"John H." wrote in message
...
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 09:51:16 -0700, Canuck57
wrote:

John H. wrote:
On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:54:03 -0800, Jim wrote:

Listening to the anti abortion people protest any health plan that
would
possibly include abortion, I was wondering what they do in other
countries to appease these opposite beliefs.

From:
http://www.arcc-cdac.ca/postionpaper...lly-Funded.PDF

The politicizing of abortion led to the current situation of one-half
of
all abortions in Canada being performed at mostly private clinics.
Abortion clinics opened in the first place because hospitals were
failing to provide adequate services on a fair and equal basis for
Canadian women.

Hard to read that document and not see the logic.

Maybe there's some concern about this language: "All abortions are
medically necessary, since it is impractical and discriminatory to
separate out abortions done for "social" reasons from those done for
"health" reasons."

Some folks just don't believe that killing babies should have no
thought behind it whatsoever. I sure don't think I should have to pay
for them.

I am sure lots of thought goes into it. But since I don't have to live
with the consequences caporial or spiratual, I am quite content with
letting the decision be between the woman and the doctor.

Too bad you could take these no-rights people, brutally rape them to get
them pregnent, makes up the arse, then dictate to them like sheep that
they will have the child.

There are methods to get rid of possible pregnancies from rape without
waiting until the baby is viable. Or, do women just wait for a while
before deciding they were raped? Something there makes no sense.


Then when the child gets old enough to ask how they were conceived, they
can be told "?? raped me an so you were born...".

--

John H


Waiting for the baby to be viable??? That's not very pro-life. Isn't it a
baby from conception? What a bunch of horsepucky. You have no business in my
or any woman's business. Butt out.

--
Nom=de=Plume

On 11/11/09 1:03 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
"John wrote in message
...
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 09:51:16 -0700,
wrote:

John H. wrote:
On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:54:03 -0800, wrote:

Listening to the anti abortion people protest any health plan that
would
possibly include abortion, I was wondering what they do in other
countries to appease these opposite beliefs.

From:
http://www.arcc-cdac.ca/postionpaper...lly-Funded.PDF

The politicizing of abortion led to the current situation of one-half
of
all abortions in Canada being performed at mostly private clinics.
Abortion clinics opened in the first place because hospitals were
failing to provide adequate services on a fair and equal basis for
Canadian women.

Hard to read that document and not see the logic.

Maybe there's some concern about this language: "All abortions are
medically necessary, since it is impractical and discriminatory to
separate out abortions done for "social" reasons from those done for
"health" reasons."

Some folks just don't believe that killing babies should have no
thought behind it whatsoever. I sure don't think I should have to pay
for them.

I am sure lots of thought goes into it. But since I don't have to live
with the consequences caporial or spiratual, I am quite content with
letting the decision be between the woman and the doctor.

Too bad you could take these no-rights people, brutally rape them to get
them pregnent, makes up the arse, then dictate to them like sheep that
they will have the child.

There are methods to get rid of possible pregnancies from rape without
waiting until the baby is viable. Or, do women just wait for a while
before deciding they were raped? Something there makes no sense.


Then when the child gets old enough to ask how they were conceived, they
can be told "?? raped me an so you were born...".

--

John H


Waiting for the baby to be viable??? That's not very pro-life. Isn't it a
baby from conception? What a bunch of horsepucky. You have no business in my
or any woman's business. Butt out.



And in a nutshell, you have stumbled across herring's favorite sexual
position for himself...butt out.



--
If you are flajim, herring, loogy, GC boater, johnson, topbassdog, rob,
or one of a half dozen others, you're wasting your time by trying to
*communicate* with me through rec.boats, because, well, you are among
the permanent members of my dumbfoch dumpster. As always, have a nice,
simple-minded day.

"H the K" wrote in message
m...
On 11/11/09 1:03 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
"John wrote in message
...
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 09:51:16 -0700,
wrote:

John H. wrote:
On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:54:03 -0800, wrote:

Listening to the anti abortion people protest any health plan that
would
possibly include abortion, I was wondering what they do in other
countries to appease these opposite beliefs.

