LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #9   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jun 2008
Posts: 5,868
Default Another 'Bama 'Cost Saving'

In article ,
says...

On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 14:21:24 -0800, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:



It's a matter of policy vs. specific women's health. Most places are
ignoring the recommendations, basically saying that it should be up to the
woman to decide if it's worth the risk of false positives, which can lead to
rather invasive investigations.

Don't think it's policy at all, since most of the medical voices I've
heard reject these findings out of hand.


The "Public Option" will not allow you to get a mammogram more than the
government study recommends in order to save money. In the mean time
more women will die unnecessarily.

From what I've gathered, it's just plain stupid.


Policy makes precedent.

Almost like saying get rid of airbags because so few people are saved
by them.


Removing airbags would increase the number of deaths in automobile
crashes which would reduce the costs of saving their lives.

Airbags increase automobile insurance costs.

Or don't change the Pinto gas tank bracket because settling with the
number of people killed by a punctured gas tank will cost less than
the brackets.


Lassie Fare at its best.

What I haven't seen is any numbers on how many cases of breast cancer
are caused by the accumulated radiation exposure of mammographies.


Radiating my balls by walking front of a focused beam of a TPS-32 and
TPS-63 didn't affect my ability to fertilize eggs and produce
intelligent offspring.

They could make a case with that. They probably don't have the
numbers.


Bingo.

But the whole thing sounds real half-assed, and plays right into the
hands of those who have been screaming "Rationing is coming!"
Sure makes it look like they might have a case for that.


Just like this whole Swine Flu epidemic and the government's inability
to contract the production of the Swine Flu vaccine. People are being
refused the vaccine because they don't fit the profile set forth by the
government for those who should get the vaccine.
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The kudus I've given 'Bama for saved jobs.... Just John General 13 November 18th 09 07:51 PM
'Bama does good - more new jobs... Just John General 0 November 16th 09 11:34 PM
Psalm 109:8 A prayer for 'Bama JohnH, General 32 November 16th 09 08:11 PM
The Story of O (bama) Frogwatch[_2_] General 10 January 28th 09 05:24 PM
Bam! Boats to be banned in 'Bama? Chuck Gould General 49 September 25th 07 10:56 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:26 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017