On Nov 14, 12:28*pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"TopBassDog" wrote in message

...
On Nov 13, 11:57 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:



"TopBassDog" wrote in message

....
On Nov 13, 12:57 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:

What ****ing insurance reform? Just changes the path of the money to
the
healthcare professionals, with the government running it as bad as
the
rest it's business.

Whooo... now you'reswearing.... you really need to get a grip.

--
Nom=de=Plume
Wait until your friend JPS gets started. Will you tell him to get a
grip as well?

I defer to you to police Usenet. Do you condone using such language?
--
Nom=de=Plume
You have repeated it yourself. Evidently you condone it. For at least
from someone whom you must be comfortable with.

Still waiting for your answer. I don't think it's forthcoming, but there's
always hope.

--
Nom=de=Plume
"Do you condone using such language?"

No, I do not. However my whole point is that if you feel you must
chastise one for foul spirit, then you should chastise all for the
same rude behaviour

Which you evidently will not do.

Firstly, using the word **** is not in and of itself evidence of a foul
spirit as you call it. It's just a word. There is a big difference between
using it as I just did and telling someone "**** you."

Secondly, if I actually have to point this out, you've got bigger problems
that can't be solved on a newsgroup.

Thirdly, it's not my job to chastise anyone or everyone. I may or may not,
but it's my decision not yours.

Finally, if you can't live with that, feel free to ignore or plonk. It makes
you seem pretty foolish to continually repeat the same thing over and over,
while looking for a different result.

--
Nom=de=Plume

Why are you repeating the word that you hate?

You must like it.

"De Plume. Beaucoup que vous savez pas. "