From:
http://www.arcc-cdac.ca/postionpaper...lly-Funded.PDF

The politicizing of abortion led to the current situation of one-half
of
all abortions in Canada being performed at mostly private clinics.
Abortion clinics opened in the first place because hospitals were
failing to provide adequate services on a fair and equal basis for
Canadian women.

Hard to read that document and not see the logic.

Maybe there's some concern about this language: "All abortions are
medically necessary, since it is impractical and discriminatory to
separate out abortions done for "social" reasons from those done for
"health" reasons."

Some folks just don't believe that killing babies should have no
thought behind it whatsoever. I sure don't think I should have to pay
for them.

I am sure lots of thought goes into it. But since I don't have to live
with the consequences caporial or spiratual, I am quite content with
letting the decision be between the woman and the doctor.

Too bad you could take these no-rights people, brutally rape them to
get
them pregnent, makes up the arse, then dictate to them like sheep that
they will have the child.

There are methods to get rid of possible pregnancies from rape without
waiting until the baby is viable. Or, do women just wait for a while
before deciding they were raped? Something there makes no sense.


Then when the child gets old enough to ask how they were conceived,
they
can be told "?? raped me an so you were born...".

--

John H


Waiting for the baby to be viable??? That's not very pro-life. Isn't it a
baby from conception? What a bunch of horsepucky. You have no business in
my
or any woman's business. Butt out.



And in a nutshell, you have stumbled across herring's favorite sexual
position for himself...butt out.


Ewww.... TMI

--
Nom=de=Plume

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"John H." wrote in message
...
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 09:51:16 -0700, Canuck57
wrote:

John H. wrote:
On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:54:03 -0800, Jim wrote:

Listening to the anti abortion people protest any health plan that
would
possibly include abortion, I was wondering what they do in other
countries to appease these opposite beliefs.

From:
http://www.arcc-cdac.ca/postionpaper...lly-Funded.PDF

The politicizing of abortion led to the current situation of one-half
of
all abortions in Canada being performed at mostly private clinics.
Abortion clinics opened in the first place because hospitals were
failing to provide adequate services on a fair and equal basis for
Canadian women.

Hard to read that document and not see the logic.

Maybe there's some concern about this language: "All abortions are
medically necessary, since it is impractical and discriminatory to
separate out abortions done for "social" reasons from those done for
"health" reasons."

Some folks just don't believe that killing babies should have no
thought behind it whatsoever. I sure don't think I should have to pay
for them.

I am sure lots of thought goes into it. But since I don't have to live
with the consequences caporial or spiratual, I am quite content with
letting the decision be between the woman and the doctor.

Too bad you could take these no-rights people, brutally rape them to get
them pregnent, makes up the arse, then dictate to them like sheep that
they will have the child.

There are methods to get rid of possible pregnancies from rape without
waiting until the baby is viable. Or, do women just wait for a while
before deciding they were raped? Something there makes no sense.


Then when the child gets old enough to ask how they were conceived, they
can be told "?? raped me an so you were born...".

--

John H


Waiting for the baby to be viable??? That's not very pro-life. Isn't it a
baby from conception? What a bunch of horsepucky. You have no business in
my or any woman's business. Butt out.

--
Nom=de=Plume


Oh, so a women beating her kids is ok because it is her business. Strange
idea.

On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 20:53:10 -0800, "Bill McKee"
wrote:


"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"John H." wrote in message
...
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 09:51:16 -0700, Canuck57
wrote:

John H. wrote:
On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:54:03 -0800, Jim wrote:

Listening to the anti abortion people protest any health plan that
would
possibly include abortion, I was wondering what they do in other
countries to appease these opposite beliefs.

From:
http://www.arcc-cdac.ca/postionpaper...lly-Funded.PDF

The politicizing of abortion led to the current situation of one-half
of
all abortions in Canada being performed at mostly private clinics.
Abortion clinics opened in the first place because hospitals were
failing to provide adequate services on a fair and equal basis for
Canadian women.

