![]() |
Anyone catch the dumb bitch's remarks?
On Mon, 09 Nov 2009 06:55:10 -0500, H the K
wrote: On 11/9/09 1:49 AM, jps wrote: On Sun, 8 Nov 2009 20:41:23 -0800, "Bill McKee" wrote: "H the wrote in message m... What did Pelosi say now? Sarah Palin isn't the Majority Leader in the US House of Representatives. Last I heard, she didn't have a job. She ain't the speaker, either. Further, Palin quit her job. According to her almost son in law, she was lazy, too, and spent most of her days locked in her bedroom. If she ever runs for office again, those wonderful interviews with Katie Couric will be revived, and Palin once again will be shown up as the moron she is. That, of course, won't prevent right-wing morons like BAR, Tusk, Herring, and SW Tom from voting for her. Her snarkiness is just so sexy. They'd love to see her get all snarky at the UN, in a short skirt. |
Anyone catch the dumb bitch's remarks?
On Mon, 09 Nov 2009 11:41:01 -0500, Johnson
wrote: TopBassDog wrote: Herr Krause. How does she irritate you so? You of all people seem to find the former governor such a threat to you that you now claim her to be a "dumb bitch." Evidently she is getting to you. Keep it up, Sarah. Ah, you've hit the nail on the head. If she really was as "dumb" as krause says she is, there'd be no need for his stalking obsession with her. Johnson His stalking obsession is based on a portion of the country's acceptance of her as a viable candidate for the highest office in the land. It's laughable and very much worth pursuing. Are you among her fans, Johnson? |
Anyone catch the dumb bitch's remarks?
On Mon, 09 Nov 2009 12:25:23 -0500, H the K
wrote: On 11/9/09 12:03 PM, Tosk wrote: In articleULCdnRaxe_xD22XXnZ2dnUVZ_vudnZ2d@giganews. com, says... nom=de=plume wrote: wrote in message ... TopBassDog wrote: Herr Krause. How does she irritate you so? You of all people seem to find the former governor such a threat to you that you now claim her to be a "dumb bitch." Evidently she is getting to you. Keep it up, Sarah. HK is intimidated by women. Scared ****less of them actually. Hmm... he doesn't seem intimidated by me. He hasn't plonked me, but others have. I wonder what that means.... With all due respect, You're incapable. |
Anyone catch the dumb bitch's remarks?
On Mon, 09 Nov 2009 11:43:42 -0500, Johnson
wrote: Canuck57 wrote: HK is intimidated by women. Scared ****less of them actually. Another truism. Ducked Peggy Hall/ran madcow off group/locks head when women on-board/dr. dr. trophy wife Johnson PH was a rightwing loon with an otherwise reasonable nature. Madcow was a female version of The Freak. It's not a function of gender, Johnson. |
Anyone catch the dumb bitch's remarks?
On Nov 9, 2:03*pm, jps wrote:
On Mon, 09 Nov 2009 11:43:42 -0500, Johnson wrote: Canuck57 wrote: HK is intimidated by women. *Scared ****less of them actually. Another truism. Ducked Peggy Hall/ran madcow off group/locks head when women on-board/dr. dr. trophy wife Johnson PH was a rightwing loon with an otherwise reasonable nature. *Madcow was a female version of The Freak. *It's not a function of gender, Johnson. Wow, you know exactly how Harry thinks and how he views women? |
Anyone catch the dumb bitch's remarks?
