On Sun, 15 Nov 2009 11:53:39 -0500, suds mcduff wrote:

Rabid Weasel Lawson wrote:
On Sat, 14 Nov 2009 09:17:20 -0500, suds mcduff wrote:

Rabid Weasel Lawson wrote:
On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 15:56:26 -0500, suds mcduff wrote:

Rabid Weasel Lawson wrote:
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 16:55:19 -0500, suds mcduff wrote:

nyrface wrote:
On Nov 11, 1:08 pm, climber wrote:
http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/p...bia_gal_punch_...

Who wants to bet that Columbia retains the savage?

climber
White people have the privilege of getting punched in the face by
black people and hearing how they had it coming
----Sometimes they *do* have it coming....
I didn't see anywhere in the article where the woman attacked the prof.
The article says he started it with a "shove" (technically "assault" at
that point) and then let fly.

Are you suggesting that it's OK to punch out people who disagree with you?
Are they allowed to defend? Should we bring back Judicial Duels?
------Some women have ways of making men fly into rages by words alone....
I just wanted to be clear on where you stand: It's ok to punch people you
disagree with, even if it's a woman, if they really make you mad.

Got it.
----Evidently, you didn't....there's a difference between disagreements
and race baiting...

There is absolutely *ZERO* evidence that there was any "race baiting."
That is, unless you assume that any time one disagrees with a black person
it must be "race baiting."

----And there is more evidence there was than ther was not...a heated
discussion about race? Suuuuure there wasn't....

So let me get this straight. A man, drinking in a bar, assaults a woman
offering *NO* physical threat to him and you *defend* his actions based on
nothing more than the fact that the man is Black and your *ASSUMPTION*
that the woman said something "really mean" and hurt his widdle feelings?

hahahaha

Racist.

(IH)