Hard to read that document and not see the logic.

Maybe there's some concern about this language: "All abortions are
medically necessary, since it is impractical and discriminatory to
separate out abortions done for "social" reasons from those done for
"health" reasons."

Some folks just don't believe that killing babies should have no
thought behind it whatsoever. I sure don't think I should have to pay
for them.

I am sure lots of thought goes into it. But since I don't have to live
with the consequences caporial or spiratual, I am quite content with
letting the decision be between the woman and the doctor.

Too bad you could take these no-rights people, brutally rape them to get
them pregnent, makes up the arse, then dictate to them like sheep that
they will have the child.

There are methods to get rid of possible pregnancies from rape without
waiting until the baby is viable. Or, do women just wait for a while
before deciding they were raped? Something there makes no sense.


Then when the child gets old enough to ask how they were conceived, they
can be told "?? raped me an so you were born...".

--

John H


Waiting for the baby to be viable??? That's not very pro-life. Isn't it a
baby from conception? What a bunch of horsepucky. You have no business in
my or any woman's business. Butt out.

--
Nom=de=Plume


Oh, so a women beating her kids is ok because it is her business. Strange
idea.

What, are into some kind of nanny state where everyone is monitored?

"jps" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 20:53:10 -0800, "Bill McKee"
wrote:


"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"John H." wrote in message
...
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 09:51:16 -0700, Canuck57
wrote:

John H. wrote:
On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:54:03 -0800, Jim wrote:

Listening to the anti abortion people protest any health plan that
would
possibly include abortion, I was wondering what they do in other
countries to appease these opposite beliefs.

From:
http://www.arcc-cdac.ca/postionpaper...lly-Funded.PDF

The politicizing of abortion led to the current situation of
one-half
of
all abortions in Canada being performed at mostly private clinics.
Abortion clinics opened in the first place because hospitals were
failing to provide adequate services on a fair and equal basis for
Canadian women.

Hard to read that document and not see the logic.

Maybe there's some concern about this language: "All abortions are
medically necessary, since it is impractical and discriminatory to
separate out abortions done for "social" reasons from those done for
"health" reasons."

Some folks just don't believe that killing babies should have no
thought behind it whatsoever. I sure don't think I should have to pay
for them.

I am sure lots of thought goes into it. But since I don't have to live
with the consequences caporial or spiratual, I am quite content with
letting the decision be between the woman and the doctor.

Too bad you could take these no-rights people, brutally rape them to
get
them pregnent, makes up the arse, then dictate to them like sheep that
they will have the child.

There are methods to get rid of possible pregnancies from rape without
waiting until the baby is viable. Or, do women just wait for a while
before deciding they were raped? Something there makes no sense.


Then when the child gets old enough to ask how they were conceived,
they
can be told "?? raped me an so you were born...".

--

John H


Waiting for the baby to be viable??? That's not very pro-life. Isn't it
a
baby from conception? What a bunch of horsepucky. You have no business
in
my or any woman's business. Butt out.

--
Nom=de=Plume


Oh, so a women beating her kids is ok because it is her business. Strange
idea.

What, are into some kind of nanny state where everyone is monitored?


Huh?

Bill McKee wrote:
"jps" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 20:53:10 -0800, "Bill McKee"
wrote:

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"John H." wrote in message
...
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 09:51:16 -0700, Canuck57
wrote:

John H. wrote:
On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:54:03 -0800, Jim wrote:

Listening to the anti abortion people protest any health plan that
would
possibly include abortion, I was wondering what they do in other
countries to appease these opposite beliefs.

From:
http://www.arcc-cdac.ca/postionpaper...lly-Funded.PDF

The politicizing of abortion led to the current situation of
one-half
of
all abortions in Canada being performed at mostly private clinics.
Abortion clinics opened in the first place because hospitals were
failing to provide adequate services on a fair and equal basis for
Canadian women.