On Mon, 9 Nov 2009 05:57:40 -0500, BAR wrote:
In article , says... You make no sense to me. I don't see "Obama giving the button to our enemies." Be specific, please. None of the Fox News/Roger Ailes method of grabbing something with a thread of truth, then taking it to an unexplainable extreme. Obama is subservient to third world dicators. Do you have a transformer hooked to that tin hat? The "Death Panels" is a great example. Don't do it, back up what you say. The provision was in the bill. The provisions was pointed out by Palin. The provision was removed from the bill. How can you remove what was never there? It wasn't a death panel. To state so is the height of ignorance. Which, it seems, is a Republican goal these days. I'll be specific about the Republicans if you'd like. Bush took a surplus and turned it into a deficit by giving supposedly temporary tax cuts, intended to boost our economy. The 10.2 is a legacy of Bush. A surplus is an accounting trick. Try this sometime. Take all of the revenue and put it into a bucket. Then pay all the oblications from the same bucket. At the end of the year if you have any money left in the bucket that is your surplus. The $787 billion stimulus was, according to Obama, supposed to limit the unemployment rate at 8%. It was clear that they "hoped" it would keep unemployment under 10%. Monetary and fiscal policy cannot control an economy, they're simply dials you can turn to try to achieve proper trim. Anyone with a brain knows that stimulus money is a measure of last resort a coarse adjustment to a failing economy. Did you expect a higher level of predictability? That's why they used the term "hope." The temporary-ness was a lie and everyone knows it. This is ok with you because you accept and or ignore reality. When they expire you will back up the argument that it's a tax increase. They play you for a fool and it's ok with you. Does your boss give you temporary raises? Bad analogy. Not ok with me, the results tell us how successful the Bush tax cut economy was. Accept the fact that taxes pay for things you want to do, like the wars. The Democrats in Congress couldn't wait to get to the floors of their respective chambers to vote for war due to the upcoming election. But, you seem to have forgotten that. Bush and Cheney set the table. If you're a politician whose livelihood depends on staying in office, how would you have voted? How did the Republicans vote? For fiscal discipline? Who pays for things in your economy? My economy? I don't believe in deficit spending. That's how you financed the tax cuts and two wars. That's who you voted for. If you stick to backing Palin the only excuse is that you are confirming you are the fool Roger Ailes thinks you are. 2012 Not a bloody chance. Economy will be recovered, jobs returning, USA's status in the world on the mend. Sarah Palin will be a distant embossment to your party. |
Anyone catch the dumb bitch's remarks?
H the K wrote:
I'm not aware of any generic comments I have made about "women." We did have one female here many years ago who claimed I was stalking her because I saw her boat piered up in Baltimore harbor, but she was as nutty as a fruitcake. And now the rest of the story- These are the facts as best I can recall them The woman had good general knowledge of boats and boating. She was a member of the Power Squadren. She owned a boat substantially larger than Krause's. She was a positive contributor to rec.boats. It's obvious that he was jealous of and felt threatened by her. He traipsed his little boat all the way over to Baltimore harbor for the sole purpose of stalking her. He photographed her on her boat without her knowledge or consent. Subsequently he posted at least one of those photos on rec.boats. He harassed and bullied her until she finally gave up and left the newsgroup. Is that about right, Harry? |
Anyone catch the dumb bitch's remarks?
On Mon, 9 Nov 2009 10:19:24 -0800, "nom=de=plume"
wrote: "Tosk" wrote in message ... In article , says... nom=de=plume wrote: "Canuck57" wrote in message ... TopBassDog wrote: Herr Krause. How does she irritate you so? You of all people seem to find the former governor such a threat to you that you now claim her to be a "dumb bitch." Evidently she is getting to you. Keep it up, Sarah. HK is intimidated by women. Scared ****less of them actually. Hmm... he doesn't seem intimidated by me. He hasn't plonked me, but others have. I wonder what that means.... With all due respect, it means you are a far left loon, just like him. Seriously though, without my usual exaggeration and such, he has a loooong record here of complete disrespect and disdain for women. He has stalked then IRL and driven several from our group. Comments he has made in the past about women, would make your hair curl. The guy is a disgusting pig when it comes to women, and even little girls down to the age of 10 years old. Insisting at one point that 10 year old little girls should have the freedom to lay down with grown men of any age, and abort the results, protecting the identity of the rapist and without her parents knowledge, much less consent... When and if he treats me with disrespect, I'll consider it. I'm far from a far left loon, but we know where you stand. On The Freak's condensed political spectrum scale, what the real world considers moderate is bat**** crazy left. A real lefty wouldn't be recognized as human. In other words, if you don't hate Pelosi, you're a far left loon. |
Anyone catch the dumb bitch's remarks?
On 11/9/09 2:03 PM, jps wrote:
On Mon, 09 Nov 2009 11:43:42 -0500, Johnson wrote: Canuck57 wrote: HK is intimidated by women. Scared ****less of them actually. Another truism. Ducked Peggy Hall/ran madcow off group/locks head when women on-board/dr. dr. trophy wife Johnson PH was a rightwing loon with an otherwise reasonable nature. Madcow was a female version of The Freak. It's not a function of gender, Johnson. I'd forgotten how udderly stupid MadCow was. You hit the nail on the head. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:49 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com