nom=de=plume wrote:




The people who say that mammograms should not start until 50.
Remember that was a government pronouncement. They realize there is
not enough money to pay for the House bill.
The House and Senate bills save billions over the long-term according
the CBO. The latter over a trillion.

I don't believe the mammogram announcement is political at all. The
people who did it are way too professional, but if nothing else the
announcement was badly timed and poorly executed.

--
Nom=de=Plume
-
Nom=de=Plume

I read the report. Says there will be a reduction in the deficit
because of the healthcare bill. Why? Because there will be more
revenue coming in from the payees than is going to be spent. Does not
say healthcare is going to cost less, just says the government will be
getting more money.
Thus, a savings and deficit reduction. Well, ok. Unless you'd prefer the
status quo...
--
Nom=de=Plume


I should think that doing nothing is better than adopting any plan that
has been put forth so far. That is not to say that doing nothing is
acceptable. You seem to think doing anything is better than doing
nothing. Funny, that is exactly what Mr Obama says. You are a lemming
that is being led to the sea to be drowned by your beloved pied piper.
Break ranks and do some independent thinking for a change.