On Sat, 14 Nov 2009 09:17:20 -0500, suds mcduff wrote:

Rabid Weasel Lawson wrote:
On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 15:56:26 -0500, suds mcduff wrote:

Rabid Weasel Lawson wrote:
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 16:55:19 -0500, suds mcduff wrote:

nyrface wrote:
On Nov 11, 1:08 pm, climber wrote:
http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/p...bia_gal_punch_...

Who wants to bet that Columbia retains the savage?

climber
White people have the privilege of getting punched in the face by
black people and hearing how they had it coming
----Sometimes they *do* have it coming....
I didn't see anywhere in the article where the woman attacked the prof.
The article says he started it with a "shove" (technically "assault" at
that point) and then let fly.

Are you suggesting that it's OK to punch out people who disagree with you?
Are they allowed to defend? Should we bring back Judicial Duels?
------Some women have ways of making men fly into rages by words alone....

I just wanted to be clear on where you stand: It's ok to punch people you
disagree with, even if it's a woman, if they really make you mad.

Got it.

----Evidently, you didn't....there's a difference between disagreements
and race baiting...

There is absolutely *ZERO* evidence that there was any "race baiting."
That is, unless you assume that any time one disagrees with a black person
it must be "race baiting."


and I suppose you believe all white women are angels
from heaven above....I guess I also shouldn't be surprised when a forum
of macho conservative martial artists suddenly become pacifists whenever
a black man is concerned....

Nah. I'm just surprised that a pinko like you were agreeing with the
folks who advocate popping someone they disagree with. On the other hand
it was a guy popping a chick. Not as if it's likely to be an "even fight"
or nuth'n so maybe it *IS* right up your alley.

(IH)