Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#26
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Canuck57 wrote:
Jim wrote: Canuck57 wrote: Jim wrote: Listening to the anti abortion people protest any health plan that would possibly include abortion, I was wondering what they do in other countries to appease these opposite beliefs. From: http://www.arcc-cdac.ca/postionpaper...lly-Funded.PDF The politicizing of abortion led to the current situation of one-half of all abortions in Canada being performed at mostly private clinics. Abortion clinics opened in the first place because hospitals were failing to provide adequate services on a fair and equal basis for Canadian women. Hard to read that document and not see the logic. Canadian liberals are a dogmatic bunch. They don't believe in freedom of choice in much of anything from abortion, taxation, etc. They are the first to impose their often myopic views on others. As for our hospitals, the government services are not that good up here. You should take note as at the rate the government is going, they smell health care as a source of general revenue. It is coming to a hospital near you in the USA. Despite what you might hear, medical services aren't that good down in the good Old USA either. I had a sudden hearing loss issue that wasn't treated even though I was in the doctor's office the next day. You have one week for treatment, then it's permanent. The doctors (several of them) diagnosed it as long term hearing loss, which isn't treatable. Eventually United Health intervened and I got treatment. Five weeks too late. "Gee we are sorry," was all I got from the initial doctors. My lesson was that I should have had hearing tests as part of my regular physical so that there would be no argument about long term versus sudden hearing loss. I had the tests, but they chose, initially, to ignore them as they weren't THEIR tests. Eventually someone looked at them and said this isn't long term hearing loss. Now I know something that's pretty damn important. Oh, they already know about profit based health care. Trust me. In Canada, you would wait 8 to 16 weeks just to see a doctor. First, you go to a clinic and a technician (not neccessarily a doctor), they do a 1 minute exam and submit the paperwork to the regional health care and IF they approve it, you see a specialist. I have lived on both sides of the border, I have used both systems. 90% of Americans are better off in the USA as it is. For the 10% (or less) they are not often because of their own stupidity. Less than 1% are in a real hole there wasn't much they could do bout it. So, like a classroom of kids you support service levels to the lowest intelligence? In the case of health care, government runs it with no competetion and revenue in mind lowers the servies standard to the UK or Canada while skiming the tax revenue for statism? My wife had a ovarian cyst. Took 3 1/2 months to see the doc, 28 weeks was the initial wait for surgery. Fortunately someone canceled and it was only 9 weeks. Who knows, maybe they died waiting? It was unknown if it was cancerious but after the surgery, my prayer came true that it was not. Think twice, the decision Americans are making in this subject is for practical purposes irreversable. And the amount of BS coming from government hungry for your health care dollars as revenue speaks for itself. I had to wait 6 weeks to see a ear specialist at UCLA. They had nothing worthwhile to say, waited another 4 weeks to see the House Ear Clinic. They knew what to do, but told me it was too late, I should have come on earlier. That's not better. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Oh, Canada | Cruising | |||
Oh Canada!? | ASA | |||
Ohhhh Canada Ohhh Canada | ASA | |||
Meanwhile in Canada... | General |