Hard to read that document and not see the logic.
Maybe there's some concern about this language: "All abortions are
medically necessary, since it is impractical and discriminatory to
separate out abortions done for "social" reasons from those done for
"health" reasons."

Some folks just don't believe that killing babies should have no
thought behind it whatsoever. I sure don't think I should have to pay
for them.
I am sure lots of thought goes into it. But since I don't have to live
with the consequences caporial or spiratual, I am quite content with
letting the decision be between the woman and the doctor.

Too bad you could take these no-rights people, brutally rape them to
get
them pregnent, makes up the arse, then dictate to them like sheep that
they will have the child.
There are methods to get rid of possible pregnancies from rape without
waiting until the baby is viable. Or, do women just wait for a while
before deciding they were raped? Something there makes no sense.

Then when the child gets old enough to ask how they were conceived,
they
can be told "?? raped me an so you were born...".
--

John H

Waiting for the baby to be viable??? That's not very pro-life. Isn't it
a
baby from conception? What a bunch of horsepucky. You have no business
in
my or any woman's business. Butt out.

--
Nom=de=Plume

Oh, so a women beating her kids is ok because it is her business. Strange
idea.
What, are into some kind of nanny state where everyone is monitored?


Huh?


This dummy is beginning to talk like Donnie.

"Jim" wrote in message
...
Bill McKee wrote:
"jps" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 20:53:10 -0800, "Bill McKee"
wrote:

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"John H." wrote in message
...
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 09:51:16 -0700, Canuck57
wrote:

John H. wrote:
On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:54:03 -0800, Jim wrote:

Listening to the anti abortion people protest any health plan that
would
possibly include abortion, I was wondering what they do in other
countries to appease these opposite beliefs.

From:
http://www.arcc-cdac.ca/postionpaper...lly-Funded.PDF

The politicizing of abortion led to the current situation of
one-half
of
all abortions in Canada being performed at mostly private clinics.
Abortion clinics opened in the first place because hospitals were
failing to provide adequate services on a fair and equal basis for
Canadian women.

Hard to read that document and not see the logic.
Maybe there's some concern about this language: "All abortions are
medically necessary, since it is impractical and discriminatory to
separate out abortions done for "social" reasons from those done
for
"health" reasons."

Some folks just don't believe that killing babies should have no
thought behind it whatsoever. I sure don't think I should have to
pay
for them.
I am sure lots of thought goes into it. But since I don't have to
live
with the consequences caporial or spiratual, I am quite content with
letting the decision be between the woman and the doctor.

Too bad you could take these no-rights people, brutally rape them to
get
them pregnent, makes up the arse, then dictate to them like sheep
that
they will have the child.
There are methods to get rid of possible pregnancies from rape
without
waiting until the baby is viable. Or, do women just wait for a while
before deciding they were raped? Something there makes no sense.

Then when the child gets old enough to ask how they were conceived,
they
can be told "?? raped me an so you were born...".
--

John H

Waiting for the baby to be viable??? That's not very pro-life. Isn't
it a
baby from conception? What a bunch of horsepucky. You have no business
in
my or any woman's business. Butt out.

--
Nom=de=Plume

Oh, so a women beating her kids is ok because it is her business.
Strange
idea.
What, are into some kind of nanny state where everyone is monitored?


Huh?
This dummy is beginning to talk like Donnie.

I'm highly insulted that you'd compare me to Kalif Swill.
I'm a virtual teetotaler compared to him.

Don White wrote:
"Jim" wrote in message
...
Bill McKee wrote:
"jps" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 20:53:10 -0800, "Bill McKee"
wrote:

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"John H." wrote in message
...
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 09:51:16 -0700, Canuck57
wrote:

John H. wrote:
On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:54:03 -0800, Jim wrote:

Listening to the anti abortion people protest any health plan that
would
possibly include abortion, I was wondering what they do in other
countries to appease these opposite beliefs.

