTOH, how do you ignore the real
science? ;-)

What real science? I am of the school of thought that looks at
a commercial for instance where trick photography or tricky editing
makes a product look good. If they have to trick you to make it look
good I tend to dismiss the product completely. For instance, there is
that annoying guy with the over priced orange towels. He has a part in
the commercial where he pours soda on a piece of carpet then cleans it
all up by pressing the towel into the carpet. If you watch carefully you
see that the clip is cut and a drier carpet is substituted... I won't
buy his towels knowing he is selling snake oil...

Sounds like a cardboard boat project. Perhaps that is why it is fresh in
your mind.

Before all the technology and computers, most decent boat projects
started with scale models. Problem?

On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 10:07:27 -0500, I am Tosk wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 08:07:46 -0500, I am Tosk wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 19:47:55 -0500, I am Tosk wrote:


How can these Lemmings ignore all the faked science? I just don't get
it, only because they are stuck on ideology?? Must be.. Bunch of good
little Harrys...

"Faked science" is easy to ignore. OTOH, how do you ignore the real
science? ;-)

What real science? I am of the school of thought that looks at
a commercial for instance where trick photography or tricky editing
makes a product look good. If they have to trick you to make it look
good I tend to dismiss the product completely. For instance, there is
that annoying guy with the over priced orange towels. He has a part in
the commercial where he pours soda on a piece of carpet then cleans it
all up by pressing the towel into the carpet. If you watch carefully you
see that the clip is cut and a drier carpet is substituted... I won't
buy his towels knowing he is selling snake oil...

Sounds like a cardboard boat project. Perhaps that is why it is fresh in
your mind.

Before all the technology and computers, most decent boat projects
started with scale models. Problem?

The problem is that in most OT discussions in this group you are in way
over your head. I suspect you have tried to sail a full sized cardboard
boat. Lucky for you the mooring line was still attached to the dock cleat.

I also suspect you have tried it more than once.

"H the K" wrote in message
...
On 11/23/09 9:45 AM, RLM wrote:
On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 08:07:46 -0500, I am Tosk wrote:

In inet,
says...

On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 19:47:55 -0500, I am Tosk wrote:


How can these Lemmings ignore all the faked science? I just don't get
it, only because they are stuck on ideology?? Must be.. Bunch of good
little Harrys...

"Faked science" is easy to ignore. OTOH, how do you ignore the real
science? ;-)

What real science? I am of the school of thought that looks at
a commercial for instance where trick photography or tricky editing
makes a product look good. If they have to trick you to make it look
good I tend to dismiss the product completely. For instance, there is
that annoying guy with the over priced orange towels. He has a part in
the commercial where he pours soda on a piece of carpet then cleans it
all up by pressing the towel into the carpet. If you watch carefully you
see that the clip is cut and a drier carpet is substituted... I won't
buy his towels knowing he is selling snake oil...

Sounds like a cardboard boat project. Perhaps that is why it is fresh in
your mind.



You gotta love it when Toskie comments on that which is beyond his
capability of understanding, and that would would science, math, history,
politics, sociology, childrearing and building of boats capable of being
launched into Long Island Sound.

The "over-priced orange towels..."commercial...

Yes, that's something worth pondering and analyzing.



I could see Snotty trying to pitch 'ShamWow' cloths....pony tail & all.
He'd make that Vince guy look like a movie star.

In article ,
says...

On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 10:07:27 -0500, I am Tosk wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 08:07:46 -0500, I am Tosk wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 19:47:55 -0500, I am Tosk wrote:


How can these Lemmings ignore all the faked science? I just don't get
it, only because they are stuck on ideology?? Must be.. Bunch of good
little Harrys...

"Faked science" is easy to ignore. OTOH, how do you ignore the real
science? ;-)

What real science? I am of the school of thought that looks at
a commercial for instance where trick photography or tricky editing
makes a product look good. If they have to trick you to make it look
good I tend to dismiss the product completely. For instance, there is
that annoying guy with the over priced orange towels. He has a part in
the commercial where he pours soda on a piece of carpet then cleans it
all up by pressing the towel into the carpet. If you watch carefully you
see that the clip is cut and a drier carpet is substituted... I won't
buy his towels knowing he is selling snake oil...

Sounds like a cardboard boat project. Perhaps that is why it is fresh in
your mind.

Before all the technology and computers, most decent boat projects
started with scale models. Problem?

The problem is that in most OT discussions in this group you are in way
over your head. I suspect you have tried to sail a full sized cardboard
boat. Lucky for you the mooring line was still attached to the dock cleat.

I also suspect you have tried it more than once.

And I suppose you find yourself much more qualified? ploink