From:
http://www.arcc-cdac.ca/postionpaper...lly-Funded.PDF

The politicizing of abortion led to the current situation of
one-half
of
all abortions in Canada being performed at mostly private clinics.
Abortion clinics opened in the first place because hospitals were
failing to provide adequate services on a fair and equal basis for
Canadian women.

Hard to read that document and not see the logic.
Maybe there's some concern about this language: "All abortions are
medically necessary, since it is impractical and discriminatory to
separate out abortions done for "social" reasons from those done
for
"health" reasons."

Some folks just don't believe that killing babies should have no
thought behind it whatsoever. I sure don't think I should have to
pay
for them.
I am sure lots of thought goes into it. But since I don't have to
live
with the consequences caporial or spiratual, I am quite content with
letting the decision be between the woman and the doctor.

Too bad you could take these no-rights people, brutally rape them to
get
them pregnent, makes up the arse, then dictate to them like sheep
that
they will have the child.
There are methods to get rid of possible pregnancies from rape
without
waiting until the baby is viable. Or, do women just wait for a while
before deciding they were raped? Something there makes no sense.

Then when the child gets old enough to ask how they were conceived,
they
can be told "?? raped me an so you were born...".
--

John H
Waiting for the baby to be viable??? That's not very pro-life. Isn't
it a
baby from conception? What a bunch of horsepucky. You have no business
in
my or any woman's business. Butt out.

--
Nom=de=Plume

Oh, so a women beating her kids is ok because it is her business.
Strange
idea.
What, are into some kind of nanny state where everyone is monitored?

Huh?
This dummy is beginning to talk like Donnie.

I'm highly insulted that you'd compare me to Kalif Swill.
I'm a virtual teetotaler compared to him.


I was comparing you to JPS. Is that better?

"Don White" wrote in message
...

"Jim" wrote in message
...
Bill McKee wrote:
"jps" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 20:53:10 -0800, "Bill McKee"
wrote:

"nom=de=plume" wrote in message
...
"John H." wrote in message
...
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 09:51:16 -0700, Canuck57
wrote:

John H. wrote:
On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:54:03 -0800, Jim wrote:

Listening to the anti abortion people protest any health plan
that
would
possibly include abortion, I was wondering what they do in other
countries to appease these opposite beliefs.

From:
http://www.arcc-cdac.ca/postionpaper...lly-Funded.PDF

The politicizing of abortion led to the current situation of
one-half
of
all abortions in Canada being performed at mostly private
clinics.
Abortion clinics opened in the first place because hospitals were
failing to provide adequate services on a fair and equal basis
for
Canadian women.

Hard to read that document and not see the logic.
Maybe there's some concern about this language: "All abortions are
medically necessary, since it is impractical and discriminatory to
separate out abortions done for "social" reasons from those done
for
"health" reasons."

Some folks just don't believe that killing babies should have no
thought behind it whatsoever. I sure don't think I should have to
pay
for them.
I am sure lots of thought goes into it. But since I don't have to
live
with the consequences caporial or spiratual, I am quite content
with
letting the decision be between the woman and the doctor.

Too bad you could take these no-rights people, brutally rape them
to get
them pregnent, makes up the arse, then dictate to them like sheep
that
they will have the child.
There are methods to get rid of possible pregnancies from rape
without
waiting until the baby is viable. Or, do women just wait for a while
before deciding they were raped? Something there makes no sense.

Then when the child gets old enough to ask how they were conceived,
they
can be told "?? raped me an so you were born...".
--

John H

Waiting for the baby to be viable??? That's not very pro-life. Isn't
it a
baby from conception? What a bunch of horsepucky. You have no
business in
my or any woman's business. Butt out.

--
Nom=de=Plume

Oh, so a women beating her kids is ok because it is her business.
Strange
idea.
What, are into some kind of nanny state where everyone is monitored?


Huh?
This dummy is beginning to talk like Donnie.

I'm highly insulted that you'd compare me to Kalif Swill.
I'm a virtual teetotaler compared to him.


How much alcohol have you consumed this month. You need to slow down your
consumption as you can not afford to lose any more brain cells.